Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: Experience of High-Volume Center with 2,477 Cases

Clinical predictors associated with prolonged pneumoperitoneum time in laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (KT) is a useful treatment option for patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease to avoid dialysis and achieve a good quality of life. In Japan, approximately 90% of kidneys for KT are obtained from living kidney donors. Laparoscopic renal nephrectomy (LDN) is the most commonly performed KT procedure in Japan. We aimed to determine the clinical variables that influence the prolongation of pneumoperitoneum time (PT) in LDN.

METHOD

This retrospective study was carried out on 218 consecutive patients who underwent LDN at Gifu University Hospital. T The enrolled patients were divided into two groups according to the third quartile of PT in the LDN, with those in the lower third quartile (Q3) as Group 1 and those in the upper Q3 as Group 2. The primary endpoint was identification of predictive factors for prolonged PT.

RESULT

In total, 178 patients were included in the analysis. For all patients, the median PT, estimated blood loss, and warm ischemic time were 170 min, 20 mL, and 4 min, respectively. Significantly longer PT was observed in Group 2 than in Group 1. Multiple regression analysis results showed that male donors, body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2, and donors with more than two renal arteries were independent predictive factors for PT prolongation.

CONCLUSION

Male sex, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, and two or more renal arteries are predictive factors for prolonged PT for donors in LDN.

Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: An Initial Moroccan Experience

Introduction Laparoscopic nephrectomy is the gold standard for kidney removal in living donors, offering advantages such as reduced pain and quicker recovery. In Morocco, where end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a growing concern, this approach could significantly impact the demand for kidney transplants. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in the Moroccan healthcare system. Materials and methods Fifteen laparoscopic nephrectomies were analyzed, focusing on donor demographics, procedure details, and outcomes. Key parameters included donor age, BMI, operative time, warm ischemia time, and blood loss. Complications and graft outcomes were also assessed. Results The procedure was safe and effective, even in obese donors. Donors were predominantly female (80%), with an average age of 49.4 years. Obese donors had longer operative times (282 minutes vs. 220 minutes). Left kidney retrieval was preferred (95%). Warm ischemia averaged 6.27 minutes and blood loss was 207 mL. One donor had elevated creatinine postoperatively, while most maintained stable renal function. Eighteen complications, mostly minor, were reported. Conclusion Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy is a safe and adaptable procedure in Morocco, offering low complication rates and favorable outcomes. It is effective for a diverse donor population, including older and obese individuals, and may help address the country's growing transplant needs.

Laterality of live-donor nephrectomy: does it have a urologic impact on post-donation pregnancy?

BACKGROUND

Our center policy is to promote right nephrectomy for pre-menopausal live donor donors. This is based on the traditional belief that ureteral obstruction and subsequent urinary tract infections (UTIs) of post-donation pregnancies would be more frequent among female donors with a solitary right (compared to left) kidney. Studies that support or dismiss our policy are lacking. Therefore, we conducted this study.

METHODS

100 donors who had post-donation pregnancy were included. They underwent an updated clinical, laboratory and ultrasound assessment. They were classified into two groups: right and left nephrectomy groups. Both groups were compared relative to pre- and post-donation data, urinary troubles during or after post-donation pregnancies as well as their current kidney function.

RESULTS

Right nephrectomy was carried-out in 60 donors (60%). Post-donation acute pyelonephritis was not reported in either group. Unexpectedly, right nephrectomy group had a slightly higher (yet insignificant) lower UTIs during post-donation pregnancy. Furthermore, obstructive uropathy {two donors) and end stage renal disease (one donor) were only reported among right nephrectomy group. Both groups were comparable in terms of their current kidney function.

CONCLUSION

Despite that the endeavor to retrieve the right rather than the left kidney among premenopausal women could give them the benefit of doubt in regard to possible obstructive uropathy and UTIs during their subsequent pregnancies, this policy is likely an overdoing practice. Larger-scale studies are needed.

The learning curve for modified hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

We aimed to introduce our modified hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy (HARPLDN) technique and define the learning curve.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-eight kidney donors who underwent modified HARPLDN by the same surgeon between May 2015 and March 2022 were included. A cumulative sum (CUSUM) learning curve analysis was performed with the total operation time as the study outcome.

RESULTS

In total, the mean operative time was 138.2 ± 32.1 min. The median warm ischemic time (WIT) and estimated blood loss were 90 s and 50 ml, respectively. The learning curve for the total operative time was best modeled as a second-order polynomial with the following equation: CUSUMOT (min) = (-0.09 case number2) + (12.88 case number) - 67.77 (R2 = 0.7875; p<0.05). The CUSUM learning curve included the following three unique phases: phase 1 (the initial 41 cases), representing the initial learning curve; phase 2 (the middle 43 cases), representing expert competence; and phase 3 (the final 54 cases), representing mastery. The overall 6-month graft survival rate was 99.3%, with 94.9% immediate onset of graft function without delayed graft function and 0.7% ureteral complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified method is safe and effective for living donor nephrectomy and has the advantages of a shorter operating time and optimized WIT. The surgeon can become familiar with the modified HARPLDN after 41 cases and effectively perform the next 97 cases.

