A Network-Wide Stroke Team Program Reduces Time to Treatment for Endovascular Stroke Therapy in a Regional Stroke-Network

Evolution of quality indicators in acute stroke during the RACECAT Trial: Impact in the general population

BACKGROUND

Acute ischemic stroke patients not referred directly to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) have reduced access to endovascular treatment (EVT). The RACECAT trial is a population-based cluster-randomized trial, designed to compare mothership and drip-and-ship strategies in acute ischemic stroke patients outside the catchment area of a CSC.

AIMS

To analyze the evolution of performance indicators in the regions that participated in RACECAT.

METHODS

This retrospective longitudinal observational study included all stroke alerts evaluated by emergency medical services in Catalonia between February 2016 and February 2020. Cases were classified geographically according to the nearest SC: local SC (Local-SC) and CSC catchment areas. We analyzed the evolution of EVT rates and relevant workflow times in Local-SC versus CSC catchment areas over three study periods: P1 (February 2016 to April 2017: before RACECAT initiation), P2 (May 2017 to September 2018), and P3 (October 2018 to February 2020).

RESULTS

We included 20603 stroke alerts, 10,694 (51.9%) of which were activated within Local-SC catchment areas. The proportion of patients receiving EVT within Local-SC catchment areas increased (P1 vs. P3: 7.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 6.4-8.7) to 22.5% (95% CI, 20.8-24.4) p < 0.001). Inequalities in the odds of receiving EVT were reduced for patients from CSC versus Local-SC catchment areas (P1: odds ratio (OR) 3.9 (95% CI, 3.2-5) vs. P3: OR 1.5 (95% CI, 1.3-1.7) In Local-SC, door-to-image (P1: 24 (interquartile range (IQR) 15-36), P2: 24 (15-35), P3: 21 (13-32) min, p < 0.001) and door-to-needle times (P1: 42 (31-60), P2: 41 (29-58), P3: 35 (25-50) p < 0.001) reduced. Time from Local-SC arrival to groin puncture also decreased over time (P1: 188 [151-229], P2: 190 (157-233), P3: 168 (127-215) min, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

An increase in EVT rates in Local-SC regions with a significant decrease in workflow times occurred during the period of the RACECAT trial.

Pre-hospital and intrahospital workflow optimization for patients with suspected ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion - findings from a tertiary care facility

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of recanalization treatment in patients with ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) is highly time dependent. We aimed to investigate the effects of an optimization of prehospital and intrahospital pathways on time metrics and efficacy of endovascular treatment in ischemic stroke due to LVO.

METHODS

Patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) at the Hospital of St. John of God Vienna, Austria, between 2013 and 2020 were extracted from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry. Study endpoints including time metrics, early neurological improvement and functional outcome measured by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months were compared before and after optimization of prehospital and intrahospital pathways.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-nine patients were treated with MT during the study period, 94 before and 205 after the workflow optimization. Workflow optimization was significantly associated with time metrics improvement (door to groin puncture time 45 versus 31 min; p < 0.001), rates of neurological improvement (NIHSS ≥ 8: 30 (35%) vs. 70 (47%), p = 0.04) and radiological outcome (TICI ≥ 2b: 71 (75%) versus 153 (87%); p = 0.013). Functional outcome (mRS 0-2: 17 (18%) versus 57 (28%); p = 0.067) and mortality (34 (37%) versus 54 (32%); p = 0.450) at 3 months showed a non-significant trend in the later time period group.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of workflow optimization was associated a significant reduction of intrahospital time delays and improvement of neurological and radiological outcomes.

Organizational Factors Determining Access to Reperfusion Therapies in Ischemic Stroke-Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

After onset of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), there is a limited time window for delivering acute reperfusion therapies (ART) aiming to restore normal brain circulation. Despite its unequivocal benefits, the proportion of AIS patients receiving both types of ART, thrombolysis and thrombectomy, remains very low. The organization of a stroke care pathway is one of the main factors that determine timely access to ART. The knowledge on organizational factors influencing access to ART is sparce. Hence, we sought to systematize the existing data on the type and frequency of pre-hospital and in-hospital organizational factors that determine timely access to ART in patients with AIS.

METHODOLOGY

Literature review on the frequency and type of organizational factors that determine access to ART after AIS. Pubmed and Scopus databases were the primary source of data. OpenGrey and Google Scholar were used for searching grey literature. Study quality analysis was based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 128 studies were included. The main pre-hospital factors associated with delay or access to ART were medical emergency activation practices, pre-notification routines, ambulance use and existence of local/regional-specific strategies to mitigate the impact of geographic distance between patient locations and Stroke Unit (SU). The most common intra-hospital factors studied were specific location of SU and brain imaging room within the hospital, and the existence and promotion of specific stroke treatment protocols. Most frequent factors associated with increased access ART were periodic public education, promotion of hospital pre-notification and specific pre- and intra-hospital stroke pathways. In specific urban areas, mobile stroke units were found to be valid options to increase timely access to ART.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of different organizational factors and strategies can reduce time delays and increase the number of AIS patients receiving ART, with most of them being replicable in any context, and some in only very specific contexts.

