Covalently linking heparin to antithrombin enhances prothrombinase inhibition on activated platelets

Interactions of heparin and a covalently-linked antithrombin-heparin complex with components of the fibrinolytic system

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is used as an adjunct during thrombolytic therapy. However, its use is associated with limitations, such as the inability to inhibit surface bound coagulation factors. We have developed a covalent conjugate of antithrombin (AT) and heparin (ATH) with superior anticoagulant properties compared with UFH. Advantages of ATH include enhanced inhibition of surface-bound coagulation enzymes and the ability to reduce the overall size and mass of clots in vivo. The interactions of UFH or ATH with the components of the fibrinolytic pathway are not well understood. Our study utilised discontinuous second order rate constant (k2 ) assays to compare the rates of inhibition of free and fibrin-associated plasmin by AT+UFH vs ATH. Additionally, we evaluated the effects of AT+UFH and ATH on plasmin generation in the presence of fibrin. The k2 values for inhibition of plasmin were 5.74 ± 0.28 x 106 M-1 min-1 and 6.39 ± 0.59 x 106 M-1 min-1 for AT+UFH and ATH, respectively. In the presence of fibrin, the k2 values decreased to 1.45 ± 0.10 x 106 M-1 min1 and 3.07 ± 0.19 x 106 M-1 min-1 for AT+UFH and ATH, respectively. Therefore, protection of plasmin by fibrin was observed for both inhibitors; however, ATH demonstrated superior inhibition of fibrin-associated plasmin. Rates of plasmin generation were also decreased by both inhibitors, with ATH causing the greatest reduction (approx. 38-fold). Nonetheless, rates of plasmin inhibition were 2–3 orders of magnitude lower than for thrombin, and in a plasma-based clot lysis assay ATH significantly inhibited clot formation but had little impact on clot lysis. Cumulatively, these data may indicate that, relative to coagulant enzymes, the fibrinolytic system is spared from inhibition by both AT+UFH and ATH, limiting reduction in fibrinolytic potential during anticoagulant therapy.

Genetic analysis should be included in clinical practice when screening for antithrombin deficiency

Antithrombin (AT) deficiency increases the risk of thrombosis. Current evidence shows that some SERPINC1 mutations responsible for antithrombin deficiency often present a slightly decreased or normal activity and therefore could not be detected by functional tests. This study was designed to compare activity assays and direct genetic analyses in identifying hereditary antithrombin deficiency. In total, 400 consecutive patients with venous thrombosis were enrolled. Functional assays showed that 16 of the 400 individuals had decreased antithrombin activity, and 14 of them were confirmed by genetic analysis. Of the remaining 384 patients, 95 individuals without a known risk factor and 95 individuals with predisposing factors were also selected for gene sequencing. Eight additional causative mutations were identified in nine individuals and they should also be considered as antithrombin deficiency. In addition, a recurrent mutation, p.Arg356_Phe361del, was characterised. The mutant appeared to have a partially impaired secretion and a reduction in functional activity by 50 %. This study indicated that including genetic analysis in screening tests for identifying antithrombin deficiency was essential. Specifically, a genetic analysis of SERPINC1 is strongly recommended when individuals experience unprovoked thrombotic diseases, even if the AT activities are normal.