1
|
Javanbakht A, Stringer S, Anderson H, Hamilton E, Philip A, Waller EK, Langston AA, Joseph N, Roback JD, Schneider T, Sullivan HC, Hendrickson JE. Optimizing autologous stem cell collections for patients with multiple myeloma receiving G-CSF and Plerixafor: A single center project. J Clin Apher 2024; 39:e22127. [PMID: 38803152 DOI: 10.1002/jca.22127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing indications for cellular therapy collections have stressed our healthcare system, with autologous collections having a longer than desired wait time until apheresis collection. This quality improvement initiative was undertaken to accommodate more patients within existing resources. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection from October 2022 to April 2023 were included. Demographic, mobilization, laboratory, and apheresis data were retrospectively collected from the medical record. RESULTS This cohort included 120 patients (49.2% male), with a median age of 60 years. All received G-CSF and 95% received pre-emptive Plerixafor approximately 18 hours pre-collection. Most (79%) had collection goals of at least 8 × 106/kg CD34 cells, with 63% over 70 years old having this high collection goal (despite 20 years of institutional data showing <1% over 70 years old have a second transplant). With collection efficiencies of 55.9%, 44% of patients achieved their collection goal in a single day apheresis collection. A platelet count <150 × 103/μL on the day of collection was a predictor for poor mobilization; among 27 patients with a low baseline platelet count, 17 did not achieve the collection goal and 2 failed to collect a transplantable dose. CONCLUSIONS With minor collection goal adjustments, 15% of all collection appointments could have been avoided over this 6-month period. Other strategies to accommodate more patients include mobilization modifications (Plerixafor timing or substituting a longer acting drug), utilizing platelet counts to predict mobilization, and modifying apheresis collection volumes or schedule templates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayda Javanbakht
- Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Stephanie Stringer
- Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Hollie Anderson
- Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ellie Hamilton
- Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Anisha Philip
- Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Edmund K Waller
- Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Amelia A Langston
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nisha Joseph
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - John D Roback
- Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Thomas Schneider
- Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - H Cliff Sullivan
- Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jeanne E Hendrickson
- Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Impact of Mobilization Strategies on Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection Efficiency and Product Quality: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246259. [PMID: 36551743 PMCID: PMC9777066 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Autologous stem cell transplantation is routinely used in the management of several hematological diseases, solid tumors, and immune disorders. Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection performed by apheresis is the preferred source of stem cells. In this study, the potential impact of mobilization regimens on the performance of the Spectra Optia® continuous mononuclear cell collection system was evaluated. We performed a retrospective data analysis for patients undergoing autologous PBSC collection at the Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital between September 2016 and June 2018. Collections were divided into two main groups according to the mobilization regimen received: without (210 collections) or with (99 collections) plerixafor. Assessed variables included product characteristics and collection efficiency (CE). Overall, product characteristics were similar between the groups. Median CD34+ CE2 was 50.1% versus 53.0%, and CE1 was 66.9% versus 69.9% following mobilization without and with plerixafor, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. Simple linear regression showed a very weak positive correlation between the mobilization method and CE1 or CE2 (mobilization with plerixafor increased CE2 by 4.106%). In conclusion, the Spectra Optia® apheresis system led to high CE and a good quality of PBSC products when mobilization regimens with or without plerixafor were used.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hsu TL, Tsai CK, Liu CY, Yeh CM, Lin FL, Hsiao LT, Liu YC, Wang HY, Ko PS, Lin TA, Chen WC, Chen PM, Liu JH, Gau JP, Liu CJ. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Stem Cell Mobilization Failure in Multiple Myeloma Patients. Transfus Med Hemother 2022; 50:39-50. [PMID: 36818774 PMCID: PMC9912005 DOI: 10.1159/000525565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a well-established treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and adequate stem cell collection must be assured before ASCT. However, prediction of poor mobilizers (PMs) is still difficult despite several risk factors for mobilization failure having been identified. Methods We retrospectively analyzed MM patients at Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan who underwent stem cell collection between October 2006 and August 2020. A CD34+ cell collection of <1 × 106 cells/kg was defined as a mobilization failure. The primary endpoint was mobilization failure. The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mobilization failure were calculated using a logistic regression model. The cumulative incidence of mortality was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results In the multivariate analysis, absolute monocyte count <500/µL (adjusted OR 10.75, 95% CI: 1.82-63.57, p = 0.009), platelet count <150,000/µL (adjusted OR 12.49, 95% CI: 2.65-58.89, p = 0.001) before mobilization, and time interval from diagnosis to stem cell harvest ≥180 days (adjusted OR 7.69, 95% CI: 1.61-36.87, p = 0.011) were risk factors for PMs. PM patients had poorer OS compared to patients with successful stem cell collection in the univariate analysis (log-rank test p = 0.027). The predicted probability of PMs was estimated by the multiple logistic regression model with a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 84.0%. Conclusion Absolute monocyte count <500/µL, platelet count <150,000/µL, and treatment duration more than 180 days before stem cell mobilization are risk factors for unsuccessful stem cell collection. Our prediction models have high sensitivity and specificity for mobilization failure prediction and allow for early interventions for possible PMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Te-Lin Hsu
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Kuang Tsai
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Yu Liu
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan,Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chiu-Mei Yeh
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan,Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Fen-Lan Lin
- Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Liang-Tsai Hsiao
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chung Liu
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Hao-Yuan Wang
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Po-Shen Ko
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Ting-An Lin
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chun Chen
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Po-Min Chen
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Jin-Hwang Liu
- Institute of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan,Chong Hin Loon Memorial Cancer and Biotherapy Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Jyh-Pyng Gau
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Jen Liu
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan,Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City, Taiwan,*Chia-Jen Liu,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Evaluation of CD34+ Cell Count at Different Time Points Following Plerixafor Administration in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.5812/ijcm-120241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: In apheresis, collecting an adequate number of CD34+ cells is required for successful autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) procedure. It is difficult to harvest a sufficient number of stem cells in certain patients due to their old age and history of intensive chemotherapy. Plerixafor could mobilize stem cells and facilitate peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell collection. However, not enough information is available on the appropriate time intervals from plerixafor administration to apheresis. Objectives: In this study, we aimed at evaluating the level of peripheral blood CD34+ cells at plerixafor administration time and every three hours to identify the peak time of circulating CD34+ cells. Methods: Circulating CD34+ cells were enumerated by flow cytometry on day 4 post mobilization. Plerixafor was administered to patients with poor mobilization based on the count of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells. The number of circulating CD34+ cells was evaluated before and 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours after plerixafor administration to assess the time it takes for stem cells to reach their peak level. Results: The highest level of stem cell concentration was found in 9 hours after plerixafor administration with an increasing trend. A statistically significant relationship was also observed between factors including platelet count on the first day of GCSF injection and the day of stem cell infusion, leukocyte count on admission, and basal levels of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood and the amount of harvested stem cells. Conclusions: We demonstrated that plerixafor causes an incremental trend in CD34+ cells mobilization, reaching its peak after 9 hours. Further research should be performed to provide insights into graft cells’ population and hematologic and immunological recovery.
