A case of bilateral visual loss after spinal cord surgery

Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Review of Current and Potential Future Pharmacotherapies

The treatment of arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AAION), non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (NAAION), and posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (PION) is a topic of ongoing research with mixed evidence on some pharmacotherapies and a need for more consensus. This manuscript provides an overview of these conditions' current, potential future, and attempted pharmacotherapies. AAION's current treatment regimen consists of high-dose steroids, with methotrexate, tocilizumab, and abatacept, being the most viable steroid-sparing therapy candidates. As for NAAION, the treatments being tried are vast, with mixed evidence supporting each modality. Similarly, despite the various treatment options explored, there still needs to be a universally effective therapy for PION. More research is needed to formulate an agreed-upon treatment regimen for these conditions.

Effect of different surgical positions on intraocular pressure: a cross-sectional study

Background

Intraoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation is a risk factor for postoperative blindness. Surgical position is associated with intraoperative IOP elevation. In China, there are few studies on the effect of various surgical positions on intraoperative IOP. This study was conducted to explore IOP change and its related factors in four common surgical positions in China.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional observational study. A total of 325 surgical patients who had non-ocular surgery from January 2019 to December 2019 in the hospital, were enrolled in this study. During their surgeries for general anesthesia, these participants were placed in lithotomy position/lateral position/prone position/supine position according to their surgery requirement. IOP was measured by icareTA03 handheld portable tonometer at 9 different time points from admission to exiting the operation room. And general information, postural position, and surgery information were collected through a uniform questionnaire. Multivariate analysis was performed to explore the related factors of IOP change.

Results

IOP of both eyes on lithotomy position, lateral position, and supine position showed statistical differences by ANOVA test at each time point (p < 0.05). IOP of both eyes in the prone position before exit from the operating room was significantly higher than IOP 10-min after anesthesia (p < 0.01). IOP under different postural angles showed statistical differences (F value = 4.85, P < 0.05), and the larger the head-down angle, the higher the IOP. IOP on the compressed side in the lateral position was higher than that on the non-compressed side (p < 0.01). In the multivariate linear regression analysis adjusted by other factors, postural position and baseline IOP were associated with IOP difference between before and after surgery (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

IOP in the four surgical positions showed different change patterns with the surgical process and position change. Nurses should assist the surgeon to reduce the head-down angle without interfering with the surgical operation and strengthen the inspection of IOP on patients with long-time surgery, to avoid intraoperative rapid IOP changes.

Posterior ischemic optic neuropathy following supine craniotomy for epidural abscess in a child

Post-operative vision loss (POVL) can be a devastating complication of neurosurgical procedures and is unusual in the pediatric population. Mechanisms of POVL include direct optic nerve injury, vascular occlusion, or indirect malperfusion resultant from surgeries with substantial blood loss or fluid shifts, with prone positioning being a major risk factor for these events. Posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (PION) is a rare cause of POVL and is associated with a poor prognosis for recovery of visual function. We present a case of PION following a supine bifrontal craniotomy for a frontal epidural abscess secondary to pan-sinusitis in a pediatric patient. This is an unusual reported case in that no additional traditional risk factors were identified. We present clinical and radiographic findings, diagnostic considerations, treatment strategies, and a literature review. The patient was managed medically and recovered substantial vision in the affected eye.

Transient visual acuity loss after spine surgery in the prone position: a case report and literature review

Visual loss after spine surgery in the prone position is a disastrous postoperative complication because it is almost irreversible. Additionally, the optimal treatments and recommended professional guidelines for visual loss after spine surgery are deficient. A 43-year-old man developed visual loss after spine surgery in the prone position. Immediate ophthalmic consultation confirmed central retinal artery occlusion. Therefore, combined therapies were administered, including neurotrophy, anticoagulation, vasodilation, and adequate fluid infusion, followed by hyperbaric oxygen treatment. After active treatment, his visual acuity gradually recovered from 5 hours postoperatively and continued to improve thereafter. We reviewed the literature on postoperative visual loss with a focus on spine surgery in the prone position. Because the etiology of this complication is complex and has few effective treatments, the best method for its avoidance is to pay close attention to preventing it during surgery.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prone Position on Intraocular Pressure in Adults Undergoing Surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing surgery in the prone position may be at risk for postoperative vision loss associated with increased intraocular pressure. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to estimate the magnitude of the increase in intraocular pressure at specific perioperative time points in adult patients. The research question to be addressed is "What is the magnitude of the increase in intraocular pressure at specific perioperative time points in adults undergoing surgery in the prone position?"

METHODS

Comprehensive search strategies were used to identify nine eligible studies (N = 229). Standardized mean difference effect sizes were calculated for two intraoperative time points.Time points for meta-analysis were selected to achieve the greatest number of comparisons for analysis at each time point. Prediction intervals for each time point were also calculated to show the dispersion of true effect sizes around the mean.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis showed that intraocular pressure increased significantly between induction of anesthesia and up to 10 minutes of prone position (T1: standardized mean difference [d] = 2.55; P < .001) and continued to increase significantly until the end of the prone position (T2: d = 3.44; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraocular pressure increases of this magnitude demonstrate the need for implementing interventions to reduce the risk for postoperative vision loss in patients undergoing surgery in the prone position.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Implementing preoperative ophthalmologic examinations for patients undergoing surgery in the prone position may help to reduce the risk for ocular injury. Intraoperative interventions that can be implemented to reduce or mitigate the increase in intraocular pressure include implementing a 5- to 10-degree reverse Trendelenburg prone position, reducing the amount of time the patient is in the prone position, considering staged procedures, monitoring intraocular pressure, providing periodic position changes or rest periods, preventing pressure on the eye, and administering specific medications or anesthetics.