1
|
Zhi L, Bai Y, Liao W, Chen G, Gao T, Wan X, Liang J, Liu L, Chen L, Zhang W, Bai J. The safety and tolerability of a one strength dose-escalation scheme for subcutaneous immunotherapy with a native house dust mite extract in Chinese children: A multicenter, randomized, open label clinical trial. Heliyon 2024; 10:e29450. [PMID: 38655350 PMCID: PMC11036000 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is still the only treatment that may affect the natural cause of allergic disease. This study is to investigate whether an accelerated up-dosing scheme for subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) using a native house dust mite (HDM) allergen extract is as safe as the standard 3-strengths dose-escalation scheme in children with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma in China. Methods In this multicenter, open label, randomized controlled trial, the children aged 5-14 years were randomized 1:1 either to One Strength group or the Standard group. The dose escalation scheme for patients in the One Strength group included 6 injections of strength 3, whereas the Standard group comprised 14 injections using strength 1, 2, and 3. All treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded and analyzed. The 5-point Likert scale was used to assess tolerability (ChiCTR2100050311). Results Overall, 101 children were included in the Safety Set (One Strength group: 50 vs. Standard group: 51). A total of 26 TEAEs were reported for 15 children. TEAEs related to AIT occurred in 10 % of the children in the One Strength group and 11.8 % of the Standard group. The number of systemic adverse reactions was comparable in both groups (One Strength: 5 vs. Standard: 4). No serious TEAEs was recorded for either group. 90.0 % of patients in the One Strength group reached the maintenance dose without an interventional dose adjustment due to adverse events, compared to 78.4 % in the Standard group. All patients who completed the dose-escalation phase reached the recommended maintenance dose of 1.0 ml of strength 3.Investigators and patients rated the tolerability of the One Strength regimen slightly better than the Standard scheme. Conclusions This exploratory study suggests that the accelerated One Strength dose-escalation scheme is comparable in safety and tolerability to the Standard regimen. However, due to the preliminary nature and small sample size, further research with larger sample sizes and robust study designs is necessary for confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lili Zhi
- Department of Allergy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250014, China
| | - Yan Bai
- Department of Pediatrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Wang Liao
- Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, China
| | - Guohua Chen
- Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, China
| | - Tingting Gao
- Department of Allergy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250014, China
| | - Xia Wan
- Department of Pediatrics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Jiawen Liang
- Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, China
| | - Lingling Liu
- Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, China
| | - Liang Chen
- Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, China
| | - Wenna Zhang
- Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, China
| | - Jun Bai
- Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528000, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sarfraz Z, Sarfraz A, Cherrez-Ojeda I. Investigating Experimental Treatments for Rhinitis: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review. EAR, NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL 2024:1455613231222363. [PMID: 38205635 DOI: 10.1177/01455613231222363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Rhinitis is a common inflammatory condition that affects the nasal passages, significantly impacting quality of life and placing a considerable burden on healthcare systems. While traditional treatments offer limited relief, there is a growing interest in novel therapies. This systematic review aims to analyze investigational new treatments for rhinitis. Methods: A search was conducted in ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the European Union Clinical Trials Register, as well as PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Both ongoing and completed clinical trials exploring innovative therapies for rhinitis, including immunotherapy, probiotics, and stem cell therapy, were included. Results: This systematic review compiled information from 74 clinical trials-51 completed and 23 ongoing-focused on new treatments for rhinitis. A significant portion of the completed studies (44) focused on various forms of immunotherapy, which showed potential for long-term effectiveness and had a high safety profile. Another seven completed trials investigated probiotics as a treatment method, yielding mixed results, though they did show promise in managing symptoms, particularly when combined with other treatments. The ongoing trials are primarily investigating immunotherapy, with a smaller number looking at probiotics and stem cell therapy. This shows a continued exploration of innovative and diverse therapies for managing rhinitis. Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of emerging rhinitis therapies to improve patient outcomes and enhance quality of life. Continued research is recommended for developing more effective, personalized, and targeted therapeutic strategies for rhinitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zouina Sarfraz
- Department of Medicine, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Azza Sarfraz