Collapse
|
5
|
Porfyriou E, Letsa S, Kosmas C. Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies to support high-dose chemotherapy: A focus on relapsed/refractory germ cell tumors. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12:746-766. [PMID: 34631440 PMCID: PMC8479351 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been explored and has played an important role in the management of patients with high-risk germ cell tumors (GCTs) who failed to be cured by conventional chemotherapy. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) collected from the peripheral blood, after appropriate pharmacologic mobilization, have largely replaced bone marrow as the principal source of HSCs in transplants. As it is currently common practice to perform tandem or multiple sequential cycles of HDCT, it is anticipated that collection of large numbers of HSCs from the peripheral blood is a prerequisite for the success of the procedure. Moreover, the CD34+ cell dose/kg of body weight infused after HDCT has proven to be a major determinant of hematopoietic engraftment, with patients who receive > 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg having consistent, rapid, and sustained hematopoietic recovery. However, many patients with relapsed/refractory GCTs have been exposed to multiple cycles of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, which compromises the efficacy of HSC mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without chemotherapy. Therefore, alternative strategies that use novel agents in combination with traditional mobilizing regimens are required. Herein, after an overview of the mechanisms of HSCs mobilization, we review the existing literature regarding studies reporting various HSC mobilization approaches in patients with relapsed/refractory GCTs, and finally report newer experimental mobilization strategies employing novel agents that have been applied in other hematologic or solid malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Porfyriou
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Unit, “Metaxa” Cancer Hospital, Piraeus 18537, Greece
| | - Sylvia Letsa
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Unit, “Metaxa” Cancer Hospital, Piraeus 18537, Greece
| | - Christos Kosmas
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Unit, “Metaxa” Cancer Hospital, Piraeus 18537, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Krummradt F, Sauer S, Pavel P, Klein EM, Schmitt A, Kriegsmann M, Jordan K, Müller-Tidow C, Goldschmidt H, Wuchter P, Kriegsmann K. Storage, Utilization, and Disposal of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Products in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2020; 26:1589-1596. [PMID: 32428735 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
High-dose chemotherapy (HD-CHT) and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) represent the standard of care in multiple myeloma (MM) for transplantation-eligible patients. Up to 3 HD-CHT/ABSCT treatments may be administered during the course of disease, including during late-onset relapse. Transplantation centers routinely collect more than 1 peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) graft; however, subsequent HD-CHT/ABSCT treatments are often not performed, for various reasons. Currently, little is known about the actual utilization rate of stored PBSCs. The collection, storage, and disposal of PBSC products was analyzed in a large cohort of patients with MM (n = 1114) over a 12-year period with a minimum follow-up of 6 years. The final dataset analysis was performed in March 2019, which was set as the reference date. Based on institution-specific charges, the costs for PBSC collection, processing, and storage were estimated. The median number of sufficient PBSC transplantations per patient was 3 (range, 0 to 6), which were stored in a median of 3 (range, 1 to 11) cryopreserved bags (overall, n = 3644). A total of 95% of all patients (n = 1059) underwent at least 1 HD-CHT/ABSCT treatment. However, multiple ABSCTs were performed in 51% of the patients (n2/3 ABSCTs = 538), and only 14% of the patients underwent ABSCT 3 times (n3 ABSCTs = 149). Only a small proportion of collected PBSC bags (5%; n = 109) were used after being stored for longer than 5 years. Overall, 23% of the products (n = 830) were discarded, and 16% (n = 566) were kept in storage until the reference date. From a retrospective standpoint, the collected and discarded (definitively not used) or stored (potentially not used) cryostored PBSCs were associated with considerable costs for long-term cryostorage of approximately €1,600,000. We identified considerable discrepancies between the collection/storage and utilization of PBSCs. This is associated with significant efforts and costs on the one hand; on the other hand, disposal may raise legal and ethical questions. Therefore, we implemented comprehensive guidelines for the systematic reevaluation of stored PBSC grafts at our institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Krummradt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sandra Sauer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Petra Pavel
- Stem Cell Laboratory, IKTZ Heidelberg GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Klein
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anita Schmitt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mark Kriegsmann
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karin Jordan
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Müller-Tidow
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center of Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center of Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Wuchter
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg-Hessen, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Katharina Kriegsmann
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Low baseline platelet count predicts poor response to plerixafor in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell mobilization. Cytotherapy 2019; 22:16-20. [PMID: 31879152 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AIMS Baseline platelet count has been shown to be a sensitive predictor of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell collection yield in patients with multiple myeloma mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Patients who mobilize poorly with G-CSF are often treated with plerixafor to enhance mobilization. There are no surrogate markers available to predict response to plerixafor. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 73 patients with multiple myeloma who did not have adequate mobilization with G-CSF alone and were treated with plerixafor as a rescue agent. RESULTS We found that baseline platelet count directly correlated with peripheral blood CD34+ (PB-CD34+) count after plerixafor treatment (r = 0.36, P < 0.0001) and the number of PB-CD34+ cells collected on the first day of apheresis and inversely correlated with the number of apheresis sessions needed to collect the target number of PB-CD34+ cells (P = 0.0015). Baseline platelet count of 153 000/µL or less was associated with 90% specificity of predicting poor response to plerixafor with a sensitivity of 33%. CONCLUSIONS Baseline platelet count is a good predictor of mobilization response to plerixafor in patients with multiple myeloma.
