1
|
Porth I, Hirsch D, Ceribas Y, Weidner P, Weichert W, Götze TO, Perner S, Luley K, Heyer CM, de la Torre C, Hofheinz RD, Lorenzen S, Gaiser T. Comprehensive biomarker analysis of long-term response to trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2023; 183:119-130. [PMID: 36848831 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A subgroup of patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers shows long-term response under trastuzumab maintenance monotherapy. Obviously, HER2 status alone is not able to identify these patients. We performed this study to identify potential new prognostic biomarkers for this long-term responding patient group. PATIENTS AND METHODS Tumour samples of 19 patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer who underwent trastuzumab treatment were retrospectively collected from multiple centres. Patients were divided into long-term responding (n = 7) or short-term responding group (n = 12) according to progression-free survival (PFS≥12 months vs. PFS < 12 months). Next-generation sequencing and microarray-based gene expression analysis were performed along with HER2 and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. RESULTS Long-term responding patients had significantly higher PD-L1 combined positive scores (CPS) and CPS correlated with longer progression-free survival. PD-L1 positivity (CPS ≥ 1) was further associated with an increased CD4+ memory T-cell score. The ERBB2 copy number as well as the tumour mutational burden could not discriminate between short-term and long-term responding patients. Genetic alterations and coamplifications in HER2 pathway associated genes such as EGFR, which were connected to trastuzumab resistance, were present in 10% of the patients and equally distributed between the groups. CONCLUSION The study highlights the clinical relevance of PD-L1 testing also in the context of trastuzumab treatment and offers a biological rational by demonstrating elevated CD4+ memory T-cells scores in the PD-L1-positive group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Porth
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Daniela Hirsch
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Yonca Ceribas
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Philip Weidner
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Wilko Weichert
- Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich; Bavarian Cancer Center (BZKF), Germany
| | - Thorsten Oliver Götze
- Institute of Clinical Cancer Research, Krankenhaus Nordwest, UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt, Germany; IKF Klinische Krebsforschung GmbH am Krankenhaus Nordwest, 60488 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sven Perner
- Institute of Pathology, University of Luebeck and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Luebeck, 23538 Luebeck, Germany; Pathology, Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Lung Center, Borstel, Germany
| | - Kim Luley
- Clinic for Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Luebeck, 23538 Luebeck, Germany
| | - Christian Moritz Heyer
- Biomedical Informatics, Data Mining and Data Analytics, Augsburg University, 86159 Augsburg, Germany; Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolina de la Torre
- NGS Core Facility, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz
- Interdisciplinary Tumor Center Mannheim, University Hospital Mannheim, University Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sylvie Lorenzen
- Medical Clinic III, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Timo Gaiser
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; Institute of Applied Pathology, 67346, Speyer, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:6433-6444. [PMID: 36135075 PMCID: PMC9497544 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29090506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, advances of anticancer and supportive therapies have determined a gradual improvement in survival rates and patients’ general conditions in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC), allowing them to receive further treatments. The choice of treatment is driven by performance status, age, stage of disease, number of metastatic sites and time from the first to third line of treatment. Targets such as microsatellite instability, PD-L1 expression, and HER2 overexpression or amplification may be addressed to personalise treatment and prolong survival. Despite a growing number of third line options that have provided clinicians with greater opportunities to customise treatments, up to date few agents have been demonstrated as effective after two standard lines for mGC; for these reasons, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy were all widely investigated in both phase II and phase III studies. Overall, TAS-102, apatinib, regorafenib, nilotinib, trastuzumab, and pembrolizumab were demonstrated to be valid options in the third line scenario for mGC patient refractory to at least two lines of therapy. A multimodal approach based on chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted agents, a personalised nutritional programme as well as the research of new predictive biomarkers may pave the way to new strategies to identify the best treatment for each patient.
Collapse
|