Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Positive Lymph Nodes at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy

Prostate Cancer Morphologies: Cribriform Pattern and Intraductal Carcinoma Relations to Adverse Pathological and Clinical Outcomes-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The present study aimed to assess the association between the cribriform pattern (CP)/intraductal carcinoma (IDC) and the adverse pathological and clinical outcomes in the radical prostatectomy (RP) cohort. A systematic search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement (PRISMA). The protocol from this review was registered on the PROSPERO platform. We searched PubMed^®, the Cochrane Library and EM-BASE^® up to the 30th of April 2022. The outcomes of interest were the extraprostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), lymph node metastasis (LNS met), risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR), distant metastasis (MET) and disease-specific death (DSD). As a result, we identified 16 studies with 164 296 patients. A total of 13 studies containing 3254 RP patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. The CP/IDC was associated with adverse outcomes, including EPE (pooled OR = 2.55, 95%CI 1.23-5.26), SVI (pooled OR = 4.27, 95%CI 1.90-9.64), LNs met (pooled OR = 6.47, 95%CI 3.76-11.14), BCR (pooled OR = 5.09, 95%CI 2.23-11.62) and MET/DSD (pooled OR = 9.84, 95%CI 2.75-35.20, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the CP/IDC belong to highly malignant prostate cancer patterns which have a negative impact on both the pathological and clinical outcomes. The presence of the CP/IDC should be included in the surgical planning and postoperative treatment guidance.

Association of True Positivity with Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels and Other Clinical Factors in Indeterminate PSMA-RADS-3A Lesions Identified on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Scans

The use of prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted PET imaging for the evaluation of prostate cancer has increased significantly in the last couple of decades. When evaluating these imaging findings based on the PSMA reporting and data system version 1.0, which categorize lesions based on their likelihood of prostate cancer involvement, PSMA-RADS-3A lesions are commonly seen, which are indeterminate for the presence of disease. A total of 28 patients with 171 PSMA-RADS-3A lesions on ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT scans from June 2016 to May 2017 who had follow-up cross-sectional imaging over time were included in this study. The PSA levels of patients with PSMA-RADS-3A lesions were categorized into four groups, 0-0.2, 0.2-1, 1-2, and &gt;2 ng/mL. The pre-operative Gleason score of these patients was categorized into two groups, Gleason score &lt; 7 or ≥7. The median age for these patients was 72.5 years (range 59-81). The median PSA value for patients with positive lesions was significantly higher than those with negative lesions (5.8 ng/mL vs. 0.2 ng/mL, p &lt; 0.0001). The lesion positivity rate was significantly higher in patients with PSA &gt; 1 ng/mL (18.2% vs. 81.9%, p &lt; 0.001). On ROC analysis, the highest classification accuracy was seen at PSA ≥ 0.6 ng/mL of 80.12% (95% CI = 73.69-86.16%), and the area under the curve was 71.32% (95% CI = 61.9-80.7%, p &lt; 0.0001). A total of 96.4% (108/112) of patients with positive lesions and 86.4% (51/59) of patients with negative lesions had a PSMA-RADS-4/5 lymph node on the initial ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT scan (p = 0.02). In patients with a Gleason score ≥ 7, the presence of positive PSMA-RADS-3A lesions was higher, compared to negative PSMA-RADS-3A lesions (p = 0.049). Higher PSA levels in patients with PSMA-RADS-3A lesions can point towards the presence of true positivity. PSA levels may be considered in deciding whether to call an indeterminate lesion on PSMA PET.

Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy for pN1 Prostate Cancer and the Risk of Death

PURPOSE

An association with a reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) and the use of adjuvant as compared with early postradical prostatectomy salvage radiation therapy (sRT) in men with pN1 prostate cancer (PC) has been observed. Yet, whether this finding applies irrespective of the number of positive lymph nodes (LNs) after adjusting for the time-dependent use and duration of androgen deprivation therapy is unknown and is addressed in the current study.

METHODS

Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate whether the ACM risk ratio for time-dependent use of adjuvant versus early sRT per unit increase in positive pelvic LNs was significantly reduced. Adjusted ACM estimates were calculated among men who received adjuvant, early salvage, or no RT stratified by one to three or four or more positive pelvic LNs.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 7.02 years, 986 (5.50%) men died, with 223 (22.62%) of PC. Adjuvant compared with early sRT was associated with a significantly lower ACM risk per unit increase in positive pelvic LNs (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.99; P = .03). A significant difference in the 7-year adjusted ACM estimates favoring aRT versus early sRT was observed in men with four or more positive LNs (7.74% v 23.36%) in that the 95% CI for the 15.62% difference (5.90 to 25.35) excluded 0.00, but this was not true for men with 1-3 positive LNs (14.27% v 13.89%; 95% CI for the 0.38% difference [-7.02 to 7.79]).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant compared with early sRT in men with pN1 PC was associated with a decreased ACM risk, and this reduction increased with each additional positive pelvic LN.

