Hemodynamic resistance as a measure of functional impairment in aortic valvular stenosis

A modified method of computed fluid dynamics simulation in abdominal aorta and visceral arteries

PURPOSE

The flow velocity of visceral arteries was measured by 2D PCMRI to produce the patient-specific flow BC imposed on the outlets of visceral arteries in CFD simulation. This modified method aimed to improve the CFD accuracy in the abdominal aorta and visceral arteries.

METHODS

A volunteer underwent non-contrast-enhanced MRA to scan the abdominal aorta and visceral arteries, and 2D PCMRI to obtain the flow velocity of the aforementioned vessels. The three-dimensional geometric model was reconstructed using the MRI scan data of the abdominal aorta and visceral arteries. The flow waveforms measured by 2D PCMRI were processed and then imposed on the aortic inlet and the outlets of all visceral arteries as the flow BC. The RCR parameters of the three elements Windkessel model were modulated and imposed on the aortic outlet. CFD simulation was run in the open-source software: svSolver. The same volunteer underwent 4D flow MRI to compare the flow field with those extracted from CFD results.

RESULTS

Four specific time points in a cardiac cycle and three cross-sectional planes of aorta were selected to analyze the flow field, pressure and wall shear stress (WSS) from CFD. The flow waveforms and streamlines of CFD agreed with those of 4D flow MRI. The pressure waveforms, pressure distribution and WSS distribution from CFD conformed with the physiological condition of human body.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest this modified CFD method may yield reasonable flow field, pressure and WSS in the abdominal aorta and visceral arteries.

Pressure gradient vs. flow relationships to characterize the physiology of a severely stenotic aortic valve before and after transcatheter valve implantation

Aims

Echocardiography and tomographic imaging have documented dynamic changes in aortic stenosis (AS) geometry and severity during both the cardiac cycle and stress-induced increases in cardiac output. However, corresponding pressure gradient vs. flow relationships have not been described.

Methods and results

We recruited 16 routine transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVI’s) for graded dobutamine infusions both before and after implantation; 0.014″ pressure wires in the aorta and left ventricle (LV) continuously measured the transvalvular pressure gradient (ΔP) while a pulmonary artery catheter regularly assessed cardiac output by thermodilution. Before TAVI, ΔP did not display a consistent relationship with transvalvular flow (Q). Neither linear resistor (median R² 0.16) nor quadratic orifice (median R² < 0.01) models at rest predicted stress observations; the severely stenotic valve behaved like a combination. The unitless ratio of aortic to left ventricular pressures during systolic ejection under stress conditions correlated best with post-TAVI flow improvement. After TAVI, a highly linear relationship (median R² 0.96) indicated a valid valve resistance.

Conclusion

Pressure loss vs. flow curves offer a fundamental fluid dynamic synthesis for describing aortic valve pathophysiology. Severe AS does not consistently behave like an orifice (as suggested by Gorlin) or a resistor, whereas TAVI devices behave like a pure resistor. During peak dobutamine, the ratio of aortic to left ventricular pressures during systolic ejection provides a ‘fractional flow reserve’ of the aortic valve that closely approximates the complex, changing fluid dynamics. Because resting assessment cannot reliably predict stress haemodynamics, ‘valvular fractional flow’ warrants study to explain exertional symptoms in patients with only moderate AS at rest.

Aortic Stenosis, a Left Ventricular Disease: Insights from Advanced Imaging

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common primary valve disorder in the elderly with an increasing prevalence. It is increasingly clear that it is also a disease of the left ventricle (LV) rather than purely the aortic valve. The transition from left ventricular hypertrophy to fibrosis results in the eventual adverse effects on systolic and diastolic function. Appropriate selection of patients for aortic valve intervention is crucial, and current guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement in severe AS with symptoms or in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50 %. LVEF is not a sensitive marker and there are other parameters used in multimodality imaging techniques, including longitudinal strain, exercise stress echo and cardiac MRI that may assist in detecting subclinical and subtle LV dysfunction. These findings offer potentially better ways to evaluate patients, time surgery, predict recovery and potentially offer targets for specific therapies. This article outlines the pathophysiology behind the LV response to aortic stenosis and the role of advanced multimodality imaging in describing it.

A computational model of aging and calcification in the aortic heart valve

The aortic heart valve undergoes geometric and mechanical changes over time. The cusps of a normal, healthy valve thicken and become less extensible over time. In the disease calcific aortic stenosis (CAS), calcified nodules progressively stiffen the cusps. The local mechanical changes in the cusps, due to either normal aging or pathological processes, affect overall function of the valve. In this paper, we propose a computational model for the aging aortic valve that connects local changes to overall valve function. We extend a previous model for the healthy valve to describe aging. To model normal/uncomplicated aging, leaflet thickness and extensibility are varied versus age according to experimental data. To model calcification, initial sites are defined and a simple growth law is assumed. The nodules then grow over time, so that the area of calcification increases from one model to the next model representing greater age. Overall valve function is recorded for each individual model to yield a single simulation of valve function over time. This simulation is the first theoretical tool to describe the temporal behavior of aortic valve calcification. The ability to better understand and predict disease progression will aid in design and timing of patient treatments for CAS.

Effects of Aging on the Diagnostic Assessment of Valvular Heart Disease

The diagnostic assessment of the severity of valvular heart disease in the older population is impacted by the anatomic and physiologic changes that accompany normal aging and by the interposition of diseases prevalent in the elderly. In this paper, the impact of those changes on the assessment of valvular heart disease will be reviewed. Special attention will be paid to the effects of age and disease on the measurement of the pressure drop and orifice area.

Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of blood pressure (BP) on the Doppler echocardiographic (Doppler-echo) evaluation of severity of aortic stenosis (AS).

METHODS

Handgrip exercise or phenylephrine infusion was used to increase BP in 22 patients with AS. Indices of AS severity (mean pressure gradient (DeltaP(mean)), aortic valve area (AVA), valve resistance, percentage left ventricular stroke work loss (% LVSW loss) and the energy loss coefficient (ELCo)) were measured at baseline, peak BP intervention and recovery.

