Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis of the impact of lesion length on the efficacy of intracoronary gamma-irradiation for preventing recurrent in-stent restenosis

Intravascular ultrasound in patients with challenging in-stent restenosis: importance of precise stent visualization

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is widely used to optimize stent (ST) implantation. However, its value to guide therapy in challenging cases of in-stent restenosis (ISR) is not well established. We present 3 patients with complex ISR where IVUS interrogation was useful: (a) to readily identify the ST "entry door," (b) to accurately detect ST malapposition, (c) to measure the extent of ST protrusion out from its deployed position, and (d) to guide and optimize therapy. Thus, due to its unique ability to visualize the complete structure of the underlying ST, IVUS constitutes a superb diagnostic tool in patients with ISR, especially in challenging anatomic settings.

Comparison of a centered 32P source wire system with a noncentered 90Sr/Y brachytherapy system for intracoronary β-radiation following PCI of diffuse in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

We investigated the potential impact of differences in effective radiation dose between the centered Guidant 32P source wire system and the noncentered Novoste 90Sr/Y BetaCath system on clinical and angiographic outcomes of intracoronary brachytherapy for the prevention of in-stent restenosis.

METHODS

From 10/00 to 05/04, a total of 400 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with brachytherapy for diffuse in-stent restenosis at our institution. Following balloon dilatation, patient Group A (n=200) was treated with the centered 32P Galileo source wire system, patient Group B (n=200) was treated with the noncentered 90Sr/Y BetaCath radiation system. In Group A, the prescribed dose of 20 Gy was applied in 1-mm depth of the vessel wall. In Group B, the prescribed dose of 18.4 Gy was applied for visual reference vessel sizes >2.7 and <3.35 mm, 23 Gy for >3.36 and <4.00 mm, and 25.3 Gy for >4.00 mm, each calculated at a distance of 2 mm from the center line of the radiation source. Patients received aspirin and clopidogrel over 12 months. Primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were the binary restenosis rate and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 30 days and 6 months.

RESULTS

At 30 days, one patient of each group underwent PCI at a nontarget lesion (0.5%). At 6 months, MACEs were equally distributed in both groups. Target lesion revascularization at 6 months was 5.9% in Group A and 9.2% in Group B (P=.08). Binary angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months was 5.5% in Group A and 11.2% in Group B (P=.014).

CONCLUSION

Intracoronary beta-radiation using the centered 32P source wire system yielded a significant reduction of recurrence rate compared to the noncentered 90S/Y BetaCath system after PCI of diffuse in-stent restenosis. There was a nonsignificant trend toward reduction of TLR among patients treated with the centered 32P source wire system.

Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation and beta-irradiation for the treatment of in-stent restenotic lesions: comparison of underlying mechanisms of acute gain and late loss as assessed by volumetric intravascular ultrasound

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare the angioplasty mechanisms of drug (sirolimus)-eluting stent (DES) implantation and vascular brachytherapy (VBT) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) as assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

METHODS

We performed IVUS in 53 patients (28 DES, 25 VBT) before and after angioplasty of ISR and at 6-month follow-up. Cross-sectional areas of the external elastic membrane, the stent, and the lumen were measured. Plaque + media, peristent plaque, and intimal hyperplasia areas were calculated, respectively.

RESULTS

Clinical and IVUS baseline characteristics did not differ between groups at baseline. After the index procedure, the lumen at the stent site was smaller in the DES group (DES 6.7 +/- 2.0 mm2 vs VBT 7.5 +/- 2.2 mm2, P = .042). Because of less intimal hyperplasia (DES 0.2 +/- 0.5 mm2 vs VBT 0.7 +/- 0.7 mm2, P = .043), the lumen dimensions revealed no difference between groups at follow-up (DES 6.5 +/- 2.3 mm2 vs VBT 6.8 +/- 2.2 mm2, P = .374). At the reference site, the index procedure led to a similar increase of plaque + media (DES 0.9 +/- 0.9 mm2 vs VBT 0.6 +/- 1.2 mm2, P = .150). At follow-up, the plaque + media was significantly smaller in the DES group (DES 8.0 +/- 6.6 mm2 vs VBT 9.9 +/- 7.8 mm2, P = .013).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-eluting stent for the treatment of ISR more effectively inhibits neointima formation when compared with VBT. Yet insufficient stent expansion might be a reason for device failure and should be avoided. At the reference site, lumen loss by an increased plaque burden, as has been well recognized following VBT, is not present with DES.

