Post-myocardial infarction exercise testing. Non-Q wave versus Q wave correlation with coronary angiography and long-term prognosis

Safety and diagnostic accuracy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs exercise tolerance testing early after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and diagnostic accuracy of adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion imaging early after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) compared with standard exercise tolerance testing (ETT).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Cross sectional observational study in a university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

35 patients admitted with first acute STEMI.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent a CMR imaging protocol which included rest and adenosine-stress perfusion, viability, and cardiac functional assessment. All patients also had an ETT (modified Bruce protocol) and x ray coronary angiography.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Safety and diagnostic accuracy of adenosine-stress perfusion CMR vs ETT early after STEMI in identifying patients with significant coronary stenosis (>or=70%) and the need for coronary revascularisation. Also, to determine if CMR can distinguish between ischaemia in the peri-infarct zone and ischaemia in remote myocardium.

RESULTS

CMR imaging was well tolerated (all patients completed the protocol) and no complications occurred. CMR was more sensitive (86% vs 48%, p = 0.0074) and more specific than ETT (100% vs 50%, p<0.0001) for detecting significant coronary stenosis, and more sensitive for predicting revascularisation (94% vs 56%, p = 0.039). Inducible ischaemia in the infarct related artery territory was seen in 21 of 35 patients and was associated with smaller infarct size and less transmurality of infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Adenosine-stress CMR imaging is safe early after acute STEMI and identifies patients with significant coronary stenosis more accurately than ETT.

Role of right-sided chest leads in the detection of multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with extended Q-wave anterior myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the improvement of diagnostic ability of exercise testing to detect multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with extended Q-wave anterior myocardial infarction, using additional right-sided chest leads.

METHODS

Fifty-two consecutive patients with Q-wave anterior myocardial infarction underwent exercise testing, using the standard 12 and the additional right-sided (V3R, V4R, V5R) chest leads, thallium-201 scintigraphy and coronary arteriography.

RESULTS

Twenty-one (40%) patients had one-vessel disease, 18 (35%) had two-vessel disease and 13 (25%) had three-vessel disease. The sensitivities of the standard 12-lead exercise testing and its combination with the additional right-sided chest leads were 24% (5/21) versus 28% (6/21) for the detection of one-vessel disease (P: NS), 33% (6/18) versus 83% (15/18) for the detection of two-vessel disease (P<0.05) and 38% (5/13) versus 92% (12/13) for the detection of three-vessel disease (P<0.05), respectively. In thallium-201 scintigraphy, 29 of the 31 (94%) patients with multivessel coronary artery disease demonstrated reversible ischemia. The usual 12-lead exercise testing could detect ischemia in 11 (35%) of these 31 patients, while the addition of the right-sided chest leads could detect ischemia in 27 (87%) of them (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The additional right-sided chest leads significantly improve the low sensitivity of the usual exercise testing to detect multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with previous extended Q-wave anterior myocardial infarction.

Use of stress echocardiography for risk assessment of patients after myocardial infarction

The main predictors of outcome after infarction (exercise capacity, ejection fraction, and extent of jeopardized myocardium) can all be identified using stress echocardiography. This review addresses the place of stress echocardiography in postinfarct risk evaluation, relative to clinical evaluation, and other technologies. The test is accurate for identification of multivessel disease and for predicting outcomes, is versatile, and can be used early after infarction.

Significance of prolonged left ventricular wall motion abnormalities after exercise echocardiography following non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction

Exercise echocardiography was used to assess myocardial ischemia after non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction in 40 consecutive patients. Resting parasternal long- and short-axis views and apical 4- and 2-chamber views were recorded, digitized, and stored. A maximal symptom-limited exercise test was performed within 21 days (mean 17.7 +/- 3) using a cycle ergometer with continuous monitoring and the echocardiogram was repeated in the same views. Resting and exercise echocardiograms were then compared. Coronary angiography was performed in all patients within 21 days of exercise echocardiography. Stenosis in > or =50% of the lumen diameter was considered significant. Of the 40 patients studied, 29 (72%) had continuing angina and 11 (28%) had no angina. Eighteen patients (62%) with angina developed angina during exercise testing and 19 (65%) developed ST-segment depression. In patients without angina, 1 (9%) developed postexercise angina and 2 (18%) developed ST-segment depression. The mean wall motion score index after exercise increased from 1.2 +/- 0.3 to 1.8 +/- 0.4 in patients with continuing angina (p <0.001) and from 1.2 +/- 0.3 to 1.4 +/- 0.3 in patients without angina (p = NS). Prolonged wall motion abnormalities lasting >20 minutes persisted in > or =1 segment in 27 of 29 patients (93%) with angina or in 2 of 1 1 patients (18%) without angina (p <0.001). Patients with continued angina had predominantly 3-vessel coronary artery disease (22 of 29 [76%]) or 2-vessel disease (7 of 29 [24%]), and those without angina had 1-vessel disease (6 of 11 [55%]) or 2-vessel disease (4 of 11 [36%]). One patient had 3-vessel disease. The duration of wall motion abnormality demonstrated a significant relation to 2- and 3-vessel coronary artery disease (p <0.001). Thus, patients with non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction had a high incidence of multivessel coronary disease not necessarily detected on routine exercise testing. There was also a significant incidence of prolonged wall motion abnormality.