RESULTS

From baseline to peak intervention, mean (SD) BP increased (99 (8) vs 121 (10) mm Hg, p<0.001), systemic vascular resistance (SVR) increased (1294 (264) vs 1552 (372) dynexs/cm(5), p<0.001) and mean (SD) transvalvular flow rate (Q(mean)) decreased (323 (67) vs 306 (66) ml/s, p = 0.02). There was no change in DeltaP(mean) (36 (13) vs 36 (14) mm Hg, p = NS). However, there was a decrease in AVA (1.15 (0.32) vs 1.09 (0.33) cm(2), p = 0.02) and ELCo (1.32 (0.40) vs 1.24 (0.42) cm(2), p = 0.04), and an increase in valve resistance (153 (63) vs 164 (74) dynexs/cm(5), p = 0.02), suggesting a more severe valve stenosis. In contrast, % LVSW loss decreased (19.8 (6) vs 16.5 (6)%, p<0.001), suggesting a less severe valve stenosis. There was an inverse relationship between the change in mean BP and AVA (r = -0.34, p = 0.02); however, only the change in Q(mean) was an independent predictor of the change in AVA (r = 0.81, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute BP elevation due to increased SVR can affect the Doppler-echo evaluation of AS severity. However, the impact of BP on the assessment of AS severity depends primarily on the associated change in Q(mean), rather than on an independent effect of SVR or arterial compliance, and can result in a valve appearing either more or less stenotic depending on the direction and magnitude of the change in Q(mean).

Noninvasive quantitation of blood flow turbulence in patients with aortic valve disease using online digital computer analysis of Doppler velocity data

Previous experimental studies have demonstrated that aortic valve disease is associated with significant downstream turbulence (T). In this study, we developed a noninvasive method on the basis of Doppler velocity recording for quantitating aortic blood flow T in patients with aortic valve disease. The instantaneous blood velocity at a point in the aorta is equal to the sum of a mean periodic velocity component with a random or turbulent velocity component. According to the ensemble average method, time mean absolute T intensity is the root-mean-square value of turbulent velocity averaged over time and T is better quantitated by the relative T intensity (TIr), which is the ratio of absolute T intensity to the ensemble average velocity averaged over time. We computed TIr in 18 patients with mild to severe aortic stenosis and in 13 healthy volunteers from instantaneous modal velocities of 70 cycle length-matched heart beats recorded in the proximal part of the descending aorta by pulsed Doppler using an ultrasound system with an output port for online digital data transfer into a microcomputer. TIr was greater in patients with aortic valve disease (18.4 +/- 5.1%, range 11.2%-28.9%) than in control patients (7.9 +/- 1.9%, range 4.8%-9.8%; P =.0001). In patients with aortic valve disease, TIr was better linearly related to the ratio of postvalvular aorta to valvular orifice cross-sectional areas (r = 0.89, P =.0001) than to other parameters of valve restriction: transvalvular pressure gradient (r = 0.78, P =.0001); valve area (r = -0.56, P =.01); and valve resistance (r = 0.72, P =.0002). Thus, T that can be computed noninvasively from direct digital transfer of Doppler velocity data appears to be linearly related to indices of aortic valve restriction. Our data support the concept of the postvalvular aorta to valvular orifice cross-sectional areas ratio as a new important hemodynamic parameter in patients with aortic valve disease.

Can progression of valvar aortic stenosis be predicted accurately?

BACKGROUND

It was the aim of the present study to elaborate criteria for the assessment of rapid hemodynamic progression of valvar aortic stenosis. These criteria are of special importance when cardiac surgery is indicated for other reasons but the established criteria for aortic valve replacement are not yet fulfilled. Such aspects of therapeutic planing were mostly disregarded in the past so that patients had to undergo cardiac reoperation within a few years.

METHODS

Hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and clinical data of 169 men and 88 women with aortic stenosis, aged 55.2 +/- 15.7 years at their first and 63.4 +/- 15.6 years at their second cardiac catheterization, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The progression rate of aortic valve obstruction was found to be dependent on the degree of valvar calcification ([VC] scoring 0 to III) and to be exponentially correlated with the aortic valve opening area (AVA) at initial catheterization. Neither age nor sex of the patient nor etiology of the valvar obstruction significantly influence the progression of aortic stenosis. If AVA decreases below 0.75 cm(2) with a present degree of VC = 0, or AVA of 0.8 with VC of I, AVA of 0.9 with VC of II, or AVA of 1.0 with VC of III, it is probable that aortic stenosis will have to be operated upon in the following years.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data indicate that for clinical purposes and planning of valvar surgery the progression of asymptomatic aortic stenosis can be sufficiently predicted by the present aortic valve opening area and the degree of valvar calcification.

Clinical efficacy of Doppler-echocardiographic indices of aortic valve stenosis: a comparative test-based analysis of outcome

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to assess which hemodynamic index best accounts for clinical severity of aortic stenosis (AS) and to analyze the value of low-dose dobutamine testing.

BACKGROUND

Pressure gradient and valve area are suboptimal because they depend on flow rate, correlate poorly with symptoms, and provide limited prognostic information. Recently, new indices and low-dose inotropic stimulation have been introduced, but their clinical value remains uncertain.

METHODS

A total of 307 consecutive patients with AS were included in an ambispective study design (71 +/- 12 years old; peak jet velocity: 3.7 +/- 1.1 m/s). Clinical and Doppler-echocardiographic data were obtained, as well as results of low-dose dobutamine infusion (47 patients). Using receiver-operator-characteristic curve analysis, we evaluated jet velocity, pressure gradient, valve area, resistance, stroke-work loss (SWL), and dobutamine-induced increase in area for predicting 1) symptomatic status at entry, 2) early (</=3 months) cardiovascular death or aortic valve replacement, and 3) long-term outcome. Logistic regression and Cox models were designed multivariate and adjusted by bootstrapping.

