Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg for Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 3 Hours of Onset

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Intravenous Thrombolysis in Cardioembolic Stroke Patients With Unknown Time of Onset - Subanalysis of the THAWS Randomized Control Trial

BACKGROUND

We investigated the clinical effect of intravenous thrombolysis using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided approach in cardioembolic stroke (CE) patients with unknown time of onset.Methods and Results: This subanalysis of the THAWS trial assessed the efficacy and safety of alteplase 0.6 mg/kg in CE patients with unknown time of onset and showing diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch. Patients were classified as CE and non-CE using the SSS-TOAST classification system during the acute period. The efficacy outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days. In all, 126 patients from the THAWS trial were included in this study, of whom 45 (35.7%) were diagnosed with CE. In the CE group, a favorable outcome was numerically more frequent in the alteplase than control group (52% vs. 35%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-9.99). However, in the non-CE group, favorable outcomes were comparable between the alteplase and control groups (44% vs. 55%, respectively; aOR 0.39; 95% CI 0.12-1.21). Treatment-by-cohort interaction for a favorable outcome was modestly significant between the CE and non-CE groups (P=0.069). In the CE group, no patients experienced symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or parenchymal hematoma Type II following thrombolysis.

CONCLUSIONS

When an MRI-guided approach is used, CE patients with unknown time of onset appear to be suitable candidates for thrombolysis.

Improvement of Functional Outcomes in Patients with Stroke who Received Alteplase for Over 15 Years: Japan Stroke Data Bank

AIM

The nationwide verification of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was rarely performed after the extension of the therapeutic time window of alteplase or after the expansion of mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aimed to examine the long-term change in accurate real-world outcomes of IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) using the Japan Stroke Databank, a representative Japan-wide stroke database.

METHODS

We extracted all patients with AIS who received IVT with alteplase between October 11, 2005, the approval date for alteplase use for AIS in Japan, and December 31, 2020. Patients were categorized into three groups using two critical dates in Japan as cutoffs: the official extension date of the therapeutic time window for IVT to within 4.5 h of symptom onset and the publication date of the revised guideline, where the evidence level of MT was heightened. We assessed the yearly trend of IVT implementation rates and the secular changes and three-group changes in clinical outcomes at discharge.

RESULTS

Of 124,382 patients with AIS, 9,569 (7.7%) received IVT (females, 41%; median age, 75 years). The IVT implementation rate has generally increased over time and plateaued in recent years. The proportion of favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) increased yearly over 15 years. The results of the changes in the outcomes of the three groups were similar to those of the annual changes.

CONCLUSIONS

We revealed that IVT implementation rates in patients with AIS increased, and the functional outcome in these patients improved over 15 years. Therefore, the Japanese IVT dissemination strategy is considered appropriate and effective.

A differential detailed diffusion-weighted imaging-ASPECTS for cerebral infarct volume measurement and outcome prediction

BACKGROUND

Diffusion-weighted imaging-Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (DWI-ASPECTS) has been used to estimate infarct core volume in acute stroke. However, the same and indiscriminate score deduction for punctate or confluent DWI high-intensity lesion might lead to variation in performance.

AIMS

To develop and evaluate a differential detailed DWI-ASPECTS method in comparison with the conventional DWI-ASPECTS in core infarct volume measurement and clinical outcome prediction.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with endovascular treatment between April 2013 and October 2019. In differential detailed DWI-ASPECTS, restricted diffusion lesion that was punctate or less than half of a cortical region (M1-M6) would not lead to subtraction of point. A favorable outcome was modified Rankin Scale score ⩽2 at 90 days after stroke onset.

RESULTS

Among 298 AIS patients, mean age was 75 years (interquartile range (IQR) 67-82), and 194 patients (65%) were males. Mean infarct core volume was 11 mL (IQR 3-37). Overall, the score by detailed DWI-ASPECTS was significantly higher than conventional DWI-ASPECTS (8 (7-9) vs. 7 (5-9); P < 0.01). The detailed DWI-ASPECTS resulted in a higher correlation coefficient (r) for core infarct volume estimation than the conventional DWI-ASPECTS (r = 0.832 vs. 0.773; P < 0.01). Upon re-classification of those scored ⩽6 in conventional DWI-ASPECTS (n = 134) by detailed DWI-ASPECTS, the rate of favorable outcome in patients with detailed DWI-ASPECTS >6 was significantly higher than those with ⩽6 (29 (48%) vs. 14 (19%); P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Detailed DWI-ASPECTS appeared to provide a more accurate infarct core volume measurement and clinical outcome correlation than conventional DWI-ASPECTS among AIS patients treated with endovascular therapy.

