Clinical pharmacology and antiarrhythmic efficacy of encainide in patients with chronic ventricular arrhythmias

Human variability in polymorphic CYP2D6 metabolism: is the kinetic default uncertainty factor adequate?

Human variability in the kinetics of CYP2D6 substrates has been quantified using a database of compounds metabolised extensively (>60%) by this polymorphic enzyme. Published pharmacokinetic studies (after oral and intravenous dosing) in non-phenotyped healthy adults, and phenotyped extensive (EMs), intermediate or slow-extensive (SEMs) and poor metabolisers (PMs) have been analysed using data for parameters that relate primarily to chronic exposure (metabolic and total clearances, area under the plasma concentration time-curve) and primarily to acute exposure (peak concentration). Similar analyses were performed with the available data for subgroups of the population (age, ethnicity and disease). Interindividual differences in kinetics for markers of oral exposure were large for non-phenotyped individuals and for EMs (coefficients of variation were 67-71% for clearances and 54-63% for C(max)), whereas the intravenous data indicated a lower variability (34-38%). Comparisons between EMs, SEMs and PMs revealed an increase in oral internal dose for SEMs and PMs (ratio compared to EMs=3 and 9-12, respectively) associated with lower variability than that for non-phenotyped individuals (coefficients of variation were 32-38% and 30% for SEMs and PMs, respectively). In relation to the uncertainty factors used for risk assessment, most subgroups would not be covered by the kinetic default of 3.16. CYP2D6-related factors necessary to cover 95-99% of each subpopulation ranged from 2.7 to 4.1 in non-phenotyped healthy adults and EMs to 15-18 in PMs and 22-45 in children. An exponential relationship (R(2)=0.8) was found between the extent of CYP2D6 metabolism and the uncertainty factors. The extent of CYP2D6 involvement in the metabolism of a substrate is critical in the estimation of the CYP2D6-related factor. The 3.16 kinetic default factor would cover PMs for substrates for which CYP2D6 was responsible for up to 25% of the metabolism in EMs.

Individual variation in first-pass metabolism

Individual variation in pharmacokinetics has long been recognised. This variability is extremely pronounced in drugs that undergo extensive first-pass metabolism. Drug concentrations obtained from individuals given the same dose could range several-fold, even in young healthy volunteers. In addition to the liver, which is the major organ for drug and xenobiotic metabolism, the gut and the lung can contribute significantly to variability in first-pass metabolism. Unfortunately, the contributions of the latter 2 organs are difficult to quantify because conventional in vivo methods for quantifying first-pass metabolism are not sufficiently specific. Drugs that are mainly eliminated by phase II metabolism (e.g. estrogens and progestogens, morphine, etc.) undergo significant first-pass gut metabolism. This is because the gut is rich in conjugating enzymes. The role of the lung in first-pass metabolism is not clear, although it is quite avid in binding basic drugs such as lidocaine (lignocaine), propranolol, etc. Factors such as age, gender, disease states, enzyme induction and inhibition, genetic polymorphism and food effects have been implicated in causing variability in pharmacokinetics of drugs that undergo extensive first-pass metabolism. Of various factors considered, age and gender make the least evident contributions, whereas genetic polymorphism, enzymatic changes due to induction or inhibition, and the effects of food are major contributors to the variability in first-pass metabolism. These factors can easily cause several-fold variations. Polymorphic disposition of imipramine and propafenone, an increase in verapamil first-pass metabolism by rifampicin (rifampin), and the effects of food on propranolol, metoprolol and propafenone, are typical examples. Unfortunately, the contributions of these factors towards variability are unpredictable and tend to be drug-dependent. A change in steady-state clearance of a drug can sometimes be exacerbated when first-pass metabolism and systemic clearance of a drug are simultaneously altered. Therefore, an understanding of the source of variability is the key to the optimisation of therapy.

Practical pharmacokinetics of ventricular antiarrhythmic therapy

An increasing number of antiarrhythmic agents have become available for the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Appropriate application of pharmacokinetic principles is essential to determine dosage amount and frequency, particularly because of the life-threatening consequences of inadequate therapy. Therefore absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of antiarrhythmic agents must be considered in their use. Although some may be given intramuscularly, antiarrhythmic drugs are usually administered either intravenously for rapid onset of action or orally during long-term therapy. Distribution of antiarrhythmic drugs may be influenced by physicochemical properties of the drug (i.e., protein binding) or by tissue blood flow. Drug interactions and half-life are also important considerations. Finally, the major routes of elimination of antiarrhythmics are hepatic metabolism and renal and biliary excretion. The pharmacokinetic profiles of drugs used for the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmia, all of which are types I and III antiarrhythmic agents, are discussed.

Pharmacokinetics of encainide in patients with cirrhosis

The pharmacokinetics of encainide were investigated in 10 patients with cirrhosis and 10 matched controls following single intravenous (IV, 25 mg), single oral (so, 25 mg), and multiple oral (mo, 25 mg thrice daily over 5 days) dosing. The hepatic oxidative drug-metabolizing enzyme capacity and its inducibility were assessed by antipyrine elimination and 6-beta-hydroxycortisol excretion. Eight controls and nine patients were of the extensive metabolizer phenotype (EM), as assessed by the sparteine metabolic ratio. Statistics was performed in EM only. The antipyrine half-life was significantly longer and clearance was significantly lower in patients with cirrhosis. Following IV administration, no significant differences in encainide half-life clearance, volume of distribution, or the area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) were observed between patients and controls. Following so and mo, there was a fourfold reduction in the oral clearance in cirrhotics. Thus, encainide bioavailability was increased in cirrhosis. Whereas the AUC of encainide was significantly higher in patients, no differences were observed in its active metabolites, O-desmethyl-encainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-O-desmethylencainide (MODE). Plasma concentrations of encainide and its metabolites after 3 and 5 days of mo suggested steady-state conditions after 3 days of oral dosing. No change in antipyrine elimination and 6-beta-hydroxycortisol excretion following mo occurred. There was no relationship between parameters of encainide and antipyrine elimination. In conclusion, even though the elimination of encainide was reduced in patients with cirrhosis, plasma levels of the pharmacologically active metabolites, ODE and MODE, were comparable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Time course of moricizine's effect on signal-averaged and 12 lead electrocardiograms: insights into mechanism of action