RESULTS

Only 28% of patients were alive without valve replacement at the end of the follow-up period (22 +/- 4 months). The decision for valve replacement was made by the referring physician, blinded to the SWL, valve resistance, and dobutamine results. Non-flow-corrected indices performed better than valve area and valve resistance. Among them, SWL best predicted the defined end points. Odds/hazard ratios associated with a SWL Delta = 17% were 5.14 for presenting AS symptoms, 4.68 for early events, and 2.31 for late outcome. A cutoff value of SWL >25% best discriminated clinical end points. Other independent predictors of prognosis were symptomatic status and left ventricular ejection fraction. Dobutamine testing added no value to baseline models.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-flow-corrected indices show the highest clinical efficacy in aortic stenosis. Among these, SWL best predicts symptomatic status and outcome and therefore should be incorporated to aid patient management in unclear situations.

Hemodynamic stability of valve area, valve resistance, and stroke work loss in aortic stenosis: a comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

Although aortic valve area (AVA) has provided the standard index for assessing aortic stenosis severity, valve resistance and percent left ventricular stroke work (%LVSW) loss have been proposed as alternative flow independent indices of stenosis severity that may provide a more stable measure under diverse hemodynamic conditions. In 30 patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis (AVA < or = 1.2 cm(2)), Doppler echocardiography indices of AVA, valve resistance, and %LVSW loss were measured at multiple transvalvular flow rates during dobutamine infusions (0-10 microg/kg/min) to compare their hemodynamic stability.

RESULTS

From baseline to maximum dobutamine dose in the 30 patients, transvalvular flow rate increased 43% and resulted in a 42% increase in mean transvalvular pressure gradient, a 15% increase in Doppler AVA, and a 26% increase in %LVSW loss. Group mean valve resistance did not change for the total cohort. For individual patients, AVA and %LVSW loss demonstrated a linear relationship with transvalvular flow (median r = 0.74 and 0.84, respectively). In contrast, both flow-mediated increases and decreases in valve resistance were observed in individual patients, resulting in the apparent stability of the group mean valve resistance in the total cohort. For individual patients, Doppler AVA and valve resistance demonstrated comparable stability in response to changes in hemodynamic conditions and were significantly more stable than mean transvalvular pressure gradient and %LVSW loss.

CONCLUSION

Doppler AVA and valve resistance provide stenotic indices of equivalent hemodynamic stability. However, transvalvular flow has a predictable directional effect on AVA and an unpredictable directional effect on valve resistance, potentially limiting valve resistance as a measure of hemodynamic severity.

Prediction of symptom-onset in aortic stenosis: a comparison of pressure drop/flow slope and haemodynamic measures at rest

To compare the pressure drop/flow slope with peak and mean pressure drop, effective orifice area and aortic valve resistance for the prediction of symptom-onset we performed resting and dobutamine stress echocardiography in 49 asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (peak aortic velocity>2.5 m/s). The end-point was progression to symptoms requiring surgery and patients were followed for a mean 21.2 (5.2) months. A total of 23 (47%) patients progressed to symptoms requiring aortic valve replacement and 26 remained asymptomatic. There was no significant difference in age, gender, fractional shortening or the presence or absence of coronary artery disease between these groups. There were differences in peak aortic velocity (P<0.0001), peak and mean pressure drop (P<0.0001), effective orifice area (P=0.03), aortic valve resistance (P=0.001) and pressure drop/flow slope (P<0.0001). On Cox regression analysis, the pressure drop/flow slope (P<0.0001), peak aortic velocity (P=0.005) and peak pressure gradient (P=0.02) were independent predictors. Mean event-free survival at 2 years for peak velocity >4.0 m/s was 17% and for pressure drop/flow slope >0.10 mmHg/ms(-1) was 20%. Of 13 patients reporting symptoms during dobutamine stress, 10 (77%) developed spontaneous symptoms during follow-up compared with 13 of 36 (36%) with no symptoms (P=0.11). The pressure drop/flow slope is a better independent predictor of symptom onset than resistance, mean pressure difference and effective orifice area, but is similar to peak velocity.

Comparison of valve resistance with effective orifice area regarding flow dependence

Aortic valve resistance has been proposed to represent the severity of aortic stenosis because some studies observed that it was less affected by change in flow than the valve-effective orifice area, but this issue remains controversial. The objective of this study was to systematically analyze the theoretical and practical determinants of these parameters in relation to changes in flow. Valve area and resistance in different valves were studied in vitro in a pulse duplicator system at different flow rates and in vivo in 90 subjects referred to either exercise or dobutamine infusion. Theoretical analysis and experimental results both demonstrated a unique relation between resistance (RES), valve-effective orifice area (EOA), and flow rate (Q): RES = K x (Q/EOA(2)). Accordingly, in fixed stenoses or in mechanical valves, resistance increased markedly with flow rate both in vitro (+0.88 +/- 0.26%/% of flow increase) and in vivo (mechanical valves: +2.09 +/- 4.61, fixed stenotic valves: +0.59 +/- 0.32%/%), whereas valve area did not change significantly (<0.2%/%). In contrast, in valves with a flexible orifice (bioprostheses and some patients with aortic stenosis), resistance was less increased due to the increase in valve area. Thus, both from a theoretical and a practical standpoint, valve resistance is much more flow dependent than valve area, particularly in fixed stenoses. Situations in which resistance does not increase with flow rate are unpredictable and are found in flexible valves when there is a concomitant increase in valve area.

Dobutamine echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: predicting outcome as a function of management strategy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To prospectively address the question whether the assessment of valvular hemodynamics and myocardial function during low-dose dobutamine infusion can guide decision making in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction.

PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS

Twenty-four patients with aortic stenosis and LV dysfunction (mean ejection fraction, 28%; New York Heart Association class, II to IV) were studied by dobutamine echocardiography assessing mean pressure gradient, aortic valve area, and aortic valve resistance. Patients were prospectively divided into severe and nonsevere aortic stenosis groups according to the response of the valve area to the augmentation of systolic flow. The clinical decision was considered to be concordant with the results of dobutamine echocardiography, when patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved contractile function were referred by a specialist for aortic valve replacement and when patients with nonsevere aortic stenosis were not. Patients were observed for up to 3 years.

RESULTS

All eight patients with severe aortic stenosis who were referred for surgery survived and had good cardiovascular outcomes, and six of eight patients who were not initially referred for surgery had poor outcomes, including heart failure and sudden cardiac death. The eight patients with nonsevere aortic stenosis did comparatively well without valve replacement. Cardiac death or pulmonary edema occurred in 4 of 16 patients (25%) when the clinical decision was concordant with the results of the dobutamine echocardiogram and occurred in 6 of 8 patients (75%) when the clinical decision was discordant (p = 0.019 [chi(2) test]).

CONCLUSION

Patients with aortic stenosis, LV dysfunction, and relatively low gradients have better outcomes when management decisions are based on the results of dobutamine echocardiograms. Those patients identified as having severe aortic stenosis and preserved contractile reserve by dobutamine echocardiography should undergo surgery, while patients identified as having nonsevere aortic stenosis can be managed conservatively.

Timing of surgery in aortic stenosis

In adults with valvular stenosis, the importance of prompt aortic valve replacement once symptoms occur is well known. The operative mortality for aortic valve replacement has improved dramatically over the past 4 decades and remains the only effective therapy for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Aortic valve replacement in patients with left ventricular dysfunction has a high operative mortality, although those patients who do not undergo surgery at all have an even worse outcome. While issues to consider include the presence or absence of coronary artery disease and expected hemodynamics of the prosthetic valve compared with the native valve, when in doubt, one should err on the side of surgical intervention. Elderly age is not a contraindication to aortic valve replacement for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, although there is a higher prevalence of comorbid disease and higher operative mortality. Life expectancy is significantly prolonged and quality of life is significantly improved in the elderly who survive surgery. Indications for surgery in asymptomatic patients are controversial. We do not recommend valve replacement in asymptomatic patients at this time due to the known risks of surgery and a prosthetic valve and the lack of evidence for benefit of early surgery. Patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery should be considered for concomitant aortic valve surgery for moderate aortic stenosis that is expected to progress to severe stenosis in less than 5 years.

Pulmonary artery hypertension in adult patients with symptomatic valvular aortic stenosis

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been reported in patients with valvular aortic stenosis (AS) and has been found to be associated with a more severe clinical picture and a poor prognosis after aortic valve replacement. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of PH in adult patients with symptomatic AS undergoing cardiac catheterization, and to evaluate the relation between pulmonary artery (PA) systolic pressure and hemodynamic and clinical variables to further clarify the pathogenetic mechanisms. We assessed right-sided heart hemodynamics during cardiac catheterization in 388 patients with symptomatic isolated or predominant AS. PA systolic pressure between 31 and 50 mm Hg was used to define mild to moderate PH, whereas PA systolic pressure >50 mm Hg was used to define severe PH. PA systolic pressure showed no significant difference according to age and sex, although it was significantly higher in patients in New York Heart Association functional classes III and IV and in patients with coexistent systemic hypertension than in the others. PH was absent in 136 patients (35%, group 1), mild to moderate in 196 patients (50%, group 2), and severe in 58 patients (15%, group 3). Only the prevalence of overt heart failure was significantly higher in group 3 patients. AS severity was similar among the 3 groups, and PA systolic pressure showed no relation to aortic valve area in the entire population. Also, a poor correlation was found between PA pressure and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (r = -0.28), with several patients having moderate or severe PH despite a preserved LV systolic function. PA systolic pressure significantly correlated with LV end-diastolic pressure (r = 0.50) and with PA wedge pressure (r = 0.84). Furthermore, transpulmonary pressure gradient, an index of resistance across the pulmonary vascular bed (obtained as the difference between PA mean and PA wedge pressure), was significantly higher in patients with PH, especially in those with a marked increase in PA systolic pressure, suggesting a reactive component of PH.

Stress Echocardiography in Aortic Stenosis: Insights into Valve Mechanics and Hemodynamics

Stress interventions have been classically combined with cardiac catheterization recordings to understand the hemodynamic principles of valvular stenosis. Indices of aortic stenosis such as pressure gradient and valve area were based on simple hydraulic principles and have proved to be clinically useful for patient management during a number of decades. With the advent of Doppler echocardiography, these hemodynamic indices can be readily obtained noninvasively. Abundant evidence obtained using exercise and pharmacological stress echocardiography has demonstrated that the assumptions of classic hemodynamic models of aortic stenosis were wrong. Consequently, it is recognized that conventional indices may be misleading indicators of aortic stenosis significance in particular clinical situations. To improve diagnostic accuracy, several alternative hemodynamic models have been developed in the past few years, including valve resistance and left ventricular stroke work loss, among others. Nevertheless, these more-accurate indices should be obtainable noninvasively and need to demonstrate greater diagnostic and prognostic power than conventional indices; preliminary data suggest such superiority. Stress echocardiography is well established as the tool of choice for testing hypothesis and physical models of cardiac valve function. Although the final role of alternative indices is not yet well established, the new insights into valvular hemodynamics provided by this technique may change the clinical assessment of aortic stenosis.

Stress echocardiography in valvular heart disease

Stress echocardiography has been widely accepted as an important diagnostic and prognostic tool in the assessment of known or suspected coronary artery disease. Its use in valvular heart disease, to date, has been more limited, but is continuing to grow as the technology and the understanding of valvular disorders progress. In this article, we will review the current literature regarding the use of both exercise and pharmacological stress testing in conjunction with echocardiography in the settings of native and prosthetic mitral and aortic valve disease. We will also discuss the limitations of this modality and touch upon possible future areas of investigation.

