Large Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery: Remodelling of Outer Retinal Layers after Traditional Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling or Inverted Flap Technique

Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap versus pars plana vitrectomy with conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular hole

BACKGROUND

Macular hole (MH) is a full-thickness defect in the central portion of the retina that causes loss of central vision. According to the usual definition, a large MH has a diameter greater than 400 µm at the narrowest point. For closure of MH, there is evidence that pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling achieves better anatomical outcomes than standard PPV. PPV with ILM peeling is currently the standard of care for MH management; however, the failure rate of this technique is higher for large MHs than for smaller MHs. Some studies have shown that the inverted ILM flap technique is superior to conventional ILM peeling for the management of large MHs.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of pars plana vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus pars plana vitrectomy with conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for treating large macular holes, including idiopathic, traumatic, and myopic macular holes.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Eyes and Vision Information Specialist searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and two trials registries on 12 December 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated PPV with ILM peeling versus PPV with inverted ILM flap for treatment of large MHs (with a basal diameter greater than 400 µm at the narrowest point measured by optical coherence tomography) of any type (idiopathic, traumatic, or myopic).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and assessed the certainty of the body of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four RCTs (285 eyes of 275 participants; range per study 24 to 91 eyes). Most participants were women (63%), and of older age (range of means 59.4 to 66 years). Three RCTs were single-center trials, and the same surgeon performed all surgeries in two RCTs (the third single-center RCT did not report the number of surgeons). One RCT was a multicenter trial (three sites), and four surgeons performed all surgeries. Two RCTs took place in India, one in Poland, and one in Mexico. Maximum follow-up ranged from three months (2 RCTs) to 12 months (1 RCT). No RCTs reported conflicts of interest or disclosed financial support. All four RCTs enrolled people with large idiopathic MHs and compared conventional PPV with ILM peeling versus PPV with inverted ILM flap techniques. Variations in technique across the four RCTs were minimal. There was some heterogeneity in interventions: in two RCTs, all participants underwent combined cataract-PPV surgery, whereas in one RCT, some participants underwent cataract surgery after PPV (the fourth RCT did not mention cataract surgery). The critical outcomes for this review were mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and MH closure rates. All four RCTs provided data for meta-analyses of both critical outcomes. We assessed the risk of bias for both outcomes using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2); there were some concerns for risk of bias associated with lack of masking of outcome assessors and selective reporting of outcomes in all RCTs. All RCTs reported postoperative BCVA values; only one RCT reported the change in BCVA from baseline. Based on evidence from the four RCTs, it is unclear if the inverted ILM flap technique compared with ILM peeling reduces (improves) postoperative BCVA measured on a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) chart at one month (mean difference [MD] -0.08 logMAR, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.20 to 0.05; P = 0.23, I2 = 65%; 4 studies, 254 eyes; very low-certainty evidence), but it may improve BCVA at three months or more (MD -0.17 logMAR, 95% CI -0.23 to -0.10; P < 0.001, I2 = 0%; 4 studies, 276 eyes; low-certainty evidence). PPV with an inverted ILM flap compared to PPV with ILM peeling probably increases the proportion of eyes achieving MH closure (risk ratio [RR] 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.18; P = 0.01, I2 = 0%; 4 studies, 276 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence) and type 1 MH closure (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.66; P = 0.03, I² = 69%; 4 studies, 276 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). One study reported that none of the 38 participants experienced postoperative retinal detachment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found low-certainty evidence from four small RCTs that PPV with the inverted ILM flap technique is superior to PPV with ILM peeling with respect to BCVA gains at three or more months after surgery. We also found moderate-certainty evidence that the inverted ILM flap technique achieves more overall and type 1 MH closures. There is a need for high-quality multicenter RCTs to ascertain whether the inverted ILM flap technique is superior to ILM peeling with regard to anatomical and functional outcomes. Investigators should use the standard logMAR charts when measuring BCVA to facilitate comparison across trials.

Microstructural and microperimetric comparison of internal limiting membrane peeling and insertion in large idiopathic macular hole

BACKGROUND

The internal limiting membrane (ILM) insertion technique was widely used to treat large macular hole (MH) for the high closure rate. However, the prognosis of closed MH after ILM insertion compared to ILM peeling remains controversial. This study aimed to compare foveal microstructure and microperimeter in large idiopathic MH surgically closed by ILM peeling and ILM insertion.