The mechanism of action of moricizine, a new antiarrhythmic agent used in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, is incompletely characterized. In addition, because moricizine is extensively metabolized, plasma moricizine concentration has an unknown relation to myocardial drug effect. Signal-averaged and standard electrocardiograms (ECGs) were used to monitor moricizine's myocardial effects in 16 patients with frequent ventricular premature complexes taking 600 to 900 mg daily. Three signal-averaged ECG variables were measured: total filtered QRS duration (fQRS), root-mean-square voltage in the terminal 40 ms of the QRS complex (V40) and the terminal low amplitude duration less than 40 microV (LAS). At steady state, plasma samples were collected and serial recordings of signal-averaged and standard ECGs were taken at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after moricizine administration. A 24 h ambulatory ECG was recorded throughout the test period. Moricizine prolonged the fQRS (p less than 0.05) and decreased the V40 (p less than 0.05) of the signal-averaged ECG and prolonged the QRS (p less than 0.05) and corrected JT (JTc) intervals (p less than 0.05) of the standard ECG. The time course of the signal-averaged and standard ECG variables paralleled plasma moricizine concentration; that is, the maximal changes occurred at 1 to 2 h and declined to time 0 values at 8 h. The maximal changes were: fQRS (+8%), V40 (-33%), QRS (+8%) and JTc (+4%). Thus, dynamic changes were observed for intraventricular conduction (fQRS, QRS) and ventricular repolarization (JTc) over the dosing interval.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Concentration-effect relations of 5-hydroxypropafenone in normal subjects

To evaluate the pharmacologic activity of 5-hydroxypropafenone, electrocardiographic changes (PQ and QRS duration) and blood pressure levels were measured in 6 healthy extensive metabolizers of debrisoquine after a single oral dose of 300 mg of this metabolite as a solution in a placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study. Well-absorbed, with a lag time of 4.4 to 9.8 minutes, 5-hydroxypropafenone reached peak concentrations of 153 to 337 ng/ml after 20 to 51 minutes. The terminal half-life was 506 to 963 minutes. To describe the temporal aspects of the concentration-effect relation, a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model with a hypothetical effect compartment was applied. The relation between electrocardiographic changes and drug concentration at the effect site could be described by a linear regression model. Significant prolongations of PQ and QRS duration were found in 5 of 6 subjects. There were no changes in QTc interval, blood pressure measurements and heart rate in the supine position. However, blood pressure measurements in the upright position revealed a greater percent decrease of systolic blood pressure than with placebo (mean +/- standard deviation -25.6 +/- 13.8% vs -3.4 +/- 13.1%, p less than 0.05). It is concluded that 5-hydroxypropafenone exerts significant pharmacologic activity in humans as well as animals. Because QRS prolongation in patients treated with class IC antiarrhythmic drugs correlates with the antiarrhythmic effect, our data suggest that 5-hydroxypropafenone may contribute to the therapeutic activity of propafenone in humans.

QT-interval prolonging drugs: mechanisms and clinical relevance of their arrhythmogenic hazards

The antiarrhythmic principle of drug-induced QT-interval prolongation is well known. However, with the widespread use of the presently known and new Class III antiarrhythmic agents under investigation, and the growing number of agents not primarily designed as antiarrhythmic drugs that potentially cause QT prolongation, we have also become aware of the proarrhythmic hazards associated with many of these agents. The proarrhythmic risk differs markedly from one agent to another and interferes with many individual clinical variables (e.g., hypokalemia, sinus bradycardia). This paper summarizes the present data on the proarrhythmic risk of drug-induced QT prolongation, including the value and problems of the rate-corrected QT interval, the mechanisms involved in the genesis of proarrhythmia, and the clinical cofactors that facilitate the occurrence of proarrhythmic events. In addition, an extensive database provides information on the known proarrhythmic risk of all currently used QT-prolonging agents.

Practical optimisation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy using pharmacokinetic principles

The optimisation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy is dependent on the definitions and methods of short term efficacy testing and the characteristics of those drugs used for rhythm disturbances. The choice of an initial antiarrhythmic drug dosage is highly empirical, and will remain so until the measurement of free concentrations, enantiomeric fractions and genetic phenotyping becomes routine. However, the clinician can devise an efficient initial dosage for efficacy testing procedures based on pharmacokinetic principles and disposition variables in the literature. In this regard, a nomogram for commonly used agents and dosages was constructed and is offered as a guide to accomplish this goal. Verification of the accuracy and usefulness of this nomogram in a prospective manner in patients with symptomatic tachyarrhythmias is still required. On a long term basis, dosage regimens can be modified by the use of pharmacokinetic principles and patient-specific target concentrations, in accordance with the methods used to monitor arrhythmia recurrence and drug-related side effects.

Selective depression of maximum rate of depolarization of guinea-pig ventricular action potentials by amiodarone and lignocaine in simulated ischaemia: comparison with encainide

1. Standard microelectrode techniques were used to record intracellular action potentials from guinea-pig ventricular myocardium superfused with either control physiological saline (pH 7.5; pO2 500 mmHg; [K+] 5.6 mmol/L) or 'simulated ischaemic' solution (pH 6.4; pO2 90 mmHg; [K+] 11.2 mmol/L). 2. The effects on action potential parameters of therapeutic concentrations of lignocaine, amiodarone and encainide were studied under both conditions. 3. Simulated ischaemia, in the absence of drugs, produced marked reductions in resting potential (-86.6 +/- 2.3 to -64.7 +/- 3.5 mV), maximum rate of depolarization (Vmax; 263 +/- 66 to 106 +/- 36 V/s) and action potential duration (164 +/- 24 to 97 +/- 26 ms). No drug produced any additional effect on resting potential. 4. All three drugs produced enhanced depression of Vmax in ischaemia compared to control conditions (class I effect). This was much more marked for lignocaine and amiodarone (inactivated channel blockers) than for encainide (open channel blocker). 5. In addition the prolongation of action potential duration seen with acute exposure to amiodarone (174 +/- 12 to 192 +/- 17 ms; class III effect) was abolished under simulated ischaemic conditions. 6. It is concluded that lignocaine and amiodarone exert greater selectivity for ischaemic tissue than does encainide and that amiodarone may function primarily as a class I agent under ischaemic conditions.