Reduction of Ischemic Stroke Associated Disability in the Population: A State-Wide Stroke Registry Analysis over a Decade

(Background): Effective prevention strategies and acute therapies have been established and distributed in recent years to reduce the global burden of stroke. However, beyond randomized clinical trials, limited data exist on the real-world impact of these measures. Our goal was to analyze whether the stroke-associated disability in the population decreased over time based on a state-wide stroke registry analysis. (Methods): Consecutive data from a state-wide inpatient stroke registry covering the entire federal state of Hesse, Germany, were obtained. The clinical data of 141,287 patients with ischemic stroke (ICD-10: I63) admitted between 2010 and 2019 were included. The primary outcome was the odds ratio for a change of modified Ranking Scale (mRS) at discharge over time, estimated by ordinary logistic regression and adjusted for age and sex. The secondary outcome was the odds ratio for a lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at hospital admission. (Results): The absolute number of severely disabled (mRS 4−5) stroke patients at discharge decreased over time (2010: 3223 (equivalent to 53/100,000 population); 2019: 2429 [39/100,000 population]). The odds at hospital admission for a higher mRS at discharge decreased significantly by 3.7% per year (OR 0.963 (95% CI 0.960−0.966), p < 0.001). The absolute number of severely affected stroke patients (NIHSS > 15) at admission declined over time (2010: 1589 [26/100,000]; 2019: 1185 [19/100,000]; p < 0.001). The odds for a higher NIHSS score at admission to hospital decreased by 3.8% per year (OR 0.962 (95% CI 0.959−0.965), p < 0.001). Trends were most prominent for patients aged 80 years and older and for patients with atrial fibrillation but absent in patients <60 years. (Conclusions): Stroke-associated disability in the population steadily decreased between 2010 and 2019. The improved prevention of severe strokes in elderly patients may be a major driver of this observation.

Optimizing Door-to-Groin Puncture Time: The Mayo Clinic Experience

OBJECTIVES

To provide a better understanding of methods that can be used to improve patient outcomes by reducing the door-to-groin puncture (DTP) time and present the results of a stroke quality improvement project (QIP) conducted by Mayo Clinic Arizona's stroke center.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search of Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies that evaluated DTP time reduction strategies. Those determined eligible for the purpose of this analysis were assessed for quality. The strategies for DTP time reduction were categorized on the basis of modified Target: Stroke Phase III recommendations and analyzed using a meta-analysis. The Mayo Clinic QIP implemented a single-call activation system to reduce DTP times by decreasing the time from neurosurgery notification to case start.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were selected for the analysis, consisting of 2277 patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large-vessel occlusions. After intervention, all the studies showed a reduction in the DTP time, with the pooled DTP improvement being the standardized mean difference (1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.93; τ²=1.09; P<.001). The Mayo Clinic QIP similarly displayed a DTP time reduction, with the DTP time dropping from 125.1 to 82.5 minutes after strategy implementation.

CONCLUSION

Computed tomography flow modifications produced the largest and most consistent reduction in the DTP time. However, the reduction in the DTP time across all the studies suggests that any systematic protocol aimed at reducing the DTP time can produce a beneficial effect. The relative novelty of mechanical thrombectomy and the consequential lack of research call for future investigation into the efficacy of varying DTP time reduction strategies.

In-hospital systems interventions in acute stroke reperfusion therapy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The value of in-hospital systems-based interventions in streamlining treatment delays associated with reperfusion therapy delivery in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), in the emergency department (ED), is poorly understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess and quantify the value of in-hospital systems-based interventions in streamlining reperfusion therapy delivery following AIS.

MATERIAL & METHODS

Articles from the following databases were retrieved: Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The primary endpoint was in-hospital time metrics between the intervention and control group. The secondary endpoint included the rate of good functional outcome at 90 days.

RESULTS

393 Systems intervention studies published after 2015 were screened, and 231 full articles were then read. In total, 35 studies with 35,815 patients were included in the final systematic review and 26 studies with 7,089 patients were used in the meta-analysis. The greatest time reductions from in-hospital system interventions were achieved in door-to-needle (DTN) time (SMD: -2.696, 95% CI: -2.976, -2.416, z = 3.03, p = 0.002). Systems interventions were also associated with a statistically significant improvement in mortality (RR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.38), rate of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (RR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.1) and ≤60-minute reperfusion rates (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of in-hospital workflow optimization is imperative to expedite reperfusion therapy delivery and improving patient outcomes. To reduce the morbidity and mortality of stroke globally, in-hospital workflow guidelines should be adhered to and incorporated including the optimal elements identified in this study.

