Deep Brain Stimulation for Spasmodic Dysphonia: A Blinded Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Stimulation in Two Patients

Alternative Deep Brain Stimulation Targets in the Treatment of Isolated Dystonic Syndromes: A Multicenter Experience-Based Survey

BACKGROUND

The globus pallidus internus (GPi) is the traditional evidence-based deep brain stimulation (DBS) target for treating dystonia. Although patients with isolated "primary" dystonia respond best to GPi-DBS, some are primary or secondary nonresponders (improvement <25%), showing variability in clinical response.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to survey current practices regarding alternative DBS targets for isolated dystonia patients with focus on nonresponders to GPi-DBS.

METHODS

A 42-question survey was emailed and distributed during a DBS conference to clinicians involved in DBS for dystonia. The survey covered (1) use of alternative DBS targets as primary or rescue options, (2) target selection based on dystonia phenomenology, (3) experience with secondary nonresponders to GPi-DBS, and (4) management of patients with additional DBS leads.

RESULTS

The response rate was 53.8%, including neurologists and neurosurgeons from 28 DBS centers in 13 countries; 89% of neurologists and 86% of neurosurgeons used alternative DBS targets to GPi, with subthalamic nucleus being the most common initial or rescue alternative to GPi. Patients with additional tremor received DBS in the ventral intermediate nucleus or caudal zona incerta. Individual experience ranged from 5 to 25 patients. Most patients were still receiving dual target stimulation at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that more than 85% of surveyed clinicians use alternative DBS targets, mostly in some isolated dystonia patients not adequately responsive to GPi-DBS. More knowledge is needed to evaluate outcomes in alternative targets and establish the best strategies for managing insufficient GPi-DBS response in dystonia patients with diverse phenomenology. Our article contributes to establishing a clearer time frame and criteria for defining nonresponders in dystonia patients undergoing DBS.

Neuromodulation for Laryngeal Dystonia: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systematically review and evaluate neuromodulation therapies that are currently being explored/used in the treatment of laryngeal dystonia (LD).

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines searching Embase, Medline, and Cochrane with the cover period January 1960-August 2024. The search strategy used was (("Laryngeal Dystonia" OR "Spasmodic Dysphonia") AND ("Neuromodulation" OR "Deep Brain Stimulation")). Articles were reviewed and screened based on the set inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists were used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. Patient demographics and diagnosis, neuromodulation therapy used and its details, voice outcomes, and complications were extracted from each of the studies. A narrative review was subsequently synthesized.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met the selection criteria and were included. In total, 130 LD patients were identified with the following neuromodulation therapies being evaluated for their use in LD: vibro-tactile stimulation, laryngeal electrical stimulation, pharmacologic (sodium oxybate), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, and deep brain stimulation (DBS). All included studies reported various degrees of improvement in patients' voice symptoms with the neuromodulation therapy used. No definitive conclusion could be drawn for their efficacy within the included studies consisting of six case reports, three proof-of-concept/pilot studies, and three phase I clinical trials that used a number of different voice outcome measures used to report treatment effects, and a general lack of long-term follow-up. No significant complications were reported for any of the neuromodulation therapies.

CONCLUSION

Most neuromodulation therapies being explored for LD are at a very early exploratory stage. Although more clinical trials are required, from the available evidence, sodium oxybate and DBS currently appear to have the most potential for translation into clinical practice.

Somato-cognitive action network in laryngeal and focal hand dystonia sensorimotor dysfunction

The central pathology causing idiopathic focal dystonia remains unclear, limiting effective treatment targets. The recently identified somato-cognitive action network (SCAN) with its role in coordinating physiologic processes and coarse movements has been implicated in dystonia dysfunction. SCAN is thought to interface between the phylogenetically newer primary motor regions that control fine movements and the cingulo-opercular network (CON) that putatively conveys cognitive intentions for action. We hypothesized that the effector-agnostic nature of SCAN may constitute a central pathology shared across focal dystonia subtypes affecting different body parts. Additionally, the effector-specific areas in the primary sensorimotor cortex may show distinct functional changes depending on the dystonic body region. We collected functional MRI from patients with either of two subtypes of focal dystonia (laryngeal dystonia or LD, N =24, and focal hand dystonia or FHD, N =18) and healthy control participants ( N =21). Regions of interest were selected based on prior work that suggested dystonia-related abnormality within the basal-ganglia-thalamo-cortical and cerebello-thalamo-cortical sensorimotor circuitries. We investigated if focal dystonia is associated with resting-state functional connectivity changes 1) between SCAN and other cortical regions (effector-specific areas and CON), 2) between cortical and non-cortical regions, or 3) between non-cortical (subcortical and cerebellar) regions. Cortical regions were individualized based on resting-state data. Separately, individualized hand and mouth/larynx regions were also generated from task-based MRI (finger-tapping and phonation, respectively) for comparison. There was a shared interaction effect in both focal dystonia subtypes ( p =0.048 for LD, p =0.017 for FHD) compared to controls, which was driven by SCAN's higher functional connectivity to task-derived mouth/larynx region and concomitantly lower connectivity to CON. This dystonia-dependent interaction was not observed with the resting-state mouth/larynx region. No significant resting-state functional changes were observed involving subcortical and cerebellar regions when LD and FHD were modeled as independent groups. However, exploratory analysis combining LD and FHD suggested a dystonia-dependent asynchronization between SCAN and sensorimotor cerebellum ( p =0.010) that may indicate a pathological rather than compensatory process. For the first time, our study systematically tested circuitry-based functional connectivity changes in two focal dystonias. Our results show that SCAN is uniquely associated with dystonia dysfunction beyond the dystonic effector regions, potentially offering insights on pathophysiology and treatments.