Natural history of potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias in patients treated with long-term antiarrhythmic drug therapy

To examine the natural history of long-term anti-arrhythmic therapy in patients with benign and potentially lethal ventricular premature complexes (VPCs), 28 patients with initial efficacy with moricizine (greater than 75% suppression of baseline mean VPCs/hr and greater than 90% suppression of repetitive VPCs) were prospectively followed for 1 to 56 (mean +/- standard deviation 25 +/- 17) months. Patients were examined during baseline placebo, anti-arrhythmic drug therapy and intermittent pulsed-placebo reexamination periods. The mean VPCs of all patients at baseline entry were 233 +/- 47 VPCs/hr, and after moricizine therapy 14 +/- 4 VPCs/hr. Follow-up demonstrated that antiarrhythmic efficacy decreased to 75% at 12 months and to 62% at 24 months. Loss of antiarrhythmic drug efficacy most commonly occurred as a "transient" event (10 patients [36%]), and efficacy was spontaneously reestablished without a change in antiarrhythmic therapy. In contrast, increased dose titration of moricizine was necessary to reestablish antiarrhythmic suppression efficacy in 4 patients (14%), and 4 patients (14%) lost antiarrhythmic drug responsiveness during follow-up. Spontaneous decrease in baseline VPCs resulted in discontinuation of antiarrhythmic therapy in 3 patients, and increase in baseline VPCs was associated with a loss of antiarrhythmic response in 2 patients. Late proarrhythmic effects (2 patients, 7%), delayed side effects necessitating drug withdrawal (6 patients, 21%) and medical events (4 patients, 14%) occurred during 56 months of follow-up. Individual serum moricizine levels remained in the therapeutic range throughout the study and did not correlate with changes in antiarrhythmic efficacy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Encainide

Encainide is a class IC antiarrhythmic agent having little or no effect on action-potential duration or maximum diastolic potential but decreasing the maximum rate of phase O depolarization as well as increasing atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods. In intact animals or humans, encainide increases the AH, PR, QRS, and H-V intervals while not affecting the sinus node cycle length or JT interval. QT interval increases only by the concomitant increase in the QRS interval. Encainide is metabolized to O-demethyl encainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-ODE (MODE), both of which are also antiarrhythmics with similar pharmacology to encainide. Encainide and its metabolites have little negative inotropic activity and ancillary pharmacology. Consequently, encainide has little or no effect on hemodynamic variables in patients with either normal or compromised cardiac function. The drug is well tolerated, with side effects being mainly those associated with its local anesthetic activity such as blurred vision and dizziness. Encainide is particularly effective in patients with excessive premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) and less so in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Like all antiarrhythmics, encainide may aggravate or precipitate new arrhythmias (proarrhythmia). The overall incidence of proarrhythmia is about 10%, with less occurring in patients with PVCs and more in those with sustained VT; also, the incidence of proarrhythmia is higher in patients with underlying heart disease. Encainide is also effective for the treatment of supra-ventricular arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, PSVT (both PAF as well as reentry of the nodal or W-P-W type), and ectopic atrial tachycardia. Its dosage and role in antiarrhythmic therapy are discussed.

New antiarrhythmic drugs

While controversy still exists as to the precise indications for the treatment of all forms of ventricular arrhythmia, advances in the number and, more importantly, type of antiarrhythmic drugs can provide the clinician with a rational basis for selecting antiarrhythmic drug therapy. A host of new agents with different pharmacokinetic and electrophysiological actions are now available, and can be compared or contrasted to conventional antiarrhythmic agents such as quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, lignocaine (lidocaine) and bretylium. This review summarises the electrophysiological, haemodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and efficacy and safety data of mexiletine, tocainide, flecainide, encainide, propafenone, amiodarone, sotalol, pirmenol, cibenzoline (cifenline) and ethmozine (moracizine, moricizine), and aims to provide a basis on which clinicians can compare and contrast these agents and form an algorithm for selection of antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the treatment of patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Newer antiarrhythmic drugs

The effective management of cardiac arrhythmias remains a major challenge in cardiovascular therapeutics. The management of arrhythmias encompasses a wide spectrum of supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurring in patients with various cardiac diagnoses and different degrees of myocardial dysfunction. A number of the newer antiarrhythmic drugs that have either recently been released or appear promising are reviewed in this article. Drugs are described with respect to their basic pharmacology, electrophysiologic actions, pharmacokinetics and metabolism, hemodynamics, antiarrhythmic effects, side effects, interactions, indications, and dosage.

Pharmacokinetics of moricizine HCl

Moricizine HCl is a phenothiazine derivative with antiarrhythmic properties. It was developed in the USSR and is now undergoing clinical evaluation. Although preliminary work has shown moricizine HCl to be effective in treating both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, little is known of its pharmacokinetics. There is a 4-fold variability in range for its elimination half-life and in volumes of distribution and clearance. There is a linear relation for peak plasma levels and area under the plasma concentration/time curve with regard to single-dose administration of moricizine HCl. The bioavailability of moricizine HCl connotes extensive first-pass effect, or presystemic metabolism. Very little of moricizine is excreted unchanged; it is extensively metabolized to certain compounds that are present in plasma for extended periods. Moricizine is extensively (92% to 95%) bound to plasma protein. Its coadministration with cimetidine leads to additive systemic effects; however, there is no evidence of alterations in steady-state levels when moricizine HCl is coadministered with digoxin. Because moricizine is a drug with active metabolites, its concentration/effect profile is complex; this poses a challenge for accurate dose titration. This may, however, be a helpful challenge in that the metabolites may one day prove useful in therapy. This surmise warrants further study.

