The association between adverse pregnancy outcomes and maternal factor V Leiden genotype: a meta-analysis

The Proper Diagnosis of Thrombophilic Status in Preventing Fetal Growth Restriction

Fetal growth restriction is an important part of monitoring a pregnancy. Because guidelines or diagnostic criteria for either minor or major thrombophilia are scarce, this systematic review aims to summarize the present knowledge in the field. We performed the CRD42022376006 protocol in Prospero with a systematic literature search in PubMed and Web of Science databases and included original full-text articles (randomized control trials and clinical trials) from the last 10 years, published in English, and with the "thrombophilia AND (pregnancy OR diagnostic criteria) AND fetal growth restriction" criteria. After two researchers extracted the articles of interest, they were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and eight articles were included. The elements from the thrombophilia diagnostic predict IUGR, factor V Leiden mutation, MTHFR C667T mutation, protein S deficiency, antithrombin deficiency, factor VII polymorphism, and antiphospholipid antibodies, while the association of protein C, PAI-1 and certain combinations of mutations are still under debate and require the collection of more data. The present systematic review provides an extensive picture of the actual knowledge about thrombophilia diagnosis and its links with pregnancy complications, such as intrauterine growth restriction, despite its limitation in the inclusion of other actually debated disorders such as PAI-1 mutation, protein C deficiency and other thrombophilia types.

Factor V Leiden G1691A and Prothrombin Gene G20210A Mutations on Pregnancy Outcome

Factor V Leiden (FVL) G1619A mutation and prothrombin gene (PTG) G20210A are the most common inherited thrombophilias. They have been associated with various obstetric complications such as venous thromboembolism, recurrent pregnancy loss, preeclampsia, abruptio placentae, and small for gestational age fetus. The prevalence of these two mutations is 3-15% in Caucasians and is assumed to be far less common in other ethnic populations. However, there have been several controversies regarding advising routine screening of these thrombophilias because of a widely variable strength of association between different ethnic groups, as well as contradictory conclusions by different studies in regards to the association. In this study, the literature was analyzed thoroughly for the effect of FVL G1619A and PTG G20210A mutations on various obstetric outcomes. A review of multiple case-control and prospective studies suggests that despite the availability of robust data on this subject the results remain inconclusive and insubstantial. Further superior quality research, preferably prospective studies, is warranted to conclusively establish this relationship and to enable practitioners to follow a definitive protocol in the screening of various populations for these mutations to achieve an improved pregnancy outcome.

Hereditary thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY QUESTION

Is there an association between hereditary thrombophilia in pregnant women and risk of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Pregnant women with hereditary thrombophilia have an increased risk of RPL, especially for pregnant women with the G1691A mutation of the factor V Leiden (FVL) gene, the G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene (PGM), and deficiency of protein S (PS).

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Prior studies have suggested that pregnant women with hereditary thrombophilia have a higher risk of RPL, however, the results are inconsistent; furthermore, a complete overview is missing. This lack of information is an obstacle to the risk assessment of RPL in pregnant women with hereditary thrombophilia. A comprehensive meta-analysis on the relation between hereditary thrombophilia and the risk of RPL is needed.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using observational studies published in English before 1 April 2020 to evaluate the relation between hereditary thrombophilia and risk of RPL.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Relevant studies were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE searches and complemented with perusal of bibliographies of retrieved articles. The exposure of interest was hereditary thrombophilia, including FVL mutation, PGM, deficiency of antithrombin (AT), deficiency of protein C (PC), and deficiency of PS. The overall risk estimates were pooled using random effects models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were carried out to explore possible sources of heterogeneity and assess the robustness of the results.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 89 studies involving 30 254 individuals were included. Results showed that women with FVL mutation (odds ratio (OR): 2.44, 95% CI: 1.96-3.03), PGM (OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.61-2.68), or deficiency of PS (OR: 3.45, 95% CI: 1.15-10.35) had higher risks of developing RPL. Compared with the reference group, there was no observed relation between a deficiency in AT or PC and RPL (all P > 0.05). Heterogeneity in the risk estimates of RPL was partially explained by geographic region, definitions of RPL, types of RPL, and controlled confounders. Sensitivity analyses validated the robustness of the findings.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Only 39 of the included studies controlled for one or more confounders, and the heterogeneity across all included studies was high. Based on the data available, we cannot determine whether this association is confounded by other potential risk factors of RPL.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This systematic review and meta-analysis show a possible association between hereditary thrombophilia and an increased risk of RPL, suggesting that testing for hereditary thrombophilia should be considered in individuals with RPL.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study was funded by the Hunan Provincial Key Research and Development Program (Grant number: 2018SK2062) and National Natural Science Foundation Program (Grant number: 81973137). There are no conflicts of interest.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Immunologic causes and thrombophilia in recurrent pregnancy loss

