Interaction of Blood Pressure Lowering and Alteplase Dose in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results of the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study

Intensive Blood Pressure Control After Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Optimal clinical outcome with successful recanalization from endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) requires optimal blood pressure (BP) management. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the intensive BP target (< 140 mm Hg) versus the standard BP target (< 180 mm Hg) after EVT for acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) obtained from PubMed, Embase Cochrane, Scopus, and WOS until September 7th, 2023. We used the fixed-effect model to report dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

PROSPERO ID

CRD42023463206.

RESULTS

We included four RCTs with 1559 patients. There was no difference between intensive BP and standard BP targets regarding the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) change after 24 h [MD: 0.44 with 95% CI (0.0, 0.87), P = 0.05]. However, the intensive BP target was significantly associated with a decreased risk of excellent neurological recovery (mRS ≤ 1) [RR: 0.87 with 95% CI (0.76, 0.99), P = 0.03], functional independence (mRS ≤ 2) [RR: 0.81 with 95% CI (0.73, 0.90), P = 0.0001] and independent ambulation (mRS ≤ 3) [RR: 0.85 with 95% CI (0.79, 0.92), P < 0.0001].

CONCLUSIONS

An intensive BP target after EVT is associated with worse neurological recovery and significantly decreased rates of functional independence and independent ambulation compared to the standard BP target. Therefore, the intensive BP target should be avoided after EVT for acute ischemic stroke.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome coexists with acute cerebral infarction: challenges of blood pressure management

Hypertension is the most common cause of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) and acute cerebral infarction. Due to the lack of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), early antihypertensive methods are diverse, even contradictory. So far, there is no consensus on the method of blood pressure (BP) management when the 2 diseases coexist. Generally, antihypertensive therapy should be initiated quickly in the acute phase of PRES, as most patients have elevated BP. However, various factors must be considered before the administration of early antihypertensive therapy in acute cerebral infarction. The coexistence of PRES and acute cerebral infarction is uncommon clinically, and more complicated subsequent BP management. This article reports a case of PRES coexisting with acute lacunar cerebral infarction, which was caused by hypertension. We have analyzed and summarized the antihypertensive principles in PRES and different phases of acute cerebral ischemic injury. We assert that when PRES and acute cerebral infarction coexist, the antihypertensive treatment should be individualized, and careful consideration should be given to the various influencing factors.