1
|
Ruff SM, Chang JY, Xu M, Ejaz AM, Dillhoff M, Pawlik TM, Makary MS, Rikabi A, Sukrithan V, Konda B, Cloyd JM. Trans-arterial embolization versus chemoembolization for neuroendocrine liver metastases: a propensity matched analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2024:S1365-182X(24)02283-4. [PMID: 39271375 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2024] [Revised: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Locoregional therapies are a mainstay of treatment for patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM), yet the optimal transarterial approach remains undefined and recent studies have raised concern over the safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). METHODS Patients with NELM who underwent TACE or transarterial embolization (TAE) at a single institution between 2000-2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) controlling for age, sex, bilateral disease, tumor size, lobar embolization, grade, and extrahepatic disease was utilized to compare short- and long-term outcomes. RESULTS Among 412 patients with NELM, 329 underwent TACE and 83 TAE. Mean age was 60.7 ± 11.1 years. Patients primarily presented with synchronous (69.2%), bilateral (84.2%), and G1 disease (48.8%) and underwent staged procedures (55.8%). Following PSM, TACE was associated with slightly worse post-procedure laboratory values, but no difference in complications compared to TAE (23.3%vs29.3%, p = 0.247). TACE was associated with improved mean PFS (21.8vs10.7 months, p = 0.002), but no difference in radiographic size, chromogranin level, or median overall survival (50.0 months vs not met, p = 0.833). CONCLUSION Among patients with NELM, TACE was associated with similar short-term outcomes and improved PFS, but no difference in OS compared to TAE. These findings highlight the need for additional research on the optimal locoregional therapy for NELM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha M Ruff
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Jin Y Chang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Menglin Xu
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Aslam M Ejaz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Mary Dillhoff
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Mina S Makary
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Ali Rikabi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Vineeth Sukrithan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Bhavana Konda
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lamarca A, Bartsch DK, Caplin M, Kos-Kudla B, Kjaer A, Partelli S, Rinke A, Janson ET, Thirlwell C, van Velthuysen MLF, Vullierme MP, Pavel M. European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2024 guidance paper for the management of well-differentiated small intestine neuroendocrine tumours. J Neuroendocrinol 2024:e13423. [PMID: 38977327 DOI: 10.1111/jne.13423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
Both the incidence and prevalence of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours from the small intestine (Si-NET) are gradually increasing. Most patients have non-functioning tumours with subtle GI symptoms and tumours are often discovered incidentally by endoscopy or at advanced disease stages by imaging depicting mesenteric lymph node and /or liver metastases while around 30% of the patients present with symptoms of the carcinoid syndrome. Adequate biochemical assessment and staging including functional imaging is crucial for treatment-related decision-making that should take place in an expert multidisciplinary team setting. Preferably, patients should be referred to specialised ENETS Centres of Excellence or centres of high expertise in the field. This guidance paper provides the current evidence and best knowledge for the management of Si-NET grade (G) 1-3 following 10 key questions of practical relevance for the diagnostic and therapeutic decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Lamarca
- Department of Oncology - Onco Health Institute, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation, Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Detlef K Bartsch
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Martyn Caplin
- Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Beata Kos-Kudla
- Department of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, ENETS Center of Excellence, Department of Pathophysiology and Endocrinology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Andreas Kjaer
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Copenhagen University of Copenhagen-Rigshospitalet, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stefano Partelli
- Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Anja Rinke
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Marburg and Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Eva Tiensuu Janson
- Department of Medical Sciences, Endocrine Oncology Unit, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Christina Thirlwell
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Marie-Pierre Vullierme
- Department of Radiology, Paul Brousse University Hospital, AP-HP-University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Marianne Pavel
- Department of Medicine 1, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, ENETS Center of Excellence Erlangen, CCC Erlangen- EMN, and Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nanno Y, Toyama H, Ueshima E, Sofue K, Matsumoto I, Ishida J, Urade T, Fukushima K, Gon H, Tsugawa D, Komatsu S, Kuramitsu K, Goto T, Asari S, Yanagimoto H, Kido M, Ajiki T, Fukumoto T. Transarterial chemoembolization for liver metastases of a pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: a single-center experience. Surg Today 2023; 53:1396-1400. [PMID: 37355500 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-023-02714-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is performed for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNEN) liver metastases; however, the safety and efficacy of TACE procedures, especially for patients who have undergone previous pancreatic surgery, have not been established. We reviewed 48 TACE procedures (1-6 procedures/patient) performed on 11 patients with PanNEN liver metastases, including 16 TACE procedures (4-6 procedures/patient) for 3 patients with a history of biliary-enteric anastomosis. The overall tumor objective response rate was 94%. The incidence of Clavien‒Dindo grade ≥ 2 complications was 1/16 (6%) and 1/32 (3%), and the median time to untreatable progression was 31 (14-41) and 27 (2-60) months among patients with and without a history of biliary-enteric anastomosis, respectively. Although validation is needed in future studies, our experiences have shown that TACE treatment is a viable treatment option for PanNEN liver metastases, even after biliary-enteric anastomosis with experienced teams and careful patient follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihide Nanno
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Hirochika Toyama
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.