Certain miscarriages result from immunologic factors, but there is no clear identification of the precise causes of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Miscarriages and RPL can arise from a disruption of maternal-fetal immune homeostasis. Remodeling of the maternal uterine spiral arteries is one of the key steps for normal growth and development of the fetus. An adequate oxygen supply is necessary for correct placentation, and it is accomplished by proper vascular changes. The development of fetal tissues creates a potential immunologic problem since the fetus can express paternal antigens and, in some cases, antigens of a gamete donor. The maternal immune system actively responds to fetal antigens, and dysregulation of this crosstalk could partly explain pregnancy complications such as miscarriages and RPL. RPL resulting from thrombophilia is primarily due to acquired thrombophilia, and therefore screening and treatment should be focused on antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 197: Inherited Thrombophilias in Pregnancy

Inherited thrombophilias are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and have been linked to adverse outcomes in pregnancy. However, there is limited evidence to guide screening for and management of these conditions in pregnancy. The purpose of this document is to review common thrombophilias and their association with maternal venous thromboembolism risk and adverse pregnancy outcomes, indications for screening to detect these conditions, and management options in pregnancy. This Practice Bulletin has been revised to provide additional information on recommendations for candidates for thrombophilia evaluation, updated consensus guidelines regarding the need for prophylaxis in women with an inherited thrombophilia during pregnancy and the postpartum period, and discussion of new published consensus guidelines from the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology addressing thromboprophylaxis and neuraxial anesthetic considerations in the obstetric population.

Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors Associated with Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and a combination of environmental and genetic risk factors contributes to VTE risk. Within environmental risk factors, some are provoking (e.g., cancer, surgery, trauma or fracture, immobilization, pregnancy and the postpartum period, long-distance travel, hospitalization, catheterization, and acute infection) and others are nonprovoking (e.g., age, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index and obesity, oral contraceptive or hormone therapy use, corticosteroid use, statin use, diet, physical activity, sedentary time, and air pollution). Additionally, VTE has a strong genetic basis, with approximately 50 to 60% of the variance in VTE incidence attributed to genetic effects. Some genetic susceptibility variants that contribute to risk have been identified in candidate genes, mostly related to the clotting system and responsible for inherited hypercoagulable states (e.g., factor V Leiden, prothrombin, fibrinogen gamma, or blood group non-O). Other susceptibility single-nucleotide polymorphisms have been identified from genome-wide association studies, such as the two new loci in TSPAN15 (rs78707713) and SCL44A2 (rs2288904) genes. Risk factors are not always associated with VTE in isolation; however, and an understanding of how environmental and genetic factors interact may provide insight into the pathophysiology of VTE, possibly identifying opportunities for targeted prevention and treatment.

The Role of Anticoagulants in the Prevention of Pregnancy Complications

The role of anticoagulants in the prevention of pregnancy complications, including recurrent miscarriage, late fetal loss, and preeclampsia, continues to be an area of active research and debate. Although prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin and aspirin is considered the standard of care in some conditions, such as obstetric antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, the optimal management of pregnant women with factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin G20210A mutation, and other inherited thrombophilias without a history of thrombosis remains unknown. Some studies suggest a benefit of heparins in preventing late-term losses but not earlier miscarriages in the inherited thrombophilias. In the following review, we will discuss the recent literature regarding anticoagulation and pregnancy complications and conclude with our suggested approach to the management of these challenging patients.

Association Between Gene Polymorphisms on Chromosome 1 and Susceptibility to Pre-Eclampsia: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Background

This meta-analysis enabled us to obtain a precise estimation of the association between gene polymorphisms on chromosome 1 (MTHFR, AGT, F5, IL-10, LEPR) and the susceptibility to pre-eclampsia (PE) in order to reach a uniform conclusion.

Material/Methods

Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochran Library (CENTRAL), and Chinese databases (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure-CNKI and Wan Fang) were electronically searched to select relevant studies for this meta-analysis. We selected 95 case-control studies investigating 5 genes (MTHFR, AGT, F5, IL-10, and LEPR) with 8 SNPs. Odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for estimating the association.

Results

A total of 16 646 PE patients and 28 901 normal-pregnancy patients were included in this meta-analysis. The overall results suggested that rs1801133 of MTHFR (OR=1.17, 95% CI: 1.05–1.13) and rs6025 of F5 (OR=1.53, 95%CI: 1.07–2.20) are significantly associated with PE, whereas rs1801131 of MTHFR, rs699 and rs4762 of AGT, rs1800896 and rs1800871 of IL-10, and rs1137101 of LEPR have no significant association with PE. Subgroup analysis by ethnicity revealed that, except for MTHFR rs1801133 and F5 rs6025 in Caucasians, which were significantly associated with an increased risk of PE, none of these SNPs were significantly associated with PE. As suggested by a symmetric funnel plot in conjunction with the Egger’s test, there was no significant publication bias in MTHFR rs1801133 (P=0.318) and rs1801131 (P=0.204), F5 rs6025 (P=0.511), LEPR rs1137101 (P=0.511), AGT rs4762 (P=0.215) and rs699 (P=0.482), IL-10 rs1800871 (P=0.955), and rs1800896 (P=0.144).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis provides evidence that MTHFR rs1801133 and F5 rs6025 are associated with an increased risk of PE, especially in Caucasians. However, we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude there is a significant association between other gene polymorphisms and PE.

