Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Resection of a Todani Type II Choledochal Malformation

Does Congenital Biliary Dilatation Todani Type II (Diverticular Type) Really Exist?

AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of the study is to clarify the clinicopathological and biliary morphological characteristics in reported cases of diverticular congenital biliary dilatation (CBD).

METHOD

Using PubMed and the Japan Medical Abstracts Society, articles on possible diverticular CBD were extracted and the clinical pictures examined. We also sought evidence for definitions of diverticular CBD and the associated condition of pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) using the original articles by Alonso-Lej and Todani. The characteristic biliary morphologies of cases with images were also investigated.

RESULTS

Analyses of 211 possible cases superficially demonstrated multiple diverticula in 12 (12%) and single diverticulum in 89 (88%), with diverticula located in the upper (n = 38, 38%), middle (n = 32, 32%), or lower (n = 26, 26%) biliary tract in and presence of intra-diverticular stones, PBM, and biliary carcinoma in 23% (n = 18), 39% (n = 25), and 11% (n = 14), respectively. However, evidence defining diverticular CBD or justifying the lack of associated PBM was not demonstrated even in the original articles. Scrutiny of the biliary anatomy in 59 cases with images showed incorrect inclusions of types I or IV-A with an irregular biliary duct wall or dilated cystic duct, periampullary choledochal diverticula, or even solitary biliary cysts. Authentic diverticular CBD, representing the diverticulum connected to the middle of the common bile duct via a thin, patent stalk was seen in only 6 cases.

CONCLUSION

Real diverticular CBD appears extremely rare. The lack of an objective definition allows wide interpretations of clinical pictures, creating inconsistencies in the diagnosis and treatment of CBD and raising questions regarding the utility of conventional classifications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Comparison of outcomes and safety of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted cyst excision and hepaticojejunostomy for choledochal cysts: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Minimally invasive cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies include laparoscopic and robotic-assisted operations. The current systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy between the 2 groups.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Wiley, Cochrane Library and Clinical Trials was performed from May 1995 to December 2021. The primary outcome was postoperative complications, and the secondary outcomes were operative details and postoperative outcomes.

Results

The meta-analysis enrolled 6 reports including 484 patients (307 in the laparoscopic group and 177 in the robotic-assisted group). The laparoscopic group was associated with lower expenses (MD = −3851.60$, 95% CI = −4031.84 to −3671.36$, P < 0.00001). No significant difference was found in short-term complications (RR = 1.55, 95% CI = 0.74 to 3.23, P = 0.24), long-term complications (RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.63 to 3.10, P = 0.41), total complications (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.59 to 3.94, P = 0.38), operative time (MD = −28.75 min, 95% CI = −77.13 to 19.64 min, P = 0.24), blood loss (MD = 2.28 ml, 95% CI = −13.51 to 18.06 ml, P = 0.78) or hospital stays (MD = 0.89 days, 95% CI = −0.13 to 1.91 days, P = 0.09). In subgroup analysis, the laparoscopic operation had shorter operative time (MD = −4.45 min, P = 0.009), and less blood loss (MD = −63.18 ml, P = 0.01) in adult patients.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy have comparable postoperative outcomes.

•

Comparison the efficacy of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted operation.

•

Reviewing the robotic-assisted operation for choledochal cysts.

•

The advantages and disadvantages of two methods.

Total robotic choledochal cyst excision with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in adults

INTRODUCTION

Choledochal cyst (CDC) excision with bilio-enteric anastomosis has been reported by a laparoscopic approach. With the advent of robotic surgery, it is likely to simplify the performance of such complex procedures. Herein, we present our technique of total robotic CDC excision with intra-corporeal Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ).

METHODS

The patient was placed in a reverse Trendelenburg position. The robotic ports were placed in a "C"-shaped manner, with the camera port placed ~2 cm below the umbilicus. A 12-mm assistant port was placed in between the camera and the left-sided robotic port. Robotic dissection and excision of extrahepatic part CDC were performed, and subsequently, intra-corporeal robotic RYHJ with jejunojejunostomy was completed. Intra-operatively, indocyanine green dye was used to delineate the biliary anatomy and to check the anastomotic integrity.

RESULTS

All three patients were female with a median age of 21 (18-34) years. Two patients had type IVa, and one had a mixed variant of type I(C) with type VI. The median operative time was 420 min, whereas docking and console time was 22 (20-25) min and 400 (360-450) min, respectively. The median blood loss and length of hospital stay were 50 (50-100) ml and 6 (5-6) days, respectively. One patient has mild acute pancreatitis in the post-operative period, which was managed conservatively.

CONCLUSION

Robotic CDC excision and reconstruction seem to be a safe, feasible, and effective surgical option that provides the benefits of minimal access surgery but also greatly aids in complex dissection and reconstruction.

A case of bile duct diverticulum with repeated acute cholangitis due to diverticular stone fall

A 34-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of epigastric pain. Endoscopic ultrasound detected a 5 mm stone in the common bile duct. After endoscopic sphincterotomy, the black stones and debris were removed with balloon catheter. Abdominal ultrasonography detected no gallbladder stones; hence, the patient was followed up. However, 3 months later, the patient again developed acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones and underwent endoscopic stone removal. Cholangiography under balloon occlusion revealed a left hepatic duct diverticulum with an internal defect. Intraductal ultrasonography showed a hyperechoic lesion with acoustic shadow in the diverticulum, suggesting a stone or debris. Therefore, the patient was considered to have had repeated acute cholangitis because of the presence of falling diverticular stones. The patient underwent left hemihepatectomy plus segmentectomy 1 and cholecystectomy. Histopathologically, it was a true diverticulum without internal epithelial atypia. Many debris were seen in the diverticulum. Gallbladder stones were not observed. Eventually, the patient was discharged from the hospital with no postoperative complications and no recurrence of cholangitis after 20 months.