Effects of exercise on Doppler-derived pressure difference, valve resistance, and effective orifice area in different aortic valve prostheses of similar size

The effects of increased transvalvular volume flow on Doppler-derived measurements were compared in similarly sized, normally functioning, mechanical prostheses, stented and stentless porcine bioprostheses, and homografts. Homograft and stentless valves showed the largest effective orifice area and the lowest pressure differences and valve resistance at rest and during exercise-induced increase in flow rates.

Regional anaesthesia with a subarachnoid microcatheter for caesarean section in a parturient with aortic stenosis

We present a woman in her first pregnancy, with known aortic stenosis prior to conception, who successfully underwent regional anaesthesia for an elective Caesarean section using a subarachnoid microcatheter. The anaesthetic management of patients with aortic stenosis requiring noncardiac surgery is a complex and contentious matter, particularly when the situation is compounded by the physiological changes accompanying pregnancy and delivery. This is the first reported use of a subarachnoid microcatheter in such a patient. The choice of technique is discussed and compared with other options for providing anaesthesia.

Results of aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with relatively low transvalvular pressure gradients

Fifty-two patients with low gradient critical aortic stenosis who underwent aortic valve replacement were found to have a perioperative mortality of 11% and an 8-year actuarial survival of only 29%. No hemodynamic variables, including valvular resistance, predicted long-term outcome, and the only clinical variable that predicted long-term survival was the absence of coronary artery disease.

Valve Resistance in Mitral Stenosis: Its Determinants and its Role in the Evaluation of the Disease

To evaluate the value and the determinants of valve resistance in mitral stenosis, 95 patients with pure mitral stenosis were examined by Doppler echocardiography during their clinical follow-up, measuring cavity dimensions, left ventricular function, mitral area (by planimetry and pressure half time), mean transmitral pressure gradient, aortic flow, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure. The mitral resistance was calculated as mean transmitral pressure gradient/aortic flow ratio. To graduate the severity of the morphological abnormalities in valvular structure, we used a point score system with evaluation of leaflet and subvalvular thickness, calcification, and valvular mobility. The functional class was determined according to NYHA classification. In this study, both mitral area (r = -0.79, P < 0.001 and r(p) = -0.60, P < 0.001) and mitral score (r = 0.68, P < 0.001 and r(p) = 0.25, P = 0.013) were independent determinants of mitral resistance. In multivariate analysis, mitral resistance and female gender were selected by multiple linear regression analysis as determinants of pulmonary artery systolic pressure, and mitral area and pulmonary artery systolic pressure were selected by logistic linear regression analysis as determinants of NYHA functional class. In patients with moderate or severe mitral stenosis, the estimated probability for III and IV NYHA functional class considering mitral area 1 cm(2) or below went from 51.1-86.4% when mitral resistance below or above 130 dynes.sec.cm(-5), respectively, was considered together. Thus, mitral valve resistance should be used as a complement to the mitral area method in assessment of mitral stenosis, adding the effects of the reduction in mitral area and the damage in mitral valve apparatus.

Application of the continuity equation and valve resistance to the evaluation of St. Jude Medical prosthetic aortic valve dysfunction

Doppler echocardiography was applied to the assessment of patients with surgically documented St. Jude medical aortic valve dysfunction. Derivation of effective orifice area and Doppler velocity index with the continuity equation and calculation of valve resistance accurately differentiated stenotic from regurgitant and normal valves.

Aortic valve resistance in aortic stenosis: Doppler echocardiographic study and surgical correlation

Four hundred seven patients with aortic stenosis who had Doppler echocardiography before surgery were studied to determine the feasibility of Doppler-derived valve resistance calculation and its clinical value. Patients with milder aortic stenosis had lower mean gradient, larger valve area, and lower maximal resistance than those with severe stenosis. Maximal resistance was related strongly to aortic stenosis severity but did not add any information after valve area and gradient were known and was not related to surgical mortality.

Computer modeling of the effects of aortic valve stenosis and arterial system afterload on left ventricular hypertrophy

The degree of left ventricular hypertrophy is generally thought to reflect the severity of aortic stenosis. However, the compounded influence of arterial system load is poorly understood. We developed a computer model to investigate the effects of aortic valve stenosis in combination with various systemic arterial parameters in the development of left ventricular hypertrophy. Data show that an increased peripheral resistance and/or aortic valve resistance, results in an increase in left ventricular wall thickness and mass, while peak systolic wall stress remains constant. Changing arterial compliance to above normal level would not induce significant changes in wall thickness, while reduction in arterial compliance below normal would cause an increase in ventricular wall thickness. When a double load is imposed on the left ventricle by way of a stenotic valve and an increased arterial afterload, a greater and an aggregated increase in wall thickness results, hastening the hypertrophic process.

Effects of dobutamine on aortic valve indexes in asymptomatic patients with bileaflet mechanical prostheses in the aortic valve position

We investigated the effects of alternating transvalvular flow rate on Doppler-derived aortic valve resistance and valve area in asymptomatic patients with mechanical aortic valve replacement under dobutamine infusion. The Gorlin-derived aortic valve area and continuity equation-derived aortic valve area seem to be less flow dependent; valve resistance tends to be flow dependent.

Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of changes in flow on aortic valve area (AVA) as measured by the Gorlin formula and transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) planimetry.

BACKGROUND

The meaning of flow-related changes in AVA calculations using the Gorlin formula in patients with aortic stenosis remains controversial. It has been suggested that flow dependence of the calculated area could be due to a true widening of the orifice as flow increases or to a disproportionate flow dependence of the formula itself. Alternatively, anatomic AVA can be measured by direct planimetry of the valve orifice with TEE.

METHODS

Simultaneous measurement of the planimetered and Gorlin valve area was performed intraoperatively under different hemodynamic conditions in 11 patients. Left ventricular and ascending aortic pressures were measured simultaneously after transventricular and aortic punctures. Changes in flow were induced by dobutamine infusion. Using multiplane TEE, AVA was planimetered at the level of the leaflet tips in the short-axis view.