Patients with Positive Lymph Nodes after Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy—Do We Know the Proper Way of Management?

Simple Summary

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most frequent malignancy in the male population worldwide. Men with a nodal invasion established after radical prostatectomy with lymph node dissection are a heterogeneous group of patients who require more thorough stratification and therapy individualization, which remain uncovered by current guidelines. Considering a multitude of prognostic factors and novel diagnostic techniques, classifying patients into narrower and more specified risk groups should be a vital part of lymph node positive PCa management in the future.

Abstract

Lymph node invasion in prostate cancer is a significant prognostic factor indicating worse prognosis. While it significantly affects both survival rates and recurrence, proper management remains a controversial and unsolved issue. The thorough evaluation of risk factors associated with nodal involvement, such as lymph node density or extracapsular extension, is crucial to establish the potential expansion of the disease and to substratify patients clinically. There are multiple strategies that may be employed for patients with positive lymph nodes. Nowadays, therapeutic methods are generally based on observation, radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy. However, the current guidelines are incoherent in terms of the most effective management approach. Future management strategies are expected to make use of novel diagnostic tools and therapies, such as photodynamic therapy or diagnostic imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen. Nevertheless, this heterogeneous group of men remains a great therapeutic concern, and both the clarification of the guidelines and the optimal substratification of patients are required.

Inguinal lymph node density as a powerful predictor of cancer specific survival in patients with node-positive penile cancer

INTRODUCTION

Penile cancer (PC) is an aggressive malignancy in which the most important prognostic factor for cancer specific survival (CSS) is the involvement of regional lymph nodes (LNs). Lymph node density (LND) could become a superior prognostic tool for CSS, by accounting for both extent of dissection and nodal disease burden. We aim to validate LND as a prognostic factor for CSS in a contemporary series of patients with PC treated and followed at a single high-volume center, treating more than 25 PC patients per year, over a 13-year period.

METHODS

Clinical charts of all patients with PC who underwent surgical treatment between 2007 and 2020 were reviewed. Clinicopathological data was collected and analyzed retrospectively. We only included patients with ≥ 8 LNs removed in a unilateral ILND or ≥16 LNs when a bilateral approach was used. We attempted to find an optimal threshold for LND, capable of maximizing effect difference in terms of CSS and RFS between dichotomized groups. To determine this threshold, we used the chi-squared and the Mann-Whitney tests, and it was required to fulfill the proportional hazards assumption. We assessed different thresholds previously reported in the literature. In our study the optimal threshold for LND was determined to be ≤ 20% Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics, CSS and RFS were graphically represented by Kaplan-Meier estimates. Harrell's C index for CSS and RFS were calculated for LND and pN stage, to determine which variable has a superior predictive capacity RESULTS: We identified 110 patients with PC who underwent ILND at our institution, of these, 87 were node-positive and were included in the final analysis. Overall estimates of CSS showed a 3-year CSS of 43% (95% CI: 32-54), the estimated 3-year CSS for the patients with a LND ≤ 20% was 69% (95% CI: 50-82) and 26% (95% CI: 14-39) in the group with a LND >20% (Log-rank P = 0.001). The estimated 3-year RFS for the patients with LND ≤ 20% was 61% (95% CI: 42-76) and 30% (95% CI: 16-44) in the group with a LND >20% (Log-rank P = 0.009). The results of univariate analysis indicate that in patients with a LND >20% the risk for cancer specific mortality was increased (HR 2.68; 95% CI: 1.45-4.98, P =  0.002) compared with LND ≤ 20%. In the and Cox multivariate analysis after Adjusting for age and pN stage the association increased (HR 2.73; 95%, CI 1.38-5.40, P = 0.004). Harrell´s C index for CSS was 0.63 for LND vs. 0.54 for pN stage, suggesting a 9% higher concordance for LND and CSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node density stands as a promising tool for risk-stratifying patients with node-positive PC after ILND. In this retrospective study, LND was a significant predictor of CSS and RFS when using a LND >20% threshold, and also showed a superior predictive ability than pN stage. These results support the use of the LND parameter in clinical practice with a final goal to improve risk stratification, and individualized adjuvant treatment decision-making to patients with high-risk of cancer specific mortality.