Optimizing dosimetry with high-dose intracoronary gamma radiation (21 Gy) for patients with diffuse in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of intracoronary gamma radiation (IRT-gamma) in reducing recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) is well established using doses of 14-18 Gy. We sought to examine whether an escalation in dose to 21 Gy is safe and confers additional benefit in reducing repeat revascularization and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with diffuse ISR.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with diffuse ISR (lesion length 20-80 mm) in native coronary arteries (n=25) and saphenous vein grafts (n=22) underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and/or additional stents followed by IRT-gamma using the Checkmate system (Cordis) with a dose of 21 Gy. All patients were discharged with clopidogrel for 12 months and aspirin indefinitely. Six-month angiographic and 12-month clinical outcomes of these patients were compared to 120 patients treated with 18 Gy using the same system.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients in the 21-Gy group had more multivessel, vein graft disease and history of prior myocardial infarctions and coronary artery bypass grafts (P<.001). The use of debulking devices and stents was less in this group (P<.001). Procedural and in-hospital complications were similar. Follow-up at 6 months revealed nonsignificant but lower late loss (in-stent, 0.33+/-0.7 mm; in-lesion, 0.41+/-0.6 mm) in the 21-Gy group compared to the 18-Gy group; follow-up at 12 months revealed a trend toward less overall myocardial infarction, although repeat revascularization and MACE rates were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

IRT-gamma therapy for diffuse ISR lesions with a 21-Gy dose is clinically safe and feasible with marked reduction in late loss but does not confer additional benefit with regard to repeat revascularization and MACE when compared to a dose of 18 Gy.

Relation of clinical success in coronary brachytherapy to dose

Intravascular brachytherapy is the primary treatment for coronary in-stent restenosis. Variations in dose in the treated artery may represent a potential cause of treatment failure. We compared dose distributions in patients who had developed recurrent restenosis (treatment failure) with those in patients who remained event free at 9 months (treatment success). We followed 140 patients who were receiving brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis with 4 radiation delivery devices to identify treatment failures and successes. Through a nested case-control construct, treatment failures (n = 14) were compared 1:2 with treatment successes (n = 28) matched by radiation delivery system and in-stent restenosis lesion pattern. The dose absorbed by 90% of the artery encompassed by the external elastic membrane (D(90)EEM) was calculated by applying intravascular ultrasound at 2-mm intervals along the treated lesion. Dose calculations were performed using dose kernel integration techniques generated from Monte Carlo simulations. The mean minimum D(90)EEM in treatment failures was 7.46 +/- 1.98 Gy, and that in treatment successes was 8.87 +/- 1.13 Gy (p = 0.007). Using a minimum dose threshold of 8.4 Gy, a minimum D(90)EEM <or=8.4 Gy occurred in 13 patients (93%) whose treatment failed but only in 9 patients (32%) whose treatment was a success (p <or=0.001). No confounding variables were found to be statistically significant between treatment failures and successes. In conclusion, current brachytherapy dose prescriptions allow for inter- and intralesion variations in dose. Arteries that receive <or=8.4 Gy at any point along the external elastic membrane are more likely to result in treatment failures. Dosimetry guided by intravascular ultrasound may be critical to ensure adequate dose delivery and outcomes.

Intracoronary brachytherapy with ??-radiation for the treatment of long diffuse in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of intracoronary brachytherapy with beta-radiation (Sr/Y) for the treatment of long diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR).