In-hospital acute stroke workflow in acute stroke - Systems-based approaches

Clinical outcomes of acute ischaemic stroke patients have significantly improved with the advent of reperfusion therapy. However, time continues to be a critical factor. Reducing treatment delays by improving workflows can improve the efficacy of acute reperfusion therapy. Systems-based approaches have improved in-hospital temporal parameters, maximizing the utility of reperfusion therapies and improving clinical benefit to patients. However, studies aimed at optimizing and hence reducing treatment delays in emergency department (ED) settings are limited. The aim of this article is to discuss existing systems-based approaches to optimize ED acute stroke workflows and its value in reducing treatment delays and identify gaps in existing workflows that need optimization. Identifying gaps in acute stroke workflow, variations in processes and challenges in implementation, in the in-hospital settings, is essential for systems-based interventions to be effective in delivering improved outcomes for patients with acute ischaemic stroke.

How do treatment times impact on functional outcome in stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy in Germany? Results from the German Stroke Registry

BACKGROUND

Functional outcome post-stroke depends on time to recanalization. Effect of in-hospital delay may differ in patients directly admitted to a comprehensive stroke center and patients transferred via a primary stroke center. We analyzed the current door-to-groin time in Germany and explored its effect on functional outcome in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Data were collected in 25 stroke centers in the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment a prospective, multicenter, observational registry study including stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. Functional outcome was assessed at three months by modified Rankin Scale. Association of door-to-groin time with outcome was calculated using binary logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Out of 4340 patients, 56% were treated primarily in a comprehensive stroke center and 44% in a primary stroke center and then transferred to a comprehensive stroke center ("drip-and-ship" concept). Median onset-to-arrival at comprehensive stroke center time and door-to-groin time were 103 and 79 min in comprehensive stroke center patients and 225 and 44 min in primary stroke center patients. The odds ratio for poor functional outcome per hour of onset-to-arrival-at comprehensive stroke center time was 1.03 (95%CI 1.01-1.05) in comprehensive stroke center patients and 1.06 (95%CI 1.03-1.09) in primary stroke center patients. The odds ratio for poor functional outcome per hour of door-to-groin time was 1.30 (95%CI 1.16-1.46) in comprehensive stroke center patients and 1.04 (95%CI 0.89-1.21) in primary stroke center patients. Longer door-to-groin time in comprehensive stroke center patients was associated with admission on weekends (odds ratio 1.61; 95%CI 1.37-1.97) and during night time (odds ratio 1.52; 95%CI 1.27-1.82) and use of intravenous thrombolysis (odds ratio 1.28; 95%CI 1.08-1.50).

CONCLUSION

Door-to-groin time was especially relevant for outcome of comprehensive stroke center patients, whereas door-to-groin time was much shorter in primary stroke center patients.Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03356392. Unique identifier NCT03356392.

The association between computed tomography angiography timing and workflow times in patients with acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

In most hospitals, computed tomography angiography (CTA) is nowadays routinely performed in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, it is unclear whether CTA is best performed before or after start of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), since acquisition of CTA before IVT may prolong door-to-needle times, while acquisition after IVT may prolong door-to-groin times in patients undergoing endovascular treatment.

METHODS

We performed a before-versus-after study (CTA following IVT, period I and CTA prior to IVT, period II), consisting of two periods of one year each. This study is based on a prospective registry of consecutive patients treated with IVT in two collaborating high-volume stroke centers; one primary stroke center and one comprehensive stroke center. The primary outcome was door-to-needle times. Secondary outcomes included door-to-groin times. Quantile regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between timing of CTA and workflow times, adjusted for prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 519 patients received IVT during the study period (246 in period I, 273 in period II). In the adjusted analysis, we found a nonsignificant 1.13 min median difference in door-to-needle times (95% confidence interval: 1.03-3.29). Door-to-groin times was significantly shorter in period II in both unadjusted and adjusted analysis with the latter showing a 19.16 min median difference (95% confidence interval: 3.08-35.24).

CONCLUSIONS

CTA acquisition prior to start of IVT did not adversely affect door-to-needle times. However, a significantly shorter door-to-groin times was observed in endovascular treatment eligible patients. Performing CTA prior to start of IVT seems the preferred strategy.

Predictors of Futile Recanalization After Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke in a Multicenter Registry Study

BACKGROUND

Futile recanalization, defined as the early recanalization of an occluded artery failing to improve neurological outcome, remains a persistent concern in the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. We investigated the occurrence and predictors of futile recanalization after endovascular treatment in a nationwide multicenter stroke registry study.