Prevalence and role of antithrombin III, protein C and protein S deficiencies and activated protein C resistance in Kosovo women with recurrent pregnancy loss during the first trimester of pregnancy

CONTEXT

Several studies have reported that thrombophilia is responsible for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and role of inherited thrombophilia in early pregnancy loss, specifically in the first trimester.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 104 women (patients) with a history of two or more miscarriages during the first trimester of pregnancy and 110 women (controls) who had experienced two or more births without a miscarriage were included in this study. In both groups, we determined the biological activities of antithrombin III (ATIII) and protein C (PC) using the chromogenic method and the biological activity of protein S (PS) and the activated protein C resistance (APCR) were examined using a clotting method.

RESULTS

In the patient group, deficiencies of ATIII, PC, and PS were detected in 3 (2.88%), 4 (3.85%), and 6 (5.77%) cases, respectively. In the control group, ATIII (0%) deficiencies were not detected, and deficiencies for PC (0.9%) and PS (0.9%) were each detected in 1 patient. APCR was detected in 9 patients (8.65%) and 4 control subjects (3.63%).

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, we can conclude that thrombophilia is a causal factor for miscarriages in the first trimester of pregnancy, although there are the conflicting data in the literature.

Ethnic differences in the association of thrombophilic polymorphisms with obstetric complications in Slovak and Roma (Gypsy) populations

AIMS

Hereditary as well as acquired thrombophilia is associated with a higher incidence of severe obstetric complications such as preeclampsia, spontaneous pregnancy loss, placental abruption, and fetal growth retardation. The aim of our study was to examine the association of selected thrombophilic polymorphisms (factor V Leiden, MTHFR C677T, and MTHFR A1298C) with pregnancy complications in the Slovak majority population and the Roma (Gypsy) ethnic population. The study included 354 women; 120 patients and 105 controls from the Slovak majority population, 50 patients and 79 controls from the Slovak Roma population. Genotyping was performed by the real-time polymerase chain reaction method using TaqMan(®) MGB probes.

RESULTS

A statistically significant higher frequency of factor V Leiden (p=0.001, odds ratio [OR]=5.9) and MTHFR C677T polymorphism (p=0.011, OR=1.7) was observed in the Slovak majority patient group compared to the control group. The incidence of MTHFR A1298C polymorphism between patients and controls did not differ significantly. None of the three polymorphisms studied was in association with pregnancy complications in the group of Roma women.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has confirmed the variable distribution of selected thrombophilic polymorphisms in different ethnic groups as well as their various effects on the clinical phenotype.

Coagulation and placenta-mediated complications

Pregnancy is a physiological hypercoagulable state, preparing the mother for the hemostatic challenge of delivery. However, this is associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis and placenta-mediated complications, which present major challenges for mother and fetus. Although these conditions are heterogeneous in their pathophysiology, hereditary and acquired thrombophilia has been associated with recurrent pregnancy loss and gestational vascular complications, such as early-onset pre-eclampsia and placental abruption. Prevention of such placenta-mediated complications, which collectively complicate up to 15% of pregnancies, is a major issue for women's health. Prospective interventional studies stratified by current knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms related to placental and systemic hemostatic alterations will impact on the management of pregnancies at risk of these complications.

The role of thrombophilia in pregnancy

Thrombotic disease is a major cause of peripartum morbidity and mortality worldwide. Development of thrombosis in pregnancy is multifactorial due to the physiologic changes of pregnancy—which induce a relative hypercoagulable state—as well as physical changes leading to increased stasis and also the effects of both the inherited and the acquired thrombophilias. In this review, we discuss the impact of each of these factors on the development of thrombosis as well as the evidence for the impact of pregnancy-associated thrombosis on pregnancy outcome. We then discuss the use of both prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation during pregnancy and the puerperium. We review the indications and dosing recommendations for administration of anticoagulation in a context of discussing the evidence including the lack of evidence and formal guidelines in this area. We briefly address the role of the new oral anticoagulants in pregnancy and conclude that significant further research in women with thrombophilias and pregnancy-associated thrombosis may help clarify the management of this condition in the future.

Thromboembolische Komplikationen und die Bedeutung der Thrombophilie in der Schwangerschaft

Ziel: Überblick über Pathogenese, Prophylaxe und Therapie thromboembolischer Komplikationen.

Methode: Literaturrecherche in Pubmed.

