Severe Diarrhea in the Setting of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Efficacy and safety of Infliximab for steroid-resistant immune-related adverse events: A retrospective study

The present study investigated outcomes of infliximab (IFX) treatment among 8 Japanese patients with various types of cancer (4 with malignant melanoma, 3 with lung cancer and 1 with renal cancer) who developed severe steroid-resistant immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in association with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to determine its efficacy and safety. Information, including patient background, treatment progress, examination data and imaging data, was collected retrospectively from electronic medical records. Adverse reactions were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Specific ICIs used were anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibody preparations in 7, 2 and 5 patients, respectively. Specific irAEs included grade 3 diarrhea/colitis in 7 patients and disseminated intravascular coagulation and myocarditis attributed to autoimmune activation in 1 patient. The median duration between systemic steroid and IFX treatments was 9 (range, 2-39) days. A total of 3 patients responded to IFX, 1 of whom responded after one dose and 2 responded after two doses. Respective diseases improved to grade 0 after a median of 18 (range, 9-32) days. No AEs were attributable to IFX. Additionally, anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) and antibacterial agents were administered in parallel given the presence of CMV and Clostridium difficile (CD) infections in all patients, except in 1 exhibiting a marked IFX response after one dose. The combination of highly immunosuppressive IFX and high-dose systemic steroid administration over a long period presumably predisposed the patients to opportunistic enteric infections. Accordingly, early initiation of IFX treatment in conjunction with systemic steroid therapy should be considered for severe diarrhea/colitis and other irAEs. However, the possibility for CMV and CD infections should be recognized, and for these the treatment strategy may need to be modified at an early stage.

Therapeutic and Systemic Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis for Clinical Management of NSCLC

Non-small-cell lung cancer takes up the majority of lung carcinoma-caused deaths. It is reported that targeting PD-1/PD-L1, a well-known immune evasion checkpoint, can eradicate tumor. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as monoclonal antibodies, are actively employed in cancer treatment. Thus, this review aimed to assess the therapeutic and toxic effects of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in treatment of NSCLC. So far, 6 monoclonal antibodies blocking PD-1/PD-L1 interaction are identified and used in clinical trials and randomized controlled trials for NSCLC therapy. These antibody-based therapies for NSCLC were collected by using search engine PubMed, and articles about the assessment of adverse events were collected by using Google search. Route of administration and dosage are critical parameters for efficient immunotherapy. Although antibodies can improve overall survival and are expected to be target-specific, they can cause systemic adverse effects in the host. Targeting certain biomarkers can limit the toxicity of adverse effects of the antibody-mediated therapy. Clinical experts with knowledge of adverse effects (AEs) of checkpoint inhibitors can help manage and reduce mortalities associated with antibody-based therapy of NSCLC.

Immune-related adverse events of checkpoint inhibitors

Cancer immunotherapies have changed the landscape of cancer treatment during the past few decades. Among them, immune checkpoint inhibitors, which target PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4, are increasingly used for certain cancers; however, this increased use has resulted in increased reports of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These irAEs are unique and are different to those of traditional cancer therapies, and typically have a delayed onset and prolonged duration. IrAEs can involve any organ or system. These effects are frequently low grade and are treatable and reversible; however, some adverse effects can be severe and lead to permanent disorders. Management is primarily based on corticosteroids and other immunomodulatory agents, which should be prescribed carefully to reduce the potential of short-term and long-term complications. Thoughtful management of irAEs is important in optimizing quality of life and long-term outcomes.

Combination Compositions Composed of l-Glutamine and Si-Jun-Zi-Tang Might Be a Preferable Choice for 5-Fluorouracil-Induced Intestinal Mucositis: An Exploration in a Mouse Model

