Serendipity and Observations in Functional Neurosurgery: From James Parkinson's Stroke to Hamani's & Lozano's Flashbacks

MR-guided focused ultrasound in movement disorders and beyond: Lessons learned and new frontiers

The development of MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) has provided a new therapeutic tool for neuropsychiatric disorders. In contrast to previously available neurosurgical techniques, MRgFUS allows precise impact on deep brain structures without the need for incision and yields an immediate effect. In its high-intensity modality (MRgHIFU), it produces accurate therapeutic thermoablation in previously selected brain targets. Importantly, the production of the lesion is progressive and highly controlled in real-time by both neuroimaging and clinical means. MRgHIFU ablation is already an accepted and widely used treatment for medically-refractory Parkinson's disease and essential tremor. Notably, other neurological disorders and diverse brain targets, including bilateral treatments, are currently under examination. Conversely, the low-intensity modality (MRgLIFU) shows promising prospects in neuromodulation and transient blood-brain barrier opening (BBBO). In the former circumstance, MRgLIFU could serve as a powerful clinical and research tool for non-invasively modulating brain activity and function. BBBO, on the other hand, emerges as a potentially impactful method to influence disease pathogenesis and progression by increasing brain target engagement of putative therapeutic agents. While promising, these applications remain experimental. As a recently developed technology, MRgFUS is not without challenges and questions to be addressed. Further developments and broader experience are necessary to enhance MRgFUS capabilities in both research and clinical practice, as well as to define device constraints. This clinical mini-review aims to provide an overview of the main evidence of MRgFUS application and to highlight unmet needs and future potentialities of the technique.

Deep brain stimulation for Alzheimer's disease - current status and next steps

INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer's disease (AD) requires novel therapeutic approaches due to limited efficacy of current treatments.

AREAS COVERED

This article explores AD as a manifestation of neurocircuit dysfunction and evaluates deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a potential intervention. Focusing on fornix-targeted stimulation (DBS-f), the article summarizes safety, feasibility, and outcomes observed in phase 1/2 trials, highlighting findings such as cognitive improvement, increased metabolism, and hippocampal growth. Topics for further study include optimization of electrode placement, and the role of stimulation-induced autobiographical-recall. Nucleus basalis of Meynert (DBS-NBM) DBS is also discussed and compared with DBS-f. Challenges with both DBS-f and DBS-NBM are identified, emphasizing the need for further research on optimal stimulation parameters. The article also reviews alternative DBS targets, including medial temporal lobe structures and the ventral capsule/ventral striatum.

EXPERT OPINION

Looking ahead, a phase-3 DBS-f trial, and the prospect of closed-loop stimulation using EEG-derived biomarkers or hippocampal theta activity are highlighted. Recent FDA-approved therapies and other neuromodulation techniques like temporal interference and low-intensity ultrasound are considered. The article concludes by underscoring the importance of imaging-based diagnosis and staging to allow for circuit-targeted therapies, given the heterogeneity of AD and varied stages of neurocircuit dysfunction.

Severe Refractory Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and Depression: Should We Consider Stereotactic Neurosurgery?

Functional neurosurgery involves modulation of activity within neural circuits that drive pathological activity. Neurologists and neurosurgeons have worked closely together, advancing the field for over a century, such that neurosurgical procedures for movement disorders are now accepted as "standard of care", benefiting hundreds of thousands of patients. As with movement disorders, some neuropsychiatric illnesses, including obsessive compulsive disorder and depression, can be framed as disorders of neural networks. Over the past two decades, evidence has accumulated that stereotactic neurosurgery can help some patients with mental disorders. Nevertheless, despite the availability of class I evidence for some interventions, there is a huge mismatch between the prevalence of severe refractory mental disorders and the number of referrals made to specialised functional neurosurgery services. This paper examines the historical trajectory of neurosurgery for movement and mental disorders. A review of neurosurgical techniques, including stereotactic radiofrequency ablation, gamma knife, deep brain stimulation, and magnetic resonance imaging guided focused ultrasound, explains the high degree of safety afforded by technological advances in the field. Evidence from clinical trials supporting functional neurosurgery for mental disorders, including obsessive compulsive disorder and depression, is presented. An improved understanding of modern functional neurosurgery should foster collaboration between psychiatry and neurosurgery, providing hope to patients whose symptoms are refractory to all other treatments.