Ergebnisse und Diskussion: In der Schwangerschaft verändert sich die plasmatische Gerinnung zugunsten der prokoagulatorischen Eigenschaften des Blutes, um dem Blutverlust bei der Geburt entgegenzuwirken. Venöse Thromboembolien (VTE) gehören in der westlichen Welt weiterhin zu den führenden Ursachen für schwerwiegende mütterliche Morbidität und Sterblichkeit. Das Risiko, eine venöse Thromboembolie zu erleiden, steigt in der Schwangerschaft um das 4-5-fache und in der Postpartum-Periode sogar um das 20-fache. Insbesondere bei Patientinnen mit einer erworbenen oder hereditären Thrombophilie kann es zu vaskulär bedingten Schwangerschaftskomplikationen kommen. Hierzu zählen die tiefe Beinvenenthrombose, die Lungenembolie, aber auch rezidivierende Aborte bei AntiphospholipidSyndrom. Empfehlungen im Hinblick auf die Notwendigkeit einer prophylaktischen Gabe von niedermolekularem Heparin werden bei den verschiedenen Thrombophilien individuell getroffen. Sie sind abhängig von der Art der Thrombophilie, der Eigen- und Familienanamnese hinsichtlich tiefer Beinvenenthrombosen, Lungenembolien oder rezidivierender Aborte sowie dem Verlauf der Schwangerschaft. Eine generelle Empfehlung für eine prophylaktische Heparinisierung bei laborchemisch nachgewiesener Thrombophilie gibt es nicht.

Als antikoagulatorische Therapie der Wahl bei thromboembolischen Komplikationen in der Schwangerschaft gelten die niedermolekularen Heparine, da sie nebenwirkungsarm und nicht teratogen sind. Die Therapie der akuten VTE sollte in der Regel bis 6 Wochen post part-um bei einer Gesamtdauer von mindestens 3 Monaten durchgeführt werden. Liegt ein Anti-phospholipid-Syndrom vor, wird zusätzlich Acetylsalicylsäure (75–100 mg/Tag) empfohlen. Da ein Großteil der tiefen Beinvenenthrombosen in der Schwangerschaft proximal auftreten, ist das Risiko eines postthrombotischen Syndroms hoch. Zur Minimierung von Früh- und Spätkomplikationen bei Thromboembolien in der Schwangerschaft ist eine frühzeitige Diagnostik sowie eine risikoadaptierte Prophylaxe entscheidend.

Inherited and acquired thrombophilias

Thrombophilias represent an evolving story that continues to stir controversy for care providers and obstetrical patients. The predominant thrombophilic mutations include the factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation G20210A, methylene tetrahydrafolate reductase C667T, and deficiencies of the natural anticoagulants proteins C and S, and antithrombin. Prospective cohort studies have provided an accurate assessment of the risk of placenta-mediated complications posed by common inherited thrombophilic conditions. Acquired thrombophilic conditions consist of the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APAS) and hyperhomocysteinemia. Well-conducted, placebo-controlled, randomized trials have demonstrated no benefit of anticoagulation in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and inherited thrombophilia. The routine use of anticoagulation to prevent other placenta-mediated complications in the setting of inherited thrombophilia should be considered experimental until the results of adequate clinical trials are available. Heparin anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies are the cornerstone of treatment of APAS in pregnancy.

Genetics of recurrent miscarriage: challenges, current knowledge, future directions

Recurrent miscarriage (RM) occurs in 1-3% of couples aiming at childbirth. Due to multifactorial etiology the clinical diagnosis of RM varies. The design of genetic/"omics" studies to identify genes and biological mechanisms involved in pathogenesis of RM has challenges as there are several options in defining the study subjects (female patient and/or couple with miscarriages, fetus/placenta) and controls. An ideal study would attempt a trio-design focusing on both partners as well as pregnancies of the couple. Application of genetic association studies focusing on pre-selected candidate genes with potential pathological effect in RM show limitations. Polymorphisms in ∼100 genes have been investigated and association with RM is often inconclusive or negative. Also, implication of prognostic molecular diagnostic tests in clinical practice exhibits uncertainties. Future directions in investigating biomolecular risk factors for RM rely on integrating alternative approaches (SNPs, copy number variations, gene/protein expression, epigenetic regulation) in studies of single genes as well as whole-genome analysis. This would be enhanced by collaborative network between research centers and RM clinics.

Factor V Leiden thrombophilia

Factor V Leiden is a genetic disorder characterized by a poor anticoagulant response to activated Protein C and an increased risk for venous thromboembolism. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are the most common manifestations, but thrombosis in unusual locations also occurs. The current evidence suggests that the mutation has at most a modest effect on recurrence risk after initial treatment of a first venous thromboembolism. Factor V Leiden is also associated with a 2- to 3-fold increased relative risk for pregnancy loss and possibly other obstetric complications, although the probability of a successful pregnancy outcome is high. The clinical expression of Factor V Leiden is influenced by the number of Factor V Leiden alleles, coexisting genetic and acquired thrombophilic disorders, and circumstantial risk factors. Diagnosis requires the activated Protein C resistance assay (a coagulation screening test) or DNA analysis of the F5 gene, which encodes the Factor V protein. The first acute thrombosis is treated according to standard guidelines. Decisions regarding the optimal duration of anticoagulation are based on an individualized assessment of the risks for venous thromboembolism recurrence and anticoagulant-related bleeding. In the absence of a history of thrombosis, long-term anticoagulation is not routinely recommended for asymptomatic Factor V Leiden heterozygotes, although prophylactic anticoagulation may be considered in high-risk clinical settings. In the absence of evidence that early diagnosis reduces morbidity or mortality, decisions regarding testing at-risk family members should be made on an individual basis.

