Genotyping in Sickle Cell Disease Patients: The French Strategy

Estimating the serological underrecognition of patients with weak or partial RHD variants

BACKGROUND

For patients with weak or discrepant RhD RBC phenotypes, RHD genotyping is employed to determine need for RhD-negative management. However, many RHD variants are type D-negative or D-positive. Serological recognition rates (RRs) of weak and partial RHD variants are poorly characterized.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Four US studies employing RHD genotyping for weak or discrepant RhD phenotypes provided data for race/ethnicity-specific serological recognition. Three studies used microplate, and 1 used gel and tube; 2 had anti-D data. We obtained White and Hispanic/Latino allele frequencies (AFs) of weak D types 1, 2, and 3 single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, v4.0.0) and devised Hardy-Weinberg-based formulas to correct for gnomAD's overcount of hemizygous RHD SNVs as homozygous. We compiled common partial RHD AF from genotyped cohorts of US Black or sickle cell disease subjects. From variant AF, we calculated hemizygous-plus-homozygous genetic prevalences. Serological prevalence: genetic prevalence ratios yielded serological RRs.

RESULTS

Overall RRs of weak D types 1-3 were 17% (95% confidence interval 12%-24%) in Whites and 12% (5%-27%) in Hispanics/Latinos. For eight partial RHD variants in Blacks, overall RR was 11% (8%-14%). However, DAR RR was 80% (38%-156%). Compared to microplate, gel-tube recognition was higher for type 2 and DAU5 and lower for type 4.0. Anti-D was present in 6% of recognized partial RHD cases, but only in 0.7% of estimated total genetic cases.

DISCUSSION

Based on AF, >80% of patients with weak or partial RHD variants were unrecognized serologically. Although overall anti-D rates were low, better detection of partial RHD variants is desirable.

RH genotypes and red cell alloimmunization rates in chronically transfused patients with sickle cell disease: A multisite study in the USA

BACKGROUND

Red cell alloimmunization remains a challenge for individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) and contributes to increased risk of hemolytic transfusion reactions and associated comorbidities. Despite prophylactic serological matching for ABO, Rh, and K, red cell alloimmunization persists, in part, due to a high frequency of variant RH alleles in patients with SCD and Black blood donors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We compared RH genotypes and rates of alloimmunization in 342 pediatric and young adult patients with SCD on chronic transfusion therapy exposed to >90,000 red cell units at five sites across the USA. Genotyping was performed with RHD and RHCE BeadChip arrays and targeted assays.

RESULTS

Prevalence of overall and Rh-specific alloimmunization varied among institutions, ranging from 5% to 41% (p = .0035) and 5%-33% (p = .0002), respectively. RH genotyping demonstrated that 33% RHD and 57% RHCE alleles were variant in this cohort. Patients with RHCE alleles encoding partial e antigens had higher rates of anti-e identified than those encoding at least one conventional e antigen (p = .0007). There was no difference in anti-D, anti-C, or anti-E formation among patients with predicted partial or altered antigen expression compared to those with conventional antigens, suggesting that variant Rh on donor cells may also stimulate alloimmunization to these antigens.

DISCUSSION

These results highlight variability in alloimmunization rates and suggest that a molecular approach to Rh antigen matching may be necessary for optimal prevention of alloimmunization given the high prevalence of variant RH alleles among both patients and Black donors.

Eleven years of alloimmunization in 6496 patients with sickle cell disease in France who received transfusion

ABSTRACT

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a major therapy for sickle cell disease (SCD). Patients are at risk of forming antibodies to RBC antigens, which can result in the impossibility to find compatible units and can cause hemolytic transfusion reactions. This retrospective study investigates the evolution of RBC consumption and the frequencies, specificities, and chronology of the appearance of antibodies in a population of patients consistently receiving RH (C, D, E, c, e) and K-matched RBC units (RBCus) from a predominantly European donor population. Over the 11-year period in the Paris area, 6496 patients received transfusion at least once for a total of 239 944 units. Antibodies were made by 1742 patients. The first antibodies of a patient were predictive of subsequent immunization. By the 17th RBCu transfused (by the 20th, excluding warm autoantibodies), 75% of the patients who would make antibodies had made their first. By the 16th, 90% who would make antibodies to a high frequency antigen had made their first antibody to these antigens. Females made their first antibodies slightly earlier than males. Patients who received multiple transfusions (>50 units) had a higher immunization prevalence than those who rarely received transfusion (<12 units) but fewer clinically significant antibodies. Patients with SCD and prophylactic RH-K matching not immunized by the 20th RBCu are likely to have a low alloimmunization risk (to antigens other than RH-K), that is, be low responders, especially relative to the most clinically significant antibodies. This number of 20 units is a point before which close monitoring of patients is most important but remains open to future adjustment.

