The Utility of Pleural Fluid Lactate Dehydrogenase to Adenosine Deaminase Ratio in Pleural Tuberculosis

Clinical significance of pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase/adenosine deaminase ratio in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

Pleural fluid is one of the common complications of thoracic diseases, and tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) is the most common cause of pleural effusion in TB-endemic areas and the most common type of exudative pleural effusion in China. In clinical practice, distinguishing TPE from pleural effusion caused by other reasons remains a relatively challenging issue. The objective of present study was to explore the clinical significance of the pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase/adenosine deaminase ratio (pfLDH/pfADA) in the diagnosis of TPE.

METHODS

The clinical data of 618 patients with pleural effusion were retrospectively collected, and the patients were divided into 3 groups: the TPE group (412 patients), the parapneumonic pleural effusion (PPE) group (106 patients), and the malignant pleural effusion (MPE) group (100 patients). The differences in the ratios of pleural effusion-related and serology-related indicators were compared among the three groups, and receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of the parameter ratios of different indicators for the diagnosis of TPE.

RESULTS

The median serum ADA level was higher in the TPE group (13 U/L) than in the PPE group (10 U/L, P < 0.01) and MPE group (10 U/L, P < 0.001). The median pfADA level in the TPE group was 41 (32, 52) U/L; it was lowest in the MPE group at 9 (7, 12) U/L and highest in the PPE group at 43 (23, 145) U/L. The pfLDH level in the PPE group was 2542 (1109, 6219) U/L, which was significantly higher than that in the TPE group 449 (293, 664) U/L. In the differential diagnosis between TPE and non-TPE, the AUC of pfLDH/pfADA for diagnosing TPE was the highest at 0.946 (0.925, 0.966), with an optimal cutoff value of 23.20, sensitivity of 93.9%, specificity of 87.0%, and Youden index of 0.809. In the differential diagnosis of TPE and PPE, the AUC of pfLDH/pfADA was the highest at 0.964 (0.939, 0.989), with an optimal cutoff value of 24.32, sensitivity of 94.6%, and specificity of 94.4%; this indicated significantly better diagnostic efficacy than that of the single index of pfLDH. In the differential diagnosis between TPE and MPE, the AUC of pfLDH/pfADA was 0.926 (0.896, 0.956), with a sensitivity of 93.4% and specificity of 80.0%; this was not significantly different from the diagnostic efficacy of pfADA.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with single biomarkers, pfLDH/pfADA has higher diagnostic value for TPE and can identify patients with TPE early, easily, and economically.

Features which discriminate between tuberculosis and haematologic malignancy as the cause of pleural effusions with high adenosine deaminase

BACKGROUND

Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is a useful biomarker for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy (TBP). However, pleural effusions with high ADA can also be caused by other diseases, particularly hematologic malignant pleural effusion (hMPE). This study aimed to investigate the features that could differentiate TBP and hMPE in patients with pleural effusion ADA ≥ 40 IU/L.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of patients with pleural effusion ADA ≥ 40 IU/L, conducted at a Korean tertiary referral hospital with an intermediate tuberculosis burden between January 2010 and December 2017. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the features associated with TBP and hMPE, respectively.

RESULTS

Among 1134 patients with ADA ≥ 40 IU/L, 375 (33.1%) and 85 (7.5%) were diagnosed with TBP and hMPE, respectively. TBP and hMPE accounted for 59% (257/433) and 6% (27/433) in patients with ADA between 70 and 150 IU/L, respectively. However, in patients with ADA ≥ 150 IU/L, they accounted for 7% (9/123) and 19% (23/123), respectively. When ADA between 40 and 70 IU/L was the reference category, ADA between 70 and 150 IU/L was independently associated with TBP (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.95-4.95; P < 0.001). ADA ≥ 150 IU/L was negatively associated with TBP (aOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14-0.90; P = 0.029) and positively associated with hMPE (aOR, 13.21; 95% CI, 5.67-30.79; P < 0.001). In addition, TBP was independently associated with lymphocytes ≥ 35% and a lactate dehydrogenase (LD)/ADA ratio < 18 in pleural effusion. hMPE was independently associated with pleural polymorphonuclear neutrophils < 50%, thrombocytopenia, and higher serum LD. A combination of lymphocytes ≥ 35%, LD/ADA < 18, and ADA < 150 IU/L demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.824 and specificity of 0.937 for predicting TBP.

CONCLUSION

In patients with very high levels of pleural effusion ADA, hMPE should be considered. Several features in pleural effusion and serum may help to more effectively differentiate TBP from hMPE.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Lactate Dehydrogenase/Adenosine Deaminase Ratio in Differentiating Tuberculous and Parapneumonic Effusions: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) and parapneumonic effusion (PPE) are often difficult to differentiate owing to the overlapping clinical features. Observational studies demonstrate that the ratio of lactate dehydrogenase to adenosine deaminase (LDH/ADA) is lower in TPE compared to PPE, but integrated analysis is warranted.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the LDH/ADA ratio in differentiating TPE and PPE. We explored the PubMed and Scopus databases for studies evaluating the LDH/ADA ratio in differentiating TPE and PPE.