Can Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A testing in women with recurrent pregnancy loss result in improved pregnancy outcomes?: Results from a targeted evidence-based review

Women with recurrent pregnancy loss are offered Factor V Leiden (F5) and/or prothrombin G20210A (F2) testing to identify candidates for anticoagulation to improve outcomes. A systematic literature review was performed to estimate test performance, effect sizes, and treatment effectiveness. Electronic searches were performed through April 2011, with review of references from included articles. English-language studies addressed analytic validity, clinical validity, and/or clinical utility and satisfied predefined inclusion criteria. Adequate evidence showed high analytic sensitivity and specificity for F5 and F2 testing. Evidence for clinical validity was adequate. The summary odds ratio for association of recurrent pregnancy loss with F5 in case-controlled studies was 2.02 (95% confidence interval, 1.60-2.55), with moderate heterogeneity and suggestion of publication bias. Longitudinal studies in women with recurrent pregnancy loss or unselected cohorts showed F5 carriers were more likely to have a subsequent loss than noncarriers (odds ratios: 1.93 and 2.03, respectively). Results for F2 testing were similar. For clinical utility, evidence was adequate that anticoagulation treatments were ineffective (except in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome) and had treatment-associated harms. The certainty of evidence is moderate (high, moderate, and low) that anticoagulation of women with recurrent pregnancy loss and F5/F2 variants would currently lead to net harms.

Factor V Leiden as a risk factor for preterm birth--a population-based nested case-control study

BACKGROUND

Preterm birth is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, occurring in 5-13% of deliveries in developed countries. Genetic thrombophilia can theoretically contribute to the induction of preterm delivery, but the role of thrombophilia as risk factor is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess factor V Leiden, FII G20210A and other selected inherited and acquired variables as risk factors for preterm birth.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We performed a population-based nested case-control study of 100,000 consecutive pregnancies in Finland. Cases and controls were identified by combining national registers. Clinical data were obtained from medical records and standardized questionnaires. We studied 324 cases with preterm delivery at or after 22 and before 37 completed weeks of gestation, and 752 controls.

RESULTS

FV Leiden was associated with a 2.4-fold risk (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-4.6) of preterm birth in all pregnancies, and a 2.6-fold risk (95% CI 1.4-5.1) in singleton pregnancies. FV Leiden was especially associated with late preterm birth at or after 32 weeks of pregnancy, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.9 (95% CI 1.5-5.6) in all pregnancies and an OR of 3.1 (95% CI 1.6-6.2) in singleton pregnancies. FII G20210A was not associated with preterm birth. Twin pregnancy (OR 12.0, 95% CI 6.0-24.1) and a history of venous thrombosis (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.4-9.8) were associated with increased risk. High educational level and modest overweight (body mass index 25-29.9 kg m(-2) ) had protective effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal carriage of FV Leiden was associated with increased risk of late but not early preterm birth. FII G20120A was not associated with preterm birth.

Thrombophilias and stillbirth

It is often postulated that both inherited and acquired thrombophilias increase the risk of stillbirth. In an attempt to reduce this theoretical risk, pregnant patients with prior fetal losses and thrombophilias are anticoagulated. However, there is no definitive proof that thrombophilias are causally linked to stillbirth. Prospective studies have failed to establish a definitive link between inherited thrombophilias and stillbirth. The extant literature suggests that only high concentrations of antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with stillbirth. Moreover, when pregnant women with prior fetal losses even in these cases are placed on anticoagulation, it is unclear that their recurrence risk of stillbirth decreases.

Anticoagulants to prevent placenta-mediated pregnancy complications: a review of current evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Placenta-mediated pregnancy complications are relatively common and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although anticoagulants are increasingly being used to prevent these complications, the evidence supporting their use is limited. This article will focus on reviewing the current evidence base for the use of anticoagulants to prevent placenta-mediated pregnancy complications in women with or without identifiable thrombophilia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Controversy exists whether inherited or acquired thrombophilias cause placenta-mediated complications. Small randomized studies with methodological limitations suggest that antepartum anticoagulant prophylaxis will reduce pregnancy loss in women with both acquired and inherited thrombophilia and prior pregnancy loss. There are no published randomized controlled trials examining anticoagulant prophylaxis in thrombophilic women with prior preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction or placental abruption. More recently, the benefit of antepartum anticoagulant prophylaxis in women without thrombophilia with prior placenta-mediated pregnancy complications has been suggested in a small pilot randomized trial.

SUMMARY

Overall, although antepartum anticoagulant prophylaxis has the potential to reduce placenta-mediated pregnancy complications in women with and without identifiable thrombophilia, the data generated by these trials are methodologically limited and inadequate. Hence, we conclude that further trials are required prior to adopting the use of antepartum anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent placenta-mediated pregnancy complications in routine clinical practice.