Deep brain stimulation in disorders of consciousness: 10 years of a single center experience

Disorders of consciousness (DoC), namely unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and minimally conscious state (MCS), represent severe conditions with significant consequences for patients and their families. Several studies have reported the regaining of consciousness in such patients using deep brain stimulation (DBS) of subcortical structures or brainstem nuclei. Our study aims to present the 10 years' experience of a single center using DBS as a therapy on a cohort of patients with DoC. Eighty Three consecutive patients were evaluated between 2011 and 2022; entry criteria consisted of neurophysiological and neurological evaluations and neuroimaging examinations. Out of 83, 36 patients were considered candidates for DBS implantation, and 32 patients were implanted: 27 patients had UWS, and five had MCS. The stimulation target was the centromedian-parafascicular complex in the left hemisphere in hypoxic brain lesion or the one better preserved in patients with traumatic brain injury. The level of consciousness was improved in seven patients. Three out of five MCS patients emerged to full awareness, with the ability to interact and communicate. Two of them can live largely independently. Four out of 27 UWS patients showed consciousness improvement with two patients emerging to full awareness, and the other two reaching MCS. In patients with DoC lasting longer than 12 months following traumatic brain injury or 6 months following anoxic-ischemic brain lesion, spontaneous recovery is rare. Thus, DBS of certain thalamic nuclei could be recommended as a treatment option for patients who meet neurological, neurophysiological and neuroimaging criteria, especially in earlier phases, before occurrence of irreversible musculoskeletal changes. Furthermore, we emphasize the importance of cooperation between centers worldwide in studies on the potentials of DBS in treating patients with DoC.

Mapping Lesion-Related Epilepsy to a Human Brain Network

Importance

It remains unclear why lesions in some locations cause epilepsy while others do not. Identifying the brain regions or networks associated with epilepsy by mapping these lesions could inform prognosis and guide interventions.

Objective

To assess whether lesion locations associated with epilepsy map to specific brain regions and networks.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This case-control study used lesion location and lesion network mapping to identify the brain regions and networks associated with epilepsy in a discovery data set of patients with poststroke epilepsy and control patients with stroke. Patients with stroke lesions and epilepsy (n = 76) or no epilepsy (n = 625) were included. Generalizability to other lesion types was assessed using 4 independent cohorts as validation data sets. The total numbers of patients across all datasets (both discovery and validation datasets) were 347 with epilepsy and 1126 without. Therapeutic relevance was assessed using deep brain stimulation sites that improve seizure control. Data were analyzed from September 2018 through December 2022. All shared patient data were analyzed and included; no patients were excluded.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Epilepsy or no epilepsy.

Results

Lesion locations from 76 patients with poststroke epilepsy (39 [51%] male; mean [SD] age, 61.0 [14.6] years; mean [SD] follow-up, 6.7 [2.0] years) and 625 control patients with stroke (366 [59%] male; mean [SD] age, 62.0 [14.1] years; follow-up range, 3-12 months) were included in the discovery data set. Lesions associated with epilepsy occurred in multiple heterogenous locations spanning different lobes and vascular territories. However, these same lesion locations were part of a specific brain network defined by functional connectivity to the basal ganglia and cerebellum. Findings were validated in 4 independent cohorts including 772 patients with brain lesions (271 [35%] with epilepsy; 515 [67%] male; median [IQR] age, 60 [50-70] years; follow-up range, 3-35 years). Lesion connectivity to this brain network was associated with increased risk of epilepsy after stroke (odds ratio [OR], 2.82; 95% CI, 2.02-4.10; P < .001) and across different lesion types (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.23-3.69; P < .001). Deep brain stimulation site connectivity to this same network was associated with improved seizure control (r, 0.63; P < .001) in 30 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (21 [70%] male; median [IQR] age, 39 [32-46] years; median [IQR] follow-up, 24 [16-30] months).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings in this study indicate that lesion-related epilepsy mapped to a human brain network, which could help identify patients at risk of epilepsy after a brain lesion and guide brain stimulation therapies.

Targeting the Future: Developing a Training Curriculum for Robotic Assisted Neurosurgery

OBJECTIVE

Technological advances have significantly fostered the use of robotics in neurosurgery. Due to their novelty, there is a need to develop training methods within neurosurgical residency programs that provide trainees the skills to utilize these systems in their future practices safely and effectively.

METHODS

We describe a detailed curriculum for trainees with significant responsibilities in the operating room, as well as hands-on and theoretical didactics. The curriculum for robot-assisted stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implantation technique and assessment tool has been designed based on Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME's) milestone requirement for surgical treatment of epilepsy and movement disorders. Residents were surveyed to assess their use of robotics in their surgical training.

RESULTS

Since 2019, more than 100 patients have undergone robot-assisted SEEG and DBS depth electrode implantations at our institution. Residents and fellows were involved in all aspects of surgical planning and execution and were encouraged to take an active role during procedures. Didactic sessions led by experienced faculty are emphasized as important learning tools prior to hands-on experience in the operating room. The results of the survey show that residents receive more training intraoperatively as compared to training sessions, yet trainees would benefit from more instruction on informative cadaveric simulation sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our curriculum was developed to become a structured tool for assessment of robotic education in neurosurgical training. This curriculum based on ACGME milestone requirements serve as a template for resident and fellow education in robotics in neurosurgery.