The budget impact of alteplase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in Egypt

Introduction

Stroke is the second leading cause of mortality worldwide. Five percent of all the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost around the world are attributed to stroke. This study aimed to assess the economic burden of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in Egypt and reveal the benefits of alteplase treatment by measuring the resource use and costs associated with this treatment compared to the standard of care and extrapolate the overall budget impact of alteplase to the local Egyptian setting over a 5-year time horizon from a societal perspective.

Methods

A budget impact model was developed to estimate the impact of adding alteplase to the current treatment of AIS patients within the Egyptian healthcare setting. The efficacy data for both arms of the model were sourced from a systematic review of the literature. Resource use and cost data were sourced from a retrospective study. Proportions of patients potentially eligible for treatment and the treatment time distributions were estimated from an analysis of the results of this retrospective data collection. A univariate sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of the model results. The input parameters varied between plausible extremes based on a review of available evidence.

Results

The total annual costs with alteplase treatment [i.e., drug, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) management, acute hospitalization, and post-hospitalization costs] for the targeted patients from a societal perspective were estimated to be less than the total annual costs without alteplase. This resulted in savings of approximately EGP 37.2 million ($ 1.2 million), EGP 14.2 million ($ 458.06), EGP -33.0 million ($ -1.06 million), EGP -54.0 million ($ -1.74 million), and EGP -89.8 million ($ -2.89 million) for each of the 5 years, respectively. In year 1, more than 2,787 patients (+30.1%) achieved an excellent outcome and <1,204 patients (-22.3%) had a poor outcome when treated with alteplase. The savings in acute hospitalization and post-hospitalization costs offset the increase in drug and ICH management costs in the alteplase group compared to treatment without alteplase. The total cumulative cost savings for alteplase in AIS patients were estimated at EGP -228,146,871 ($ -7,359,576) over 5 years.

Conclusion

The budget impact model estimates suggest that from a societal perspective, alteplase is likely to be a cost-saving option for the treatment of AIS in Egypt due to the treatment benefits, resulting in savings in acute hospitalization and annual post-hospitalization costs.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolytic therapy in patients over eighty years

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous thrombolytic therapy (IVTT) is licensed for patients under 80 years in many countries. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate functional results and complication rates of IVTT in patients over eighty years and whether there is a difference in efficacy and safety between low dose and standard dose recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA).

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of patients over eighty who admitted to Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine Hospital between August 2016 and April 2021 and to Isparta City Hospital between April 2017 and April 2021 and diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke were conducted. Third month modified rankin scores (mRS) and mortality rates of patients and hemorrhagic transformations were determined.

RESULTS

There were 29 patients in IVTT group and 25 patients in non-IVTT group. By the third month, it was observed that functional independence (mRS 0-2) ratio was increased more in IVTT group, but it wasn't statistically significant (p: 0.087). In mortality and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates, there wasn't statistically significant difference between IVTT and non-IVTT groups and low dose and standard dose rTPA groups by the third month.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and complication rates of IVTT in patients over 80 years were found similar to not receive IVTT. These results support the safety of IVTT in patients over 80 years. In low or standard dose rTPA preference, we observed that there was not statistically significance in efficacy and safety. We believe that these results will be supported by studies with larger number of patients.

The impact of SAH finding on CT to the clinical outcome after mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Whether subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) after mechanical thrombectomy affects the clinical outcomes of patients with acute large-vessel occlusion remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of SAH on computed tomography (CT) after mechanical thrombectomy.

METHODS

The SKIP study was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, open-label clinical trial. This study was performed in 23 hospital networks in Japan from January 1, 2017, to July 31, 2019. Among the 204 patients, seven were excluded because they did not undergo mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and had a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score > 2. The main outcome was the association between SAH within 36 h after mechanical thrombectomy and the clinical outcome at 90 days.

RESULTS

Among 197 patients, the median age was 74 (67-79) years, 62.9% were male. Moreover, 26 (13.2%) patients had SAH (seven isolated SAH) on CT within 36 h. The SAH rate did not differ according to IV rt-PA administration (p = 0.4). The rate of favourable clinical outcomes tended to be lower in patients with SAH rather than patients without SAH (11 [42%] vs. 106 [62%], p = 0.08). Among the seven patients with isolated SAH, 6 showed favourable outcomes at 90 days. In the multivariate regression analysis, the presence of SAH within 36 h from onset was not associated with clinical outcome (Odd ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-1.95; p = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with acute stroke treated with MT, SAH, especially isolated SAH findings on CT, were not associated with poor clinical outcomes after 90 days.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000021488.

Retrospective Evaluation of the Results of Low-Dose Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the clinical data of patients with acute ischemic stroke who received low-dose intravenous (IV) thrombolytic therapy (0.9 mg/kg; maximum 50 mg) for various reasons, compare the obtained results with those of patients who received standard-dose thrombolytic therapy, and discuss them in light of the literature.

