Response to the Letter to the Editor: "Impact of Anterior Kidney Calyx Involvement of Complex Stones on Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy"

The impact of anterior calyceal stones on the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex kidney stones: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the possible effect of anterior calyceal stones on the surgical outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with complex kidney stones from 2012 to 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. In total, 219 patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence of anterior calyceal stones (group 1; N.=89) or not (group 2; N.=130). The groups were compared in terms of surgical outcomes (i.e., stone-free rate [SFR], operation time, and hemoglobin drop) and complications.

RESULTS

The patient demographics and stone characteristics were similar between the groups. Multiple access was more frequently done in group 1 than it was in group 2 (47.2% vs. 30.8%; P=0.014), and the SFR was lower in group 1 (51.7%) than it was in group 2 (67.7%; P=0.017). Of the anterior calyceal stones in group 1, 42.6% could not be cleaned. However, when excluding patients who have only anterior residual stones from the statistical analysis, the groups had similar SFRs (68.5% vs. 67.7% for group 1 and group 2, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of complex kidney stones with anterior calyceal extension are associated with higher residual stones rates in the anterior calyx. Also, it increases multiple access, the operation time, and level of hemoglobin drop.