A prospective case-control study analyzes 12 thrombophilic gene mutations in Turkish couples with recurrent pregnancy loss

PROBLEM

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a heterogeneous disorder. The contribution of specific thrombophilic genes to the pathophysiology of RPL has remained controversial. We evaluated the prevalences of 12 thrombophilic gene mutations among homogenous Caucasian couples with RPL and fertiles.

METHOD

of study This was a prospective case-control study evaluating 272 women with RPL and 152 of their male partners, and a control group of 56 fertile couples. We investigated mutations including FV Leiden, factor V H1299R, factor II prothrombin G20210A, F XIII V34L, beta-fibrinogen -455G>A, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, GPIIIa L33P (HPA-1 a/b L33P), MTHFR C677T, MTHFR A1298C, ACE I/D, Apo B R3500Q, and Apo E.

RESULTS

Overall, heterozygous mutations of FV Leiden, FXIII V34L, GPIIIa L33P, Apo E4, and prothrombin G20210A and homozygous mutations of PAI-1and MTHFR C677T were associated with RPL. There was no meaningful association between RPL and other studied genes.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to the other mutations and polymorphisms, FV Leiden, FXIII V34L, GPIIIa L33P, Apo E, prothrombin G20210A, PAI-1 and MTHFR C677T gene mutations may help to identify the couples at risk for recurrent pregnancy loss.

Third trimester nonrecurrent fetal loss is associated with factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutations

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutation in the pathogenesis of unexplained second and third trimester nonrecurrent fetal loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and fourteen women with unexplained nonrecurrent late fetal loss made up the study group, and 106 normal pregnant women with a history of delivery of at least one healthy fetus and no history of late fetal loss made up the control group. The study group was further divided into two subgroups: second (n = 36) and third (n = 78) trimester fetal loss. All women were tested for factor V Leiden and G20210A prothrombin gene mutations.

RESULTS

Twenty-one (18.4%) of the women in the study group and seven (6.6%) of the women in the control group were heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden mutation (OR = 3.19). Eleven (9.6%) of the women in the study group and three (2.8%) of the women in the control group were heterozygous carriers of prothrombin gene mutation (OR = 3.66). In assessing with regard to trimesters, 18 (23%) factor V Leiden and 10 (12.8%) prothrombin gene mutations were present in the group of third trimester fetal loss (OR = 4.24 and OR = 5.04, respectively). Three (8.3%) factor V Leiden and one (2.7%) prothrombin gene mutation were detected in women with second trimester fetal loss (OR = 1.28 and OR = 0.40, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutations were associated with third trimester nonrecurrent fetal loss. These mutations should be screened in women with third trimester but not second trimester unexplained nonrecurrent late fetal loss.

Thrombophilia risk factors are associated with intrauterine foetal death and pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism

Pregnancy in healthy women is accompanied by hypercoagulable changes that may interact with thrombophilia risk factors and threaten pregnancy. However, the literature on this issue is conflicting. In investigating the relationship between pregnancy-associated complications and the presence of thrombophilia risk factors, we studied the records of 414 women who had been examined for inherited and acquired thrombophilia in the period 1996 to 2006 because of pregnancy-associated complications. Of a total of 885 pregnancies among the women, 397 were recorded as foetal loss/intrauterine foetal death during the first (62 %), second (25 %) or third trimester (13 %). One-hundred-and-two (25 %) women had had a thromboembolic event during one of their pregnancies, and 98 (24 %) had had pre-eclampsia on at least one occasion. Intrauterine growth restriction was found in 105 (25 %) of the women, and 29 (7 %) suffered placental abruption. We found that 120 (29 %) women had at least one thrombophilia risk factor. Factor V Leiden heterozygosity was the most common thrombophilia factor (n = 52), mostly linked with the risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum and to foetal death during the second or third trimester. Fifty-three (13 %) women had antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant and/or anti-beta2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies) mainly associated with the risk of spontaneous abortion during the first trimester. In conclusion, thrombophilia was found to be considerably more common in women with pregnancy-associated complications in comparison with the general population, and most frequently in conjunction with venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Genetic thrombophilia variants and risk for preeclampsia among American Indians

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of thrombophilic genetic variants in an American Indian population and determine if they are associated with preeclampsia.

METHODS

A total of 87 cases, 165 controls and an additional 75 population-based controls were genotyped for two thrombophilic polymorphisms.

RESULTS

The allelic prevalence of the factor V Leiden and 20210 G/A prothrombin variants in this population was 2.1% and 0.5% respectively. No statistically significant associations between these genetic variants and preeclampsia were found.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of thrombophilic variants is of possible public health significance for other morbidity; but perhaps not in relation to preeclampsia.

Inherited thrombophilias and unexplained pregnancy loss: an incident case-control study

BACKGROUND

Despite an initial impressive impact, a critical appraisal of the link between pregnancy loss and inherited thrombophilias is currently growing. Furthermore, little is known about the paternal thrombophilic phenotype and pregnancy loss.