Collapse
|
8
|
Getta BM, Tong D, Deren S, Huang G, Hogg M, Collins D, Bhattacharyya A, Panicker S, Micklethwaite K, Blyth E, Bilmon I, Kwan J, Antonenas V, Gottlieb DJ. Pre- and post-bone marrow harvest anaemia is associated with lower CD34+ stem cell collection, high harvest volume and female gender. Intern Med J 2019; 50:299-306. [PMID: 31276271 DOI: 10.1111/imj.14419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2018] [Revised: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Donor safety is paramount when performing bone marrow stem cell harvest. The incidence of full blood count (FBC) abnormalities among donors and variables associated with anaemia after marrow harvest are not well established. AIMS To describe the frequency of FBC abnormalities prior to bone marrow stem cell harvest and to identify variables associated with post harvest anaemia. METHODS Outcomes of 80 consecutive adult marrow harvests performed at our centre were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS FBC abnormalities were present in 28% of donors prior to marrow harvest with normocytic anaemia the most common abnormality in 13%. Reduced donor haemoglobin (Hb) was independently correlated with lower CD34+ cell count per kg of recipient body weight. Anaemia (Hb < 100 g/L) was seen in 20% of donors after harvest with median decrease in Hb of 19 g/L. Variables independently associated with anaemia after harvest included donor to recipient weight ratio (P = 0.011), high collection volume (P = 0.044) and female gender (P = 0.023). Total nucleated cell and CD34 concentration in the final collected product were associated with the inverse of harvested marrow volume (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Pre-harvest anaemia should be corrected where possible particularly in female donors. Marrow collection volume should be minimised to reduce post-harvest anaemia, optimise CD34+ cell number and improve nucleated and stem cell concentrations in the harvest product.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bartlomiej M Getta
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daochen Tong
- Sydney Cellular Therapies Laboratory, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephanie Deren
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gillian Huang
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Megan Hogg
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Collins
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Abir Bhattacharyya
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shyam Panicker
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kenneth Micklethwaite
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Cellular Therapies Laboratory, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily Blyth
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Cellular Therapies Laboratory, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Bilmon
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Kwan
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vicki Antonenas
- Sydney Cellular Therapies Laboratory, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David J Gottlieb
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Martino M, Gori M, Moscato T, Naso V, Ferreri A, Provenzano F, Loteta B, Sanguedolce MC, Console G, Dattola A, Pucci G, Gentile M, Morabito A, Recchia AG, Tripepi G, Pitino A. Challenge to Predict Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cells on the Fourth Day of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Treatment in Healthy Donors: Predictive Value of Basal CD34 + Cell and Platelet Counts. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019; 25:1586-1591. [PMID: 31002994 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Revised: 04/06/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
A longitudinal, prospective, observational, single-center cohort study on healthy donors was designed to identify predictors of CD34+ cell mobilization on day 4 after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration. As potential predictors of mobilization, age, sex, body weight, height, blood volume, WBC count, peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cell count, platelet (Plt) count, and hematocrit and hemoglobin levels were considered. Two different evaluations of CD34+ cell counts were determined for each donor: baseline (before G-CSF administration) and in PB on day 4 after G-CSF administration. One hundred twenty-two consecutive healthy donors with a median age of 47.5 years were enrolled. The median value of CD34+ on day 4 was 43 cells/µL (interquartile range, 23 to 68), and 81.1% of donors had ≥20 cells/µL. Basal WBC count, Plt count, and CD34+ were significantly higher for the subjects with CD34+ levels over median values on day 4. A multivariate quartile regression analysis, adjusted by sex, age, basal CD34+, and basal Plt count, showed a progressively stronger relationship between baseline CD34+ and Plt levels and the CD34+ levels on day 4. The basal CD34+ cut-off level to predict the levels of CD34+ on day 4 was either ≤2 cells/μL or ≥3 cells/μL and that of basal Plt count was ≤229 × 109/L or ≥230 × 109/L, respectively, to determine whether mobilization therapy should or should not be attempted. PB stem cell mobilization with G-CSF was highly effective on day 4, and herein we describe a model for predicting the probability of performing PB stem cell collection after a short course of G-CSF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Martino