Intestinal mucositis is a common toxicity of many anti-neoplastic therapies that negatively influences health, the quality of life, economic outcomes, and even the success of cancer treatment. Unfortunately, there is presently no optimal medicine that is able to effectively manage this condition. l-glutamine is one of the most frequently used agent in practice among the limited treatment choices due to its safety and inexpensiveness despite there being a lack of evidence. Previous studies indicated that l-glutamine may alleviate mucositis and mucosal atrophy but failed to improve patients' macroscopic conditions, such as the occurrence of diarrhea. A compound glutamine capsule (G-SJZ), composed of l-glutamine and the traditional Chinese herbal formula Si-Jun-Zi-Tang, has been used in China for 23 years to treat many types of gastrointestinal diseases, including gastrointestinal reactions induced by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, the exact effect of G-SJZ on intestinal mucositis is unclear, and moreover, whether l-glutamine combined with Si-Jun-Zi-Tang is more effective than l-glutamine alone have not been studied. In the current study, we explored the effects of G-SJZ and l-glutamine in a mouse model of intestinal mucositis induced by 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu). The results revealed that pretreatment with G-SJZ ameliorated the physical manifestations of weight loss and the severity of diarrhea following continuous 5-Fu injections in mice. Likewise, the histopathological damage and the destruction of villus and crypt structures in the intestinal mucosa as well as the increase in circulating intestinal injury markers caused by 5-Fu were reversed with G-SJZ pretreatment. Furthermore, the protective effect of G-SJZ was accompanied by modulations in the immunohistochemical expression of tight junction proteins. Interestingly, although treatment with a dose of l-glutamine alone that was equivalent to the dose in G-SJZ also showed a protective effect, it did not appear to be as strong as treatment with G-SJZ. Si-Jun-Zi-Tang in G-SJZ may compensate for the deficiencies of l-glutamine in this model which seems not to be related to the regulation of tight junction proteins. Our study is the first to suggest that the combined use of l-glutamine and Si-Jun-Zi-Tang might be more effective than l-glutamine alone despite exact mechanism still needs further study. Because of the limited number of therapeutic agents, G-SJZ is likely to be a preferable choice for intestinal mucositis.

A large scale meta analysis identifies common adverse events with checkpoint inhibitors vs chemotherapy in melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

A meta-analysis was performed to assess the risk of common adverse events in melanoma patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors.

METHODS

Eligible studies were downloaded from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases based on an established strategy. Review manager version 5.3 was used to analyze data.

RESULTS

After exclusion of ineligible studies, six studies were finally included in the meta-analysis, which comprised of 2136 patients in intervention group and 1773 patients in control group. There was a difference in low grade risk of pruritus (OR 5.63, 95% CI 2.92-10.85, P < 0.00001), diarrhea/colitis (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.09-2.09, P = 0.01), but not fatigue (low grade, OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.72-1.29, P = 0.80; high grade, OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.23-2.24, P = 0.57) and some high grade risk between the intervention group and control group. Subgroups analysis revealed that low grade risk of pruritus (OR 8.17, 95% CI 4.29-15.55, P < 0.00001) and high grade risk of pruritus (OR 7.08, 95% CI 1.25-40.09, P = 0.03) were significantly different between patients treated with chemotherapy and those treated with checkpoint inhibitors. But fatigue and diarrhea/colitis were not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Checkpoint inhibitors are associated with a higher risk in some side effects than chemotherapy in melanoma patients. Therefore, strategies that reduce the risk of adverse events in patients taking checkpoint inhibitors should be developed.

Effects of Drugs and Excipients on Hydration Status

Despite being the most essential nutrient, water is commonly forgotten in the fields of pharmacy and nutrition. Hydration status is determined by water balance (the difference between water input and output). Hypohydration or negative water balance is affected by numerous factors, either internal (i.e., a lack of thirst sensation) or external (e.g., polypharmacy or chronic consumption of certain drugs). However, to date, research on the interaction between hydration status and drugs/excipients has been scarce. Drugs may trigger the appearance of hypohydration by means of the increase of water elimination through either diarrhea, urine or sweat; a decrease in thirst sensation or appetite; or the alteration of central thermoregulation. On the other hand, pharmaceutical excipients induce alterations in hydration status by decreasing the gastrointestinal transit time or increasing the gastrointestinal tract rate or intestinal permeability. In the present review, we evaluate studies that focus on the effects of drugs/excipients on hydration status. These studies support the aim of monitoring the hydration status in patients, mainly in those population segments with a higher risk, to avoid complications and associated pathologies, which are key axes in both pharmaceutical care and the field of nutrition.