OBJECTIVE

We sought an association between unexplained pregnancy loss and parental factor V Leiden (FVL) and Prothrombin G20210A (PTG) mutations.

METHODS

Design - Incident case-control study. Setting- University Hospital of Brest (France). Patients - Women and their partners from the West Brittany area, consecutively referred for unexplained pregnancy losses (two or more consecutive losses at or before 21 weeks of gestation, or at least one later loss). Controls - Women and their partners with no history of pregnancy loss and at least one normal pregnancy, from the same geographic area, recruited using electoral lists. Statistical analysis - Comparison of FVL and PTG allele frequency between cases and controls using the chi-square test. Separate analyses were performed according to the type of pregnancy loss (early recurrent or later loss).

RESULTS

311 women (mean age: 32.8) and 284 of their partners were enrolled as cases while 599 women (mean age: 34.3) and 297 of their partners were recruited as controls. The prevalence of female, male or couple thrombophilic mutations was not statistically different between cases and controls whatever the definition of pregnancy loss retained.

CONCLUSIONS

Presently, there is no clinical indication to routinely test for FVL and likely PTG mutations in women with early recurrent pregnancy loss. Moreover, our results did not reveal that paternal thrombophilic polymorphism should be further explored.

Blood group AB and factor V Leiden as risk factors for pre-eclampsia: a population-based nested case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Pre-eclampsia is an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Its etiology is still unknown. Clinical symptoms correlate with activation of coagulation and inherited thrombophilia has been associated with pre-eclampsia. ABO blood group has been associated with thrombotic disorders and pre-eclampsia. We assessed ABO blood group, seven thrombophilia associated polymorphisms, and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies as risk factors for pre-eclampsia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a population-based nested case-control study of 100,000 consecutive pregnancies in Finland. Cases and controls were identified by combining national registers and medical records were reviewed. We studied 248 cases fulfilling strict criteria for pre-eclampsia and 679 controls. Severe pre-eclampsia, early pre-eclampsia, and pre-eclampsia with intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR) were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

Blood group AB increased the risk for pre-eclampsia as a whole (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.5), and in the three subgroups (OR 2.3, 3.8, 3.4; 95% CI 1.3-3.9, 2.0-7.1, 1.6-7.1). FV Leiden increased the risk as a whole (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.8-3.9), and in the three subgroups, although not statistically significantly. Anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies were not associated with pre-eclampsia. High body mass index, diabetes, first pregnancy, and twin pregnancy increased the risk from 1.5-fold to 8.2-fold.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm and extend the prior observation of blood group AB being a risk factor for pre-eclampsia. ABO blood group is known from all pregnant women. The value of blood group as risk factor for pre-eclampsia should be further assessed in prospective studies. In this study, FV Leiden was not statistically significant risk factor.

Factor V Leiden is associated with pre-eclampsia but not with fetal growth restriction: a genetic association study and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adverse pregnancy outcomes have been related to environmental and/or genetic factors. Of interest are genes associated with the clotting system as any perturbation in the balance of thrombotic and thrombolytic cascades could affect the placental circulation and hence the viability of the developing fetus. Several previous reports using relatively small numbers of cases and controls have suggested that there is a relationship between poor pregnancy outcomes and two polymorphisms, one in the factor V gene, the 1691G to A change (rs6025) located on chromosome 1q23 (factor V Leiden, FVL), and the other in the prothrombin gene, 20210G to A change (rs1799963) on chromosome 11p11-q12 (PT). These results, however, are conflicting.

METHODS

We genotyped 6755 mother/infant pairs from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) to determine whether maternal or fetal FVL or PT, either alone or in combination, are associated with fetal growth restriction (FGR) or pre-eclampsia (PE). We also added the present results to previous cohort studies using meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Smoking, primiparity and lower body mass index (BMI) were all associated with FGR, but neither maternal nor fetal FVL or PT, singly or in combination, were associated with FGR in the ALSPAC cohort. Meta-analysis confirmed the lack of association between maternal FVL and FGR with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.15 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-1.39]. High BMI, primiparity, diabetes and chronic hypertension were all associated with pre-eclampsia. Combining ALSPAC results with previous studies in ameta-analysis indicated that maternal FVL is significantly associated with pre-eclampsia, with a pooled OR of 1.49 (95% CI 1.13-1.96).

CONCLUSION

Neither maternal nor fetal FVL or PT, singly or in combination, are associated with FGR; this contradicts previous case-control studies and meta-analyses based on these studies. In a meta-analysis of all published cohort studies to date, maternal FVL appears to increase the risk of pre-eclampsia by almost 50%. This result is robust, homogeneous and does not appear to be affected by publication bias.