Central Mechanisms and Pathophysiology of Laryngeal Dystonia: An Up-to-Date Review

OBJECTIVE

Laryngeal dystonia (LD), previously termed spasmodic dysphonia, is an isolated focal dystonia that involves involuntary, uncontrolled contractions of the laryngeal muscles during speech. It is a severely disabling condition affecting patients' work and social lives through prevention of normal speech production. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of LD and available therapeutic options are currently limited. The aim of this short review is to provide an up-to-date summary of what is known about the central mechanisms and the pathophysiology of LD.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed searching Embase, CINHAL, Medline, and Cochrane with the cover period January 1990-October 2023 with a search strategy (("Laryngeal dystonia" OR "Spasmodic dysphonia") AND ("Central Mechanism" OR "Pathophysiology")). Original studies involving LD patients that discussed central mechanisms and/or pathophysiology of LD were chosen.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-six articles were identified of which 27 articles were included to formulate this systematic review following the screening inclusion and exclusion criteria. LD is a central neurological disorder involving a multiregional altered neural network. Affected neural circuits not only involve the motor control circuit, but also the feedforward, and the feedback circuits of the normal speech production neural network, involving higher-order planning, somatosensory perception and integration regions of the brain.

CONCLUSION

Speech production is a complex process, and LD is a central neurological disorder involving multiregional neural network connectivity alteration reflecting this. Neuromodulation targeting the central nervous system could therefore be considered and explored as a new potential therapeutic option for LD in the future, and should assist in elucidating the underlying central mechanisms responsible for causing the condition.

Exploring Neurophysiological Mechanisms and Treatment Efficacies in Laryngeal Dystonia: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Approach

Laryngeal dystonia (LD), known or termed as spasmodic dysphonia, is a rare movement disorder with an unknown cause affecting the intrinsic laryngeal muscles. Neurophysiological studies point to perturbed inhibitory processes, while conventional genetic studies reveal fragments of genetic architecture in LD. The study's aims are to (1) describe transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) methodology for studying the functional integrity of the corticospinal tract by stimulating the primary motor cortex (M1) for laryngeal muscle representation and recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from laryngeal muscles; (2) evaluate the results of TMS studies investigating the cortical silent period (cSP) in LD; and (3) present the standard treatments of LD, as well as the results of new theoretical views and treatment approaches like repetitive TMS and laryngeal vibration over the laryngeal muscles as the recent research attempts in treatment of LD. Neurophysiological findings point to a shortened duration of cSP in adductor LD and altered cSP duration in abductor LD individuals. Future TMS studies could further investigate the role of cSP in relation to standard laryngological measures and treatment options. A better understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms might give new perspectives for the treatment of LD.

The Patho-Neurophysiological Basis and Treatment of Focal Laryngeal Dystonia: A Narrative Review and Two Case Reports Applying TMS over the Laryngeal Motor Cortex

Focal laryngeal dystonia (LD) is a rare, idiopathic disease affecting the laryngeal musculature with an unknown cause and clinically presented as adductor LD or rarely as abductor LD. The most effective treatment options include the injection of botulinum toxin (BoNT) into the affected laryngeal muscle. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the patho-neuro-physiological and genetic background of LD, as well as the standard recommended therapy (BoNT) and pharmacological treatment options, and to discuss possible treatment perspectives using neuro-modulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and vibrotactile stimulation. The review will present two LD cases, patients with adductor and abductor LD, standard diagnostic procedure, treatments and achievement, and the results of cortical excitability mapping the primary motor cortex for the representation of the laryngeal muscles in the assessment of corticospinal and corticobulbar excitability.