Les anémies aiguës et la stratégie transfusionnelle chez les drépanocytaires adultes

Worsening of anemia is very common in sickle cell disease. It is important to investigate specific complications related to sickle cell disease but also other causes of anemia in general. Transfusions or exchange transfusions are major therapeutic options and are frequently used for acute complications of sickle cell disease but also for primary and secondary prevention of some of the chronic complications. The transfusion strategy has been modified since the awareness of post-transfusion hemolysis by taking into account the transfusion risk score. A strong collaboration between the patient's expert center, the Blood center and the patient's hospitalization unit is required to make decisions. © 2023 Société nationale française de médecine interne (SNFMI). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Alloimmunisation against red blood cells in sickle cell disease: transfusion challenges in high-income and low-income countries

Sickle cell disease is the most frequent inherited disorder in sub-Saharan Africa and in many high-income countries (HICs). Transfusion is a key element of treatment, but it results in high rates of alloimmunisation against red blood cell antigens and post-transfusion haemolysis, which can be life-threatening in severe cases. The prevention of alloimmunisation is, therefore, an important issue in both HICs and in low-income countries (LICs). In HICs, the main reason for high alloimmunisation rates is blood group disparity between blood donors, who are mostly of European descent, and the patients, who are mostly of African descent. However, alloimmunisation rates also remain high in sub-Saharan Africa despite the homogeneity of blood group antigen frequencies between donors and patients; this occurrence is probably due to matching strategies limited to ABO blood group and RhD. However, other possible underlying causes of alloimmunisation have also been suggested, with each cause affecting HICs and LICs in different ways-eg, the immunogenetic and inflammatory status of the patient and the characteristics of the red blood cell products. In this Viewpoint, we discuss the available data and hypotheses that potentially account for the association of sickle cell disease with high rates of alloimmunisation in both settings, HICs and LICs (focusing particularly on sub-Saharan Africa), and the challenges faced by HICs and LICs to improve prevention of alloimmunisation.

Frequency and characterization of RHD and RHCE variants in the Noir Marron population from French Guiana

BACKGROUND

The RH system is one of the most polymorphic blood group systems due to the proximity and opposite orientation of RHD and RHCE genes. Numerous alleles are described and can affect Rh protein expression. This complexity is especially evident in populations of African origin. We performed RHD and RHCE genotyping of the Noir Marron population in French Guiana. This population belongs to the Maroon community who are direct descendants of African slaves, who escaped from Dutch plantations, in the current day Suriname, during the 17th century. They represent an original ethnic group with highly blended culture.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 89 DNA samples were collected from four different ethnic groups of the Noir Marron population of French Guiana. RHD and RHCE genotyping was performed using DNA microarray and/or sequencing.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Significant allelic diversity was shown, with 45% of individuals presenting an RHD gene variant (most common: RHD*DAU, RHD*DIVa, and RHD*DIIIa allele) and 9.4% with a partial D phenotype. Likewise, 85% presenting an RHCE gene variant and 9% a partial RH2 antigen. One original allele was identified in two D+ Noir Marron individuals: a hybrid RHD*DIIIa-CE(9)-D allele, encoding probably a partial D antigen and associated with an RHCE*ce(48C,733G,1006T) allele. The African diversity of RHD and RHCE genes is found in this population with preserved genetic but mixed cultural backgrounds. These data allow us to describe the characteristics of the RH system antigen and highlights a significant number of partial antigens with a risk of alloimmunization.