Encainide: its electrophysiologic and antiarrhythmic effects, pharmacokinetics, and safety

Encainide is a class IC antiarrhythmic agent that has been under clinical investigation for the last decade. Laboratory and clinical studies have demonstrated it to be a potent suppressor of ventricular extrasystoles. It is effective in approximately one-half of patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias. The preliminary experience in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias indicates that the drug is particularly effective in arrhythmias associated with an accessory pathway. Side effects most commonly include blurred vision, nausea, heart block, and proarrhythmic effects. The hemodynamic effect of oral encainide are insignificant in patients with well-preserved left ventricular function. Despite minimal myocardial depression in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, there is the potential for worsening of heart failure. Encainide has a short half-life of 3 hours, but has 2 active metabolites with longer half-lives. No clinically significant drug interaction has been demonstrated with encainide therapy.

Safety of encainide for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias

A data base of 1,245 patients treated for ventricular arrhythmias, most of whom had serious cardiac disease, was reviewed. Only 2.9% of these patients had benign ventricular arrhythmias without structural heart disease. The overall incidence of proarrhythmia in this population was 9.2% (115/1,245), but was as frequent as 16% in patients with a history of cardiomyopathy. The proarrhythmic form was new sustained ventricular tachycardia in 22 patients (1.8%). Only 2 of 71 patients (2.8%) with primary arrhythmia had a proarrhythmic event. The incidence has decreased markedly over the past years as reduced doses and gradual titration have been used. There were 137 deaths in the data base of which 82 were sudden, all in patients with advanced (79) or moderately severe (3) cardiac disease. High initial doses, prior myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure (CHF) were positively associated with sudden cardiac death. There were no deaths among the 71 patients with benign arrhythmias. Death rates were related to the severity of the arrhythmia being treated. Comparisons with published survival curves indicated modest improvement; in no case was survival decreased. Invasive and noninvasive measures of left ventricular function indicated no adverse hemodynamic effects. There was only 1 case of new and 3 cases of worsened CHF probably related to encainide. Only 5 patients discontinued for CHF or related signs and symptoms. The most frequent drug-related noncardiac adverse reactions were dizziness (26%), abnormal or blurred vision (19%), QRS interval prolongation (5%), taste perversion (4%) and tremor (3%). In conclusion, the use of reduced doses and gradual titration of encainide has markedly decreased the incidence of proarrhythmia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Encainide for ventricular arrhythmias: placebo-controlled and standard comparison trials

Efficacy data obtained from the use of encainide in the treatment of patients with benign or potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias are reviewed. These include an oral dose multicenter titration study involving 111 patients in whom encainide was given from 25 to 75 mg, 4 times/day, which was followed by a 3-center, reduced dose study in which 35 patients received a forced escalation of encainide from 10 to 30 mg, 4 times/day. Frequent Holter monitoring was used to judge efficacy. An 8-center, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled outpatient trial was conducted using encainide from 10 to 50 mg, 3 times/day, in 125 patients. This trial defined the lower end of the dose response curve for encainide to be 25 mg, 3 times/day. The data from all these trials show that when properly titrated, encainide is effective in decreasing ventricular premature complex frequency by at least 75% in about 80% of patients. A similar percentage will have abolition of ventricular tachycardia. When encainide was compared with quinidine in a 9-center placebo-controlled crossover study, encainide demonstrated more efficacy at 25 mg, 4 times/day, compared with quinidine at 200 mg, 4 times/day, in all arrhythmia parameters. Encainide was also better tolerated than quinidine and there was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of asymptomatic proarrhythmia as detected by Holter monitoring between these 2 drugs. Long-term data in 220 patients over 36-month follow-up show continued encainide efficacy. Thus, encainide is a potent, effective class 1C antiarrhythmic agent and it has minimal negative inotropic effects and is well tolerated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Drug interaction studies and encainide use in renal and hepatic impairment

The effect of encainide administration on steady-state plasma digoxin levels was evaluated in 17 patients receiving stable doses of digoxin. A paired t test, comparing plasma digoxin levels (mean +/- standard error) before encainide therapy (1.05 +/- 0.14 ng/ml) and after 2 weeks of encainide, 100 mg/day (1.03 +/- 0.11 ng/ml) or 200 mg/day (1.2 +/- 0.2 ng/ml), indicates no significant (p greater than 0.05) change in digoxin levels. These results were confirmed in a second study of 10 patients with severe congestive heart failure. Also, no difference in efficacy of either drug was observed and changes in dosing of digoxin were not required. Plasma concentrations of encainide and its 2 major metabolites, O-demethyl encainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-O-demethyl encainide, significantly increased by 31.6%, 43.1% and 35.6% after concomitant cimetidine administration in 13 healthy adult men receiving 75 mg/day of encainide. However, a retrospective evaluation of 33 patients receiving both drugs did not reveal any clinically significant interactions. Retrospective evaluation of patients enrolled in clinical studies who received concomitant digoxin (268), antiarrhythmics (118), anticoagulants (78), antidiabetics (40), antipsychotics (23), beta blockers (88), calcium-channel blockers (24) or diuretics (229) did not reveal any clinically significant interactions with encainide. Similarly, in vitro protein binding studies did not reveal any clinically significant interactions with encainide or its major metabolites. Six patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance 10 to 38 ml/min) received 25 mg of encainide, 3 times/day, for 7 doses. Plasma encainide, ODE and 3-methoxy-O-demethyl concentrations were similar to those observed in normal subjects who had received twice the dose of encainide, and steady-state apparent oral clearance of encainide was reduced by 66% with renal impairment. Based on these data it is recommended that in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment encainide be initiated at one-third the normal dose, or 25 mg once a day. Doses may be elevated in small increments at 1-week intervals if needed for efficacy. The effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of encainide was studied in 7 patients with clinically documented cirrhosis. Compared with normal subjects studied using a similar protocol, the plasma concentrations of encainide were elevated significantly due to a 6-fold decrease in oral clearance. However, since plasma concentrations of the active metabolite ODE were correspondingly lower, specific encainide dosing instructions for patients with hepatic impairment are not indicated.

