A Modified Direct-Smear Processing Technique Employing Two-Step Centrifugation/Fixation Is Useful for Detecting High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma

The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: A Meta-Analysis

The Paris System (TPS) for Reporting Urinary Cytology is a standardized, evidence-based reporting system, comprising seven diagnostic categories: nondiagnostic, negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), atypical urothelial cells (AUC), suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC), HGUC, low-grade urothelial neoplasm (LGUN), and other malignancies. This study aimed to calculate the pooled risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM) of each category and demonstrate the diagnostic accuracy of urine cytology reported with TPS. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, while data were extracted and analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The pooled ROHM was 17.70% for the nondiagnostic category (95% CI, 0.0650; 0.3997), 13.04% for the NHGUC (95% CI, 0.0932; 0.1796), 38.65% for the AUC (95% CI, 0.3042; 0.4759), 12.45% for the LGUN (95% CI, 0.0431; 0.3101), 76.89 for the SHGUC (95% CI, 0.7063; 0.8216), and 91.79% for the HGUC and other malignancies (95% CI, 0.8722; 0.9482). A summary ROC curve was created and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 0.849, while the pooled sensitivity was 0.669 (95% CI, 0.589; 0.741) and false-positive rate was 0.101 (95% CI, 0.063; 0.158). In addition, the pooled DOR of the included studies was 21.258 (95% CI, 14.336; 31.522). TPS assigns each sample into a diagnostic category linked with a specific ROHM, guiding clinical management.

Quantitative cytomorphological comparison of SurePath and ThinPrep liquid-based cytology using high-grade urothelial carcinoma cells

OBJECTIVE

In The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS), the important cytomorphological features for diagnosing high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) are a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N:C) ratio exceeding 0.7, hyperchromasia, coarse chromatin, and irregular nuclear borders. However, quantitative cytomorphological assessments of HGUC cells using SurePath slides are rare. Therefore, we evaluated HGUC cells on SurePath slides quantitatively using a digital image analysis system and compared these data with ThinPrep data.

METHODS

The same urine samples were divided into two aliquots and used to prepare SurePath and ThinPrep slides. We used ImageJ to measure the N:C ratio, hyperchromasia, and irregular nuclear borders for HGUC cells on SurePath and ThinPrep slides.

RESULTS

The total number of analysed HGUC cells on SurePath slides was 981, versus 889 on ThinPrep slides. Hyperchromasia and irregular nuclear borders were significantly more severe on SurePath than on ThinPrep slides. Conversely, the N:C ratio did not differ between the methods. Additionally, HGUC cells with N:C ratios exceeding 0.7 were present on almost all slides for both methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicated the reasonableness of using the N:C ratio as the major criterion for TPS on both SurePath and ThinPrep slides, and an N:C ratio cut-off of 0.7 as suitable for identifying HGUC cells. However, the severity of hyperchromasia and irregular nuclear borders differed between the processing methods.