How to avoid the problem of erythrocyte alloimmunization in sickle cell disease

Erythrocyte alloimmunization is a major barrier to transfusion in sickle cell disease (SCD) because it can lead to transfusion deadlock and the development of life-threatening hemolytic transfusion reactions (HTRs). Several risk factors have been identified, such as blood group polymorphism in these patients of African ancestry frequently exposed to antigens they do not carry and an inflammatory clinical state of the disease. The most important preventive measure is prophylactic red blood cell antigen matching, and there is a consensus that matching for Rh (D, C, E, c, e) and K antigens should be performed for all SCD patients. However, some patients are high responders and more at risk of developing antibodies and HTRs. For these patients, the extension of matching to other blood groups, including variant antigens of the RH blood group, the use of genotyping rather than serology to characterize significant blood groups, and the prophylactic administration of immunosuppressive treatments remain a matter of debate due to low levels of certainty concerning their effects and the difficulty of determining which patients, other than those already immunized, are at high risk. These issues were recently addressed by a panel of experts established by the American Society of Hematology. Here, we review and stratify the various interventions for preventing alloimmunization, based on the literature and our experience and taking into account the obstacles to their implementation and any future developments required.

RHCE diversity among Brazilian patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and selected groups of blood donors

BACKGROUND

Several centers have selected Black donors to prevent Rh alloimmunization of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). As the Brazilian population is considered very admixed and race definition by self-declaration is questionable, this study aimed to compare RHCE diversity among patients with SCD and selected groups of Brazilian blood donors to define which group of donors would be the adequate red cell supply for patients with SCD.

METHOD

We compared RHCE allele frequencies between patients with SCD and four groups of Brazilian blood donors: self-declared Black donors (SDB), donors with predominant African genetic markers (AAM), donors with weak D expression (WDD), and random donors (RDs). Variant RHCE alleles were identified using molecular protocols.

RESULTS

Among patients with SCD, 47% had at least one variant RHCE, in SDB and WDD this frequency was higher, 53% and 58.6%, respectively. In AAM and in RD the frequencies were 32% and 27.6%, respectively. In patients with SCD and SDB, the most common alleles were RHCE*ce.01, RHCE*ceVS.01, and RHCE*ceVS.02. WDD had a high frequency of RHCE*ceAR and highest frequency of variant RHCE in both alleles, followed by patients with SCD and SDB.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that even in an admixed population the selection of SDB donors is the best choice of matching for transfusion support in patients with SCD. For specific RHCE alleles, selection of donors with weak D expression could be a good option.

Maternal red blood cell alloimmunisation Working Party, literature review. RH blood group system: Rare specificities

This report is part of a series reporting the GRADE review performed by the 2018-2020 French Working Party on maternal red blood cell alloimmunisation. This report focusses on the clinical significance in obstetrics, as published in the scientific literature, of the rare RH antibodies, variants and antigens (i.e. excluding conventional RH1 trough RH8 antigens, RH12, RH22 and RH27, which are discussed in other reports of this series). Extremely severe or severe haemolytic disease of the fetus and the newborn (HDFN), leading to death or requiring transfusions, have been reported for: anti-RH1 (-D) associated with DVI, DBT and DIVb phenotypes, RHD*12.04 (DOL4), RHD*03.03 (DIIIc), RHD*D-CE(2-5)-D, RHD*01EL.31 (RHD*148+1T), anti-RH9 (-C^X), anti-RH11 (-E^W), anti-RH17 (-Hr⁰), anti-RH18 (-Hr), anti-RH19 (-hr^S), anti-RH23 (-D^W), anti-RH29 ("total" Rh), anti-RH30 (-Go^a), anti-RH32, anti-RH34 (-Hr^B), anti-RH36 (-Be^a), anti-RH40 (-Tar), anti-RH46 (-Sec), anti-RH48 (-JAL), anti-RH54 (DAK), and antibodies to high prevalence antigens such as those associated with RHCE*02.08.02 (RHCE*C^W-RHD(6-10)), RHCE*03N.01 (RHCE*cEMI). HDFN of moderate, mild or undetailed severity have been reported for: anti-RH1 associated with DHar, DIIIa and DIVa phenotypes, RHD*01EL.08 (RHD*486+1A),RHD*01EL.44 (RHD*D-CE(4-9)-D),RHD*25 (DNB), anti-RH20 (-VS), anti-RH31 (-hr^B), anti-RH37 (-Evans), ani-RH42, anti-RH49 (-STEM), anti-RH51 (-MAR), anti-RH55 (-LOCR), anti-RH58 (-CELO). Positive direct antiglobulin test in the newborn but no clinically significant HDFN has been reported for anti-RH1 (-D) associated with RHD*10.05 (DAU5), RHD*12.02 (DOL2). Because so many specificities are associated with severe HDFN in the RH system, all RH antibodies should be considered as potentially able to cause HDFN, even if none has been reported yet.