Venous thromboembolism, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This article discusses the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and thrombophilia, as well as the use of antithrombotic agents, during pregnancy and is part of the American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 recommendations are weaker and imply that the magnitude of the benefits and risks, burden, and costs are less certain. Support for recommendations may come from high-quality, moderate-quality or low-quality studies; labeled, respectively, A, B, and C. Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: for pregnant women, in general, we recommend that vitamin K antagonists should be substituted with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) [Grade 1A], except perhaps in women with mechanical heart valves. For pregnant patients, we suggest LMWH over UFH for the prevention and treatment of VTE (Grade 2C). For pregnant women with acute VTE, we recommend that subcutaneous LMWH or UFH should be continued throughout pregnancy (Grade 1B) and suggest that anticoagulants should be continued for at least 6 weeks postpartum (for a total minimum duration of therapy of 6 months) [Grade 2C]. For pregnant patients with a single prior episode of VTE associated with a transient risk factor that is no longer present and no thrombophilia, we recommend clinical surveillance antepartum and anticoagulant prophylaxis postpartum (Grade 1C). For other pregnant women with a history of a single prior episode of VTE who are not receiving long-term anticoagulant therapy, we recommend one of the following, rather than routine care or full-dose anticoagulation: antepartum prophylactic LMWH/UFH or intermediate-dose LMWH/UFH or clinical surveillance throughout pregnancy plus postpartum anticoagulants (Grade 1C). For such patients with a higher risk thrombophilia, in addition to postpartum prophylaxis, we suggest antepartum prophylactic or intermediate-dose LMWH or prophylactic or intermediate-dose UFH, rather than clinical surveillance (Grade 2C). We suggest that pregnant women with multiple episodes of VTE who are not receiving long-term anticoagulants receive antepartum prophylactic, intermediate-dose, or adjusted-dose LMWH or intermediate or adjusted-dose UFH, followed by postpartum anticoagulants (Grade 2C). For those pregnant women with prior VTE who are receiving long-term anticoagulants, we recommend LMWH or UFH throughout pregnancy (either adjusted-dose LMWH or UFH, 75% of adjusted-dose LMWH, or intermediate-dose LMWH) followed by resumption of long-term anticoagulants postpartum (Grade 1C). We suggest both antepartum and postpartum prophylaxis for pregnant women with no prior history of VTE but antithrombin deficiency (Grade 2C). For all other pregnant women with thrombophilia but no prior VTE, we suggest antepartum clinical surveillance or prophylactic LMWH or UFH, plus postpartum anticoagulants, rather than routine care (Grade 2C). For women with recurrent early pregnancy loss or unexplained late pregnancy loss, we recommend screening for antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs) [Grade 1A]. For women with these pregnancy complications who test positive for APLAs and have no history of venous or arterial thrombosis, we recommend antepartum administration of prophylactic or intermediate-dose UFH or prophylactic LMWH combined with aspirin (Grade 1B). We recommend that the decision about anticoagulant management during pregnancy for pregnant women with mechanical heart valves include an assessment of additional risk factors for thromboembolism including valve type, position, and history of thromboembolism (Grade 1C). While patient values and preferences are important for all decisions regarding antithrombotic therapy in pregnancy, this is particularly so for women with mechanical heart valves. For these women, we recommend either adjusted-dose bid LMWH throughout pregnancy (Grade 1C), adjusted-dose UFH throughout pregnancy (Grade 1C), or one of these two regimens until the thirteenth week with warfarin substitution until close to delivery before restarting LMWH or UFH) [Grade 1C]. However, if a pregnant woman with a mechanical heart valve is judged to be at very high risk of thromboembolism and there are concerns about the efficacy and safety of LMWH or UFH as dosed above, we suggest vitamin K antagonists throughout pregnancy with replacement by UFH or LMWH close to delivery, after a thorough discussion of the potential risks and benefits of this approach (Grade 2C).

Factor V Leiden mutation: a treatable etiology for sporadic and recurrent pregnancy loss

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that the thrombophilic G1691A factor V Leiden (FVL) gene mutation was a common, significant, and treatable cause of sporadic and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).

DESIGN

We compared the frequency of the FVL mutation in 141 women with >or=1 pregnancy and 1 sporadic pregnancy loss (308 live births, 141 pregnancy losses), 44 women with >or=1 pregnancy and >or=3 pregnancy losses (105 live births, 180 pregnancy losses), and 638 women with >or=1 live birth pregnancy and 0 pregnancy loss (1553 live births).

SETTING

Outpatient Clinical Research Center.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 823 caucasian women with consecutive measures of the FVL mutation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

We used polymerase chain reaction techniques to characterize the thrombophilic FVL G1691A gene mutation.

RESULT(S)

Of the 638 controls, 47 (7.4%) had FVL heterozygosity versus 16 heterozygous and 2 homozygous FVL cases (18/141, 12.8%) in 141 women with 1 sporadic pregnancy loss versus 9/44 RPL cases (20.5%, 8 heterozygous and 1 homozygous FVL). The FVL frequency in cases with 1 sporadic pregnancy loss (18/141, 12.8%) did not differ from RPL cases (9/44, 20.45%).

CONCLUSION(S)

After unexplained sporadic pregnancy loss, as well as after RPL, to provide the option to prospectively optimize subsequent live birth outcomes with low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis, we suggest that measurements be done of the FVL mutation, a treatable etiology for sporadic pregnancy loss as well as for RPL.