Pneumothorax in Patients with Idiopathic Pleuroparenchymal Fibroelastosis: Incidence, Clinical Features, and Risk Factors

Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: diagnosis and management

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (iPPFE) is a rare progressive interstitial lung disease characterized by upper-lobe fibrosis, severe restrictive impairment, and poor prognosis. Unlike idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, in which acute exacerbations, chronic respiratory failure, and lung cancer are the major causes of death, iPPFE primarily leads to progressive respiratory failure, often complicated by malnutrition and recurrent pneumothorax. Despite growing recognition, its pathogenesis remains unclear and no effective treatments exist.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the epidemiological, clinical, radiological, and pathological features of iPPFE, as well as diagnostic and prognostic advancements. Key prognostic factors include weight loss, reduced forced vital capacity, hypercapnia, and lower-lobe interstitial pneumonia. Serum biomarkers (e.g. latent transforming growth factor-beta binding protein-4) are being explored for early detection and prognostic purposes. Although antifibrotic agents show limited efficacy, supportive care - pulmonary rehabilitation, nutritional management, and pneumothorax prevention - remains essential. Research on the fibroelastotic pathways may inform the development of future therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

IPPFE remains a challenging disease. Therefore, early diagnosis and comprehensive management of this condition are crucial. Future research should refine prognostic models and explore novel therapeutic approaches for treating fibroelastosis. Lung transplantation may be an option for select patients. Further studies are required to optimize these outcomes.

Pleuroparenchymal Fibroelastosis: Update on CT and Histologic Findings

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is an interstitial lung disease (ILD) characterized at CT by upper lobe-predominant pleural thickening and subpleural fibrosis and histologically by visceral pleural fibrosis and subpleural fibroelastosis. Although initially classified as a rare idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, many cases are related to known risk factors, particularly hematopoietic stem cell and lung transplant, or observed in association with other ILDs. This review summarizes the diagnostic criteria for PPFE and illustrates the CT and histologic manifestations, aiming to familiarize the radiologist with the range of findings suggestive of the diagnosis. Keywords: Conventional Radiography, CT, Pulmonary, Thorax, Lung, Pleura, Complications, Transplantation, Fibrosis © RSNA, 2025.

Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: A review of the previous literature and current knowledge

Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (iPPFE) is characterized by upper lobe-dominant fibrosis involving the pleura and subpleural lung parenchyma. Pathologically, it is characterized by parenchymal intra-alveolar fibrosis with marked deposition of elastic fibers and dense thickening of the visceral pleura. Since iPPFE was categorized as a rare idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) by the America Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society, several studies have been conducted, revealing an overall picture of iPPFE in terms of epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and mortality, in addition to its radiological and histological characteristics. Subsequently, several clinical diagnostic criteria that were not necessary for pathological analyses were proposed. Further, the underlying diseases responsible for secondary PPFE and PPFE-like lesions and their clinical implications were delineated. Typically, patients with iPPFE exhibit lean body stature together with platythorax, as well as relatively severe impairment of pulmonary function. In addition to upper-lobe PPFE lesions, lower-lobe interstitial lung disease (ILD) is commonly observed in patients with iPPFE, with the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern being most frequent. These distinct features of iPPFE were mostly associated with mortality, resulting in a poor prognosis relative to fibrotic ILD. Despite increased knowledge regarding the clinical characteristics of iPPFE, no effective therapy has been established other than lung transplantation. The efficacy of antifibrotic therapy, nutrition intervention, and pulmonary rehabilitation has not been determined. This article reviews previous studies and discusses the etiology, clinical manifestations, mortality risk, and treatment of iPPFE.

Distinctive clinical features of radiological pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the characteristics and prognosis of patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) pulmonary disease (PD) with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) with those of patients with nodular/bronchiectatic (NB) and fibrocavitary (FC) NTM-PD.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study enrolled 32 patients with NTM-PPFE (median age: 70.5 years, 15 females) from six institutions in Japan from January 2003 to December 2018. Their clinical characteristics and response to therapy were compared with age- and sex-matched cohorts of patients with noncavitary NB and cavitary NB/FC NTM-PD.