METHODS

As recurrent ISR depends on intimal injury after coronary angioplasty, long in-stent restenotic lesions were defined as lesions with a treatment length >26 mm (lesion length >20 mm plus a treatment margin of 3 mm at each end). Seventy-eight patients with long ISR were treated at our institution with beta-brachytherapy after coronary angioplasty. Patients were irradiated with either an approximate dose of 12 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth or with 18 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth. Clinical follow-up was available for 69 patients and angiographic follow-up for 65 patients. Late lumen loss (LLL), binary restenosis (stenosis >50%), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were assessed for a follow-up time of 6.6+/-2.2 months.

RESULTS

Mean interventional treatment length was 46+/-18 mm. TLR was performed in all 23 patients with binary restenosis (33%). Death of cardiac cause was reported for two patients, one of whom did not undergo TLR. Thus, overall MACE rate was 35%. Recurrent ISR was significantly more frequent in patients with geographic miss. Comparison of the different radiation dose regimens revealed significantly lower LLL in patients irradiated with the higher dose (0.20+/-0.68 mm compared with 0.65+/-0.96 mm, P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Intracoronary brachytherapy with beta-radiation (Sr/Y) is a safe and effective therapeutic option for the reduction of recurrent ISR in long diffuse lesions. We recommend a high-dose irradiation with 18 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth.

Successful reduction of in-stent restenosis in long lesions using beta-radiation--subanalysis from the RENO registry

PURPOSE

Long lesions remain a challenging task in interventional cardiology, with a high propensity of restenosis, especially within the stented segment. Although intracoronary gamma-radiation has been proved to reduce diffuse in-stent restenosis in long lesions, such an effect remains to be determined using beta-radiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Of 1098 consecutive patients at 46 European centers treated with localized beta-radiation ((90)Sr, Novoste Beta-Cath System), 139 patients (mean age 61.5 +/- 10.7 years, 84% male, 22% with diabetes mellitus) with lesions treated using a >40-mm source length underwent radiation using a single 60-mm source train (34%) or a stepping/pullback procedure with a 30-mm (12%) or 40-mm (87%) source length after conventional interventional procedures. The mean lesion length was 35.3 +/- 17.9 mm.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 96% of cases. Geographic miss was noted in 9 patients (6.5%). The reference (placebo) group was obtained from the Washington Hospital Center for In-Stent Restenosis Trial (WRIST) and the WRIST Trial for long lesions (LONG WRIST) studies by selecting the cases (94 patients) that required a dummy source length >/=13 seeds (or >51 mm in length). Statistically significant improvement was noted in late angiographic restenosis (34.7% vs. 76.5%, p <0.0001), target vessel revascularization (14.9% vs. 60.6), and major adverse cardiac events (i.e., death, myocardial infarction, or total vessel revascularization) (17.9% vs. 64.9%, p <0.0001) at 6 months in reference to the nonradiation group.

CONCLUSION

This subanalysis from the Radiation in Europe with Novoste study confirms the safety and efficacy of beta-radiation combined with conventional interventional procedures in patients with diffuse, long, in-stent restenosis

Late intravascular ultrasound findings of patients treated with brachytherapy for diffuse in-stent restenosis

This study aimed at evaluating long-term (24-month) effects of beta-irradiation (188Re-MAG3-filled balloon) using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). Long-term effects of beta-irradiation on intimal hyperplasia (IH) within the stented segment and vessel and lumen dimensions of nonstented adjacent segments in patients with ISR have not been sufficiently evaluated. Two-year follow-up IVUS was performed in 30 patients with patent ISR segments at 6-month follow-up angiography. Serial IVUS images were acquired at five equidistant intrastent sites and at three different reference segment sites. IH burden (%) was defined as 100 x (IH/stent area). Mean intrastent IH area and IH burden significantly increased between 6 and 24 months, from 2.1 +/- 1.1 to 2.6 +/- 1.4 mm2 (P < 0.001) and from 26% +/- 10% to 33% +/- 14% (P < 0.001), respectively. There was a significant decrease of mean external elastic membrane (from 10.1 +/- 3.9 to 9.7 +/- 3.9 mm2; P = 0.015) and lumen area (from 5.6 +/- 2.3 to 5.1 +/- 2.3 mm2; P = 0.021) within distal reference segments between 6 and 24 months. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in six patients (20%) between 6 and 24 months after beta-irradiation therapy. There were no significant differences between TLR and non-TLR groups except for a smaller minimum lumen area at 24 months in the TLR group. Because of a small amount of late loss between 6 and 24 months, most irradiated ISR vessel segments remained stable for up to 2 years. However, quantitative evidence of late catch-up was evident in most patients and was significantly associated with 24-month TLR in some patients.