A Review of the Literature Organized Into a New Database: RHeference

Hundreds of articles containing heterogeneous data describe D variants or add to the knowledge of known alleles. Data can be difficult to find despite existing online blood group resources and genetic and literature databases. We have developed a modern, elaborate database for D variants, thanks to an extensive literature search with meticulous curation of 387 peer-reviewed articles and 80 abstracts from major conferences and other sources. RHeference contains entries for 710 RHD alleles, 11 RHCE alleles, 30 phenotype descriptions (preventing data loss from historical sources), 35 partly characterized alleles, 3 haplotypes, and 16 miscellaneous entries. The entries include molecular, phenotypic, serological, alloimmunization, haplotype, geographical, and other data, detailed for each source. The main characteristics are summarized for each entry. The sources for all information are included and easily accessible through doi and PMID links. Overall, the database contains more than 10,000 individual pieces of data. We have set up the database architecture based on our previous expertise on database setup and biocuration for other topics, using modern technologies such as the Django framework, BioPython, Bootstrap, and Jquery. This architecture allows an easy access to data and enables simple and complex queries: combining multiple mutations, keywords, or any of the characteristics included in the database. RHeference provides a complement to existing resources and will continue to grow as our knowledge expands and new articles are published. The database url is http://www.rheference.org/.

Insights into anti-D formation in carriers of RhD variants through studies of 3D intraprotein interactions

BACKGROUND

Many RhD variants associated with anti-D formation (partial D) in carriers exposed to the conventional D antigen carry mutations affecting extracellular loop residues. Surprisingly, some carry mutations affecting transmembrane or intracellular domains, positions not thought likely to have a major impact on D epitopes.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A wild-type Rh trimer (RhD₁ RhAG₂ ) was modeled by comparative modeling with the human RhCG structure. Taking trimer conformation, residue accessibility, and position relative to the lipid bilayer into account, we redefine the domains of the RhD protein. We generated models for RhD variants carrying one or two amino acid substitutions associated with anti-D formation in published articles (25 variants) or abstracts (12 variants) and for RHD*weak D type 38. We determined the extracellular substitutions and compared the interactions of the variants with those of the standard RhD.

RESULTS

The findings of the three-dimensional (3D) analysis were correlated with anti-D formation for 76% of RhD variants: 15 substitutions associated with anti-D formation concerned extracellular residues, and structural differences in intraprotein interactions relative to standard RhD were observed in the others. We discuss the mechanisms by which D epitopes may be modified in variants in which the extracellular residues are identical to those of standard RhD and provide arguments for the benignity of p.T379M (RHD*DAU0) and p.G278D (RHD*weak D type 38) in transfusion medicine.

CONCLUSION

The study of RhD intraprotein interactions and the precise redefinition of residue accessibility provide insight into the mechanisms through which RhD point mutations may lead to anti-D formation in carriers.