Methods

Patients who received IV thrombolytic therapy within 4.5 h of symptom onset between January 2015 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into the low-dose group (0.9 mg/kg; max. 50 mg) and the standard-dose group (0.9 mg/kg; max 90 mg) according to the thrombolytic therapy dose, after which demographic data and clinical results were analyzed.

Results

A total of 109 patients receiving thrombolytic therapy (19 patients in the low-dose group and 90 patients in the standard-dose group) were included in the study. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of good outcome rates (47.4% vs. 52.2%). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of symptomatic and asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates.

Conclusion

Our study showed similar efficacy and safety for low-dose IV thrombolytic therapy compared with standard-dose IV thrombolytic therapy administered within 4.5 h of symptom onset in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Integrative Approaches in Acute Ischemic Stroke: From Symptom Recognition to Future Innovations

Among the high prevalence of cerebrovascular diseases nowadays, acute ischemic stroke stands out, representing a significant worldwide health issue with important socio-economic implications. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are important milestones for the management of this multifaceted pathology, making understanding the various stroke-onset symptoms crucial. A key role in acute ischemic stroke management is emphasizing the essential role of a multi-disciplinary team, therefore, increasing the efficiency of recognition and treatment. Neuroimaging and neuroradiology have evolved dramatically over the years, with multiple approaches that provide a higher understanding of the morphological aspects as well as timely recognition of cerebral artery occlusions for effective therapy planning. Regarding the treatment matter, the pharmacological approach, particularly fibrinolytic therapy, has its merits and challenges. Endovascular thrombectomy, a game-changer in stroke management, has witnessed significant advances, with technologies like stent retrievers and aspiration catheters playing pivotal roles. For select patients, combining pharmacological and endovascular strategies offers evidence-backed benefits. The aim of our comprehensive study on acute ischemic stroke is to efficiently compare the current therapies, recognize novel possibilities from the literature, and describe the state of the art in the interdisciplinary approach to acute ischemic stroke. As we aspire for holistic patient management, the emphasis is not just on medical intervention but also on physical therapy, mental health, and community engagement. The future holds promising innovations, with artificial intelligence poised to reshape stroke diagnostics and treatments. Bridging the gap between groundbreaking research and clinical practice remains a challenge, urging continuous collaboration and research.

Efficacy and safety of short-term high dosage dual antiplatelet therapy after 0.6 mg/kg rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of short-term high-dose of dual antiplatelet therapy after 0.6 mg/kg rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

All 208 patients with AIS were randomized into group 1 (103 cases, after 0.6 mg/kg rt-PA, 300 mg of oral aspirin(ASP) q.d. and 225 mg of oral clopidogrel (CLO) q.d. for for 5 days, then 100 mg of oral ASP q.d. for the next 85 days and 75 mg of oral CLO q.d. for the next 16 days) and group 2 (105 cases, after 0.9 mg/kg rt-PA, 100 mg of oral ASP q.d. for 90 days and 75 mg of oral CLO q.d. for 21 days).The efficacy index was the mRS score, NIHSS score and recurrence risk of stroke, while the safety index was the incidence of bleeding events and mortality. All parameters were evaluated at 30 and 90 days after thrombolysis. Patients whose characteristics may provide the best treatment benefit were further analyzed using the logistic regression model in group 1.

RESULTS

The proportion of mRS scores between 0 and 1 in group 1 was higher than that in group 2 at both 30 days (44.7% vs 32.4%, P < .05) and 90 days (50.5% vs 35.2%, P < .05). Compared to group 2, the proportion of NIHSS scores less than 4 was significantly higher in group 1 at both 30 days (37.9% vs 25.7%, P < .05) and 90 days (46.6% vs 30.5%, P < .05). At 90 days, Group 1 had a lower stroke recurrence risk than Group 2 (3.9% vs 10.5%, P < .05). The incidence of SICH was significantly different between the 2 groups at both 30 days (2.9% vs 9.5%, P < .05) and 90 days (2.9% vs 10.5%, P < .05). However, other bleeding events and mortality rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The lower the baseline NIHSS score and the shorter the OTT, the more favorable the outcomes obtained at 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to standard doses, short term high-dose dual antiplatelet therapy after 0.6 mg/kg rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis may be a good choice for AIS patients.

Pathophysiology and Optimal Treatment of Intracranial Branch Atheromatous Disease

Intracranial branch atheromatous disease (BAD) is a pathological condition characterized by the occlusion of a relatively large perforating branch (700-800 µm) near the orifice of a parent artery due to atherosclerotic plaque-based thrombus (microatheroma). BAD is refractory to treatment and follows a course of progressive exacerbation, especially motor paralysis. Uniform treatment for common atherothrombotic cerebral infarction or lacunar infarction does not prevent the progressive exacerbation of BAD, and consequently affects functional prognosis. To date, various combinations of treatments have been investigated and proposed to attenuate the worsening symptoms of BAD. However, no therapy with established efficacy is yet available for BAD. Since it is the most difficult condition to treat in the area of cerebral infarction, the establishment of optimal treatment methods for BAD is keenly awaited. This review presents an overview of the acute treatments available for BAD and discusses the prospects for optimal treatment.

