Head-up tilt test. A nonspecific method of evaluating patients with bifascicular block

Preliminary Comparison of Zero-Gravity Chair With Tilt Table in Relation to Heart Rate Variability Measurements

Heart rate variability (HRV) measurements are performed using a tilt-table (TT) to diagnose dysfunctionality in the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and the cardiovascular system. To maintain homeostasis, the ANS adapts to body position changes through alterations in sympathetic and parasympathetic responses that can be quantified by extracting time-domain and frequency-domain parameters from the heart rate signal. When body position is changed from supine to erect, a healthy subject’s response also shows changes in ANS activity. However, TT can be unsafe or uncomfortable for elderly or overweight subjects. Furthermore, it may induce anxiety which alters the HRV measurements. This study proposes an alternative strategy to replace the TT with a zero-gravity chair (ZGC). The statistical analysis between HRV parameters from the TT and the ZGC shows that ZGC can be a feasible alternative to TT. Therefore, ZGC can be used as a more convenient, secure, stable and safer option to the traditional HRV analysis with TT.

[Experience with the use of an implantable loop recorder in a series of older people with falls and suspected arrhythmic syncopes]

OBJECTIVE

To review our experience on using an implantable loop recorder (ILR) in patients with recurrent falls, when an arrhythmogenic cause is suspected.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational study of patients with repetitive unexplained falls, suspected syncope, or electrocardiographic abnormalities. All of them had been evaluated by a cardiologist, who decided to implant a loop recorder (ILR) for an accurate diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients received an ILR. The average falls rate for the sample was 3.3. The mean age was 78 years, and 46% were female, with a mean follow-up period of 24 months. During this time, three patients did not suffer from a new fall. An arrhythmogenic diagnosis was obtained in 5 patients: bradycardia was identified in 4 cases, and tachycardia in one of them. The symptoms did not coincide with a documented arrhythmia in the rest of the patients.

CONCLUSION

ILR is a helpful tool to establish an arrhythmogenic cause of unexplained and recurrent falls, in this selected sample of older adults.

Time Relation between a Syncopal Event and Documentation of Atrioventricular Block in Patients with Bifascicular Block: Clinical Implications

BACKGROUND

Transient high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block is a common cause of syncope in patients with bifascicular block (BFB) but the intermittent nature of AV block makes ECG documentation a challenge. A sensitive and safe tool to investigate BFB patients with syncope would be a bradycardia-detecting pacemaker, which provides a possibility of studying the time relation between the index syncopal episode and the development of high-degree AV block.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with BFB and syncope were studied prospectively. All patients received a single-chamber ventricular-based pacemaker with bradycardia-detecting ability. A bradycardia episode was defined as a heart rate of < 30 beats/min lasting > or = 6 s.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 60 months, a bradycardia event was detected in 14 patients (52%), of whom 13 also had documented high-degree AV block on ECG. The median time between the syncopal episode and the first pacemaker-detected bradycardia event was 5 months and after an additional median time of 6 months, high-degree AV block was documented on the ECG. In 10 of 13 patients (77%) high-degree AV block was documented within 24 months of the syncopal episode corresponding to an annual incidence of 19% during the first 2 years of follow-up in the study population.

CONCLUSION

In this group of BFB patients a syncopal episode was highly predictive of the development of high-degree AV block within 24 months, justifying pacemaker therapy without prior ECG verification.

A "dysautonomic" head-up tilt test pattern in elderly patients with neurocardiogenic syncope

The characteristics of neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS) in elderly patients remain unclear. We compared the hemodynamic profiles of young and older patients with consecutive and positive head-up tilt tests (HUT). Continuous, noninvasive, and reliable monitoring of arterial pressure (AP) and heart rate (HR) was done throughout 46 consecutive positive HUTs of symptomatic patients. The population (12-82 years old) was divided into two groups: younger patients, Y (n = 25, < or = 65 years), and older patients, O (n = 21). Changes in AP and HR after the first minute of tilting, during the stable orthostatic phase and during syncope were compared. Except for systolic pressure, baseline hemodynamic parameters were similar in Y and O. No difference appeared in the mean time elapsed before syncope (19+/-9 vs 22+/-2 min). Asymptomatic hypotension was observed, only in O, 1 minute after tilting, followed by a progressive fall in the mean AP before syncope (0+/-0.9 vs -1+/-0.7 mmHg/min) without HR increase (0.7+/-1 vs 0+/-0.6 beats/min). This pressure slope was strongly related to age (r = 0.54, P < 0.001). Hemodynamic recording during HUT identifies a dysautonomic pattern in elderly patients with NCS and the abnormal AP/HR responses to orthostasis may be a feature specific to this population. Although the central mechanism of NCS is common to all ages, the age-related characteristics of the trigger event may indicate the need for specific management at different ages.

[The tilt-table test in assessing syncope of unknown origin: do differences exist between children and adults?]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Little is known about the differences between children and adults in the results of head-up tilt test. This study sought to investigate the potential differences concerning: a) the clinical profile and circumstances of spontaneous syncope; b) the overall diagnostic performance of the test, and c) the type of positive response obtained.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We studied 31 children and 123 adults with unexplained syncope. If baseline test (tilting at 70 degrees for 30 min) resulted negative, it was repeated under isoprenaline low-dose infusion.

RESULTS

There were no differences in either clinical profile, except for severe traumatism more frequent in adults (25% vs. 3% in children; p < 0.05), or overall diagnostic performance (39% in children vs. 33% in adults; p = NS). However, the way the test rendered positive (via basal tilting in 92% of children vs. 50% in adults; p < 0.05) and the rate of cardioinhibitory response (42% in children vs 8% in adults; p < 0.01) were significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study children, in contrast to adults, rarely have a positive response in tilting under isoprenaline infusion. They also present a much higher rate of cardio-inhibitory response than adults.

Clinical usefulness of head-up tilt test in patients with syncope and intraventricular conduction defect

Head-up tilt test was performed in 99 patients with syncope of unknown origin and intraventricular conduction defect. Twenty-five per cent had a positive response to tilt with reproduction of spontaneous clinical symptoms. Holter recording revealed paroxysmal atrioventricular (AV) block in three patients. Carotid sinus massage was positive in four patients. An electrophysiological study was performed in 76 patients with abnormal findings in 17 (22%). Thus, vasovagal syncope was the discharge diagnosis in 25 patients (25%). Therefore, tilt test should be considered in patients with intraventricular conduction defect presenting with syncope of unknown origin, especially if clinical findings suggest the possibility of a vasovagal mechanism, or if the results of the electrophysiological study are inconclusive.