Disposition kinetics of encainide and metabolites

Interpretation of plasma concentration data during encainide therapy is predicated on an understanding of the role of active metabolites during treatment. In over 90% of patients, encainide is rapidly biotransformed to O-desmethyl encainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-O-desmethyl encainide (3-MODE), which persist in plasma hours after encainide itself is undetectable. This metabolism occurs in the liver, and encainide clearance is sufficiently high that a significant first-pass effect is seen during oral therapy (bioavailability 30 +/- 7%). In these extensive metabolizers, ODE and 3-MODE appear to mediate the arrhythmia suppression and electrocardiographic changes seen during encainide therapy. In less than 10% of patients, a genetic defect prevents expression of the enzyme responsible for the rapid biotransformation of encainide. In this poor metabolizer subset, the systemic clearance of encainide is 10-fold lower than in extensive metabolizers (0.18 +/- .002 vs 1.9 +/- 0.2 liters/min), the first-pass effect is virtually absent (bioavailability 83% to 88%), plasma concentrations are higher and an antiarrhythmic effect may be seen at usual encainide doses. Minimally effective plasma concentrations appear to be 35 ng/ml (ODE), 100 ng/ml (3-MODE) and 300 ng/ml (encainide), making ODE one of the most potent sodium channel blockers yet used in man. The elimination half-life of encainide is 2.3 +/- 0.3 hours in extensive metabolizer patients. Despite this rapid elimination, encainide can be administered every 8 to 12 hours in both extensive and poor metabolizer subsets; this is because of slowly eliminated metabolites in extensive metabolizers and slower elimination of encainide itself (11.3 +/- 0.3 hours) in poor metabolizers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Safety and efficacy of encainide for malignant ventricular arrhythmias

The antiarrhythmic effect of encainide was evaluated in 140 patients with documented symptomatic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation refractory to conventional agents. In 102 patients with reproducible spontaneous arrhythmia, noninvasive methods, including ambulatory monitoring and exercise testing, were used to evaluate drug efficacy, while in the remaining 38 patients electrophysiologic testing was performed. Side effects necessitated drug discontinuation in 10 patients before noninvasive evaluation. Of the remaining 92 patients 44 (48%) responded to encainide. Of the 38 patients who underwent electrophysiologic study, 1 discontinued encainide because of side effects and in 4 patients the spontaneous occurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia precluded repeat study. Of the remaining 33 patients, 10 (30%) were rendered noninducible with encainide. The drug was more effective in those with a left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 35% (p less than 0.03) and in those presenting with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Side effects were reported in 53 of 140 patients (38%) and were primarily nausea, vomiting, headaches and tremors. Aggravation of arrhythmia occurred in 4% of patients with a history of nonsustained arrhythmia and in 25% of those with a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Worsening of arrhythmia was not related to mean dose of drug, mean blood level or electrocardiographic changes; it was more likely to occur in patients with a markedly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (average 32%) and in those with a history of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia (p less than 0.05). Long-term encainide therapy was continued in 48 patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Relation of blood level and metabolites to the antiarrhythmic effectiveness of encainide

Encainide is a potent new antiarrhythmic agent with 2 major active metabolites and 2 distinct phenotypes for metabolism, extensive (approximately 92%) and nonextensive (8%). Encainide is an active compound with close correlation of plasma levels with antiarrhythmic effectiveness and electrocardiographic changes in nonextensive metabolizers. Its metabolites, O-demethyl-encainide and 3-methoxy-O-demethyl-encainide, are active against experimental and clinical arrhythmias. They have longer half-lives than and equal or greater potency than the parent compound. All 3 compounds contribute to the antiarrhythmic profile in extensive metabolizers. There is no readily apparent relation between encainide and its metabolites, blood levels and efficacy because of the complexity of the 3 active compounds and individual variation in pharmacokinetic and arrhythmia responsiveness. Encainide has been given for up to 2 years in 140 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. The survival curves are similar to historical control data from patients reported by Graboys and Swerdlow. The survival curves for long-term administration in patients with frequent ventricular premature complexes (greater than 30/min) are comparable to data from Califf. While these data must be viewed cautiously, it seems fair to conclude that encainide is as effective as any combination of drugs for preventing sudden death in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

Oxidative metabolism of encainide: polymorphism, pharmacokinetics and clinical considerations

The 8-h urinary metabolic profiles of encainide and its oxidized metabolites, O-desmethyl- (ODE), 3-methoxy-O-desmethyl- (MODE), N-desmethyl- (NDE) and N, O-didesmethyl- (DDE) encainide were studied in a group of 112 normal Caucasians. Nine of these subjects (8%) were defective in their ability to 4-hydroxylate debrisoquine. The cumulative frequency distribution of the 8-h recovery ratio of encainide/ODE indicated two distinct populations in complete concordance with the debrisoquine phenotyping. The subjects with an 'extensive metabolizer' (EM) phenotype had a ratio from 0.003 to 0.9 whereas the PM group had values from 7.4 to 48. In addition, no MODE was detected in the urine from 'poor metabolizers' (PM). The oxidative metabolism of encainide, specifically the O-demethylation pathway, is, therefore, polymorphically distributed and controlled by the same genetic factor(s) that determine the 4-hydroxylation of debrisoquine. In EM subjects, ODE and MODE are the major metabolites in plasma and their concentrations are much greater than those of unchanged drug. As ODE is a more potent antiarrhythmic agent than encainide and MODE is at least equipotent, these metabolites significantly contribute to the overall antiarrhythmic effect in EM patients. The low plasma concentrations of ODE and MODE in PM subjects would be expected to result in inefficacious therapy when usual doses of encainide are administered. However, in such individuals, chronic oral therapy results in accumulation of unmetabolized encainide to far higher levels than in EM subjects. As encainide itself has intrinsic antiarrhythmic activity at these concentrations, this generally results in the desired clinical response. Despite pronounced interphenotypic differences in encainide's disposition and pharmacokinetics, the polymorphic oxidative metabolism appears to have limited consequences for the drug's clinical efficacy.