Best medical management versus intravenous thrombolysis for mild non-disabling ischemic stroke: A prospective noninferiority registry study

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis uncertain in patients with non-disabling mild ischemic stroke. Our aim was to investigate whether best medical management only is noninferior to intravenous thrombolysis plus best medical management therapy for achieving favorable functional outcome at 90 days.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective acute ischemic stroke registry from 2018 through 2020, 314 non-disabling mild ischemic stroke patients received best medical management only and 638 underwent intravenous thrombolysis plus best medical management. The primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale ≤1 at Day 90. The noninferiority margin was -5%. Secondary outcomes of hemorrhagic transformation, early neurologic deterioration and mortality were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The best medical management only was noninferior to the combined therapy of intravenous thrombolysis and best medical management with regard to the primary outcome (unadjusted risk difference, 1.16%; 95% CI, -3.48% ∼ 5.8%; p = 0.0046 for noninferiority; adjusted risk difference, 3.01%; 95% CI, -3.39% ∼ 9.41%). After propensity score matching, p < 0.0001 for noninferiority. RD, 4.03%; 95% CI, -1.59% ∼ 9.69%. p < 0.0001 for noninferiority. Adjusted RD, 5.23%; 95% CI, -1.88% ∼ 9.97%. The occurrence of hemorrhagic transformation was significantly increased in the group of combination therapy (OR, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.30 to 13.99; p = 0.008), while no significant difference was detected in early neurologic deterioration (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.49-2.52; p = 0.808) and mortality (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.69; p = 0.214) between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, we found the best medical management only was noninferior to the combination therapy of intravenous thrombolysis plus best medical management for non-disabling mild ischemic stroke within 4.5 h after onset. Best medical management may be a treatment of choice for non-disabling mild ischemic stroke patients. Further randomized controlled studies are warranted.

Safety of recanalization therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke on direct oral anticoagulants: A sub-analysis of PASTA registry study

BACKGROUND

The safety of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) before stroke has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the safety of recanalization therapy in patients receiving DOACs.

METHODS

We assessed data from a prospective multicenter registry of patients with stroke, including those with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with rtPA and/or MT who were administered DOACs. We evaluated the safety of recanalization considering the DOACs dosage and interval between the last DOAC intake and recanalization.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 108 patients (women, n = 54; median age, 81 years; DOAC overdose, n = 7; appropriate dose, n = 74; and inappropriate low dose, n = 27). The rate of any ICH differed significantly among overdose-, appropriate dose-, and inappropriate-low dose DOACs groups (71.4, 23.0, and 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.0121), whereas no significant difference was observed in respect of symptomatic ICH (P = 0.6895). Multivariate analysis showed that the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission (odds ratio [OR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.11; P = 0.0267) and overdose-DOAC (OR: 8.40, 95% CI: 1.24-56.88; P = 0.0291) were independently associated with any ICH. No relationship was observed between the timing of the last DOAC intake and occurrence of ICH in patients treated with rtPA and/or MT (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Recanalization therapy during DOAC treatment may be safe in selected patients with AIS, if it is performed >4 h after the last DOAC intake and the patient is not overdosed with DOACs.

REGISTRATION

https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000034958.

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

The aim of the present meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose and standard-dose recombinant tissue plasminogen activators (r-tPA) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The present meta-analysis was conducted according to the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies published between January 1, 2010, and January 31, 2023, using the following terms: "stroke," "alteplase," "doses," "efficacy," "tissue plasminogen activator," "r-tPA," and "safety." Primary efficacy outcomes included favorable outcomes (Modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2), while secondary efficacy outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. Safety outcomes included asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH assessed using the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) study and the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring (SITS-MOST) study. We also compared parenchymal hematomas as safety outcome between the two groups defined by the authors themselves in their research. A total of 16 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. The meta-analysis did not report any significant difference between low-dose and standard-dose r-tPA in terms of mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), asymptomatic ICH, and parenchymal hematomas. However, the favorable outcome was significantly greater in patients receiving a standard dose of r-tPA.

Low-dose vs. standard-dose alteplase for Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke: A propensity score analysis

Background and purpose

Previous studies have stimulated debates on low-dose alteplase administration in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) among the Asian population. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose alteplase in Chinese patients with AIS using a real-world registry.

Methods

We analyzed data from the Shanghai Stroke Service System. Patients receiving alteplase intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 hours were included. These patients were divided into the low-dose alteplase group (0.55-0.65 mg/kg) and the standard-dose alteplase group (0.85-0.95 mg/kg). Baseline imbalances were adjusted by using the propensity score matching. The primary outcome was mortality or disability, which was defined as the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score ranging from 2 to 6 at discharge. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and functional independence (mRS score 0-2).