RESULTS

Overall, cardiac output, stroke volume and transvalvular volume flow rate ranged from 2.5 to 7.3 liters/min, from 43 to 86 ml and from 102 to 306 ml/min, respectively. During dobutamine infusion, cardiac-output increased by 42% and mean aortic valve gradient by 54%. When minimal flow was compared with maximal flow, the Gorlin area varied from (mean +/- SD) 0.44 +/- 0.12 to 0.60 +/- 0.14 cm2 (p < 0.005). The mean change in Gorlin area under different flow rates was 36 +/- 32%. Despite these changes, there was no significant change in the planimetered area when minimal flow was compared with maximal flow. The mean difference in planimetered area under different flow rates was 0.002 +/- 0.01 cm2 (p = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

By simultaneous determination of Gorlin formula and TEE planimetry valve areas, we showed that acute changes in transvalvular volume flow substantially altered valve area calculated by the Gorlin formula but did not result in significant alterations of the anatomic valve area in aortic stenosis. These results suggest that the flow-related variation in the Gorlin AVA is due to a disproportionate flow dependence of the formula itself and not a true change in valve area.

Effects of increasing flow rate on aortic stenotic indices: evidence from percutaneous transvenous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve in patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of transvalvar flow rate on aortic valve resistance and valve area after percutaneous transvenous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve in a homogeneous group of patients with rheumatic heart disease.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of 12 patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis who had undergone balloon dilatation of the mitral valve over a period of 9 years.

SETTING

Tertiary referral centre.

PATIENTS

Twelve (8 women, 4 men; mean (SD) age 37 (9) of 227 consecutive patients with critical mitral stenosis undergoing transvenous balloon dilation of the mitral valve in the centre also had aortic stenosis, defined as a transaortic pressure gradient of more than 25 mm Hg measured at a catheterisation study before valvuloplasty.

INTERVENTIONS

Echocardiographic variables (mitral valve area measured by the pressure half-time method and planimetry, and the aortic valve area derived from the continuity equation) and haemodynamic measurements (cardiac output, left ventricular mean systolic pressure, aortic mean pressure, transaortic valve pressure gradient, mitral valve and aortic valve areas derived from the Gorlin formula, and aortic valve resistance) were assessed before and after transvenous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve. Follow up catheterisation to measure haemodynamic variables was performed one week after mitral valvuloplasty.

RESULTS

Mean transaortic flow rate increased 33% after mitral valvuloplasty (from 198 (68) to 254 (41) ml/s, P = 0.002). Aortic valve areas derived from the Gorlin formula were significantly increased from 0.57 (0.12) to 0.73 (0.14) cm2 (P = 0.006) after mitral valvuloplasty. However, aortic valve area and valve resistance derived from the continuity equation were independent of the increase in flow rate after mitral valvuloplasty (from 1.29 (0.35) to 1.30 (0.29) cm2 and from 317 (65) to 259 (75) dyn.s.cm-5, both P = NS).

CONCLUSION

The Gorlin-derived aortic valve area tends to be flow-dependent, and continuity equation-derived aortic valve area and catheterisation-derived valve resistance seem to be less flow-dependent. In patients with combined mitral and aortic stenosis, these flow-independent indices are important for decision-making.

Vasoactive drugs in chronic regurgitant lesions of the mitral and aortic valves

This review examines the results of vasodilator therapy in patients with chronic regurgitant lesions of the aortic and mitral valves. The analysis includes those studies which provide data on hemodynamic measurements, left ventricular systolic function, ventricular volumes and regurgitant flow. In patients with chronic aortic or mitral regurgitation, the short-term administration of nitroprusside, hydralazine, nifedipine or an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor produces salutary hemodynamic effects. The major difference in the response to combined preload and afterload reduction (i.e., nitroprusside) in patients with aortic versus mitral regurgitation was that forward stroke volume generally increased and ejection fraction remained unchanged in mitral regurgitation, whereas ejection fraction generally increased and forward stroke volume remained unchanged in aortic regurgitation. These observations suggest that a reciprocal relation between regurgitant and forward flow characterizes the response to preload and afterload reduction in mitral regurgitation (through a preload-dependent dynamic regurgitant orifice), whereas correction of afterload mismatch dominates the response in aortic regurgitation. In studies of long-term vasodilator therapy in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation, a reduction in left ventricular volumes and regurgitant fraction, with or without an increase in ejection fraction, has been observed during treatment with hydralazine, nifedipine and ACE inhibitors. Patients with the largest, sickest hearts generally benefit the most from treatment with vasoactive drugs. Nonetheless, favorable ventricular remodeling has been reported in asymptomatic patients, and long-term nifedipine use has delayed the need for operation in asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. For patients with chronic mitral regurgitation, definition of the etiology of the lesion is a prerequisite for choosing appropriate therapy. Excluding patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and mitral valve prolapse, and some with fixed-orifice (i.e., rheumatic) mitral regurgitation, the signal importance of preload reduction suggests that the preferred long-term therapy for symptomatic chronic mitral regurgitation is an ACE inhibitor. There are no long-term studies that support the use of vasodilator therapy in asymptomatic patients with chronic mitral regurgitation.

Effects of dobutamine on Doppler echocardiographic indexes of aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the diagnostic implications of the flow dependence of Doppler echocardiographic indexes of aortic valve stenosis.

BACKGROUND

Although valve area has been shown to change with alterations in flow rate, the diagnostic consequences of this phenomenon remain unknown. Valve resistance has been suggested as a more stable index for evaluating aortic stenosis.

METHODS

A low dose dobutamine protocol was performed in 35 patients with aortic stenosis. Hemodynamic indexes were obtained by Doppler echocardiography at baseline and at each dobutamine dose.