RESULTS

Patients with NTM-PPFE had a lower body mass index and a higher standard NTM-PD therapy initiation rate than patients with other NTM-PD types. Sputum culture conversion rates were comparable between groups; however, patients with NTM-PPFE had a higher incidence of treatment-related adverse events, including optic neuropathy associated with high-dose ethambutol therapy, lower percent predicted forced vital capacity values, higher serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels, and poorer treatment outcomes than the other groups. Cox regression revealed that NTM-PPFE was an independent risk factor for death/pneumothorax (adjusted hazard ratio: 35.3, 95% confidence interval: 3.90-4692).

CONCLUSION

NTM-PPFE is a unique NTM-PD phenotype with a poorer prognosis than the NB and FC phenotypes.

Proposed Clinical Algorithm for Pleuroparenchymal Fibroelastosis (PPFE)

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is characterized by fibrosis involving the pleura and subpleural lung parenchyma, predominantly in the upper lobes. As PPFE appears to occur in patients with heterogeneous etiologies, the disease course is thus also heterogenous, with some patients showing rapid progression while others have slow progression. Therefore, it is very difficult to predict prognosis with PPFE. Needless to say, this problematic matter has influenced the treatment strategy of PPFE patients. In fact, until now no evidence has been shown for use in creating an appropriate management algorithm for PPFE. We speculate that "uncoordinated breathing" is the most important reason for dyspnea in PPFE patients. Because monitoring of physique and not just pulmonary function and radiological evaluation is also very important, particularly in PPFE patients, this review focused on the characteristics of PPFE through an overview of previous studies in this field, and we proposed an algorithm as precision medicine based on the current evidence. Multiple views by the pulmonologist are needed to standardize a clinical algorithm that is necessary to correctly assess PPFE patients under the premise of maintenance of physique by providing appropriate nutritional care and pulmonary rehabilitation.

A Rare Case of Idiopathic Pleuro-Parenchymal Fibroelastosis Presenting With Bilateral Spontaneous Pneumothoraces

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a rare interstitial lung disease (ILD), characterized by predominantly upper lobe pleural and subjacent sub-pleural parenchymal fibrosis. Its name refers to a combination of fibrosis involving the visceral pleura with fibroelastotic changes, predominantly in the subpleural lung parenchyma. We describe the case of a 67-year-old lady who presented to the accident and emergency department of Weston General Hospital with worsening shortness of breath (SOB) and cachexia of six to eight months' duration. The initial imaging studies showed bilateral spontaneous pneumothoraces on a background of pleural-based consolidation and fibrotic changes. A subsequent high-resolution CT (HRCT) chest showed evidence of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis in the background. She was not considered for anti-fibrotic medications due to the advanced stage of the disease and was managed with supportive measures, including oxygen support, oral steroids and antibiotics to cover for any infections. After initial management of symptoms and long discussions with the patient, family and the palliative team, she was discharged home with community follow-up.

Prognostic impact of the cross-sectional area of the erector spinae muscle in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) progresses slowly but sometimes relatively quickly, leading to decreased activities of daily living (ADL) and muscle weakness. Skeletal muscle atrophy and muscle weakness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients may be caused by cachexia and are associated with reduced ADLs and increased risk of death. However, the association between skeletal muscle mass and the prognosis of PPFE patients remains unknown. We retrospectively analysed the clinical significance of the cross-sectional area of the erector spinae muscle (ESMCSA), a skeletal muscle index, and predictors of mortality within 3 years in PPFE 51 patients, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) 52 patients and COPD 62 patients. PPFE patients had significantly lower ESMCSA than IPF or COPD patients, and lower ESMCSA (< 22.57 cm2) was associated with prognosis within 3 years (log-rank test; p = 0.006), whereas lower body mass index (BMI) showed no association. Multivariate analysis showed that ESMCSA was an independent predictor of mortality within 3 years in PPFE patients (hazard ratio, 0.854; 95% confidence interval: 0.737-0.990, p = 0.036). These results suggest the importance of monitoring ESMCSA in PPFE patients and that assessing ESMCSA in PPFE patients could be a more useful prognostic indicator than BMI.