Results

From January 2019 to December 2020, a total of 1,334 patients were enrolled and 368 (27.6%) were treated with low-dose alteplase. The median age of the patients was 71 years, and 38.8% were female. Our study showed that the low-dose group had significantly higher rates of death or disability (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.12, 1.98]) and less functional independence (aOR = 0.71, 95%CI [0.52, 0.97]) than the standard-dose group. There was no significant difference in sICH or in-hospital mortality between the standard-dose and low-dose alteplase groups.

Conclusions

Low-dose alteplase was related to a poor functional outcome without lowering the risk of sICH, compared with standard-dose alteplase for AIS patients in China.

Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease on Hemodialysis: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a significant and devastating complication in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis (ESRD/HD). Since one-third of AIS in ESRD/HD patients occurs during or soon after dialysis, patients are more likely to present within the time window when intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) can be performed. IVT may improve prognosis in ESRD/HD patients with AIS. However, ESRD/HD patients have been excluded from large trials and may have been withheld from IVT due to concerns about bleeding complications. To date, there is no clear evidence and firm guidance on the safety and efficacy of IVT in ESRD/HD patients with AIS. This narrative review aimed to evaluate critical scientific data on the benefits and risks of IVT use in patients with ESRD/HD and AIS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the electronic database of PubMed for studies evaluating the relationship between AIS, ESRD/HD, and IVT. Reference sections and additional publications were also searched manually. Studies on AIS in patients with ESRD/HD requiring maintenance dialysis that referred to IVT were included.

RESULTS

In total, 560 studies were found in the PubMed electronic database during the period covered, of which 10 met the selection criteria. IVT for AIS in ESRD/HD patients could improve neurological outcomes and be safely performed even with the possibility of hemorrhagic complications associated with hypertension. Despite the high complication and mortality rates in ESRD/HD patients with AIS after IVT, the association with IVT was unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

IVT for AIS in ESRD/HD patients may improve outcomes and should not be withheld based solely on ESRD/HD status.

Analyses on safety and efficacy of non-standard dose of r-tPA in intravenous thrombolysis-treated AIS patients

Background

Intravenous 0.9 mg/kg recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) is one of the most effective treatments in acute ischemic stroke patients. Practically, the dose of r-tPA is still a topic that is constantly being discussed.

Methods

For this observational study, data were obtained from 537 patients who received r-tPA thrombolysis at Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital stroke center over 5 years (2014–2019). Patients were divided into two groups: a non-standard dose group (0.6 mg/kg ≤ dose &lt; 0.9 mg/kg) and a standard dose group (0.9 mg/kg). Different outcomes were observed: efficacy: 3 months mRS 0-1 (3m-mRS0-1); safety: symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 24 h (24h-sICH) and 3 months mortality (3m-death). We also observed the effect of r-tPA dose coefficient on outcomes in different age groups and baseline National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score subgroups.

Results

There were 265 patients who gave the standard dose treatment and 272 gave the nonstandard dose. There was no significant difference between the non-standard dose group and the standard dose group in 3m-mRS0-1, 3m-death, and 24h-sICH (p = 0.567, 0.327, and 0.415, respectively). The dose coefficient presents a significant negative correlation (p = 0.034, B = −4.290) with 3m-death in NIHSS &lt; 16 sub-group. Door-to-needle time (DNT) is the most important independent outcome-influential factor (MIOIF) in the NIHSS ≥16 sub-group. The diabetes history and baseline NIHSS score were the MIOIF in the age ≥80-year sub-group.

Conclusions

The non-standard dose group (0.6 mg/kg ≤ dose &lt; 0.9 mg/kg) shows no difference in safety and effectiveness than the standard dose group (0.9 mg/kg) in our study. The standard dose should be considered first according to current evidence and Guidelines, but the non-standard dose (0.6 mg/kg ≤ dose &lt; 0.9 mg/kg) might be an option in the actual diagnosis and treatment process considering the patient's clinical profile and financial condition.

Effects of tissue plasminogen activator on medium-term functional independence: A propensity score-matched analysis

This study revealed the effects of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) on medium-term functional independence in patients with stroke. We retrospectively examined 240 patients from April 2016 to March 2019 and selected 68 who met our criteria. After adjusting the functional status at the onset by propensity score matching, the functional independence measure (FIM) on admission to and discharge from the convalescent rehabilitation wards was compared between the groups classified by the presence or absence of tPA. Twelve pairs were derived by propensity score matching. Upon admission to the convalescent rehabilitation ward, the median score of the FIM was significantly higher in the tPA group than in the non-tPA group (P = .028). Patients in the tPA group had higher median FIM scores at discharge than those in the non-tPA group (P = .060). The difference in the independence level of activities of daily living (ADL) between the groups with and without tPA may gradually decrease with continuous inpatient rehabilitation. However, the tPA group tended to have high levels of independence in ADL at the time of discharge.