Encainide: a new antiarrhythmic agent

Encainide is classified as a type Ic antiarrhythmic agent. Absorption is essentially complete, but bioavailability is variable because of first-pass metabolism. Two metabolic phenotypes, extensive and poor metabolizers, have been identified. O-demethyl encainide and 3-methoxy-O-demethyl encainide are active metabolites of encainide and contribute significantly to its antiarrhythmic effect. In clinical trials, encainide has been shown to be highly effective in suppressing premature ventricular contractions and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The drug is useful in treating ventricular arrhythmias refractory to other agents. Encainide is also moderately effective in supraventricular arrhythmias involving an accessory pathway. It is highly effective in cases of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, where the accessory pathway has a short refractory period. Common adverse effects of encainide are dizziness, visual disturbances, nausea, and headache. Encainide appears to be a safe and effective antiarrhythmic agent with few adverse effects and negligible hemodynamic effects. Encainide may be a useful agent for ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias, particularly those refractory to other agents.

Comparative study of encainide and quinidine in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias

The antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of oral encainide hydrochloride and quinidine sulfate were compared in a nine center double-blind crossover study in 187 outpatients with benign or potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. Patients with at least 30 premature ventricular complexes/h were randomized to receive either encainide, 25 mg four times/day, or quinidine, 200 mg four times/day, for 2 weeks. These doses were continued for another 2 weeks if a 75% or greater reduction in premature ventricular complexes was observed. If this reduction was not seen, encainide was increased to 50 mg four times/day or quinidine to 400 mg four times/day for an additional 2 weeks. Both drugs produced a statistically significant reduction in premature ventricular complex frequency compared with baseline values. Encainide produced a statistically significant greater mean reduction in total premature ventricular complexes than did quinidine during the initial dose phase and after dose adjustment. More patients required dose increases of quinidine (60%) than of encainide (51%). Early discontinuation of treatment resulting in advancement to the next study period occurred in 12 patients taking encainide and 38 patients taking quinidine (p less than 0.05). PR and QRS intervals increased significantly during encainide treatment, as did QTc and JT intervals during quinidine treatment. No adverse reactions resulted from these electrocardiographic changes. Adverse reactions were more common with quinidine than with encainide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Spectrum of antiarrhythmic response to encainide

Encainide is effective in suppressing non-life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias; however, inconsistent results have been noted in patients with more serious ventricular arrhythmias. Thirty-seven patients with drug-resistant ventricular arrhythmias were studied. Patients in group I (n = 11) has sustained ventricular tachycardia and those in group II (n = 26) had nonsustained ventricular arrhythmias. In group I, 8 patients had remote myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure and sustained ventricular tachycardia requiring repeated cardioversion (group Ia). None of these patients responded to encainide treatment, but 6 did have an antiarrhythmic response (complete in 3 and only partial in 3) to other investigational antiarrhythmic agents. Three patients in group I, all without ischemic heart disease (group Ib), had an excellent antiarrhythmic response to encainide, as did 21 of 26 patients in group II. In 4 of 5 patients in group II who did not respond, the dosage was limited due to the development of sinus pauses, atrioventricular block or bundle branch block, and in 3 of these 4 patients preexisting conduction disease was evident (PR longer than 0.2 second or QRS longer than 0.12 second). Diplopia occurred while taking the maximal oral dosage in the fifth patient. At 21.5 months of follow-up, 14 of the original 24 patients who responded to encainide continue to receive it; 3 have died (all due to natural progression of left ventricular dysfunction) and encainide was discontinued in 7: in 2 because of syncope, in 2 because of new-onset atrial fibrillation, in 1 patient because of exercise-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, in 1 because of diplopia and in 1 because of skin exanthem.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Long-term efficacy and safety of oral encainide in the treatment of chronic ventricular ectopic activity: relationship to plasma concentrations--a French multicenter trial

To establish long-term efficacy and safety of encainide, 48 patients with chronic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) underwent 6 months of therapy with encainide. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory ECGs were obtained at baseline for each daily dosage of 75 mg, 150 mg, and 225 mg of encainide during the in-hospital titration period and at the end of the first and sixth months during the follow-up period. There was a significant reduction in the median hourly total PVC rates from 480.6 at baseline to 2.0 at the end of the titration period with the highest dosage and to 22.1 at the last visit of the chronic dosing period. Nearly total suppression of PVCs was observed in 56% of patients at the end of the titration period and in 30% at the end of the 6-month follow-up period. The most common side effects were vertigo, vision disturbance, and headache. PR, QRS, and QTc intervals showed consistent significant increases from baseline during the various encainide trial periods. Encainide may have worsened ventricular arrhythmia in four patients who received more than 200 mg of encainide daily. Plasma concentrations of encainide and encainide metabolites showed wide interpatient variation, and no relationship was found between antiarrhythmic efficacy and plasma levels of encainide, O-demethyl-encainide, or 3-methoxy-O-demethyl-encainide.