Relationship between surgical difficulty and postoperative complications of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and establishment of prediction model

BACKGROUND

Few studies have systematically explored the factors influencing the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. To investigate the relationship between the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and postoperative complications of the donor as well as the recipient, and then build a model for predicting the difficulty of surgery.

METHODS

In this study, 60 patients who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy by the same surgeon from September 2022 to March 2024 were included as the modeling group. 20 patients operated on by another surgeon served as the external validation group. The subjective score (1-3 points) of surgical difficulty was used as the quantitative index of surgical difficulty. Pearson and Spearman correlation tests were used to explore the correlation between preoperative data and surgical difficulty scores of kidney donors, and finally built a prediction model through multiple linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

With the increase in the difficulty of operation, both donors and recipients' complications were increased. Linear regression analysis showed that only the number of renal arteries, visceral fat thickness and MAP score were independent risk factors for the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. The prediction equation is as follows: Difficulty score = 0.584*Number of renal arteries + 0.731*MAP score + 0.110*visceral fat thickness.

CONCLUSIONS

Donors with higher surgical difficulty are more likely to have serious complications after surgery as well as the recipient. We also established a reliable prediction model for the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Comprehensive Surgical Audit of Live-Related Donor Nephrectomy: Procedural Parameters, Demographics, Health Assessments, Complications, and Postoperative Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) rates are on the rise globally, including in India. However, the affordability of dialysis treatment remains a significant challenge for many, with costs varying across different regions. Although cost-effective, kidney transplantation faces challenges like a surgeon shortage, lack of infrastructure, and lack of logistic support. The study examines Indian laparoscopic nephrectomy outcomes and their benefits for donor recovery. It covers kidney donor procedural details, demographics, preoperative health evaluations, complications, and one-month follow-up.

METHODS

Ethical approval was obtained, and the study involved 102 cases at the Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Science, Patna, Bihar, India, from 2019 to 2023. Detailed preoperative assessments, postoperative complications, and one-month follow-up analyses were conducted. Statistical analysis employed SPSS version 17 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

RESULTS

The results revealed an average surgery time of 152.3 min, blood loss of 205 ± 42 ml, and a hospital stay of 4.6 ± 2.2 days. The study found a female predominance (80.39%), with a mean donor age of 35.9 ± 5.2 years. Preoperative assessments showed robust patient health, with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) exceeding the expected threshold and normal urea levels, creatinine, electrolytes, liver enzymes, bilirubin, albumin, and total protein. Post-nephrectomy complications were reported, with females experiencing more difficulties than males.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the efficiency and safety of laparoscopic nephrectomy in the Indian context, providing valuable insights into donor demographics, preoperative health assessments, complications, and postoperative outcomes. The findings contribute to understanding laparoscopic nephrectomy outcomes and associated risk factors despite certain limitations.

The impact of body mass index on oncological and surgical outcomes of patients undergoing nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on oncological (primary) and surgical (secondary) outcomes of patients who underwent nephrectomy, as obesity or high BMI is a known risk factor for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and predictor of poorer outcomes.

METHODS

Studies were identified from four electronic databases from database inception to 2 June 2021, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews with the identification number: CRD42021275124.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies containing 13 865 patients were identified for the final meta-analysis. Regarding oncological outcomes, higher BMI predicted higher overall survival (BMI >25 vs BMI <25 kg/m2 : hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.85), cancer-specific survival (BMI >25 vs BMI <25 kg/m2 : HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.50-0.73; BMI 25-30 vs BMI <25 kg/m2 : HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.95; BMI >30 vs BMI <25 kg/m2 : HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.36-0.69), and recurrence-free survival rates (BMI >25 vs BMI <25 kg/m2 : HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.82; BMI 25-30 vs BMI <25 kg/m2 : HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.42-0.82). Those with a lower BMI fared better in surgical outcomes, such as operation time and warm ischaemic time, although the absolute difference was minimal and unlikely to be clinically significant. There was no difference between groups for length of hospital stay, intraoperative or postoperative complications, blood transfusion requirements, and conversion to open surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that a higher BMI is associated with improved long-term oncological survival and similar perioperative outcomes as a lower BMI. More research into the underlying biological and physiological mechanisms will enable better understanding of the effect of BMI, beyond mere association, on post-nephrectomy outcomes.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Retrospective Bicentric Comparison of Learning Curves and Surgical Outcomes From 2 High-volume European Centers

BACKGROUND

Although laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) represents the gold-standard technique for kidney living donation, robotic donor nephrectomy (RDN) settled as another appealing minimally invasive technique over the past decades. A comparison between LDN and RDN outcomes was performed.