Gamma radiation for in-stent restenosis: effect of lesion length on angiographic and clinical outcomes

The relation between lesion length and effectiveness of gamma radiation treatment (gamma-RT) has not been well described. We evaluated the acute and long-term outcome according to baseline lesion length in 130 patients treated with (192)Ir in the Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial; 44 (35.5%) had baseline short in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions (length < 15 mm) and 80 (64.5%) long ISR lesions (length > or = 15 mm). At 6-month follow-up after gamma-RT, the short ISR group had larger lumen dimensions and lower late loss than the long ISR group. Restenosis rate was significantly higher in patients with long ISR for both the placebo (74% vs. 39%; P = 0.01) and the gamma-RT arm (31% vs. 5.3%; P = 0.04). gamma-RT significantly improved the angiographic outcome in the short-lesion groups but had the more pronounced effect on the reduction of clinical events after treatment of long ISR group. Lesion length remains a powerful predictor of recurrent ISR and clinical events after treatment of ISR even with gamma-RT.

Contribution of early lumen loss after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis to lumen loss at follow-up

The treatment of in-stent restenosis using balloon angioplasty alone often produces excellent early results, but is associated with high rate of recurrence. Previous studies have demonstrated significant tissue reintrusion shortly after the treatment of in-stent restenosis with balloon angioplasty. The study was designed to elucidate the contribution of early lumen loss 6 hr after balloon angioplasty to lumen loss at follow-up. We prospectively performed quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in 12 patients with in-stent restenosis before intervention, after the final procedure, 6 hr later (5.6 +/- 1.4 hr), and at follow-up (7.7 +/- 2.3 months). Compared with immediately after balloon angioplasty, by 6 hr postintervention, the minimum lumen diameter (MLD) and lumen cross-sectional area had decreased significantly (2.48 +/- 0.44 to 2.01 +/- 0.57 mm, P = 0.01, and 7.0 +/- 1.2 to 5.5 +/- 1.4 mm2, P = 0.004, respectively). Furthermore, the MLD decreased further between 6 hr postintervention and long-term follow-up (2.01 +/- 0.57 to 1.55 +/- 0.64 mm; P = 0.001). Patients who showed recurrence of restenosis at follow-up had greater early lumen loss than patients without recurrence of restenosis (0.71 +/- 0.31 vs. 0.23 +/- 0.13 mm; P = 0.006). Diffuse lesions had greater early lumen loss compared to focal lesions (0.75 +/- 0.35 vs. 0.28 +/- 0.13 mm; P = 0.008). Early lumen loss is common after the treatment of in-stent restenosis by balloon angioplasty. Within the first 6 hr postintervention, 32% +/- 29% of acute lumen gain is lost, and early lumen loss contributed to 42% +/- 18% of total lumen loss at follow-up.

Acute and long-term outcomes of cutting balloon angioplasty followed by gamma brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis

In-stent restenosis lesions were divided into 2 groups according to the use of cutting balloon (n = 76) or conventional balloon angioplasty (n = 407) before gamma-brachytherapy. Cutting balloon angioplasty, compared with conventional balloon angioplasty, in patients undergoing gamma-brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis is associated with less requirement for new stents (11% vs 22%, p = 0.02) but similar target vessel revascularization (35.1% vs 29.8%, p = 0.4) at follow-up.