Machine learning prediction of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after stroke thrombolysis: a cross-cultural validation in Caucasian and Han Chinese cohort

Background

Previous studies found that Asians seemed to have higher risk of HT after thrombolysis than Caucasians due to its race differences in genetic polymorphism. Whether the model developed by Caucasians could predict risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) in Asians was unknown.

Objectives

To develop a machine learning-based model for predicting sICH after stroke thrombolysis in Caucasians and externally validate it in an independent Han Chinese cohort.

Design

The derivation Caucasian sample included 1738 ischemic stroke (IS) patients from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA) data set, and the external validation Han Chinese cohort included 296 IS patients who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis.

Methods

Twenty-eight variables were collected across both samples. According to their properties, we classified them into six distinct clusters (ie, demographic variables, medical history, previous medication, baseline blood biomarkers, neuroimaging markers on initial CT scan and clinical characteristics). A support vector machine (SVM) model, which consisted of data processing, model training, testing and a 10-fold cross-validation, was developed to predict the risk of sICH after stroke thrombolysis. The receiving operating characteristic (ROC) was used to assess the prediction performance of the SVM model. A domain contribution analysis was then performed to test which cluster had the highest influence on the performance of the model.

Results

In total, 85 (4.9%) patients developed sICH in the Caucasians, and 29 (9.8%) patients developed sICH in the Han Chinese cohort. Eight features including age, NIHSS score, SBP (systolic blood pressure), DBP (diastolic blood pressure), ALP (alkaline phosphatase), ALT (alanine transaminase), glucose, and creatine level were included in the final model, all of which were from demographic, clinical characteristics, and blood biomarkers clusters, respectively. The SVM model showed a good predictive performance in both Caucasians (AUC = 0.87) and Han Chinese patients (AUC = 0.74). Domain contribution analysis showed that inclusion/exclusion of clinical characteristic cluster (NIHSS score, SBP, and DBP), had the highest influence on the performance of predicting sICH in both Caucasian and Han Chinese cohorts.

Conclusion

The established SVM model is feasible for predicting the risk of sICH after thrombolysis quickly and efficiently in both Caucasian and Han Chinese cohort.

Intravenous Thrombolysis With Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg in Patients With Ischemic Stroke Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Background

We elucidated the safety of treatment with alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg within 24 hours for patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) before ischemic stroke onset.

Methods and Results

Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent intravenous thrombolysis using alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg from 2011 to 2021 were enrolled from our single‐center prospective stroke registry. We compared outcomes between patients taking DOACs and those not taking oral anticoagulants within 48 hours of stroke onset. The primary safety outcome was the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage with a ≥4‐point increase on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score from baseline. The efficacy outcome was defined as 3‐month modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 after stroke onset. Of 915 patients with acute ischemic stroke who received intravenous thrombolysis (358 women; median age, 76 years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 10), 40 patients took DOACs (6 took dabigatran, 8 took rivaroxaban, 16 took apixaban, and 10 took edoxaban) within 24 hours of onset and 753 patients did not take any oral anticoagulants. The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was comparable between patients on DOACs and those not on oral anticoagulants (2.5% versus 2.4%, P=0.95). The rate of favorable outcomes was comparable between the 2 groups (59.4% versus 58.2%, P=0.46), although the admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was higher in patients on DOACs. No significant differences showed in any intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours or mortality at 3 months.

Conclusions

Intravenous thrombolysis would be safely performed for patients on DOACs following the recommendations of the Japanese guidelines.

Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02251665.

Intravenous thrombolysis with 0.65 mg/kg r-tPA may be optimal for Chinese mild-to-moderate stroke

Background

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) with 0.9 mg/kg is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke, but it remains unclear whether it is optimal for all patients. We aimed to determine the optimal dose of r-tPA for Chinese stroke based on the data from the INTRECIS study.

Methods

From the INTRECIS cohort, patients receiving intravenous r-tPA within 4.5 h of onset were included. According to r-tPA dose, patients were assigned into seven groups (from 0.60 to 0.90 mg/kg). The primary outcomes were the proportion of excellent functional outcomes and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

Results

Overall, 2,666 patients were included: 156 in 0.60 mg/kg group, 117 in 0.65 mg/kg group, 127 in 0.70 mg/kg group, 188 in 0.75 mg/kg group, 154 in 0.80 mg/kg group, 359 in 0.85 mg/kg group, and 1,565 in 0.90 mg/kg group. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, only 0.65 mg/kg group had significantly higher proportion of excellent functional outcome than 0.90 mg/kg group (79.5 vs. 71.4%, odds ratio = 1.833, 95% CI = 1.006–3.341, adjusted p = 0.048). The subgroup analysis showed no evidence of differences in the odds of having a primary outcome between the two groups by age, admission NIHSS, onset to thrombolysis time, and TOAST classification. There was no significant difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between groups.