METHODS

This retrospective, non-randomized, comparative study included patients with idiopathic MH (minimum diameter ≥ 650 μm) who underwent primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with ILM peeling or ILM insertion. The initial closure rate was recorded. Patients with initially closed MHs were divided into two groups according to the surgery methods. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and microperimeter-3 (MP-3) outcomes of two groups were compared at baseline, 1 and 4 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

For idiopathic MH (minimum diameter ≥ 650 μm), ILM insertion had a significantly higher initial closure rate than ILM peeling (71.19% vs. 97.62%, P = 0.001). Among 39 patients with initially closed MHs who were on regular follow-up, twenty-one were assigned to the ILM peeling group and 18 to the ILM insertion group. Postoperative BCVA improved significantly in both groups. The final BCVA (logMAR) (0.40 vs. 0.88, P < 0.001), macular hole sensitivity (19.66 dB vs. 14.14 dB, P < 0.001), peripheral sensitivity of macular hole (24.63 dB vs. 21.95 dB, P = 0.005), and fixation stability (FS) within 2 degrees (82.42% vs. 70.57%, P = 0.031) were significantly better and external limiting membrane (ELM) defect (330.14 μm vs. 788.28 μm, P < 0.001) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) defect (746.95 μm vs. 1105.11 μm, P = 0.010) were significantly smaller in the ILM peeling group than in the ILM insertion group.

CONCLUSION

For initially closed MHs (minimum diameter ≥ 650 μm), both ILM peeling and ILM insertion significantly improved the microstructure and microperimeter in the fovea. However, ILM insertion was less efficient at microstructural and functional recovery after surgery.

Visual improvement and regeneration of retinal layers in eyes with small, medium, and large idiopathic full-thickness macular holes treated with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique over a period of 12 months

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the improvement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the reduction in defect length of external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) in small ([Formula: see text] 250 μm), medium ([Formula: see text] 250 μm), and large ([Formula: see text] 400 μm) full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) treated with inverted internal limiting membrane (I-ILM) flap technique over a follow-up period of 12 months.

METHODS

Ninety-one eyes of 87 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. BCVA and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were conducted preoperatively as well as after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. The defect length of the ELM and the EZ was measured using the caliper tool at each follow-up time point.

RESULTS

BCVA improved significantly in the group of small, medium, and large FTMH over the time of 12 months, whereby the improvement did not depend on FTMH size over 9 months. Only after 12 months, large FTMH showed significantly higher BCVA improvement compared to small and medium FTMH. The closure rate was 100% (91/91). The defect length of ELM and EZ reduced continuously over the period of 12 months. There was a significant correlation between defect length of ELM and EZ with postoperative BCVA.

CONCLUSION

The I-ILM flap technique has very good morphological and functional outcomes in small, medium, and large FTMH over a long-time period, indicating that it can be considered as a treatment option in small and medium FTMH. The defect length of ELM and EZ is directly connected to postoperative BCVA.

OUTCOME OF REVISION PROCEDURES FOR FAILED PRIMARY MACULAR HOLE SURGERY

PURPOSE

To analyze the outcomes of revision surgery for idiopathic full-thickness macular holes that have failed to close after primary surgery, and also to assess factors predicting success and to review the relative effect of adjunctive surgical techniques.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study. Anatomical closure rates and visual acuity change between pre and postrevision surgery were assessed. Hole size, age, symptom duration, surgical interval, and reduced hole size were analyzed as predictive factors for success. Effectiveness of adjunctive surgical techniques was reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven eyes were included in the study. Anatomical closure was achieved in 71% (55/77) cases. There was a median gain of 11 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Score letters in all holes and 14 letters in closed holes. Full-thickness macular holes that increased in size by more than 10% following primary surgery had a closure rate of 50% compared with 80% in holes that reduced by 10% or stayed the same (P = 0.015). Increasing hole size is associated with a modest reduction in odds of closure (odds ratio = 0.99; P = 0.04). Surgical interval <2 months is not associated with better outcomes compared with >2 months (P = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

Revision surgery for full-thickness macular holes that have failed to close after primary surgery is associated with high closure rates and significant visual gains.