Should all patients undergo cardiac catheterization after a myocardial infarction?

Between one half and two thirds of patients who survive an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may be at low risk for future complications and hence can be managed with medical therapy. However, the remaining patients are prone to future complications, which by and large occur within the subsequent 3 months and include cardiac death, recurrent AMI, unstable angina, and congestive heart failure. Current available methods for risk stratification include a good clinical evaluation, rest and stress electrocardiograms (preferentially combined with radionuclide imaging), and possibly two-dimensional stress echocardiography. In patients unable to exercise, pharmacologic perfusion scintigraphy affords a powerful means to identify high-risk patients. Patients deemed to be at high risk should be referred for cardiac catheterization and myocardial revascularization. The practice of performing routine cardiac catheterization after an AMI has led to an over use of resources in the United States. Such a practice is not based on any scientific evidence of enhanced benefit. In fact, in other Western world countries where only selected patients are referred for cardiac catheterization, patient survival appears to be similar to that in the United States. In conclusion, most patients after AMI, whether treated with thrombolytic therapy or not, can be managed conservatively and risk stratified on the basis of noninvasive testing, after which patients deemed to be at high risk should undergo invasive evaluation.

Comparison of symptom-limited and low level exercise tolerance tests early after myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to determine the diagnostic yield and risks of a symptom-limited treadmill exercise test before hospital discharge.

BACKGROUND

Currently, predischarge low level and 6-week symptom-limited exercise treadmill tests are recommended for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. However, few data exist on the safety and value of a predischarge symptom-limited exercise test.

METHODS

We utilized a modified Bruce protocol starting at 1.7 mph and 0 grade with 3-min stages in 150 consecutive patients 6.4 +/- 3.1 days after myocardial infarction. Each exercise test was interpreted for duration, symptoms and ST segment changes at the low level (70% of predicted heart rate) and symptom-limited end point.

RESULTS

There were no complications related to the symptom-limited exercise tests. The test results were positive in only 23% of the patients at the low level end point, but were positive in 40% of the patients at the later symptom-limited end point (p < 0.001). During a mean follow-up period of 15 +/- 5 months in 138 patients (92%), 50 patients (36%) had a cardiac event. Of the patients with a cardiac event, significantly more (p < 0.001) had a positive exercise test at the symptom-limited end point (31 vs. 16 patients). Five patients with a negative and 14 patients with a nondiagnostic symptom-limited exercise test had an event.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with uncomplicated myocardial infarction, we demonstrated the safety of an early symptom-limited treadmill exercise test. Symptom-limited exercise tests will identify more patients with inducible ischemia who are at risk of future cardiac events and who may benefit from early intervention.

Prediction of severe coronary artery disease using computerized ECG measurements and discriminant function analysis

This study tested the hypothesis that discriminant function analysis of clinical and exercise-test variables including computerized ST measurements could improve the prediction of severe coronary artery disease. Secondary objectives were to demonstrate the effect of digoxin and/or resting electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities, and to evaluate the relative importance of ST measurements made during the recovery phase and in the three lead group areas. The design was a retrospective analysis of data collected during exercise testing and coronary angiography. The ECG data were gathered and stored in digital format on optical discs and all ST measurements were made off-line using the authors' own software. Univariate and multivariate analytic methods were used to analyze all pretest characteristics as well as hemodynamic and computerized ECG responses to exercise. A 1,000-bed Veterans Affairs Medical Center served as the setting. The study included 446 male veterans who underwent a sign or symptom limited treadmill exercise test and coronary angiography. Analysis was also performed on a subset of this population formed by excluding patients receiving digoxin or with resting ECGs exhibiting left ventricular hypertrophy or ST depression (n = 328). In the total study population, the authors derived a treadmill score using discriminant function analysis. This score included: (1) the time-slope area in lead V5 during recovery; (2) delta heart rate; (3) angina pectoris during the exercise test; and (4) presence of diagnostic Q waves on the resting ECG. This score was effective in predicting triple vessel/left main disease and outperformed exercise-induced ST depression for predicting severe coronary artery disease. After exclusion of patients with ECGs exhibiting left ventricular hypertrophy or resting ST depression and patients receiving digoxin, discriminant function analysis chose: (1) the time-slope area in lead V5 during recovery and (2) delta heart rate. Exclusion of these patients resulted in a nonsignificant decrease in specificity of all ST criteria. ST-segment amplitude or slope in lead V5 at 3.5 minutes in recovery clearly outperformed the maximal exercise measurements in both groups. Summing the depressions or selecting the most depression in the three areas (ie, lateral-V5, inferior-II, anterior-V2) did not improve test performance. Leads other than V5 did not contain significant diagnostic information. A quantitative approach to exercise testing using discriminant function analysis enhanced the tests' performance for predicting severe coronary disease. The inclusion of patients taking digoxin or with resting ECG abnormalities nonsignificantly decreases the specificity of all ST criteria.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)