| | - Eisuke Ueshima
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Keitaro Sofue
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Ippei Matsumoto
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jun Ishida
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Takeshi Urade
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Kenji Fukushima
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Gon
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Daisuke Tsugawa
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Shohei Komatsu
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Kaori Kuramitsu
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Tadahiro Goto
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Sadaki Asari
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Yanagimoto
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kido
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Ajiki
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Takumi Fukumoto
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harrelson A, Wang R, Stewart A, Ingram C, Gillis A, Rose JB, El-Rayes B, Azmi A, Chen H. Management of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases. Am J Surg 2023; 226:623-630. [PMID: 37657968 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) are a group of tumors that arise from neuroendocrine cells, and are increasing in incidence worldwide. These tumors often metastasize to the liver, and management of these neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NELMs) requires a multi-disciplinary approach. We aim to provide a comprehensive update for treatment of NELMs. METHODS We completed a comprehensive systemic review of papers involving the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of NELMs. We identified 1612 records via Scopus database literature search. Two independent authors reviewed these records, with 318 meeting criteria for inclusion in the final systemic review. RESULTS Primary tumor resection with resection of liver metastases is the treatment of choice for patients with NELMs. Liver-directed therapies and liver transplantation can be considered for patients with unresectable liver metastases. Systemic medical therapy is used for managing tumor burden and symptoms caused by NELMs. CONCLUSIONS Advancement in liver-directed and targeted systemic therapies provide improved options for patients with unresectable tumors. Given the complexity of NELMs, management of NELMs necessitates multidisciplinary teams at comprehensive health centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Harrelson
- Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rongzhi Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Addison Stewart
- Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Clark Ingram
- Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Andrea Gillis
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J Bart Rose
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Bassel El-Rayes
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Asfar Azmi
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Herbert Chen
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Castillón JC, Gordoa TA, Bayonas AC, Carretero AC, García-Carbonero R, Pulido EG, Fonseca PJ, Lete AL, Huerta AS, Plazas JG. SEOM-GETNE clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic and bronchial neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) (2022). Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:2692-2706. [PMID: 37204633 PMCID: PMC10425298 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03205-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous family of tumors of challenging diagnosis and clinical management. Their incidence and prevalence continue to rise mainly due to an improvement on diagnostic techniques and awareness. Earlier detection, along with steadfast improvements in therapy, has led to better prognosis over time for advanced gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of this guideline is to update evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic and lung NENs. Diagnostic procedures, histological classification, and therapeutic options, including surgery, liver-directed therapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and systemic hormonal, cytotoxic or targeted therapy, are reviewed and discussed, and treatment algorithms to guide therapeutic decisions are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaume Capdevila Castillón
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Vall D’Hebron, Ps Vall d’Hebron, 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Teresa Alonso Gordoa
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Paula Jiménez Fonseca
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Angela Lamarca Lete
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angel Segura Huerta
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Javier Gallego Plazas
