Novel passive implantable atrial defibrillator using transcutaneous radiofrequency energy transmission successfully cardioverts atrial fibrillation

Waveform optimization for internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

A novel atrial defibrillator was developed at the Royal Victoria Hospital in collaboration with the Nanotechnology and Integrated Bio-Engineering Centre, University of Ulster. This device is powered by an external pulse of radiofrequency energy and designed to cardiovert using low-tilt monophasic waveform (LTMW) and low-tilt biphasic waveform (LTBW), 12 milliseconds pulse width. This study compared the safety and efficacy of LTMW with LTBW for transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Patients were anticoagulated with warfarin to maintain International Normalized Ratio between 2 and 3 for 4 weeks prior cardioversion. Warfarin international normalized ratio level was maintained in between 2 and 3 for 4 weeks prior cardioversion. St Jude's defibrillating catheter was positioned in the distal coronary sinus and right atrium and connected to the defibrillator via a junction box. After a test shock using a dummy load, the patient was cardioverted in a step-up progression from 50 to 300 V. Shock success was defined as return of sinus rhythm for 30 seconds or more. If cardioversion was unsuccessful at peak voltage, the patient was crossed over to the other arm of the waveform type and cardioverted at peak voltage.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were randomized equally to LTBW and LTMW (15 each). Seven out of 15 patients (46%) cardioverted to sinus rhythm with LTBW, and 1 (6%) of 15, with LTMW (P = .035). Including crossover patients, 14 patients (46%) converted to sinus rhythm. After crossover, 4 patients were cardioverted with LTBW and 2 with LTMW. Overall mean voltage, current, and energy used for cardioversion were 270.53 ± 35.96 V, 3.68 ± 0.80 A, and 9.12 ± 3.73 J, respectively, and intracardiac impedance was 70.82 ± 13.46 Ω. For patients who were successfully cardioverted, mean voltage, current, energy, and intracardiac impedance were 268.28 ± 42.41 V, 3.52 ± 0.63 A, 8.51 ± 3.16 J, and 73.92 ± 12.01 Ω. There were no major adverse complications during the study. Cardiac markers measured postcardioversion were unremarkable.

CONCLUSION

Low-tilt biphasic waveform was more efficacious for low-energy transvenous cardioversion of AF. A significant proportion of patients were successfully cardioverted to sinus rhythm with low energy. Radiofrequency-powered defibrillation can be safely used for transvenous cardioversion of AF.

A radio frequency identification implanted in a tooth can communicate with the outside world

A radio frequency identification (RFID) transponder covering the 13.56 MHz band was adapted to minimize its volume so that it could be placed in the pulp chamber of an endodontically treated human tooth. The minimized transponder had a maximum communication distance of 30 mm. In an animal experiment, the transponder was fixed in the cavity of a mandibular canine of a dog. An RFID reader positioned close to the dog's face could communicate with the transponder in the dog's tooth. In certain cases, the system is applicable for the personal identification procedures for hospitalized patients instead of an identification wristband.

Novel rectangular biphasic and monophasic waveforms delivered by a radiofrequency-powered defibrillator compared with conventional capacitor-based waveforms in transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

AIMS

To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of novel low-tilt biphasic waveforms in transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF), delivered by a radiofrequency-powered defibrillator.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The investigation was performed in three phases in an animal model of AF: a feasibility and efficacy study (in 10 adult Large White Landrace swine), comparison with low-tilt monophasic and standard capacitor-based waveforms, and an assessment of sequential shocks delivered over several pathways (in 15 adult Suffolk sheep). Defibrillation electrodes were positioned transvenously under fluoroscopic control in the high lateral right atrium and distal coronary sinus. When multiple defibrillation pathways were tested, a third electrode was also attached to the lower interatrial septum. The electrodes were then connected to a radiofrequency (RF)-powered defibrillator or a standard defibrillator. After confirmation of successful induction of sustained AF, defibrillation was attempted. Percentage success was calculated from the effects of all shocks delivered to all the animals within each set of experiments. Of the low-tilt (RF) biphasic waveforms delivered during internal atrial cardioversion, 100% success was achieved with a 6/6 ms 100/-50 V waveform (1.45+/-0.01 J). This waveform was similar in efficacy to low-tilt (RF) monophasic waveforms (88 vs. 92% success, 1.58+/-0.01 vs. 2.67+/-0.03 J; P=NS; delivered energy 41% lower) and superior to equivalent voltage standard monophasic (50% success, 0.67+/-0.00 J; P<0.001) and biphasic waveforms (72% success, 0.69+/-0.00 J; P=0.03). Sequential shocks delivered over dual pathways did not improve the efficacy of low-tilt biphasic waveforms.

CONCLUSION

A low-tilt biphasic waveform from a RF-powered defibrillator (6/6 ms 100/-50 V) is more efficacious than standard monophasic or biphasic waveforms (equivalent voltage) and is similar in efficacy to low-tilt monophasic waveforms.

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Monophasic Waveform Delivered by the Passive Implantable Atrial Defibrillator With Biphasic Waveforms in Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

Background— The passive implantable atrial defibrillator (PIAD) (with no battery or discharging capacitor and powered transcutaneously by radio-frequency energy) delivering a novel monophasic low-tilt waveform is more efficacious than the standard monophasic waveform at atrial defibrillation. Standard biphasic (STB) waveforms, however, are more efficacious and safer than monophasic waveforms. This study compared the efficacy and safety of the PIAD waveform with biphasic waveforms.

Methods and Results— Sustained atrial fibrillation (AF) was induced by rapid atrial pacing. Cardioversion was attempted via 2 atrial defibrillation leads. The efficacy of the PIAD was compared with 3 biphasic waveforms (standard, single rounded, and double rounded) at varying voltage settings in 10 pigs. After a synchronized shock, hemodynamic changes between the PIAD, standard biphasic, and monophasic waveforms were compared at 1.5 and 3.0 J in 12 pigs. Myocardial injury (biochemical and histological) after ten 5-J PIAD shocks was compared with a no-shock group in 14 pigs. The PIAD 100-V setting was significantly more efficacious than the STB (100/−50 V: 100% [1.88±0.02 J] versus 90% [0.89±0.0 J]; P =0.025). No arrhythmic, hemodynamic, or myocardial injury was observed with the PIAD waveform.

Conclusions— Defibrillation with the PIAD is more efficacious than with the STB waveform and appears safe. This device could provide a more effective option for cardioversion.