METHODS

The subjects consisted of eligible patients from the Acute Ischemic Stroke Cooperation Group of Endovascular Treatment registry study (2015-2017). Subjects with acute anterior large vessel occlusion who achieved successful angiographic recanalization (defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grades 2b or 3) by endovascular treatment were dichotomized into the futile-recanalization group (with a modified Rankin Scale score of 3-6) and the favorable-recanalization group (with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) according to 90-day functional independence. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate predictors of futile recanalization.

RESULTS

Futile recanalization was observed in 200 (49.6%) out of 403 patients. On multivariate analysis, older age (>74 vs. ≤74; odds ratio (OR), 2.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.31-4.44; P=0.005), high baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (>21 vs. ≤13; OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.21-5.28; P=0.014), delayed puncture to recanalization time (>80 vs. ≤80 min; OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.67-4.51; P=0.000), and the use of general anesthesia (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.15-3.14; P=0.012) were positively associated with futile recanalization after mechanical thrombectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of futile recanalization is common following endovascular treatment among Asian patients with anterior circulation occlusion. Advanced age, higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, delayed puncture to reperfusion, and the use of general anesthesia are associated with lower functional independence 90 days post-treatment despite successful recanalization.

Effectiveness of emergency physician determinations of the need for thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke

An increased emphasis on stroke care has led to a proliferation of specialized stroke teams despite relatively few trials demonstrating their efficacy. Our academic stroke center incorporated a unique setup allowing for the comparison between stroke teams and emergency physicians. During weekday working hours, a stroke team would respond to the emergency department for stroke activations. During all other times, the emergency physician caring for the patient would make all treatment decisions. We sought to determine whether there was any difference in treatment and outcomes between these two groups. We conducted a retrospective review of all stroke activations from January 2015 to June 2016 and compared the thrombolytic administration rates, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge, and change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). A total of 415 stroke activations were identified. Of those, 69 of 262 patients (26.3%) seen by emergency physicians and 60 of 153 patients (39.2%) seen by neurologists received thrombolysis (P = 0.006). No significant difference was found in the discharge mRS or change in NIHSS between the two groups. Emergency physicians administered significantly less thrombolytics than did neurologists. No significant difference was observed in outcomes, including mRS and admission-to-discharge change in NIHSS.

Simulation-Based Training of the Rapid Evaluation and Management of Acute Stroke (STREAM)-A Prospective Single-Arm Multicenter Trial

Introduction: Acute stroke care delivered by interdisciplinary teams is time-sensitive. Simulation-based team training is a promising tool to improve team performance in medical operations. It has the potential to improve process times, team communication, patient safety, and staff satisfaction. We aim to assess whether a multi-level approach consisting of a stringent workflow revision based on peer-to-peer review and 2–3 one-day in situ simulation trainings can improve acute stroke care processing times in high volume neurocenters within a 6 months period.

Methods and Analysis: The trial is being carried out in a pre-test-post-test design at 7 tertiary care university hospital neurocenters in Germany. The intervention is directed at the interdisciplinary multiprofessional stroke teams. Before and after the intervention, process times of all direct-to-center stroke patients receiving IV thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular therapy (EVT) will be recorded. The primary outcome measure will be the “door-to-needle” time of all consecutive stroke patients directly admitted to the neurocenters who receive IVT. Secondary outcome measures will be intervention-related process times of the fraction of patients undergoing EVT and effects on team communication, perceived patient safety, and staff satisfaction via a staff questionnaire.

Interventions: We are applying a multi-level intervention in cooperation with three “STREAM multipliers” from each center. First step is a central meeting of the multipliers at the sponsor's institution with the purposes of algorithm review in a peer-to-peer process that is recorded in a protocol and an introduction to the principles of simulation training and debriefing as well as crew resource management and team communication. Thereafter, the multipliers cooperate with the stroke team trainers from the sponsor's institution to plan and execute 2–3 one-day simulation courses in situ in the emergency department and CT room of the trial centers whereupon they receive teaching materials to perpetuate the trainings.

Clinical Trial Registration: STREAM is a registered trial at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03228251.

Tools for your stroke team: adapting crew-resource management for acute stroke care

Crew-resource management is an approach to work and training that focuses on non-technical skills and strategies to prevent human error in complex procedures. It was initially termed 'cockpit-resource management' and developed for aviation in the 1970s after several severe accidents; it has contributed to a measurable increase in flight safety. In recent years, this approach has been successfully implemented in other high-reliability environments; surgical disciplines have made particular use of crew-resource management strategies and training, with resulting reduced mortality rates. The stepwise implementation of different crew-resource management strategies in stroke care at our tertiary stroke centre has helped to speed up process times significantly, and to improve patient safety and staff satisfaction. Here, we summarise our experience in adapting different crew-resource management tools to acute stroke care, sharing specific tools that have proven valuable in our hands, and we encourage colleagues to implement such strategies in acute stroke care.