RESULTS

From a yield of 110 studies, five were included for systematic review. The cutoff value for the LDH/ADA ratio in TPE ranged from <14.2 to <25. The studies demonstrated high heterogeneity, precluding meta-analysis. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Tool 2 assessment revealed a high risk of bias in terms of patient selection and index test.

CONCLUSION

LDH/ADA ratio is a potentially useful parameter to differentiate between TPE and PPE. Based on the limited data, we recommend an LDH/ADA ratio cutoff value of <15 in differentiating TPE and PPE. However, more rigorous studies are needed to further validate this recommendation.

Diagnostic flowchart for tuberculous pleurisy, pleural infection, and malignant pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

Several markers for the diagnosis of pleural effusion have been reported; however, a comprehensive evaluation using those markers has not been performed. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a diagnostic flowchart for tuberculous pleurisy, pleural infection, malignant pleural effusion, and other diseases by using these markers.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 174 patients with tuberculous pleurisy, 215 patients with pleural infection other than tuberculous pleurisy, 360 patients with malignant pleural effusion, and 209 patients with other diseases at Fukujuji Hospital from January 2012 to October 2022. The diagnostic flowchart for four diseases was developed by using several previously reported markers.

RESULTS

The flowchart was developed by including seven markers: pleural ADA ≥40 IU/L, pleural fluid LDH <825 IU/L, pleural fluid ADA/TP < 14, neutrophil predominance or cell degeneration, peripheral blood WBC ≥9200/μL or serum CRP ≥12 mg/dL, pleural amylase ≥75 U/L, and the presence of pneumothorax according to the algorithm of a decision tree. The accuracy ratio of the flowchart was 71.7 % for the diagnosis of the four diseases, with 79.3 % sensitivity and 75.4 % positive predictive value (PPV) for tuberculosis pleurisy, 75.8 % sensitivity and 83.2 % PPV for pleural infection, 88.6 % sensitivity and 68.8 % PPV for malignant pleural effusion, and 33.0 % sensitivity and 60.0 % PPV for other diseases in the flowchart. The misdiagnosis ratios were 4.6 % for tuberculosis pleurisy, 6.8 % for pleural infection, and 8.3 % for malignant pleural effusion.

CONCLUSION

This study developed a useful diagnostic flowchart for tuberculous pleurisy, pleural infection, malignant pleural effusion, and other diseases.

Primary Effusion Lymphoma-like Lymphoma Mimicking Tuberculous Pleural Effusion: Three Case Reports and a Literature Review

Primary effusion lymphoma-like lymphoma (PEL-LL) is a rare lymphoma, localized in the body cavity without detectable tumor masses. Tuberculous pleural effusion is a form of extra pulmonary tuberculous. We herein report three cases of PEL-LL in patients with a history of pulmonary tuberculosis. Despite the presentation with lymphocyte predominance and high levels of adenosine deaminase, a notable characteristic of tuberculous pleural effusion, the patients were ultimately diagnosed with PEL-LL. Pleural fluid laboratory tests yield similar results for PEL-LL and tuberculous pleural effusion; therefore, cytological and immunophenotyping examinations are useful for their differential diagnosis and the determination of treatment.

Application of Adenosine Deaminase and γ-Interferon Release Assay in Pleural Fluid for the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Pleural Effusion in Patients Over 40 Years Old

Background

In patients with tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) of various ages, the diagnostic accuracy of pleural biomarkers varies, and there are insufficient studies specifically in different age groups. Therefore, we investigated the adenosine deaminase cut-off value and its combination with the gamma interferon release assay for the diagnosis of TPE among patients aged ≥40 years.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 198 patients who underwent medical thoracoscopy and were admitted to the hospital between 2015 and 2020 with exudative pleural effusion and either fever, night sweats, fatigue, cough, or other clinical manifestations was performed. The medical thoracoscopy, ADA, and T-SPOT results were analysed in the pleural fluid. The patients were divided into groups based on age: 18-39, 40-59, and 60-87.

Results

The best cut-off values of ADA were 29.5, 31.5 and 19.5 U/L, respectively, for the aged 18-39, aged 40-87 and aged 60-87 groups. The accuracy of 31.5 U/L was higher than 40 U/L for aged ≥40 years (86 vs 83%). The ADA diagnostic accuracy was higher than that of people under 40 years (83 vs 77%) when cut-off value of ADA was 40 U/L, but the IGRA accuracy was lower than that of people under 40 (87 vs 91%). The sensitivity of ADA or IGRA detection in patients over 40 years was 99%, and the specificity was 78%. The ADA specificity combined with IGRA for TPE was the highest (100%) in the ≥40 age group, and the sensitivity was 69%.

Conclusion

Our study revealed the best cut-off values of ADA for TBE in different age groups. Combining ADA and IGRA in pleural fluid improves the detection rate of TPE in patients over 40 years of age with exudative pleural effusion. ADA combined with IGRA increases specificity, and ADA or IGRA increases sensitivity substantially.

Diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase to adenosine deaminase ratio for tuberculous pleural effusion: an analysis of two cohorts

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid (PF) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to adenosine deaminase (ADA) (LDH/ADA) ratio for tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE). Especially to explore whether the LDH/ADA ratio provides added diagnostic value to ADA.

Methods

The diagnostic accuracy of PF LDH/ADA ratio and ADA for TPE was evaluated in two cohorts, named the BUFF (Biomarkers for patients with Undiagnosed pleural eFFusion) cohort (62 with TPE and 194 with non-TPE) and the SIMPLE (a Study Investigating Markers in PLeural Effusion) cohort (33 with TPE and 177 with non-TPE). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve were used to measure the diagnostic accuracy of the PF LDH/ADA ratio. The added diagnostic value of the LDH/ADA ratio to ADA was evaluated with net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

Results

The area under the ROC curves (AUCs) of PF ADA and LDH/ADA ratio in the BUFF cohort were 0.76 and 0.74, respectively. In the SIMPLE cohort, the AUCs of PF ADA and LDH/ADA ratio were 0.80 and 0.85, respectively. The decision curves of PF LDH/ADA and ADA were close in both the BUFF and SIMPLE cohorts. The NRI and IDI analyses did not reveal any added diagnostic value of LDH/ADA to ADA.

Conclusions

PF LDH/ADA ratio has moderate diagnostic accuracy for TPE. It does not provide added diagnostic value beyond ADA. The current evidence does not support LDH/ADA ratio for diagnosing TPE.

Clinical Value of Pleural Effusion and Serum MMP-3 and CYFRA21-1 Combined with ADA in Differential Diagnosis of Pleural Exudative Effusion

Objective

The aim of the study is to investigate the clinical value of matrix metalloproteinases-3 (MMP-3) and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) combined with adenosine deaminase (ADA) in pleural effusion and serum in benign and malignant pleural exudative effusion (PEE).

Methods

A total of 119 adult patients with PEE admitted in our hospital from May 2018 to October 2021 were selected. According to the patient's condition, the patients were divided into the benign group (n = 75) and the malignant group (n = 44). The levels of MMP-3, CYFRA21-1, and ADA in pleural effusion and serum were detected. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the individual and combined predictive value of MMP-3, CYFRA21-1, and ADA levels.

Results

In the malignant group, the pleural effusion and serum MMP-3 and CYFRA21-1 levels were higher than those in the benign group and the ADA levels were lower than those in the benign group (P < 0.05). In the malignant group, the positive detection rate of pleural effusion and serum MMP-3 and CYFRA21-1 was higher than that in the benign group and the positive detection rate of pleural effusion and serum ADA were lower than that in the benign group (P < 0.05). The AUC of pleural effusion MMP-3, serum MMP-3 and the combination of them in the diagnosis of PEE were 0.764, 0.722 and 0.810, respectively. The AUC of pleural effusion CYFRA21-1 and serum CYFRA21-1 and combination of them in the diagnosis of PEE were 0.776, 0.748 and 0.822, respectively. The AUC of pleural effusion ADA, serum ADA and their combination in differential diagnosis of PEE were 0.762, 0.737 and 0.836, respectively. The AUC of pleural effusion and serum of MMP-3 and CYFRA21-1 combined with ADA for differential diagnosis of PEE was 0.923.

Conclusions

The diagnostic efficacy of MMP-3 combined with CYFRA21-1 and ADA in pleural effusion and serum for benign and malignant PEE are better than single index, which has certain clinical values for the selection of early intervention scheme for PEE patients.

Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis—An Update on the Diagnosis, Treatment and Drug Resistance

Pathogenic Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms (MTBC) primarily cause pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB); however, MTBC are also capable of causing disease in extrapulmonary (EP) organs, which pose a significant threat to human health worldwide. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) accounts for about 20–30% of all active TB cases and affects mainly children and adults with compromised immune systems. EPTB can occur through hematogenous, lymphatic, or localized bacillary dissemination from a primary source, such as PTB, and affects the brain, eye, mouth, tongue, lymph nodes of neck, spine, bones, muscles, skin, pleura, pericardium, gastrointestinal, peritoneum, and the genitourinary system as primary and/or disseminated disease. EPTB diagnosis involves clinical, radiological, microbiological, histopathological, biochemical/immunological, and molecular methods. However, only culture and molecular techniques are considered confirmatory to differentiate MTBC from any non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) species. While EPTB due to MTBC responds to first-line anti-TB drugs (ATD), drug susceptibility profiling is an essential criterion for addressing drug-resistant EPTB cases (DR-EPTB). Besides antibiotics, adjuvant therapy with corticosteroids has also been used to treat specific EPTB cases. Occasionally, surgical intervention is recommended, mainly when organ damage is debilitating to the patient. Recent epidemiological studies show a striking increase in DR-EPTB cases ranging from 10–15% across various reports. As a neglected disease, significant developments in rapid and accurate diagnosis and better therapeutic interventions are urgently needed to control the emerging EPTB situation globally. In this review, we discuss the recent advances in the clinical diagnosis, treatment, and drug resistance of EPTB.