- Stem Cell Transplant Program, Clinical Section, Department of Hemato-Oncology and Radiotherapy, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
| | - Mercedes Gori
- Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC-CNR), Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Moscato
- Stem Cell Transplant Program, Clinical Section, Department of Hemato-Oncology and Radiotherapy, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Virginia Naso
- Stem Cell Transplant Program, Clinical Section, Department of Hemato-Oncology and Radiotherapy, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Anna Ferreri
- Stem Cell Transplant Program, Clinical Section, Department of Hemato-Oncology and Radiotherapy, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Fabio Provenzano
- Stem Cell Transplant Program, Clinical Section, Department of Hemato-Oncology and Radiotherapy, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Barbara Loteta
- Stem Cell Transplant Program, Clinical Section, Department of Hemato-Oncology and Radiotherapy, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Sanguedolce
- Stem Cell Transplant Program, Processing Facility Section, Department of Hemato-Oncology and Radiotherapy, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Console
- Stem Cell Transplant Program, Clinical Section, Department of Hemato-Oncology and Radiotherapy, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Antonia Dattola
- Stem Cell Transplant Program, Processing Facility Section, Department of Hemato-Oncology and Radiotherapy, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Giulia Pucci
- Stem Cell Transplant Program, Processing Facility Section, Department of Hemato-Oncology and Radiotherapy, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Massimo Gentile
- Hematology Unit, Department of Hemato-Oncology, Ospedale Annunziata, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Antonella Morabito
- Complex Operative Unit "Hospital Pharmacy", Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Tripepi
- CNR-IFC, Research Unit of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kriegsmann K, Wack M, Pavel P, Schmitt A, Kriegsmann M, Bruckner T, Müller-Tidow C, Wuchter P. Collection, Cryostorage, Transplantation, and Disposal of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Products. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019; 25:382-390. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
11
|
Kriegsmann K, Wuchter P. Mobilization and Collection of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells in Adults: Focus on Timing and Benchmarking. Methods Mol Biol 2019; 2017:41-58. [PMID: 31197767 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9574-5_4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are preferentially used as a hematopoietic stem cell source for autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) upon high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) in a variety of hemato-oncologic diseases. As a prerequisite, hematopoietic stem cells have to be mobilized into the peripheral blood (PB) and collected by leukapheresis (LP). Despite continuous improvements, e.g., the introduction of plerixafor, current challenges are the further optimization regarding the leukapheresis procedure, preventing collection failures, as well as benchmarking and harmonization of mobilization approaches between institutions.This chapter summarizes the current PBSC mobilization and collection approaches and is focusing on timely orchestration of mobilization therapy, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) application, and peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell assessment. Moreover, strategies for prediction and performance assessment of the PBSC collection yield are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Kriegsmann
- Department of Medicine V (Hematology, Oncology, Rheumatology), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Wuchter
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany. .,German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg - Hessen, Mannheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|