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, SD, Pakistan
| | - Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda
- Department of Allergy and Pulmnology, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Guayas, Ecuador
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Šošić L, Paolucci M, Flory S, Jebbawi F, Kündig TM, Johansen P. Allergen immunotherapy: progress and future outlook. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2023:1-25. [PMID: 37122076 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2023.2209319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Allergy, the immunological hypersensitivity to innocuous environmental compounds, is a global health problem. The disease triggers, allergens, are mostly proteins contained in various natural sources such as plant pollen, animal dander, dust mites, foods, fungi and insect venoms. Allergies can manifest with a wide range of symptoms in various organs, and be anything from just tedious to life-threatening. A majority of all allergy patients are self-treated with symptom-relieving medicines, while allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causative treatment option. AREAS COVERED This review will aim to give an overview of the state-of-the-art allergy management, including the use of new biologics and the application of biomarkers, and a special emphasis and discussion on current research trends in the field of AIT. EXPERT OPINION Conventional AIT has proven effective, but the years-long treatment compromises patient compliance. Moreover, AIT is typically not offered in food allergy. Hence, there is a need for new, effective and safe AIT methods. Novel routes of administration (e.g. oral and intralymphatic), hypoallergenic AIT products and more effective adjuvants holds great promise. Most recently, the development of allergen-specific monoclonal antibodies for passive immunotherapy may also allow treatment of patients currently not treated or treatable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Šošić
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marta Paolucci
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Flory
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fadi Jebbawi
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas M Kündig
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pål Johansen
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ponda P, Carr T, Rank MA, Bousquet J. Nonallergic Rhinitis, Allergic Rhinitis, and Immunotherapy: Advances in the Last Decade. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:35-42. [PMID: 36152989 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Chronic rhinitis encompassing both allergic and nonallergic rhinitis affects a significant portion of the population worldwide, having a great impact on patient quality of life, and associated comorbid conditions, with an important societal economic burden. Allergists are often the first to evaluate and treat allergic and nonallergic rhinitis, addressing the individual triggers of the disease as well as the patient-specific responses to these triggers. This review focuses on the advances that have been made in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of nonallergic and allergic rhinitis over the past 10 years, including specific allergen immunotherapy, care pathways, and digital health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Punita Ponda
- Division of Allergy & Immunology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY; Department of Pediatrics, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY; Department of Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Northwell Health System, Manhasset, NY; Institute of Health System Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY.
| | - Tara Carr
- Asthma and Airway Disease Research Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz; Section of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Ariz
| | - Matthew A Rank
- Division of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix and Scottsdale, Ariz; Division of Pulmonology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Ariz
| | - Jean Bousquet
- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Allergen Immunotherapy: Current and Future Trends. Cells 2022; 11:cells11020212. [PMID: 35053328 PMCID: PMC8774202 DOI: 10.3390/cells11020212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the sole disease-modifying treatment for allergic rhinitis; it prevents rhinitis from progressing to asthma and lowers medication use. AIT against mites, insect venom, and certain kinds of pollen is effective. The mechanism of action of AIT is based on inducing immunological tolerance characterized by increased IL-10, TGF-β, and IgG4 levels and Treg cell counts. However, AIT requires prolonged schemes of administration and is sometimes associated with adverse reactions. Over the last decade, novel forms of AIT have been developed, focused on better allergen identification, structural modifications to preserve epitopes for B or T cells, post-traductional alteration through chemical processes, and the addition of adjuvants. These modified allergens induce clinical-immunological effects similar to those mentioned above, increasing the tolerance to other related allergens but with fewer side effects. Clinical studies have shown that molecular AIT is efficient in treating grass and birch allergies. This article reviews the possibility of a new AIT to improve the treatment of allergic illness.