Aggravation of electrically provoked ventricular tachycardia during treatment with propafenone

Propafenone is a new class Ic antiarrhythmic agent currently being investigated in the United States. It is generally well tolerated. We administered propafenone to 16 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) that had been refractory to conventional antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Three of these 16 patients developed electrically provoked incessant VT during treatment with propafenone without other evidence of toxicity. These arrhythmias subsided after lidocaine was administered. Propafenone therapy was discontinued in each case. Incessant VT did not develop in any of these patients in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs or on antiarrhythmic drugs other than propafenone. Alternative effective treatment was identified for each patient. Although VT was initially provoked by pacing in each of these patients, these observations suggest that propafenone, like some other class Ic drugs, may favor the development of incessant VT in occasional patients. This appears most likely to occur in patients with ventricular dysfunction and prior sustained VT or ventricular fibrillation.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of the newer antiarrhythmic agents

This article reviews clinical pharmacokinetic data on 8 new antiarrhythmic agents. Some of these drugs have been studied extensively while others are relatively new, with incomplete data due to limited evaluation. Amiodarone is a class III antiarrhythmic drug which is effective in treating many atrial and ventricular arrhythmias that are refractory to other drugs. Amiodarone accumulates extensively in tissues and its disposition characteristics are best described by models with 3 and 4 compartments. Its apparent volume of distribution is very large (1300 to 11,000L) and its elimination half-life very long (53 days). A delay of up to 28 days from of treatment to onset of antiarrhythmic effect may be observed, and the antiarrhythmic effect may persist for weeks to months following cessation of therapy. Clinically significant drug interactions have been observed with amiodarone and warfarin, digoxin, quinidine and procainamide. Encainide is a class Ic antiarrhythmic drug. Although it has a short elimination half-life (1 to 3h), 2 major metabolites with antiarrhythmic effects accumulate in the plasma of patients during long term therapy. Plasma concentrations of O-demethyl encainide appear to correlate with the antiarrhythmic effect. Flecainide, another class Ic antiarrhythmic agent, has an elimination half-life of 14 hours which makes it suitable for twice daily dosing. Flecainide elimination is prolonged in patients with low output heart failure. Significant drug interactions with digoxin and cimetidine have been reported. Lorcainide is also a class Ic antiarrhythmic drug, the bioavailability of which is nonlinear. Clearance of the drug is reduced during long term therapy. A major active metabolite, norlorcainide, accumulates in the plasma of patients during long term therapy and its concentration exceeds that of lorcainide by a factor of 2. The elimination half-lives of lorcainide (9h) and norlorcainide (28h) allow for once or twice daily dosing. Mexiletine, a class Ib antiarrhythmic drug, is structurally similar to lignocaine (lidocaine). A sustained release formulation provides effective plasma concentrations when administered twice daily. The apparent volume of distribution of mexiletine is 5.0 to 6.6 L/kg, and the elimination half-life varies from 6 to 12 hours in normal subjects and from 11 to 17 hours in cardiac patients. Mexilitine is extensively metabolised but the metabolites are not pharmacologically active. Renal elimination of mexiletine is pH dependent. Drugs which induce hepatic metabolism significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of mexiletine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Increased incidence of side effects after encainide: a newly developed antiarrhythmic drug

In a clinical trial the efficacy of encainide, a newly developed class I antiarrhythmic agent, was compared with the well-known mexiletine. Nine patients with different underlying cardiac disease and chronic complex ventricular ectopies (documented by 24-h Holter monitoring, confirmed during the initial placebo period) entered the study. The dosage of encainide was increased from 25 to 75 mg three times daily and the antiarrhythmic effect monitored by repeated 24-h Holter registration and in some patients by treadmill exercise testing. During the clinical followup we noted a high incidence of so-called "minor side effects" (headache, dizziness, blurred vision, tremor, and nausea), which caused us to terminate the study. In all instances adverse effects emerged before ectopic activity was suppressed satisfactorily prohibiting further increment of dosage. These results indicate that encainide cannot be regarded as an antiarrhythmic drug of first choice in routine clinical application.

Therapy with investigational antiarrhythmic drugs

The investigational antiarrhythmic agents available for use in this country are predominantly class I drugs with local anesthetic membrane effects. These drugs are often used successfully to control arrhythmias refractory to treatment with the standard antiarrhythmic drugs. Side effects often limit their use, and particular attention needs to be paid to their cardiac side effects, such as exacerbation of arrhythmia or enhanced conduction defects.

New directions in antiarrhythmic drug therapy

Cardiac arrhythmia causing sudden cardiac death is a serious worldwide public health problem. Antiarrhythmic agents have been available for therapy, but the conventional agents cause a high degree of intolerable side effects. The recent development of many new experimental antiarrhythmic agents has increased our capacity to effectively treat cardiac arrhythmias. Using a multifaceted approach of programmed electrical stimulation studies, drug level determinations, exercise testing and 24-hour ambulatory Holter monitoring, it can reasonably be decided which patient needs therapy and if therapy is going to be effective. Both aspects of the sudden death equation, ectopy frequency (triggering mechanism) and the ability to propagate sustained ventricular tachycardia (substrate), may be examined. Careful follow-up is needed to determine continued drug efficacy and the presence of side effects that may compromise patient compliance with therapy. If side effects intervene that may cause continued therapy to be intolerable, changing the antiarrhythmic agent, as opposed to decreasing the dosage to an ineffective range, may be appropriate. A comprehensive approach to arrhythmia management may begin to reduce the high incidence of sudden death due to fatal arrhythmias.

Electrophysiologic effects of ethmozin in patients with ventricular tachycardia

Ten patients with recurrent episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) had electrophysiologic studies in the basal state and on chronic oral ethmozin (12.1 +/- 0.6 SE mg/kg/day). Ethmozin significantly prolonged the AH interval (basal: 75 +/- 8 SE msec; ethmozin: 91 +/- 10 msec, p less than 0.05), the HV interval (51 +/- 3; 66 +/- 5 msec, p less than 0.01), and the QRS duration (101 +/- 4; 118 +/- 4 msec, p less than 0.001). Atrial and ventricular refractory periods and the corrected QT interval were not significantly affected by ethmozin. VT was induced in 7 of 10 patients in the basal state by means of programmed right ventricular extrastimulation or rapid burst ventricular pacing. On oral ethmozin nine patients had inducible VT. VT cycle length was consistently prolonged on ethmozin (250 +/- 13; 326 +/- 14 msec, p less than 0.001). Four of the seven patients with VT on basal ambulatory monitoring had total abolition of spontaneous VT on ethmozin. Ethmozin failed to prevent induction of VT in most patients despite significant reductions in ventricular arrhythmia on ambulatory monitoring. Further studies comparing VT induction with ambulatory monitoring in patients on ethmozin are needed to confirm these findings and to define the clinical significance of this dissociation.