Conclusion

Our study presented the first evidence that intravenous thrombolysis with 0.65 mg/kg r-tPA may be optimal for Chinese mild-to-moderate stroke.

Registration

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT 02854592.

Alteplase or tenecteplase for thrombolysis in ischemic stroke: An illustrated review

Intravenous thrombolysis is a standard of care treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) has been the main thrombolytic agent used since the publication of the seminal National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke trial in 1995. There is now mounting evidence to support the routine use of Tenecteplase (TNK) to treat acute ischemic stroke. TNK is a genetically modified tPA with higher fibrin specificity, longer half‐life, and reduced systemic coagulopathy. In this illustrated review, we compare the indications, doses, mechanisms of action, efficacy and safety of TNK and tPA. We provide an overview of published clinical trials studying TNK in acute ischemic stroke, including dose‐escalation studies and head‐to‐head comparisons with tPA. Finally, we summarize current acute stroke guideline recommendations and suggest treatment algorithms to manage the two main complications of intravenous thrombolysis: symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and angioedema.

Safety and efficacy of low-dose rt-PA with tirofiban to treat acute non-cardiogenic stroke: a single-center randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The recanalization rate after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is not enough and there is still the possibility of re-occlusion. We aim to investigate the effectiveness and safety of infusing tirofiban after IVT.

METHODS

We performed a prospective controlled study of 60 patients with acute non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke who were hospitalized in Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received tirofiban for 24 h after IVT (rt-PA + T group) and those who did not receive postprocedural intravenous tirofiban (rt-PA group). The rt-PA + T group received low-dose rt-PA (0.6 mg/kg). The rt-PA group received standard dose rt-PA (0.9 mg/kg). The main outcome measure were safety, included the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any ICH, severe systemic bleeding, and mortality. The secondary outcome measure is curative efficacy which were evaluated by the 7d-NIHSS score and functional outcomes at 90 days. During hospitalization, the deterioration of neurological function was recorded.

RESULTS

All patients completed the follow-up with complete data, there were 30 patients in each of groups. The general characteristics between the two group patients had no statistically significant differences. Compared with the rt-PA + T group and the rt-PA group, in terms of safety, the rates of the sICH, severe systemic bleeding, and mortality in both groups were 0, and there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of any ICH between the two groups (10.0% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.306). In terms of efficacy, the rate of the early neurological deterioration events (END) was no statistical significance (0 vs. 6.6%, P = 0.246). There was no significant difference in the NIHSS score between the two groups before the IVT, and also at 24 h, however, the 7d-NIHSS score was lower in the rt-PA + T group compared with the rt-PA group (2.33 ± 1.85 vs. 4.80 ± 4.02, P = 0.004). At 90 days, 83.3% of patients in the rt-PA + T group had favorable functional outcomes compared with 60.0% of patients in the rt-PA group (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose rt-PA combined with tirofiban in acute non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke did not increase the risk of ICH, and mortality, and it was associated with neurological improvement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial has been registered at the ChiCTR and identified as ChiCTR1800014666 (28/01/2018).

Low-dose alteplase for the management of acute ischemic stroke in South Asians: A systematic review on cost, efficacy and safety

INTRODUCTION

South Asia is responsible for more than 40% of the stroke burden and stroke mortality in the developing world. South Asia, which is home to one-fourth of the world's population, is the most densely populated and one of the poorest regions. The majority of patients in this region are unable to afford intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). If low-dose alteplase proves effective and safe in South Asians, it may be a more cost-effective treatment option.

METHODS

The study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-Analyses) guideline. Researchers searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for English literature from 2005 to 2021. END, ENI, good functional outcome, SICH, and all-cause mortality were used to assess efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

In the low-dose alteplase treated patients, different studies reported 32 to 57% ENI 24 h after IVT, and 7% to 9.7% END. At 3 months follow-up, good functional outcome was achieved by 48%-76.92% of low-dose alteplase treated patients. SICH rates ranged from 0% to 16.6% across studies. Asymptomatic ICH occurred in 5-14% of patients. The mortality rate in all included studies varied from none to 25%.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review demonstrates that the use of low-dose alteplase for AIS in the South Asians offer comparable efficacy and reduced risk of SICH at a significantly lower cost than standard alteplase dose. Future well-randomized clinical trials are necessary to validate the findings of our study.