Coronary in-stent restenosis: current status and future strategies

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a novel pathobiologic process, histologically distinct from restenosis after balloon angioplasty and comprised largely of neointima formation. As percutaneous coronary intervention increasingly involves the use of stents, ISR is also becoming correspondingly more frequent. In this review, we examine the available studies of the histology and pathogenesis of ISR, with particular reference to porcine and other animal models. An overview of mechanical treatments is then provided, which includes PTCA, directional coronary atherectomy and high speed rotational atherectomy. Radiation-based therapies are discussed, including a summary of current problems associated with this modality of treatment. Finally, novel strategies for the prevention of ISR are addressed, including novel developments in stents and stent coatings, conventional drugs, nucleic acid-based drugs and gene transfer. Until recently, limited pharmacologic and mechanical treatment options have been available for both treatment and prevention of ISR. However, recent advances in gene modification and gene transfer therapies and, more particularly, in local stent-based drug delivery systems make it conceivable that the incidence of ISR will now be seriously challenged.

Intravascular radiation accelerates atherosclerotic lesion formation of hypercholesteremic rabbits

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effect of intravascular radiation (IR) on the arterial wall of uninjured vessels in the hypercholesteremic rabbit model.

METHODS

Aortas of 24 New Zealand white rabbits were treated with either intravascular 192-Ir gamma-radiation (15 Gy at 2 mm from the center of the source) or were exposed to the source catheter without radiation (sham controls). Following the radiation treatment, the animals were fed a 2% cholesterol diet until euthanasia at 2 (n=8) or 6 (n=16) weeks. Arteries were analyzed using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM); transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) 1, a promoter of connective tissue deposition, was also monitored.

RESULTS

At 2 weeks, SEM analysis showed well-aligned endothelial cells in nonradiated segments, whereas irradiated arteries consistently contained adherent and subendothelial macrophages with focal areas of endothelial disruption. Further radiated segments at 2 weeks showed a 7-fold increase in active TGF beta-1 over nonradiated segments. At 6 weeks, there was a significant increase in plaque and vessel wall area relative to control arteries, however, no differences were noted in the density of actin-positive smooth muscle cells (SMCs) or macrophages. Similarly, no differences were noted in cell proliferation between groups as evidenced by the marker bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU). In contrast, nonirradiated segments frequently contained cellular areas with extracellular lipid.

CONCLUSION

Exposure of previously uninjured vessels to IR and hypercholesterolemia is associated with increased plaque burden and leads to more advanced plaque types. Special care should be taken to minimize radiation exposure in normal vascular segments in hypercholesterolemic patients undergoing radiation therapy.

Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis of edge recurrence after intracoronary gamma radiation treatment of native artery in-stent restenosis lesions

In the Washington Radiation for In-Stent restenosis Trial (WRIST), patients were first treated with conventional techniques and then randomized to either gamma-irradiation ((192)Ir) or placebo (dummy seeds). In the (192)Ir group with native coronary in-stent restenosis, we identified 8 patients with edge recurrence and compared them with 21 patients with no recurrence. Serial (postirradiation and follow-up) intravascular ultrasound analysis was performed according to conventional methods. When compared with nonrecurring lesions, lesions with distal edge recurrence had (1) greater decrease in mean distal lumen cross-sectional area (-3.0 +/- 1.2 vs -0.7 +/- 1.0 mm(2), p = 0.0002), (2) no change in mean distal external elastic membrane cross-sectional area versus an increase in mean distal cross-sectional area of 1.0 +/- 0.9 mm(2) in nonrecurring lesions (p = 0.0047), and (3) a greater increase in mean distal plaque + media cross-sectional area (2.9 +/- 1.2 mm vs 1.7 +/- 0.6 mm(2), p = 0.0103). Within the stented segment, the nonrecurring lesions had no decrease in mean lumen and no increase in mean intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area. Conversely, lesions with distal edge recurrence had a significant decrease in mean intrastent lumen cross-sectional area (-1.7 +/- 1.7 mm(2)) and a significant increase in mean intrastent intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area (1.6 +/- 1.6 mm(2)). Lesions with distal edge recurrence also had a greater decrease in mean proximal lumen cross-sectional area (-1.7 +/- 1.3 vs -0.3 +/- 0.8 mm(2), p = 0.0213), with a trend toward a greater increase in mean proximal plaque + media cross-sectional area. Thus, edge recurrence after (192)Ir treatment of in-stent restenosis is the result of neointimal hyperplasia (part of generalized treatment failure) and the absence of radiation-induced positive remodeling.