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clift AK, Thomas R, Frilling A. Developments in interventional management of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2023; 37:101798. [PMID: 37468404 DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2023.101798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumours commonly metastasise to the liver, particularly those arising from the intestinal tract and pancreas. Whilst surgery offers the only approach with intent to cure, the vast majority of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases are ineligible. Liver-directed interventional therapies seek to exploit the patho-anatomy of the blood supply of hepatic metastases to deliver therapy to liver deposits. This may involve percutaneous ablation, bland embolization, or the selective infusion of chemotherapeutics, targeted agents or radiolabelled embolic material. Retrospective case series evidence has characterised objective response rates, disease control rates, and longer-term outcomes associated with each approach. Recent advances in this field include ongoing comparative trials of different techniques, but more importantly, combinations of interventional liver-directed therapies and other systemic therapy in multimodal treatment concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Kieran Clift
- Cancer Research UK Oxford Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Robert Thomas
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Andrea Frilling
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chetcuti Zammit S, Sidhu R. Small bowel neuroendocrine tumours - casting the net wide. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2023; 39:200-210. [PMID: 37144538 DOI: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Our aim is to provide an overview of small bowel neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), clinical presentation, diagnosis algorithm and management options. We also highlight the latest evidence on management and suggest areas for future research. RECENT FINDINGS Dodecanetetraacetic acid (DOTATATE) scan can detect NETs with an improved sensitivity than when compared with an Octreotide scan. It is complimentary to small bowel endoscopy that provides mucosal views and allows the delineation of small lesions undetectable on imaging. Surgical resection is the best management modality even in metastatic disease. Prognosis can be improved with the administration of somatostatin analogues and Evarolimus as second-line therapies. SUMMARY NETs are heterogenous tumours affecting most commonly the distal small bowel as single or multiple lesions. Their secretary behaviour can lead to symptoms, most commonly diarrhoea and weight loss. Metastases to the liver are associated with carcinoid syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Surgery, Liver Directed Therapy and Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205103. [PMID: 36291892 PMCID: PMC9599940 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are described by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification by grade (1–3) and degree of differentiation. Grade 1 and 2; well differentiated PNETs are often characterized as relatively “indolent” tumors for which locoregional therapies have been shown to be effective for palliation of symptom control and prolongation of survival even in the setting of advanced disease. The treatment of liver metastases includes surgical and non-surgical modalities with varying degrees of invasiveness; efficacy; and risk. Most of these modalities have not been prospectively compared. This paper reviews literature that has been published on treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases using surgery; liver directed embolization and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Surgery is associated with the longest survival in patients with resectable disease burden. Liver-directed (hepatic artery) therapies can sometimes convert patients with borderline disease into candidates for surgery. Among the three embolization modalities; the preponderance of data suggests chemoembolization offers superior radiographic response compared to bland embolization and radioembolization; but all have similar survival. PRRT was initially approved as salvage therapy in patients with advanced disease that was not amenable to resection or embolization; though the role of PRRT is evolving rapidly
Collapse
|
9
|
Sharma R, Slater S, Evans J, Martinez M, Ward C, Izadi H, Wernig F, Thomas R. ArTisaN trial protocol: a single Centre, open-label, phase II trial of the safety and efficacy of TheraSphere selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in the treatment of inoperable metastatic (liver) neuroendocrine neoplasia (NENs). BMC Cancer 2022; 22:800. [PMID: 35858849 PMCID: PMC9297626 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09859-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroendocrine neoplasias (NENs) are a rare type of malignancy that arise from the cells of the neuroendocrine system. Most patients present with advanced, unresectable disease, typically with metastases to the liver. The presence of liver metastases dictates prognosis and there has been a number of studies investigating therapies that reduce the burden of liver disease. Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) allows the delivery of targeted high dose radiation directly to tumours, with relative sparing of the surrounding liver tissue. Here, we describe the design and rationale of ArtTisaN, a phase II study to assess efficacy and tolerability of SIRT using TheraSpheres for the management of liver metastases secondary to NENs. METHODS Twenty-four eligible participants will be recruited to receive SIRT with TheraSpheres. The primary objective is to determine the objective response rate to treatment, defined as the rate of best overall response in the treated liver volume. In addition, total hepatic response and overall response will be assessed according to RECIST 1.1. The second co-primary objective is to determine the incidence of adverse and serious adverse device events. The secondary objectives are progression free survival, overall survival and quality of life. Additional exploratory objectives include investigation of circulating biomarkers of response and identification of a radiomic signature of response. DISCUSSION This trial will provide prospective evidence on the efficacy of SIRT using TheraSpheres for the management of liver metastases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04362436 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini Sharma