Clinical significance of para-carinal air cysts in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: The relationship with pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax

BACKGROUND

Para-tracheal or para-carinal air cysts (PACs) are often asymptomatic and usually detected incidentally by methods such as computed tomography. Their clinical significance is unclear in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE).

METHODS

We evaluated the clinical significance of PACs in PPFE and their relationship with pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax.

RESULTS

In total, 50 patients had PPFE and 34 (68%) had PACs. Most PACs were para-carinal (n = 30). A para-tracheal air cyst was detected in only nine patients, which included five patients having both para-carinal and para-tracheal air cysts. Overall median survival was 24.7 months. Survival was not significantly different between the patients with [PACs(+)] and without PACs (P = 0.268). A high frequency (64%) of the complication of pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax occurred in the overall population during follow-up. Pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax occurred significantly more frequently in patients with PACs(+) than in those without (76.5% vs. 37.5%; P = 0.012). PACs(+) was the only significant risk factor for pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed that PACs commonly occur in patients with PPFE, and most PACs were para-carinal air cysts. Additionally, PACs(+) was a significant risk factor for pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax; therefore, clinicians should be more aware of these complications during follow-up examination, particular in PACs(+) patients with PPFE.

The world of rare interstitial lung diseases

The world of rare interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) is diverse and complex. Diagnosis and therapy usually pose challenges. This review describes a selection of rare and ultrarare ILDs including pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis and pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis. In addition, monogenic ILDs or ILDs in congenital syndromes and various multiple cystic lung diseases will be discussed. All these conditions are part of the scope of the European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases (ERN-LUNG). Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment of each disease are presented.

Clinical features of idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis with progressive phenotype showing a decline in forced vital capacity

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (IPPFE) is heterogeneous, with some patients showing a progressive decline in forced vital capacity (FVC). However, the clinical features of these cases with progressive phenotypes remain unknown.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 48 patients diagnosed with IPPFE who underwent longitudinal pulmonary function tests at our institution from 2005 to 2021. The progressive phenotype was defined as a relative decline of ≥10% in %FVC within two years from diagnosis of IPPFE, and its clinical features were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 48 patients, 23 (47.9%) were classified as progressive IPPFE. They were significantly older with a higher rate of dyspnea, fine crackles on chest auscultation, lower-lobe usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on high-resolution computed tomography, and lower %FVC at diagnosis than non-progressive IPPFE. Additionally, progressive IPPFE had a significantly higher rate of long-term oxygen therapy requirement, the incidence of pneumothorax, and weight loss after diagnosis, which showed worse survival than non-progressive IPPFE. The relative decline in %FVC and weight loss showed a significant positive correlation. Multivariate analysis revealed that lower body mass index tended to predict early progression, and the coexistence of lower-lobe UIP pattern was significantly associated with early progression. A decline in %FVC was an independent poor prognostic factor in IPPFE.

CONCLUSIONS

With a progressive decline in %FVC, IPPFE often has an advanced stage at diagnosis and lower-lobe UIP pattern and is associated with weight loss and worse survival.

Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: three-dimensional computed tomography assessment of upper-lobe lung volume

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (iPPFE) is a rare interstitial lung disease characterised by predominant upper-lobe fibrosis involving the pleura and subpleural lung parenchyma. Despite its poor prognosis, there is no consensus on prognostic determinants of iPPFE to date. Because volume loss in the upper lobe is a distinct feature of iPPFE, we hypothesised that the lung volume of the bilateral upper lobes (upper-lobe volume) accurately indicates disease severity and mortality risk in iPPFE patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study assessed two cohorts of 132 patients with iPPFE (69 in Hamamatsu cohort; 63 in Seirei cohort) and 45 controls. Each lobe volume was quantitatively measured using three-dimensional computed tomography at the time of iPPFE diagnosis and standardised using predicted forced vital capacity.

RESULTS

The standardised upper-lobe volume in iPPFE patients was less than half that of controls, whereas the lower-lobe volume did not decrease. iPPFE patients with lower standardised upper-lobe volume had significantly shorter survival rates than those with higher volume (median survival: 6.08 versus 2.48 years, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, the lower standardised upper-lobe volume was significantly associated with increased mortality adjusting for age, sex and forced vital capacity (HR 0.939). A composite scoring model, including age, sex and standardised upper-lobe volume, better predicted risk of death than the gender-age-physiology model.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of upper-lobe volume provides useful information for managing iPPFE by evaluating disease severity and mortality risk in clinical practice.

