Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Metastatic Solid Tumors Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Risk factors for long-term invasive mechanical ventilation: a longitudinal study using German health claims data

BACKGROUND

Long-term invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is a major burden for those affected and causes high costs for the health care system. Early risk assessment is a prerequisite for the best possible support of high-risk patients during the weaning process. We aimed to identify risk factors for long-term IMV within 96 h (h) after the onset of IMV.

METHODS

The analysis was based on data from one of Germany's largest statutory health insurance funds; patients who received IMV ≥ 96 h and were admitted in January 2015 at the earliest and discharged in December 2017 at the latest were analysed. OPS and ICD codes of IMV patients were considered, including the 365 days before intubation and 30 days after discharge. Long-term IMV was defined as evidence of invasive home mechanical ventilation (HMV), IMV ≥ 500 h, or readmission with (re)prolonged ventilation.

RESULTS

In the analysis of 7758 hospitalisations, criteria for long-term IMV were met in 38.3% of cases, of which 13.9% had evidence of HMV, 73.1% received IMV ≥ 500 h and/or 40.3% were re-hospitalised with IMV. Several independent risk factors were identified (p < 0.005 each), including pre-diagnoses such as pneumothorax (OR 2.10), acute pancreatitis (OR 2.64), eating disorders (OR 1.99) or rheumatic mitral valve disease (OR 1.89). Among ICU admissions, previous dependence on an aspirator or respirator (OR 5.13), and previous tracheostomy (OR 2.17) were particularly important, while neurosurgery (OR 2.61), early tracheostomy (OR 3.97) and treatment for severe respiratory failure such as positioning treatment (OR 2.31) and extracorporeal lung support (OR 1.80) were relevant procedures in the first 96 h after intubation.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive analysis of health claims has identified several risk factors for the risk of long-term ventilation. In addition to the known clinical risks, the information obtained may help to identify patients at risk at an early stage. Trial registration The PRiVENT study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05260853). Registered at March 2, 2022.

Critically ill metastatic cancer patients returning home after unplanned ICU stay: an observational, multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Data about critically ill metastatic cancer patients functional outcome after unplanned admission to the ICU are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with 90-day return home and 1-year survival in this population.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study included all consecutive metastatic cancer patients admitted to the ICU for unplanned reason between 2017 and 2020.

RESULTS

Among 253 included metastatic cancer patients, mainly with lung cancer, 94 patients (37.2%) could return home on day 90. One-year survival rate was 28.5%. Performance status 0 or 1 (OR, 2.18; 95% CI 1.21-3.93; P = 0.010), no malnutrition (OR, 2.90; 95% CI 1.61-5.24; P < 0.001), female gender (OR, 2.39; 95% CI 1.33-4.29; P = 0.004), recent chemotherapy (OR, 2.62; 95% CI 1.40-4.90; P = 0.003), SOFA score ≤ 5 on admission (OR, 2.62; 95% CI 1.41-4.90; P = 0.002) were significantly predictive for 90-day return home. Malnutrition (HR, 1.66; 95% CI 1.18-2.22; P = 0.003), acute respiratory failure (ARF) as reason for admission (HR, 1.40; 95% CI 1.10-1.95; P = 0.043), SAPS II on admission (HR, 1.03; 95% CI 1.02-1.05; P < 0.001) and decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapies (DFLST) (HR, 2.80; 95% CI 2.04-3.84; P < 0.001) were independently associated with 1-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one out of three metastatic cancer patients could return home within 3 months after an unplanned admission to the ICU. Previous performance and nutritional status, ongoing specific treatment and low severity of the acute illness were found to be predictive for return home. Such encouraging findings should help change the dismal perception of critically ill metastatic cancer patients.