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Division of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK
| | - Susanna Slater
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Department of Oncology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS UK
| | - Joanne Evans
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Department of Oncology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS UK
| | - Maria Martinez
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Division of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK
| | - Caroline Ward
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Division of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN UK
| | - Hooshang Izadi
- grid.7628.b0000 0001 0726 8331Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Florian Wernig
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Department of Endocrinology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS UK
| | - Rob Thomas
- grid.7445.20000 0001 2113 8111Department of Interventional Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee L, Ramos-Alvarez I, Jensen RT. Predictive Factors for Resistant Disease with Medical/Radiologic/Liver-Directed Anti-Tumor Treatments in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Advances and Controversies. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051250. [PMID: 35267558 PMCID: PMC8909561 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Tumor resistance, both primary and acquired, is leading to increased complexity in the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs, which would be greatly helped by reliable prognostic/predictive factors. The importance in identifying resistance is being contributed to by the increased array of possible treatments available for treating resistant advanced disease; the variable clinical course as well as response to any given treatment approach of patients within one staging or grading system, the advances in imaging which are providing increasing promising results/parameters that correlate with grading/outcome/resistance, the increased understanding of the molecular pathogenesis providing promising prognostic markers, all of which can contribute to selecting the best treatment to overcome resistance disease. Several factors have been identified that have prognostic/predictive value for identifying development resistant disease and affecting overall survival (OS)/PFS with various nonsurgical treatments of patients with advanced panNENs. Prognostic factors identified for patients with advanced panNENs for both OS/PFSs include various clinically-related factors (clinical, laboratory/biological markers, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors. Particularly important prognostic factors for the different treatment modalities studies are the recent grading systems. Most prognostic factors for each treatment modality for OS/PFS are not specific for a given treatment option. These advances have generated several controversies and new unanswered questions, particularly those related to their possible role in predicting the possible sequence of different anti-tumor treatments in patients with different presentations. Each of these areas is reviewed in this paper. Abstract Purpose: Recent advances in the diagnosis, management and nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) have led to an emerging need for sensitive and useful prognostic factors for predicting responses/survival. Areas covered: The predictive value of a number of reported prognostic factors including clinically-related factors (clinical/laboratory/imaging/treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological/classification/grading), and molecular factors, on therapeutic outcomes of anti-tumor medical therapies with molecular targeting agents (everolimus/sunitinib/somatostatin analogues), chemotherapy, radiological therapy with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, or liver-directed therapies (embolization/chemoembolization/radio-embolization (SIRTs)) are reviewed. Recent findings in each of these areas, as well as remaining controversies and uncertainties, are discussed in detail, particularly from the viewpoint of treatment sequencing. Conclusions: The recent increase in the number of available therapeutic agents for the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs have raised the importance of prognostic factors predictive for therapeutic outcomes of each treatment option. The establishment of sensitive and useful prognostic markers will have a significant impact on optimal treatment selection, as well as in tailoring the therapeutic sequence, and for maximizing the survival benefit of each individual patient. In the paper, the progress in this area, as well as the controversies/uncertainties, are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingaku Lee
- Digestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, USA; (L.L.); (I.R.-A.)