Bilateral pneumothoraces with apical consolidations

Bilateral pneumothoraces are extremely rare. Patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis are frequently complicated by pneumothorax, which is sometimes bilateral. Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis should be considered a cause of bilateral pneumothoraces with apical fibrosis.

Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis

The term idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis refers to a rare interstitial lung disease that predominantly involves the upper lobes. It has been considered a rare subtype of interstitial lung disease since 2013, when it was included in the joint consensus statement on the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases published by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Currently, two distinct types of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis are recognized: the idiopathic type for cases in which it has not been possible to establish a specific etiology and a secondary type associated with a variety of different causes. The diagnosis of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis must be managed from a combined clinical and radiological perspective. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the imaging method of choice for the evaluation and diagnosis of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis. In many cases, the diagnosis will be based exclusively on the HRCT findings and histologic confirmation will be unnecessary. This article describes the clinical, radiological, and histological characteristics of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis, discussing the different associations with this entity and its differential diagnosis.

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a clinico-radiologic-pathologic interstitial lung disease (ILD) characterized by fibrosis that has upper lobe and subpleural predominance, involving both the visceral pleura and the subjacent subpleural lung parenchyma, and comprises dense fibroelastic changes with prominent elastosis of the alveolar walls together with fibrous thickening of the visceral pleura. The goal of this review is to summarize the state-of-the-art understanding in PPFE.

RECENT FINDINGS

PPFE was described in an increasing number of conditions. The course of disease is heterogeneous. Idiopathic PPFE, cases associated with telomerase-related gene mutations, cases related to a history of chemotherapy, and cases combining PPFE with a pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia, may have a particularly poor prognosis. Well-conducted retrospective studies identified marked PPFE features in approximately 10% of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 11% of patients with systemic sclerosis-associated ILD, 6.5% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD, and 23% of patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Drug therapy has not been evaluated prospectively. A small retrospective study suggests that nintedanib may slow disease progression. However, whether the efficacy of antifibrotics is comparable in PPFE and in other forms of progressive pulmonary fibrosis warrants further evaluation.

SUMMARY

Accumulating data indicate that PPFE features are associated with poor prognosis in fibrosing ILDs. Further research on the management of PPFE is warranted.

A proposed prognostic prediction score for pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis

BACKGROUND

Clinical course of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) shows considerable variation among patients, but there is no established prognostic prediction model for PPFE.

METHODS

The prediction model was developed using retrospective data from two cohorts: our single-center cohort and a nationwide multicenter cohort involving 21 institutions. Cox regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors. The total score was defined as the weighted sum of values for the selected variables. The performance of the prediction models was evaluated by Harrell's concordance index (C-index). We also examined the usefulness of the gender-age-physiology (GAP) model for predicting the prognosis of PPFE patients.

RESULTS

We examined 104 patients with PPFE (52 cases from each cohort). In a multivariate Cox analysis, a lower forced vital capacity (FVC [defined as FVC < 65%]; hazard ratio [HR], 2.23), a history of pneumothorax (HR, 3.27), the presence of a lower lobe interstitial lung disease (ILD) (HR, 2.31), and higher serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels (> 550 U/mL, HR, 2.56) were significantly associated with a poor prognosis. The total score was calculated as 1 × (FVC, < 65%) + 1 × (history of pneumothorax) + 1 × (presence of lower lobe ILD) + 1 × (KL-6, > 550 U/mL). PPFE patients were divided into three groups based on the prognostic score: stage I (0-1 points), stage II (2 points), and stage III (3-4 points). The survival rates were significantly different in each stage. The GAP stage was significantly associated with the prognosis of PPFE, but no difference was found between moderate (stage II) and severe (stage III) disease. Our new model for PPFE patients (PPFE Prognosis Score) showed better performance in the prediction of mortality in comparison to the GAP model (C-index of 0.713 vs. 0.649).

CONCLUSIONS

Our new model for PPFE patients could be useful for predicting their prognosis.