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mota CA, Oyama J, Souza Terron Monich MD, Brustolin AÁ, Perez de Souza JV, Murase LS, Ghiraldi Lopes LD, Silva Santos TD, Vieira Teixeira JJ, Verzignassi Silveira TG. Three decades of clinical trials on immunotherapy for human leishmaniases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Immunotherapy 2021; 13:693-721. [PMID: 33853344 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2020-0184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Current treatments for leishmaniases are not satisfactory, thus alternatives are needed. We searched for clinical trials with immunotherapeutic approaches for patients with leishmaniasis. Materials & methods: Out of 205 articles, 24 clinical trials were selected, and eight submitted to meta-analysis. Results: A reduction in healing time was observed in patients with tegumentary leishmaniasis treated with pentavalent antimony plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and therapeutic vaccines. Overall meta-analysis indicated that immunotherapy associated with the standard chemotherapy generated a significantly reduced risk of treatment failure than the pentavalent antimony alone (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Our review confirmed the efficacy of immunotherapies for the treatment of cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis and highlighted the importance of clinical trials using immunotherapies for leishmaniases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camila Alves Mota
- Graduate Program in Health Sciences, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Jully Oyama
- Graduate Program in Bioscience & Physiopathology, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
| | | | - Aline Ávila Brustolin
- Graduate Program in Health Sciences, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
| | - João Vítor Perez de Souza
- Graduate Program in Bioscience & Physiopathology, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Letícia Sayuri Murase
- Graduate Program in Health Sciences, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Luciana Dias Ghiraldi Lopes
- Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Department of Clinical Analysis & Biomedicine, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Thais da Silva Santos
- Graduate Program in Bioscience & Physiopathology, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Jorge Juarez Vieira Teixeira
- Laboratory of Leishmaniases, Department of Clinical Analysis & Biomedicine, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Thaís Gomes Verzignassi Silveira
- Laboratory of Leishmaniases, Department of Clinical Analysis & Biomedicine, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bovermann X, Ricklefs I, Vogelberg C, Klimek L, Kopp MV. Accelerated Dose Escalation with 3 Injections of an Aluminum Hydroxide-Adsorbed Allergoid Preparation of 6 Grasses Is Safe for Children and Adolescents with Moderate to Severe Allergic Rhinitis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2021; 182:524-534. [PMID: 33503610 DOI: 10.1159/000512561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
A high-dose, accelerated escalation schedule during subcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is safe and well-tolerated in adults. However, there are no data in children and adolescents. The aim of the present trial was to assess safety and tolerability of an accelerated dose escalation schedule of an AIT with a grass pollen allergoid in children and adolescents with moderate to severe seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis in a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II trial. The dose escalation scheme for patients in the One Strength Group included 3 injections with 1 strength B (10,000 TU/mL), whereas the dose escalation scheme for the Standard group included 7 injections with 2 strengths A (1,000 TU/mL) and B (10,000 TU/mL) of an allergoid grass pollen preparation. Overall, n = 50 children (n = 25 in each group; mean age 8.9 + 1.54 years) and n = 37 adolescents (n = 20 and n = 17; 14.2 + 1.62 years) were randomized. For all patients, the mean treatment duration was 59.4 days in the One Strength group and 88.6 days in the Standard group. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to AIT were reported in 52 and 40% in children and 35 and 35.3% in adolescents, respectively. Systemic allergic reactions occurred in about 5% of our patients and were reported in more patients of the One Strength group (6.7 vs. 2.4%). All systemic reactions were classified as WAO Grade 1. Accelerated high-dose escalation with an aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed grass pollen allergoid can be initiated with a safety and tolerability profile comparable to the standard dose escalation schedule in children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis with or without asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xenia Bovermann
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Allergology, University of Lübeck, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.,Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center of Lung Research (DZL), Lübeck, Germany
| | - Isabell Ricklefs
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Allergology, University of Lübeck, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.,Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center of Lung Research (DZL), Lübeck, Germany
| | - Christian Vogelberg
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology/Allergology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Matthias V Kopp
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Allergology, University of Lübeck, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany, .,Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center of Lung Research (DZL), Lübeck, Germany, .,Division of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland,
| |
Collapse
|