- National Kyushu Cancer Center, Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatology, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan
| | - Irene Ramos-Alvarez
- Digestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, USA; (L.L.); (I.R.-A.)
| | - Robert T. Jensen
- Digestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, USA; (L.L.); (I.R.-A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-301-496-4201
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Clift AK, Frilling A. Liver-Directed Therapies for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Curr Oncol Rep 2021; 23:44. [PMID: 33721122 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01030-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To comprehensively synthesise and appraise the available evidence regarding therapies for metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms that exploit the hepatic vasculature to deliver therapy to liver metastases. RECENT FINDINGS Various techniques including transarterial embolisation/chemoembolisation (TAE/TACE) and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT, also termed radioembolisation [RE]) have been examined in patents with neuroendocrine liver metastases. Variations in the radioactive agents for selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) have been explored, such as the use of Holmium-166, in addition to more established agents such as Yttrium-90. Recent trials have examined the safety and efficacy of combining liver-targeted therapy with systemic treatments, such as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. More retrospective case series of liver-directed modalities will not provide additional knowledge. Randomised clinical trials have begun to compare the efficacy of different forms of liver-directed therapies, and also their combination with systemic treatment. Their results are expected to guide optimal treatment sequencing within multimodal concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Kieran Clift
- CRUK Oxford Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Andrea Frilling
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. .,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lamarca A, Cives M, de Mestier L, Crona J, Spada F, Öberg K, Pavel M, Alonso-Gordoa T. Advanced small-bowel well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours: An international survey of practice on 3 rd-line treatment. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:976-989. [PMID: 33776367 PMCID: PMC7968134 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i10.976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Somatostatin analogues are an established first-line therapy for well differentiated small bowel neuroendocrine tumours (Wd-SBNETs), while and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is frequently used as a second-line therapy. Adequate treatment selection of third-line treatment remains challenging due to the limited prospective data currently available on the best therapeutic sequence.
AIM To understand current practice and rationale for decision-making by physicians in the 3rd-line setting by building an online survey.
METHODS Weighted average (WA) of likelihood of usage between responders (1 very unlikely; 4 very likely) was used to reflect the relevance of factors explored.
RESULTS Replies from representatives of 28 centers were received (5/8/2020-21/9/2020); medical oncologist (53.6%), gastroenterologist (17.9%); United Kingdom (21.4%), Spain (17.9%), Italy (14.3%). Majority from European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Centres of Excellence (57.1%), who followed ENETS guidelines (82.1%). Generally speaking, 3rd-line treatment for Wd-SBNETs was: everolimus (EVE) (66.7%), PRRT (18.5%), liver embolization (LE) (7.4%) and interferon-alpha (IFN) (3.7%); chemotherapy (0%); decision was based on clinical trial data (59.3%), or personal experience (22.2%). EVE was most likely used if Ki-67 < 10% (WA 3.27/4) or age < 70 years (WA 3.23/4), in the 3rd-line setting (WA 3.23/4); regardless of presence/absence of carcinoid syndrome (CS), rate of progression or extent of disease. Chemotherapy was mainly utilised only if rapid progression (within 6 mo) (WA 3.35/4), Ki-67 10%-20% (WA 2.77/4), negative somatostatin receptor imaging (WA 2.65/4) or high tumour burden (WA 2.77/4); temozolomide or streptozocin was used with capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (57.7%), FOLFOX (5-FU combined with oxaliplatin) (23.1%). LE was selected if presence of CS (WA 3.24/4) or Ki-67 < 10% (WA 2.8/4), after progression to other treatments (WA 2.8/4). IFN was rarely used (WA 1.3/4).