RESULTS

As a result of the shortening of the systolic ejection period, flow increased from (mean +/- SD) 164 +/- 48 to 229 +/- 102 ml/s (p < 0.0001). At peak flow, valve area increased by 28% (from 0.5 +/- 0.2 to 0.6 +/- 0.3 cm2, p < 0.0001), whereas valve resistance decreased by 4% (from 498 +/- 252 to 459 +/- 222 dynes.s.cm-5, p = 0.04). This observed change in resistance was smaller than that for valve area (p < 0.01). The flow dependence of valve area varied among individual patients (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified calcific degenerative etiology (beta 0.29, p = 0.002), left ventricular velocity of fiber shortening (beta 0.22, p = 0.01), baseline flow (beta -0.28, p = 0.04) and amount of flow increased induced by dobutamine (beta 0.90, p < 0.0001) as factors related to valve area flow dependence.

CONCLUSIONS

Although all Doppler echocardiographic indexes of aortic stenosis are affected by flow, valve resistance is more stable than valve area under dobutamine-induced hemodynamic changes. Baseline valve area may be unreliable in patients with calcific degenerative aortic stenosis and low output states.

Changes in effective aortic valve area during ejection in adults with aortic stenosis

Measurements of valve orifice area in aortic stenosis are based on the assumption that orifice area remains constant throughout ejection and is independent of transvalvular gradients and flow. Recent studies, however, have suggested that the calculated valve area of calcific aortic stenosis may change in different flow conditions. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that in vivo effective orifice area of a stenotic aortic valve changes continuously during ejection, which would make a single area measurement a potentially inadequate indicator of the severity of the stenosis. Doppler measurements of flow velocity in the ascending aorta and in the left ventricular outflow tract at peak velocity, at half-peak velocity during acceleration (midacceleration), and at half-peak velocity during deceleration (mid-deceleration) were obtained in 26 patients with aortic stenosis (mean gradient 50 +/- 19 mm Hg and effective aortic orifice are 0.7 +/- 0.3 dcm2) and in 14 normal subjects of similar age and gender, to calculate instantaneous effective aortic orifice area at midacceleration, at peak velocity and at mid-deceleration. In the 26 patients with aortic stenosis, aortic valve area at midacceleration was 84 +/- 15% of valve area at peak velocity (p < 0.0001), and valve area at mid-deceleration was 113 +/- 17% of that measured at peak velocity (p < 0.01). Conversely, in normal subjects, aortic valve area remained constant during ejection and was 97 +/- 5% and 99 +/- 6% of valve area at peak velocity, respectively, at midacceleration and mid-deceleration (p > 0.05). In addition, in patients with aortic stenosis the percentage of change in effective aortic valve area from midacceleration to mid-deceleration varied widely, from -17% to +49% (mean change +26 +/- 14%). There was no relation between percentage of change in effective valve area and mean transaortic gradient (r = 0.05; p = 0.30) or effective valve area at peak velocity (r = -0.11; p = 0.14). Our results indicate that effective aortic valve area continues to change during ejection in patients with aortic stenosis, and that the magnitude of this change is independent of the usual indexes of severity of the stenosis. Conversely, effective aortic valve area remains constant during ejection in normal subjects.

Hemodynamic assessment of patients with low-flow, low-gradient valvular aortic stenosis

In aortic stenosis (AS), conventional indexes of severity vary with changes in transvalvular flow. It is important to determine the true severity of obstruction because AS in the presence of low cardiac output and low gradient is associated with high mortality during aortic valve replacement. This study compares 3 indexes of stenosis severity at different transvalvular flow rates in patients with low-flow, low-gradient critical AS. Eight patients with critical AS (valve area < or = 0.7 cm2), low cardiac output (< 4.0 L/min), and low mean transvalvular gradient (< or = 40 mm Hg) underwent hemodynamic assessment at baseline, after transvalvular flow was augmented with dobutamine, and after the valve opening was increased with percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Severity of obstruction was assessed using 3 different measures: Gorlin formula calculated valve area, valvular resistance, and percentage left ventricular stroke work loss. Dobutamine infusion increased cardiac output by 35% and mean transvalvular gradient by 27%. The mean Gorlin formula calculated aortic valve area increased from 0.5 to 0.6 cm2 (p = 0.002). Percentage left ventricular stroke work loss increased from 23% to 28% (p = 0.03). Valve resistance was unchanged by dobutamine (350 to 310 dynes X sec X cm(-5); p = NS). Balloon valvuloplasty increased cardiac output 13% and decreased the gradient 31%; this resulted in an increase in the calculated valve area from 0.6 to 0.9 cm2 (p = 0.001). Percentage left ventricular stroke work loss decreased from 28% to 20% (p = 0.002), and valve resistance decreased from 310 to 181 dynes X sec X cm(-5) (p = 0.001) after valvuloplasty. We conclude that in patients with low-flow, low-gradient critical AS, valve resistance is the most flow-independent measure of severity of stenosis. All measures improve with percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty.

Stenotic lesions

Images

Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to investigate the effect of altering transvalvular volume flow rate on indexes of aortic stenosis severity (valve area, valve resistance, percent left ventricular stroke work loss) derived by using Doppler echocardiography.

BACKGROUND

Assessment of hemodynamic severity in aortic stenosis has been limited by the absence of an index that is independent of transvalvular flow rate. The traditional measurement of valve area by the Gorlin equation has been shown to vary with alterations in transvalvular flow. Recently, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss have been proposed as indexes that are relatively independent of flow. Although typically derived with invasive measurements, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss (in addition to continuity equation valve area) can be determined noninvasively with Doppler echocardiography.

METHODS

We performed 110 symptom-limited exercise studies in 66 asymptomatic patients with valvular aortic stenosis. Continuity equation valve area, valve resistance (the ratio between mean transvalvular pressure gradient and mean flow rate) and the steady component of percent stroke work loss (the ratio between mean transvalvular pressure gradient and left ventricular systolic pressure) were assessed by Doppler echocardiography at rest and immediately after exercise.