Encainide and its metabolites. Comparative effects in man on ventricular arrhythmia and electrocardiographic intervals

To assess the relative contributions of encainide and its putatively active metabolites, O-demethyl encainide (ODE) and 3 methoxy-O-demethyl encainide (3MODE), to the drug's pharmacologic effects, we compared intravenous infusions and sustained oral therapy in two phenotypically distinct groups of patients, extensive and poor metabolizers of encainide. Unlike poor metabolizers, extensive metabolizers had appreciable quantities of both metabolites detectable in plasma and had fourfold shorter elimination half-lives for encainide. By quantitating electrocardiogram intervals, arrhythmia frequency, and plasma concentrations, we found that, in poor metabolizers, arrhythmia suppression and ventricular complex (QRS) prolongation were correlated positively with encainide concentrations (r greater than or equal to 0.570, P less than 0.014). In these two subjects, antiarrhythmic concentrations of encainide (greater than 265 ng/ml) were at least fivefold higher than those sustained in the six extensive metabolizers during steady state oral therapy. In extensive metabolizers, encainide concentrations were uncorrelated with effects. Arrhythmia suppression and QRS prolongation in extensive metabolizers correlated best with ODE (r greater than or equal to 0.816, P less than 0.001); QTc change correlated positively with both 3MODE and ODE. Arrhythmia suppression paralleled QRS prolongation; the relationship between them appeared similar in both phenotypic groups. In most patients, extensive metabolizers, encainide effects during oral therapy are mediated by metabolites, probably ODE.

First-pass elimination. Basic concepts and clinical consequences

First-pass elimination takes place when a drug is metabolised between its site of administration and the site of sampling for measurement of drug concentration. Clinically, first-pass metabolism is important when the fraction of the dose administered that escapes metabolism is small and variable. The liver is usually assumed to be the major site of first-pass metabolism of a drug administered orally, but other potential sites are the gastrointestinal tract, blood, vascular endothelium, lungs, and the arm from which venous samples are taken. Bioavailability, defined as the ratio of the areas under the blood concentration-time curves, after extra- and intravascular drug administration (corrected for dosage if necessary), is often used as a measure of the extent of first-pass metabolism. When several sites of first-pass metabolism are in series, the bioavailability is the product of the fractions of drug entering the tissue that escape loss at each site. The extent of first-pass metabolism in the liver and intestinal wall depends on a number of physiological factors. The major factors are enzyme activity, plasma protein and blood cell binding, and gastrointestinal motility. Models that describe the dependence of bioavailability on changes in these physiological variables have been developed for drugs subject to first-pass metabolism only in the liver. Two that have been applied widely are the 'well-stirred' and 'parallel tube' models. Discrimination between the 2 models may be performed under linear conditions in which all pharmacokinetic parameters are independent of concentration and time. The predictions of the models are similar when bioavailability is large but differ dramatically when bioavailability is small. The 'parallel tube' model always predicts a much greater change in bioavailability than the 'well-stirred' model for a given change in drug-metabolising enzyme activity, blood flow, or fraction of drug unbound. Many clinically important drugs undergo considerable first-pass metabolism after an oral dose. Drugs in this category include alprenolol, amitriptyline, dihydroergotamine, 5-fluorouracil, hydralazine, isoprenaline (isoproterenol), lignocaine (lidocaine), lorcainide, pethidine (meperidine), mercaptopurine, metoprolol, morphine, neostigmine, nifedipine, pentazocine and propranolol. One major therapeutic implication of extensive first-pass metabolism is that much larger oral doses than intravenous doses are required to achieve equivalent plasma concentrations. For some drugs, extensive first-pass metabolism precludes their use as oral agents (e. g. lignocaine, naloxone and glyceryl trinitrate).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Clinical profiles of newer class I antiarrhythmic agents--tocainide, mexiletine, encainide, flecainide and lorcainide

New class I antiarrhythmic drugs differ in potency, adverse effects and pharmacokinetics. Encainide and flecainide can totally suppress arrhythmias in some patients, but arrhythmia induction can also occur. At effective dose levels, neurologic and gastrointestinal adverse effects are uncommon. Flecainide pharmacokinetics are suitable for oral use but encainide disposition is complex with variable bioavailability and active metabolites that contribute substantially to activity. Lorcainide is also potent, but neurologic adverse effects are common and dose-dependent bioavailability and an active metabolite may complicate long-term oral therapy. Tocainide and mexiletine can suppress arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction, during convalescence from myocardial infarction and in patients with arrhythmias resistant to other therapy. Dose-related neurologic and gastrointestinal adverse effects are common, but hemodynamic effects are minor and arrhythmia induction is rare. Tocainide disposition is reasonably predictable and stable in patients, but mexiletine disposition is less so because of variation in distribution and clearance. Although all of the newer agents have some disadvantages, their availability should increase the likelihood of success in the high-risk patient.

Importance of metabolites in antiarrhythmic therapy

The presence of metabolites with pharmacologic activity can produce unanticipated drug efficacy or toxicity. This is particularly true during treatment with drugs that have narrow therapeutic-toxic ratios, such as the antiarrhythmic agents. The presence of active metabolites can often be inferred from variability in the relation between pharmacologic effect and steady-state plasma concentrations of the parent drug. Moreover, metabolites may ordinarily be unimportant but can accumulate to therapeutic (or toxic) levels in disease states such as congestive heart failure, renal failure and hepatic failure. Further characterization of the contribution of such metabolites during treatment requires direct evaluation of their pharmacology in vitro, in animal models and, if indicated, in man. Procainamide and its active metabolite N-acetylprocainamide provide the best and most complete example of this sequence of observations. Other drugs, including quinidine, disopyramide, verapamil and the investigational agents encainide and lorcainide, have active metabolites for which pharmacologic activity is less well-defined. Further studies in this area will help reduce the frequency of antiarrhythmic drug adverse effects, make successful therapy more frequent, and perhaps allow insights into structure-activity relations.