CONCLUSION Everolimus was the most frequently used therapeutic option in the third-line setting. The most important factors for decision-making included Ki-67, rate of progression, functionality and tumour burden; since this decision is based on multiple factors, it highlights the need for a multidisciplinary assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Lamarca
- Department of Medical Oncology, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Centre of Excellence, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Mauro Cives
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari 70121, Italy
| | - Louis de Mestier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence, Paris-Diderot University, Clichy 75006, France
| | - Joakim Crona
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-751 85, Sweden
| | - Francesca Spada
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Kjell Öberg
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala SE-751 85, Sweden
| | - Marianne Pavel
- Department of Endocrinology, Universitatsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen 91054, Germany
| | - Teresa Alonso-Gordoa
- Medical Oncology Department, The Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute, Alcalá University, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tai E, Kennedy S, Farrell A, Jaberi A, Kachura J, Beecroft R. Comparison of transarterial bland and chemoembolization for neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Oncol 2020; 27:e537-e546. [PMID: 33380868 PMCID: PMC7755439 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.6205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumours improves survival and symptom relief. Hepatic arterial embolotherapy techniques include transarterial chemoembolization (tace) and bland embolization (tae). The relative efficacy of the techniques is controversial. The purpose of the present study was to use a meta-analysis and systematic review to compare tace with tae in the treatment of hepatic metastases. Methods A literature search identified studies comparing tace and tae for treatment of hepatic metastases. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (os), progression-free survival (pfs), radiographic response, complications, and symptom control. The hazard ratios (hrs) and odds ratios (ors) were estimated and pooled. Results Eight studies and 504 patients were included. No statistically significant differences between tace and tae were observed for os at 1, 2, and 5 years or for hrs [1-year or: 0.72; 95% confidence interval (ci): 0.27 to 1.94; p < 0.52; 2-year or: 0.69; 95% ci: 0.43 to 1.11; p < 0.12; 5-year or: 0.91; 95% ci: 0.37 to 2.24; p < 0.85; hr: 0.96; 95% ci: 0.73 to 1.24; p < 0.74]. No statistically significant differences between tace and tae were observed for pfs at 1, 2, and 5 years or for hrs (1-year or: 0.71; 95% ci: 0.38 to 1.55; p < 0.30; 2-year or: 0.83; 95% ci: 0.33 to 2.06; p < 0.69; 5-year or: 0. 91; 95% ci: 0.37 to 2.24; p < 0.85; hr: 0.99-1.74; 95% ci: 0.74 to 1.73; p < 0.97). Both techniques are safe and effective for symptom control. Conclusions No statistically significant differences between tace and tae were observed for os and pfs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Tai
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| | - S Kennedy
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| | - A Farrell
- Library and Information Services, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON
| | - A Jaberi
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| | - J Kachura
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| | - R Beecroft
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ito T, Jensen RT. Perspectives on the current pharmacotherapeutic strategies for management of functional neuroendocrine tumor syndromes. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 22:685-693. [PMID: 33131345 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1845651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: In the past, controlling the hormone-excess-state was the main determinant of survival in Functional-Neuroendocrine-Neoplasm-syndromes (F-NENs). This was difficult because the pharmacological-armamentarium available was limited. Recently, new therapeutic strategies have increased but it also generated controversies/uncertainties.Areas covered: The authors briefly review: established/proposed F-NENs; the rationale for treatments; the recommended initial-pharmacotherapeutic-approach to controlling F-NENs hormone-excess-state; the secondary-approaches if the initial approach fails or resistance develops; and the approach to deal with the malignant nature of the NEN. Also discussed are controversies/uncertainties related to new treatments.Expert opinion: Unfortunately, except for patients with insulinomas (>90-95%), gastrinomas (<20-40%), a minority with the other F-panNENs and 0-<1% with Carcinoid-syndrome is curative-surgery possible. Except for insulinomas, gastrinomas, and ACTHomas, long-acting somatostatin-analogs are the initial-pharmacological-treatments for hormone-excess-state. For insulinomas prior to surgery/malignancy, diazoxide is the initial drug-treatment; for gastrinomas, oral PPIs; and for ACTHomas, steroidogenesis inhibitors. There are now several secondary pharmacotherapeutic treatments. Surgery and liver-directed therapies also have a role in selected patients. Particularly promising is the recent results with PRRT for the hormone-excess-state, independent of its anti-growth effect. The sequence to use various agents and the approach to syndrome diagnosis while taking various agents remains unclear/controversial in many cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuhide Ito
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital, International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|