Globus Pallidus Interna and Ventral Intermediate Nucleus of the Thalamus Deep Brain Stimulation for Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia: a Case Report of Blinded Analyses of Objective Voice Outcomes in 2 Patients

BACKGROUND

Adductor laryngeal dystonia (ADLD) is a substantially debilitating focal progressive neurological voice disorder. Current standard of care is symptomatic treatment with repeated injections of botulinum toxin into specific intrinsic laryngeal muscles with extremely variable and temporary benefits. We report the use of bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of globus pallidus (GPi) for long-term improvement of ADLD voice symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of bilateral DBS of the GPi and ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus on vocal function in 2 patients with ADLD associated with voice and hand tremor.

METHODS

Blinded objective and quantitative analyses of voice were conducted before and after treatment in 2 female patients (70 and 69 years). Paired t-tests were conducted to compare voice measurements pre-GPi and post-GPi and VIM-DBS. A 2-way analysis of variance was conducted to determine the interaction between target (GPi/VIM) and time (pre/post) for each voice measure.

RESULTS

Although the follow-up period differed between patients, the GPi-DBS implanted patient had notable improvement in vowel voicing (%), extent of tremor intensity (%), and overall speech intelligibility (%), compared with preoperative status. GPi-DBS also resulted in significant improvement in cepstral peak prominence (dB). VIM-DBS resulted in a significantly greater change in the tremor rate (Hz).

CONCLUSION

Changes in phonatory function provide preliminary support for the use of bilateral GPi-DBS for treatment of ADLD and bilateral VIM-DBS for vocal tremor predominant ADLD. Future studies with larger sample sizes and standardized follow-up periods are needed to better assess the role of DBS for ADLD.

Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Spasmodic Dysphonia: A Phase I Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Crossover Trial

BACKGROUND

Adductor spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is a dystonia of the vocal folds causing difficulty with speech. The current standard of care is repeated botulinum toxin injections to weaken the adductor muscles. We sought to ameliorate the underlying neurological cause of SD with a novel therapy—deep brain stimulation (DBS).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety of DBS in SD through phase I trial, and to quantify the magnitude of any benefit.

METHODS

Six patients had left ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) thalamic DBS and were randomized to 3 mo blinded-DBS “on” or “off” followed by a crossover. Primary outcomes were quality of life and quality of voice during the blinded phase. Patients continued with open-DBS “on.” Secondary outcomes were comparisons of pre- and 1-yr cognitive, mood, and quality of life. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02558634).

RESULTS

There were no complications. Every patient reported an improvement in quality of life (P = .07) and had an improvement in quality of their voice (P = .06) when their blinded DBS was “on” versus “off.” The trend did not reach statistical significance with the small sample size. Secondary outcomes showed no difference in cognition, an improvement in mood, and quality of life at 1 yr.

CONCLUSION

This phase I randomized controlled trial confirmed that DBS can be performed safely in patients with SD. Blinded DBS produced a strong trend toward improved quality of life and objective quality of voice despite the small sample size. The cerebellar circuit, not the pallidal circuit, appears to be crucial for motor control of the vocal folds.

Arching deep brain stimulation in dystonia types

Although medical treatment including botulinum toxic injection is the first-line treatment for dystonia, response is insufficient in many patients. In these patients, deep brain stimulation (DBS) can provide significant clinical improvement. Mounting evidence indicates that DBS is an effective and safe treatment for dystonia, especially for idiopathic and inherited isolated generalized/segmental dystonia, including DYT-TOR1A. Other inherited dystonia and acquired dystonia also respond to DBS to varying degrees. For Meige syndrome (craniofacial dystonia), other focal dystonia, and some rare inherited dystonia, further evidences are still needed to evaluate the role of DBS. Because short disease duration at DBS surgery and absence of fixed musculoskeletal deformity are associated with better outcome, DBS should be considered as early as possible when indicated after careful evaluation including genetic work-up. This review will focus on the factors to be considered in DBS for patients with dystonia and the outcome of DBS in the different types of dystonia.

Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia Improves with Bilateral Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation: Report of 3 Cases Done Asleep and Review of Literature

Background

To date, there are only six published reports of adductor spasmodic dysphonia (SD) responding to awake thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed cases of Essential Tremor (ET) with SD that were seen in our center from 2012 to 2020. We further identified those that have undergone thalamic DBS, and had a blinded laryngologist rate first the audio voice recordings before and after DBS using the Unified Spasmodic Dysphonia Rating Scale (USDRS), and the video recordings last to rate the related movements and facial grimacing.

Results

We identified three cases of adductor SD with ET that had undergone bilateral ventralis intermedius (VIM) DBS under general anesthesia. All patients noted improvement of their limb and voice tremor, as well as their SD post-DBS. Although improvement of tremor was observed even with initial programming in all three, improvement of SD was noted only upon reaching higher amplitudes or wider pulse widths. Blinded voice assessments showed improvement of USDRS scores post-DBS compared to pre-DBS, and with stimulator on compared to stimulator off.

Discussion

We report the first three cases of SD responding favorably to bilateral VIM asleep DBS and summarize the nine cases so far of SD who have undergone thalamic DBS.