Comparative study of combined vitrectomy with phacoemulsification versus vitrectomy alone for primary full-thickness macular hole repair

Background

To assess the effectiveness and safety of 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification versus vitrectomy alone in patients over 50 years with primary full-thickness macular holes (FTMH).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records related to 406 consecutive vitrectomies performed for primary FTMH. Phacovitrectomy was performed in 294 phakic eyes whereas vitrectomy alone in 112 pseudophakic eyes. The cases were divided into three groups according to the stage of the FTMH: stage 2 (n = 93), stage 3 (n = 270), or stage 4 (n = 43). The primary outcome measure was the closure of the FTMH. The secondary outcome measures were the evolution of visual acuity as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Results

Neither the primary nor the secondary outcomes differed between phacovitrectomy and vitrectomy alone for all three stages. The FTMH were closed in 375 eyes (92.4 %) after a first operation. The closure rate was higher for stage 2 (96.8 %) than for stages 3 (91.1 %) or 4 (90.75 %), but not significantly (P = 0.189). The mean visual acuity increased significantly from preoperatively LogMAR 0.68 (± SD 0.2) to LogMAR 0.43 (± SD 0.24) at the end of the follow-up (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Combined 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with phacoemulsification for primary FTMH repair in patients over 50 years is as efficient and safe when compared with vitrectomy only.

Trial registration

The study was approved on 30^th April 2020 by the local ethics committee (Ethikkommission Ostschweiz, EKOS 20/074; BASEC Nr. 2020-01033).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-021-01918-2.

Anatomical and Functional Outcomes in Eyes with Idiopathic Macular Holes that Underwent Surgery Using the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) Flap Technique Versus the Conventional ILM Peeling Technique

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique (IFT) in macular holes (MHs), especially in MHs with a macular hole index (MHI) < 0.5.

METHODS

This was a retrospective comparative study. Patients with idiopathic MHs who underwent either the IFT or conventional ILM peeling (CP) were investigated. The main outcomes included the MH closure rate, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and recovery rates of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Forty-eight eyes of 48 patients who underwent the IFT (n = 29, Group A) or CP (n = 19, Group B) were included. The mean minimal diameter was 522.00 ± 208.08 µm. The closure rate was 100.0% in Group A and 94.7% in Group B (P = 0.396). The mean BCVA and EZ and ELM recovery rates improved significantly in both groups postoperatively. No significant differences in BCVA or the EZ or ELM recovery rates were found between the two groups. Of the 39 eyes whose MHI was < 0.5, 25 underwent the IFT, and 14 underwent CP. Comparing the results of the closure rate, BCVA and recovery rates of the EZ and ELM between groups were similar to those in 48 eyes.

CONCLUSION

Both the IFT and CP can achieve a high closure rate, with no significant difference in ordinary idiopathic MHs. The IFT does not seem to achieve better anatomical and functional outcomes than CP. The IFT should be used conservatively in ordinary non-refractory MH surgery.

[Large macular hole-Always a poor prognosis?]

Hintergrund

Alter, präoperativer Visus und Makulaforamengröße gelten als prognostische Marker für das postoperative Ergebnis bei Patienten mit durchgreifendem Makulaforamen (MF).

Ziel der Arbeit

Um den postoperativen Verlauf nach i‑ILM Peeling (inverted-Flap ILM-Peeling) mit konventionellem ILM-Peeling (k-ILM) zu vergleichen, wurde eine retrospektive Beobachtungsstudie durchgeführt. Patienten mit i‑ILM Peeling hatten dabei präoperativ ein statistisch signifikant größeres Makulaforamen.

Material und Methoden

Es wurden 45 konsekutive Patienten mit durchgreifendem Makulaforamen (MF) in 2 Gruppen (i-ILM vs. k‑ILM) eingeteilt und auf Unterschiede im postoperativen Visus (BCVA) und der Netzhautmorphologie hin untersucht. Die Integrität der äußeren Netzhautschichten, äußere limitierende Membran (ELM), ellipsoide Zone (EZ) und äußere Photorezeptoraußensegmente (OS), wurde postoperativ mittels SD-OCT (Spectral-Domain-OCT) analysiert.

