Reviving the Clinician Scientist: A Best Practice Model

Mind the (research) gap: a retrospective observational study on the utilization of new medical technologies and related research activities in German hospitals

OBJECTIVES

Hospitals play a major role in generating clinical evidence on new medical technologies. Thus far, the extent of German hospitals' contribution to the evidence base has not been sufficiently investigated. This study aims to: (1) examine the utilization of new medical technologies in German hospitals and its relationship to different hospital characteristics; (2) investigate the participation of German hospitals in research on these technologies and the association between hospital characteristics and research involvement; and (3) investigate the contribution of German hospitals to international research activities, including the levels of evidence of any studies conducted.

METHODS

Using a systematically derived sample of 13 new medical technologies and various data sources, we retrospectively analyzed the utilization of and research activities by German hospitals between 2005 and 2017 and explored which hospital characteristics they were associated with. The data were analyzed descriptively and are expressed as bar plots, box plots, quartiles, and crude odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

The proportion of German hospitals using new technologies while also being involved in related clinical research was relatively low (ranging from 0.3% to 29.4%, except for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), with 60.7%), particularly for prospective studies. Research involvement was positively associated with university hospital status, larger bed capacity, and public ownership. Overall, the research involving German hospitals predominantly consisted of single-arm studies and not randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified a gap between hospitals using new medical technologies and their involvement in evidence generation. This imbalance can contribute to uncertainty regarding the actual efficacy, effectiveness and safety of new medical technologies. To ensure evidence-based patient care, it is therefore essential to strengthen the link between research and practice, in both directions. A first step to achieve this could entail restricting the use of new medical technologies to specialized innovation centers (e.g., university hospitals, specialized hospitals) during the initial years of their utilization to ensure an adequate evidence base is generated before widespread implementation.

"Walking on both sides of the fence": A qualitative exploration of the challenges and opportunities facing emergent clinician-scientists in child health

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES

While paediatric clinician-scientists are ideally positioned to generate clinically relevant research and translate research evidence into practice, they face challenges in this dual role. The authors sought to explore the unique contributions, opportunities, and challenges of paediatric clinician-scientists, including issues related to training and ongoing support needs to ensure their success.

METHOD

The authors used a qualitative descriptive approach with thematic analysis to explore the experiences of clinician-scientist stakeholders in child health (n = 39). Semi-structured interviews (60 min) were conducted virtually and recorded. Thematic analysis was conducted according to the phases outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006).

RESULTS

The analysis resulted in the creation of three themes: (1) "Walking on both sides of the fence": unique positioning of clinician-scientists for advancing clinical practice and research; (2) the clinician-scientist: a specialized role with significant challenges; and (3) beyond the basics of clinical and research training programmes: essential skill sets and knowledge for future clinician-scientists.

CONCLUSIONS

While clinician-scientists can make unique contributions to the advancement of evidence-based practice, they face significant barriers straddling their dual roles including divergent institutional cultures in healthcare and academia and a lack of infrastructure to effectively support clinician-scientist positions. Training programmes can play an important role in mentoring and supporting early-career clinician-scientists.

[Promoting research competence in psychosocial medicine - A new curriculum for medical students]

Promoting research competence in psychosocial medicine - A new curriculum for medical students Objectives: The objective of this study is the introduction and evaluation of a new graduate-students curriculum to enhance research competence in psychosocial medicine. Method: N = 57 students have participated in the curriculum to date. All participants completed questionnaires regarding teaching quality and pre-post changes in subjective research competence. Results: All items on teaching quality were scored significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to data of three other comparable psychosocial seminars. In addition, a substantial increase in subjective research competence was found (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The presented curriculum provides an opportunity to strengthen research competence and evidence-based critical thinking of prospective physicians at an early stage. As a consequence of these encouraging results, the curriculum has been implemented permanently at the medical faculty in Heidelberg.