RESULTS

Mean transvalvular volume flow rate increased 24% (from [mean +/- SD] 319 +/- 80 to 400 +/- 140 ml/s, p < 0.0001); mean pressure gradient increased 36% (from 30 +/- 14 to 41 +/- 18 mm Hg, p < 0.0001); continuity equation aortic valve area increased 14% (from 1.38 +/- 0.50 to 1.58 +/- 0.69 cm2, p < 0.0001); valve resistance increased 13% (from 137 +/- 81 to 155 +/- 97 dynes.s.cm-5, p < 0.0001); and percent stroke work loss increased 17% (from 17.4 +/- 6.9% to 20.3 +/- 8.5%, p < 0.0001). The effects of flow on valve area, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss were independent of the presence of an aortic valve area < or = or > 1.0 cm2 or reduced transvalvular flow rate (rest cardiac output < 4.5 liters/min).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis, Doppler echocardiographic measures of valve area, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss are flow dependent. Flow dependence is observed with valve area < or = or > 1.0 cm2 and in the presence of both normal and low transvalvular flow states. The potential effects of transvalvular flow should be considered when interpreting Doppler measures of aortic stenosis severity.

The role of percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty in patients with cardiogenic shock and critical aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate the role of percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty in patients with cardiogenic shock due to severe aortic stenosis and associated major comorbid conditions and to establish predictors of survival.

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for patients in cardiogenic shock with severe aortic stenosis is poor. Aortic valve replacement can be lifesaving, but the presence of multiorgan failure precludes these patients from operation. Percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty has been used in these patients with short-term improvement and could be an alternative therapeutic option.

METHODS

Of 310 patients undergoing percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty, 21 were in cardiogenic shock and were included in this study. All 21 patients had associated major comorbid conditions at the time of presentation.

RESULTS

After percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty, systolic aortic pressure increased from 77 +/- 3 (mean +/- SEM) to 116 +/- 8 mm Hg (p = 0.0001); aortic valve area increased from 0.48 +/- 0.04 to 0.84 +/- 0.06 cm2 (p = 0.0001); and cardiac index increased from 1.84 +/- 0.13 to 2.24 +/- 0.15 liters/min per m2 (p = 0.06). Nine patients died in the hospital, two during the procedure and seven after successful percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty (five from multiorgan failure). Five patients had vascular complications. Stroke, cholesterol emboli and aortic regurgitation requiring aortic valve replacement occurred in one patient each. Twelve patients (57%) survived and were followed up for 15 +/- 6 months; five patients subsequently died. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed a 38 +/- 11% survival rate at 27 months. The only predictor for longer survival rate was the postprocedure cardiac index.

CONCLUSIONS

1) Emergency percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty can be performed successfully as a lifesaving procedure. 2) Morbidity and mortality remain high despite successful percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty. 3) For nonsurgical candidates, percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty may be the only therapeutic alternative.

Effect of catheter positioning on the variability of measured gradient in aortic stenosis

The purpose of this study was to quantify the variation in measured aortic valve gradient and calculated aortic valve area when different techniques of cardiac catheterization were utilized. Hemodynamic assessment of aortic stenosis severity requires an accurately determined pressure gradient. In aortic stenosis, the presence of intraventricular pressure gradients and downstream pressure recovery within the aorta means that a range of aortic valve gradients could be measured in a given patient depending upon catheter position and measurement technique. To quantify the degree of variation in measured gradient and calculated aortic valve area, we generated transvalvular gradients by nine different techniques in 15 patients (11 men, 4 women; 29-86 years old). Patients were divided into those with severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area < or = 0.6 cm2, n = 6) and those with moderately severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 0.61-0.90 cm2, n = 9). Considerable variation in measured gradient and calculated aortic valve area was observed. The maximum variation in gradient was similar in severe and moderately severe aortic stenosis groups (33 mm Hg. vs. 32 mm Hg., p = NS). However, the variation in gradient as a percent of maximum gradient was greater (P < 0.05) in the moderately severe aortic stenosis group. The maximum variation in calculated aortic valve area was 0.1 cm2 in the severe group and 0.3 cm2 in the moderately severe group (P < 0.01). An intraventricular gradient, present in 13 of 15 (87%) patients, was partially responsible for the variation in pressure gradient measurement and calculated aortic valve area.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of exercise on valvular resistance in patients with mitral stenosis

OBJECTIVES

This exercise study assessed the relation between valvular resistance and flow in patients with mitral stenosis.

BACKGROUND

Valvular resistance has been proposed as an alternative measure of stenotic valvular lesions, which is speculated to remain stable under changing hemodynamic conditions.

METHODS

In 35 of 40 patients with pure or predominant mitral stenosis, continuous wave Doppler measurements of the mitral stenotic jet were possible at rest and during supine bicycle ergometry. Simultaneously, transvalvular flow was assessed by thermodilution technique. For calculation of valvular resistance, the mean mitral valve pressure gradient was determined according to the simplified Bernoulli equation and divided by transvalvular flow. Additionally, effective mitral valve area was calculated according to the continuity equation method, dividing flow by the mean diastolic flow velocity.

RESULTS

Valvular resistance was 65 +/- 32 dynes.s.cm-5 at rest and increased to 82 +/- 43 dynes.s.cm-5 at 25 W (p < 0.001). The most prominent increase in valvular resistance (rest to 25 W 63 +/- 28 to 95 +/- 48 dynes.s.cm-5, p < 0.001) was found in those patients who had no or only a moderate (< 20%) change in effective mitral valve area. In contrast, valvular resistance remained constant (67 +/- 36 vs. 70 +/- 32 dynes.s.cm-5) in patients with a significant (> or = 20%) increase in mitral valve area with exercise.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mitral stenosis, the exercise-induced changes in valvular resistance are heterogeneous. This is the result of the variable response of mitral valve area to an increase in flow. In the individual patient, mitral valve area can significantly increase, a factor that has to be taken into account when interpreting the hemodynamic relevance of the obstruction. Calculated valvular resistance is flow dependent and has no advantage over valve area calculations for quantifying mitral stenosis.