Ergebnisse

Die präoperative Apertur in der i‑ILM Gruppe war signifikant größer (i-ILM = 408,4 µm, SD = 157,5 µm; k‑ILM = 287,4 µm, SD = 104,9 µm; p = 0,01). Der Ausgangsvisus sowie der postoperative Visus nach 1 Monat waren in der Gruppe mit k‑ILM-Peeling signifikant besser (p = 0,03 und p = 0,001). Der postoperative Visus nach mindestens 6 Monaten zeigte keinen signifikanten Unterschied zwischen den beiden Gruppen (p = 0,24). Die ELM zeigte als erste der äußeren Netzhautschichten eine Re-Integrität in beiden Gruppen.

Schlussfolgerung

Mithilfe der i‑ILM-Peeling-Technik erschien es in dieser konsekutiven Serie möglich zu sein, für Patienten mit großem durchgreifendem MF ein ähnliches postoperatives Visusergebnis zur erreichen wie für mittels k‑ILM-Peeling-Technik operierte Patienten mit kleinerem durchgreifendem MF.

Long-term results of autologous plasma as adjuvant to pars plana vitrectomy in the treatment of high myopic full-thickness macular holes

Background:

To analyse the feasibility and efficacy of a novel autologous plasma rich in growth factor (PRGF) preparation as adjuvant to pars plana vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peel in high myopic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH).

Methods:

Single-centre, single-surgeon retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with high myopic FTMH who underwent surgery with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Patients were divided in group 1 (naïve) and group 2 (persistent). Quantitative and qualitative variables were analysed, compared among groups and correlated with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

Results:

Postoperatively, FTMH resolved in 28/31 eyes in group 1 (90%) and in 10/11 eyes in group 2 (91%), without significant differences ( p = 0.954). None of the preoperative anatomical variables analysed showed significant association with preoperative BCVA. Intraoperatively, no significant complications were registered. Postoperatively, BCVA improved significantly in the studied population ( p < 0.001). Preoperative factors associated with better postoperative BCVA were the presence of intraretinal cystoid spaces ( p = 0.028) and elevated FTMH borders ( p = 0.005). Preoperative dome-shaped macula was associated with significantly worse postoperative BCVA ( p = 0.049).

Conclusion:

The use of PRGF as adjuvant to vitrectomy showed to be reproducible, straightforward and efficient, with primary anatomical success rate comparable to other surgical approaches and lower risk of complications.

Secondary Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Plug due to Persistent Full-Thickness Macular Hole OCT-Angiography and Microperimetry Features: Case Series

Purpose

To study the features in OCT-angiography and microperimetry in eyes with persistent full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) closed with the secondary plana vitrectomy (PPV) with autologous internal limiting membrane (ILM) plug.

Methods

Secondary PPV was performed with closing the persistent FTMH with ILM plug, C₃F₈ tamponade, and face-down positioning. Four patients were followed for 6 months with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, SD-OCT and OCT-A, and microperimetry. The results were compared with the fellow eye; in two patients, it was the healthy eye, and in two remaining eyes, successfully closed FTMH after primary PPV.

Results

ILM flap was integrated in all cases with V-shape of closure, and atrophy was found in one case, with the largest diameter of FTMH. BCVA improved in two cases and remained the same in two cases. In OCT-A, the area of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was larger, and foveal vessel density (FVDS) was smaller in eyes after secondary PPV in comparison to fellow eyes. In microperimetry, retinal sensitivity was lower in eyes after secondary PPV, and eccentric fixation was found in 2 of 4 patients.

Conclusion

Although the anatomical results of repeated surgeries of FTMH with ILM plug are favorable, visual function results may be limited. Secondary closure of FTMH with ILM plug may lead to atrophy, changes in the macular vasculature, and eccentric fixation. The trial is registered with NCT03701542.

[Management of submacular hemorrhage : What, when, how?]

BACKGROUND

Subretinal hemorrhage involving the macula is a typical complication in a variety of retinal diseases, whereby age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is by far the leading cause.

METHOD

A literature search was carried out in PubMed.

RESULTS

Numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of various approaches to the management of submacular hemorrhage, including intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment, pneumatic displacement supported by fibrinolytic agents or surgical drainage.

DISCUSSION

There is currently no consensus regarding evidence-based standard treatment for macular hemorrhage, although there is a trend towards minimally invasive approaches. Regardless of the choice of the primary treatment approach, the time to treatment and an accompanying intravitreal treatment with VEGF inhibitors are decisive for the functional outcome.