METHODS

RDN and LDN outcomes were compared, focusing on operative time and perioperative risk factors affecting surgery duration. Learning curves for both techniques were compared through spline regression and cumulative sum models.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 512 procedures (154 RDN and 358 LDN procedures) performed between 2010 and 2021 in 2 different high-volume transplant centers. The RDN group presented a higher prevalence of arterial variations (36.2 versus 22.4%; P  = 0.001) compared with the LDN cohort. No open conversions occurred; operative time (210 versus 195 min; P  = 0.011) and warm ischemia time (WIT; 230 versus 180 s; P  < 0.001) were longer in RDN. Postoperative complication rate was similar (8.4% versus 11.5%; P  = 0.49); the RDN group showed shorter hospital stay (4 versus 5 d; P  < 0.001). Spline regression models depicted a faster learning curve in the RDN group ( P  = 0.0002). Accordingly, cumulative sum analysis highlighted a turning point after about 50 procedures among the RDN cohort and after about 100 procedures among the LDN group.Higher body mass index resulted as an independent risk factor for longer operative time for both techniques; multiple arteries significantly prolonged operative time in LDN, whereas RDN was longer in right kidney procurements; both procedures were equally shortened by growing surgical experience.

CONCLUSIONS

RDN grants a faster learning curve and improves multiple vessel handling. Incidence of postoperative complications was low for both techniques.

Lactated Ringer as Preservation Solution in Living Donor Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Optimal organ preservation remains a critical hallmark event in renal transplantation as it is the supply line. Previous studies have shown that the choice of preservation solution may affect transplant outcomes. In this study, we aimed to present the early follow-up results of the graft and patients, using lactated Ringer to preserve kidney allografts with living donors.

METHODS

The results of 97 living donor transplant operations performed in Sanko University Hospital were evaluated retrospectively. The patient's evaluation included demographics, dialysis time duration, renal replacement method, primary disease, comorbidity, surgical and clinical complications in the acute period, graft functions, blood levels of calcineurin inhibitor drugs, anastomotic renal artery, warm ischemia, and cold ischemia times.

RESULTS

Donor (49 men, 50.5%) and recipient (58 men, 59.7%) demographics, HLA compatibility (mismatch), hospitalization days, and length of warm and cold ischemic time are summarized in Table 1. Primary nonfunction was not defined in any patients, but delayed graft function was observed during the follow-up of 3 patients (3.09%), who were all hypotensive in the post-transplantation period, and positive inotropic infusion was needed for hemodynamic stability.

CONCLUSIONS

Lactated Ringer demonstrated efficacy in terms of patient and graft survival, and its lower cost represents a financial advantage, so it can be used in living donor kidney transplantation because it is safe, effective, and inexpensive. Standard preservation solutions may still be recommended in cases with long cold ischemia times, such as paired exchange transplants and cadaveric transplants. Thus, randomized controlled studies are needed for further investigation.

Pure Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Single Institution Experience From a Middle Eastern Country

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN) is the most adopted technique for kidney transplantation. Several obstacles preclude brain-dead organ transplantation in the Middle East, going from social and cultural barriers to economical and structural difficulties. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report Lebanese experience with pure LLDN, and kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We included 120 cases of pure LLDN performed at our center. Demographic, perioperative, and immediate postoperative data were analyzed. Surgical particularities of the technique are described.

RESULTS

The reported laparoscopic technique allowed for minimal perioperative morbidity, with an overall complication rate of 3%. Operative time averaged 146 minutes and warm ischemia time averaged 4 minutes. Mean hospital stay was 3 ± 1 days. Postoperative hemoglobin and creatinine showed a mean absolute variation of 0.09 ± 0.06 g/dL for hemoglobin and 0.51 ± 015 μmoles/L increase for creatinine. No Clavien-Dindo III-V complications were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Strict adherence to the reproducible pure LLDN technique allowed for the performance of almost 45 cases per year with minimal morbidity and results comparable to similar series.

Abdominal Panniculectomy Can Simplify Kidney Transplantation in Obese Patients

BACKGROUND

Obesity is frequently present in patients suffering from end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, overweight kidney transplant candidates are a challenge for the transplant surgeon. Obese patients tend to develop a large abdominal panniculus after weight loss creating an area predisposed to wound-healing disorders. Due to concerns about graft survival and postoperative complications after kidney transplantation, obese patients are often refused in this selective patient cohort. The study aimed to analyze the effect of panniculectomies on postoperative complications and transplant candidacy in an interdisciplinary setting.

METHODS

A retrospective database review of 10 cases of abdominal panniculectomies performed in patients with ESRD prior to kidney transplantation was conducted.

RESULTS

The median body mass index was 35.2 kg/m2 (range 28.5-53.0 kg/m2) at first transplant-assessment versus 31.0 kg/m2 (range 28.0-34.4 kg/m2) at panniculectomy, and 31.6 kg/m2 (range 30.3-32.4 kg/m2) at kidney transplantation. We observed no major postoperative complications following panniculectomy and minor wound-healing complications in 2 patients. All aside from 1 patient became active transplant candidates 6 weeks after panniculectomy. No posttransplant wound complications occurred in the transplanted patients.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal panniculectomy is feasible in patients suffering ESRD with no major postoperative complications, thus converting previously ineligible patients into kidney transplant candidates. An interdisciplinary approach is advisable in this selective patient cohort.