Rapid modulation of renal and adrenal responsiveness to angiotensin II

Response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is selectively blunted by high sodium in angiotensin-converting enzyme DD genotype: evidence for gene-environment interaction in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade is a cornerstone in cardiovascular protection. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-DD genotype has been associated with resistance to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACEi), but data are conflicting. As sodium intake modifies the effect of ACEi as well as the genotype-phenotype relationship, we hypothesize gene-environment interaction between sodium-status, the response to ACEi, and ACE genotype.

METHOD

Thirty-five male volunteers (26 ± 9 years; II n = 6, ID n = 18, DD n = 11) were studied during placebo and ACEi (double blind, enalapril 20 mg/day) on low [7 days 50 mmol Na/day (low salt)] and high [7 days 200 mmol Na/day (high salt)] sodium, with a washout of 6 weeks in-between. After each period mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured before and during graded infusion of angiotensin II (Ang II).

RESULTS

During high salt, ACEi reduced MAP in II and ID, but not in DD [II: 88 (78-94) versus 76 (72-88); ID: 87 (84-91) versus 83 (79-87); both P < 0.05 and DD: 86 (82-96) versus 88 (80-90); ns, P < 0.05 between genotypes]. However, during low salt, ACEi reduced MAP in all genotype groups [II: 83 (78-89) versus 77 (72-83); ID: 88 (84-91) versus 82 (78-86); DD: 84 (80-91) versus 81 (75-85); all P < 0.05]. During high salt + ACEi, the Ang II response was blunted in DD, with an 18% rise in MAP during the highest dose versus 22 and 31% in ID and II (P < 0.05). Low salt annihilated these differences.

CONCLUSION

In healthy participants, the MAP response to ACEi is selectively blunted in DD genotype during high salt, accompanied by blunted sensitivity to Ang II. Low salt corrects both abnormalities. Further analysis of this gene-environment interaction in patients may contribute to strategies for improvement of individual treatment efficacy.

Mechanisms of acute natriuresis in normal humans on low sodium diet

This study evaluates the relative importance of several mechanisms possibly involved in the natriuresis elicited by slow sodium loading, i.e. the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), oxytocin and nitric oxide (NO). Eight seated subjects on standardised sodium intake (30 mmol NaCl day(-1)) received isotonic saline intravenously (NaLoading: 20 micromol Na(+) kg(-1) min(-1) or approximately 11 ml min(-1) for 240 min). NaLoading did not change MAP or GFR (by clearance of (51)Cr-EDTA). Significant natriuresis occurred within 1 h (from 9 +/- 3 to 13 +/- 2 micromol min(-1)). A 6-fold increase was found during the last hour of infusion as plasma renin activity, angiotensin II (ANGII) and aldosterone decreased markedly. Sodium excretion continued to increase after NaLoading. During NaLoading, plasma renin activity and ANGII were linearly related (R = 0.997) as were ANGII and aldosterone (R = 0.999). The slopes were 0.40 pM ANGII (mi.u. renin activity)(-1) and 22 pM aldosterone (pM ANGII)(-1). Plasma ANP and oxytocin remained unchanged, as did the urinary excretion rates of cGMP and NO metabolites (NO(x)). In conclusion, sodium excretion may increase 7-fold without changes in MAP, GFR, plasma ANP, plasma oxytocin, and cGMP- and NO(x) excretion, but concomitant with marked decreases in circulating RAAS components. The immediate renal response to sodium excess appears to be fading of ANGII-mediated tubular sodium reabsorption. Subsequently the decrease in aldosterone may become important.

Renal hemodynamic response to an angiotensin II antagonist, eprosartan, in healthy men

In view of the vasodilator potential of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition via prostaglandins and kinins, we asked why renin inhibition induces a larger renal vasodilator response than ACE inhibitors in healthy humans in earlier studies. One possibility was that there was a more complete blockade of the renin system, which could also be achieved by an angiotensin II antagonist, eprosartan. We measured the hormonal and renal hemodynamic responses to eprosartan doses, from 10 to 400 mg in 9 healthy young men in balance on a 10-mmol/d sodium intake. The threshold eprosartan dose to influence renal perfusion was <10 mg, and the 100-mg dose induced a near-maximal vasodilator response of 135+/-19.7 mL x min(-1) x 1.73 m2. When the dose was increased to 400 mg, there was a modest additional increase of 147+/-57 mL x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2). A highly significant dose-related fall in arterial blood pressure occurred (r=-.97; P<.001), with no indication of a maximal response at 400 mg. In 6 additional subjects, we compared responses to eprosartan on a high salt and a low salt diet. The renal response to 200 mg eprosartan on a high salt diet, 26.0+/-6.6 mL x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2), was significantly less than that seen with the low salt diet (P<.001). There was no renal partial agonist angiotensin-like effect of eprosartan. Eprosartan reduced sharply the pressor, renal vascular, and hormonal responses to exogenous angiotensin II. The renal vasodilator response to the angiotensin II antagonist eprosartan closely resembles responses to renin inhibition and exceeds previously reported responses to ACE inhibitors. Thus, eprosartan probably exerted its effect via the angiotensin receptor. More complete blockade of the renin system can be achieved by pharmacological interruption at this level, a finding that could have therapeutic implications.