Diagnostic Pitfalls Related to Morular Metaplasia in Endometrioid Carcinoma: An Underestimated Issue

Endometrioid Squamous Proliferations of the Endometrium Express Alpha-Methylacyl-CoA Racemase (P504s)

Squamous morular metaplasia is closely associated with endometrioid proliferative lesions such as endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, whereas endometrioid adenocarcinoma may also demonstrate squamous differentiation (morular or nonmorular). Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR; P504s) is an immunohistochemistry marker expressed in many tumors, including prostate adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and in a subset of gynecologic carcinomas, predominantly of clear cell histology. In small biopsy samples, the distinction between cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) involving endocervical glands from endometrioid squamous proliferations can be challenging, given their anatomic vicinity and some degree of morphologic overlap. Following the observation of AMACR positivity by immunohistochemistry within squamous morules in an index case, 35 endometrial samples containing squamous morular metaplasia (25) and nonmorular squamous metaplasia (10), and 32 cases of cervical HSIL involving endocervical glands were stained with AMACR. The endometrial cohort consisted of 2 benign anovulatory endometrium, 7 endometrial polyps, 7 endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, 4 atypical polypoid adenomyomas, and 15 endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Positive cases were scored as diffuse (≥50%) or focal (<50%). AMACR staining was present in 96.7% of endometrial squamous lesions, including 14 (93.3%) of endometrioid carcinomas, and in all cases of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, endometrial polyps, atypical polypoid adenomyomas, and anovulatory endometrium with squamous morular metaplasia or nonmorular squamous metaplasia. In comparison, only 2 cases (5.8%) of cervical HSIL demonstrated positivity for AMACR. In conclusion, AMACR can reliably differentiate the cervical versus endometrial origin of squamous lesions in small biopsy specimens.

Corded and hyalinized endometrioid carcinoma: Summary of clinical, histological, immunohistochemical and molecular data

Corded and hyalinized endometrioid carcinoma (CHEC) represents a potential pitfall for pathologists. This study aimed to provide a complete overview of all clinicopathological and molecular features of CHEC. Electronic databases were searched for all published series of CHEC. Clinical, histological, immunohistochemical and molecular data about CHEC were extracted and pooled. Six studies with 62 patients were identified; mean age was 49.8 years (range 19-83). Most cases showed FIGO stage I (68%), low grade (87.5%), and a favorable outcome (78.4%), with "no specific molecular profile" (NSMP). A subset of cases showed high-grade features (12.5%), p53 abnormalities (11.1%) or mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (20%) and occurred at an older age (mean age>60 years). Common features of CHEC were: superficial localization of the corded component (88.6%), squamous/morular differentiation (82.5%), nuclear β-catenin accumulation (92%), partial/total loss of CKAE1/AE3 (88.9%), estrogen receptor (95.7%) and e-cadherin (100%), stromal changes such as myxoid (38.5%), osteoid (24%) and chondroid (4.5%), CTNNB1 mutations (57.9%), and POLE-wild-type (100%); 24.4% of cases showed lymphovascular space invasion. A minority of cases (16.2%) showed poor outcome despite a low-grade, NSMP phenotype; the molecular basis for the aggressiveness of these cases is still undefined. Further studies are necessary in this field.

Pilomatrix-like High-Grade Endometrioid Carcinoma of the Ovary: Case Report, Literature Review, and Differential Diagnosis

Pilomatrix-like high-grade endometrioid carcinoma (PiMHEC) has recently been described as an aggressive variant of endometrial carcinoma. Herein, we described a case of ovarian PiMHEC, comparing it to endometrial PiMHEC and assessing previously published cases of putative ovarian PiMHEC. A 65-year-old woman underwent hysterectomy for an ovarian tumor characterized by solid nests of basaloid cells with prominent ghost cell keratinization. Immunohistochemistry showed nuclear β-catenin and CDX2 expression and loss of estrogen and progesterone receptors and PAX8. These features were consistently observed in all previously published cases and may represent diagnostic criteria of PiMHEC. Other frequent features were geographic necrosis and a low-grade endometrioid component. CK7, neuroendocrine, and basal/squamous markers were inconsistently expressed. All cases with available follow-up showed poor prognosis. PiMHEC should be distinguished from mimickers, such as high-grade endometrioid carcinoma with geographic necrosis, low-grade endometrioid carcinoma with ghost cell keratinization, and undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma. In conclusion, PiMHEC can also occur in the ovary and shows several consistent clinical, morphological, and immunophenotypical features. These features support that PiMHEC is a distinct entity requiring an aggressive management.