Red Blood Cells: Exchange, Transfuse, or Deplete

Erythrocytapheresis, red blood cell (RBC) depletion, and RBC exchange transfusions are apheresis techniques used to rapidly lower the circulating RBC mass or to exchange the patient erythrocyte mass with donor RBC. Automated RBC exchange is performed using an apheresis device, while manual RBC exchange is based on sequential phlebotomies and isovolemic replacement. Compared to simple RBC transfusions, RBC exchange offers several advantages, e.g., a lower risk for iron accumulation and efficient control of pathological erythrocyte populations. Disadvantages are the higher costs of the procedure, the increased use of donor RBC, and the requirement of apheresis devices and trained hospital staff. The most frequent indication for RBC exchange is sickle cell disease (SCD). RBC exchange transfusions are standard treatment in SCD patients with a history of or a risk for acute stroke and are clinical options for other acute complications of SCD. The most common indication for RBC depletion is the removal of donor RBC from the bone marrow grafts in major ABO-incompatible allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to avoid immediate hemolysis. Rare indications for RBC exchange are severe infections with intraerythrocytic pathogens such as malaria or babesiosis and severe erythrocytosis or hereditary hemochromatosis where the aim is to rapidly decrease RBC populations or the iron content. However, only few high-quality studies are available looking at the efficacy of RBC exchange in the different disease entities, and treatment is often based on low levels of evidence and should therefore be decided in close collaboration with a transfusion medicine specialist.

Immuno-hematological findings in Delayed Hemolytic Transfusion Reaction (DHTR)

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most prevalent genetic disorder in France. Many other countries are also affected. Transfusion is still a key treatment for patients suffering from this condition. As a result, SCD patients are much more exposed to transfusions and their risks than the general population. The most feared situation is delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction (DHTR). In certain situations, defined as hyperhemolysis, autologous red blood cells (RBCs) are also targeted and destroyed. This can put the patient in a life-threating situation. Further transfusions worsen the hemolysis. As DHTR will mimic a new or resistant vaso-occlusive crisis, it can be easily underdiagnosed. SCD patients are more likely to be alloimmunized than the general population, due to discrepancies between the recipient's and donor's RBCs phenotypes. Furthermore, they are often transfused in an inflammatory state, and they also frequently harbor partial antigens in the RH system. SCD patients are more prone to develop a new alloantibody than the general population. As a result, patients with DHTR often have complex mixtures of allo and autoantibodies; RH antibodies and those considered as irregular natural antibodies are frequent. Nevertheless, about a third of DHTRs are reported in patients with no previous history of immunization. In addition, a third of SCD patients will not develop an antibody after a DHTR. The evanescence of the antibodies is important. In several studies, DHTRs were reported only in patients who were occasionally transfused. Identifying patients at risk of developing a DHTR is key to managing them properly.

Towards a Regional Registry of Extended Typed Blood Donors: Molecular Typing for Blood Group, Platelet and Granulocyte Antigens

BACKGROUND

The provision of compatible blood products to patients is the most essential task of transfusion medicine. Besides ABO and Rh, a number of additional blood group antigens often have to be considered for the blood supply of immunized or chronically transfused patients. It also applies for platelet antigens (HPA) and neutrophil antigens (HNA) for patients receiving platelet or granulocyte concentrates. Here, we describe the molecular screening for a number of blood group, HPA, and HNA alleles. Based on the screening results we are building up a regional blood donor registry to provide extended matched blood products on demand.

METHODS

We developed and validated TaqMan™ PCR and PCR-SSP methods for genetic markers defining 37 clinically relevant blood group antigens (beyond ABO and Rh), 10 HPA, and 11 HNA. Furthermore, we describe a feasible method for fast molecular screening of the HNA-2null phenotype. All data were statistically evaluated regarding genotype distribution. Allele frequencies were compared to ExAC data from non-Finnish Europeans.

RESULTS

Up to now more than 2,000 non-selected regular blood donors in south-west Germany have been screened for blood group, HPA, and HNA alleles. The screening results were confirmed by serology and PCR-SSP methods for selected numbers of samples. The allele frequencies were similar to non-finnish Europeans in the ExAC database except for the alleles encoding the S, HPA-3b and HNA-4b antigens, with significantly lower prevalence in our cohort, as well as the LU14 and the HNA-3b antigens, with a higher frequency compared to the ExAC data. We identified 71 donors with rare blood groups such as Lu(a+b-), Kp(a+b-), Fy(a-b-) and Vel-, and 169 donors with less prevalent HPA or HNA types.

CONCLUSION

Molecular screening for blood group alleles by using TaqMan™ PCR is an effective and reliable high-throughput method for establishing a rare donor registry.