Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: Diagnostic Value of Different MRI Sequences

Recent advances and future challenges in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with increasing incidence, whose diagnosis is usually delayed, negatively impacting on patients' prognosis. The latest advances in pathological classifications, biomarker identification and imaging techniques may provide early detection, leading to personalized treatment strategies. In this narrative review the recent developments in diagnosis of NEN are discussed including progresses in pathological classifications, biomarker and imaging. Furthermore, the challenges that lie ahead are investigated. By discussing the limitations of current approaches and addressing potential roadblocks, we hope to guide future research directions in this field. This article is proposed as a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers involved in the management of NEN. Update of pathological classifications and the availability of standardized templates in pathology and radiology represent a substantially improvement in diagnosis and communication among clinicians. Additional immunohistochemistry markers may now enrich pathological classifications, as well as miRNA profiling. New and multi-analytical circulating biomarkers, as liquid biopsy and NETest, are being proposed for diagnosis but their validation and availability should be improved. Radiological imaging strives for precise, non-invasive and less harmful technique to improve safety and quality of life in NEN patient. Nuclear medicine may benefit of somatostatin receptors' antagonists and membrane receptor analogues. Diagnosis in NEN still represents a challenge due to their complex biology and variable presentation. Further advancements are necessary to obtain early and minimally invasive diagnosis to improve patients' outcomes.

New Directions in Imaging Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Purpose of Review

Accurate imaging is crucial for correct diagnosis, staging, and therapy of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The search for the optimal imaging technique has triggered rapid development in the field. This review aims at giving an overview on contemporary imaging methods and providing an outlook on current progresses.

Recent Findings

The discovery of molecular targets due to the overexpression of specific peptide hormone receptors on the NEN’s surface has triggered the development of multiple radionuclide imaging modalities. In addition to the established imaging technique of targeting somatostatin receptors, several alternative radioligands have been developed. Targeting the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor by exendin-4 has a high sensitivity in localizing insulinomas. For dedifferentiated NENs, new molecular targets such as the C-X-C motif chemokine-receptor-4 have been evaluated. Other new targets involve the fibroblast activation protein and the cholecystokinin-2 receptors, where the ligand minigastrin opens new possibilities for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma.

Summary

Molecular imaging is an emerging field that improves the management of NENs.

Radiological Imaging of Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. The Review of Current Literature Emphasizing the Diagnostic Value of Chosen Imaging Methods

Despite development of radiologic imaging, detection and follow-up of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) still pose a diagnostic challenge, due to the heterogeneity of NEN, their relatively long-term growth, and small size of primary tumor. A set of information obtained by using different radiological imaging tools simplifies a choice of the most appropriate treatment method. Moreover, radiological imaging plays an important role in the assessment of metastatic lesions, especially in the liver, as well as, tumor response to treatment. This article reviews the current, broadly in use imaging modalities which are applied to the diagnosis of GEP-NETs, (the most common type of NENs) and put emphasis on the strengths and limitations of each modality.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of 68Ga DOTA-TATE PET/CT, 111In-Pentetreotide SPECT/CT and CT for Diagnostic Workup of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare neoplasms arising from the hormone-producing neuroendocrine system that can occur in various organs such as pancreas, small bowel, stomach and lung. As the majority of these tumors express somatostatin receptors (SSR) on their cell membrane, utilization of SSR analogs in nuclear medicine is a promising, but relatively costly approach for detection and localization. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT (Gallium-68 DOTA-TATE Positron emission tomography/computed tomography) compared to ¹¹¹In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT (Indium-111 pentetreotide Single Photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography) and to CT (computed tomography) alone in detection of NETs. A decision model on the basis of Markov simulations evaluated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) related to either a CT, SPECT/CT or PET/CT. Model input parameters were obtained from publicized research projects. The analysis is grounded on the US healthcare system. Deterministic sensitivity analysis of diagnostic parameters and probabilistic sensitivity analysis predicated on a Monte Carlo simulation with 30,000 reiterations was executed. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) was determined to be $ 100,000/QALY. In the base-case investigation, PET/CT ended up with total costs of $88,003.07 with an efficacy of 4.179, whereas CT ended up with total costs of $88,894.71 with an efficacy of 4.165. SPECT/CT ended up with total costs of $89,973.34 with an efficacy of 4.158. Therefore, the strategies CT and SPECT/CT were dominated by PET/CT in the base-case scenario. In the sensitivity analyses, PET/CT remained a cost-effective strategy. This result was due to reduced therapy costs of timely detection. The additional costs of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT when compared to CT alone are justified in the light of potential savings in therapy costs and better outcomes.