Different Doses of Intravenous Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background

This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of different doses of intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by adopting a network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods

Studies comparing different doses of tPA in AIS were identified by retrieving electronic databases. NMAs of outcome measures included favorable functional outcome with a modified Rankin scale score (mRS) of 0 or 1 at 3 months after treatment (3M-FF), the functional independence with a mRS of 0, 1, or 2 at 3 months (3M-FI), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month all-cause mortality (3M-M). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month all-cause mortality (3M-M) were assessed. Probability-based ranking and surface under cumulative ranking (SUCRA) were performed to identify the best dose of tPA. Inconsistency was evaluated by node-splitting analysis and a loop-specific approach. Publication bias was analyzed by funnel plots.

Results

A total of 14 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. The NMA results revealed no difference among low (<0.7 mg/kg), moderate (0.8 mg/kg), and standard (0.9 mg/kg) doses of tPA with regard to efficacy and safety. The SUCRAs of 3M-FF and 3M-FI showed that the standard dose ranked first, the moderate dose ranked second, and the low dose ranked third. The SUCRA of sICH showed that the standard dose ranked first (78.1%), the low dose ranked second (61.0%), and the moderate dose ranked third (11.0%). The SUCRAs of 3-month mortality showed that the standard dose ranked first (73.2%), the moderate dose ranked second (40.8%), and the low dose ranked third (36.1%). No significant inconsistency was shown by node-splitting analysis and no publication bias was shown in funnel plots.

Conclusion

Lower dose tPA was comparable to the standard dose with regard to efficacy and safety. Based on the SUCRA results and American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) guidelines, the standard dose was still the optimal selection for AIS.

Systematic Review of Existing Stroke Guidelines: Case for a Change

Methods

We systematically searched for guideline recommendation on the day-to-day use of peripheral inflammatory markers such as NLR published in the English language between January 1, 2005, and October 2020. Any other evidence of system biology-based approach or recommendation was explored within the selected guidelines for this scoping review. Only the latest guideline per writing group was selected. Each guideline was analyzed independently by 2 to 4 authors to determine clinical scenarios explained/given, scientific evidence used, and recommendations presented in the context of system biology.

Results

The scoping review found 2,911 titles at the beginning of the search. Final review included with 15 guidelines. Stroke-related organizations wrote sixty-five percent of the guidelines while national ministries wrote a fewer number of guidelines. We were primarily interested in recommendations for acute management in AIS published in the English language. Fifteen eligible guidelines were identified from 15 different countries/regions. None of the guidelines recommended the routine use of peripheral markers of inflammation, such as NLR, among their acute assessment and management recommendations. None of the existing guidelines explored the system biology approach to one of the most complex diseases affecting the human brain, stroke.

Conclusions

This systematic review has identified a significant evidence-practice gap in all existing national stroke guidelines published in English medium as of October 2020. These guidelines included the only current “living stroke guidelines,” stroke guidelines from Australia with a real opportunity to modernize the living stroke guidelines with systems biology approach, and provide 2020 vision towards better stroke care globally. Investigation of complex disease such as stroke is best served through a systems biology approach. One of the easiest places to start is simple blood tests such as total white cell count and NLR. Systems biology approach point us towards simple tools such immune-inflammatory index (SII) and serial systemic immune inflammatory indices (SSIIi) which should pave the way for the stroke physician community address the challenges in systems biology approach in stroke care. These challenges include translating bench research to the bedside, managing big data (continuous pulse, blood pressure, sleep, oxygen saturation, progressive changes in NLR, SII, SSIIi, etc.). Working with an interdisciplinary team also provides a distinct advantage. Recent adoption of historic WHO-IGAP calls for immediate action. The 2022 World Brain Day campaign on Brain Health for All is the perfect opportunity to raise awareness and start the process.

Emergency Cervical Carotid Artery Stenting After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV rtPA) is the mainstay of treatment for acute ischemic stroke to recanalize thrombosed intracranial vessels within 4.5 hours. Emergency carotid artery stenting for the treatment of acute stroke due to steno-occlusion of the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) can improve symptoms, prevent neurological deterioration, and reduce recurrent stroke risk. The feasibility and safety of the combination therapy of IV rtPA and urgent carotid artery stenting have not been established.

METHODS

From November 2005 to October 2020, we retrospectively assessed patients who had undergone emergent carotid artery stenting after IV rtPA for hyperacute ischemic stroke due to steno-occlusive proximal ICA lesion. Hemorrhagic transformation, successful recanalization, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days, and stent patency at 3 and 12 months or longer were evaluated. Favorable outcome was defined as a 90-days mRS score of ≤ 2.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients with hyperacute stroke had undergone emergent carotid artery stenting after IV rtPA therapy. Their median age was 70 (67.5-73.5) years (94.7% men). Among 15 patients with an additional intracranial occlusion after flow restoration in the proximal ICA, a modified TICI grade ≥ 2b was achieved in 11 patients (73.3%). Hemorrhagic transformation occurred in five patients (26.3%); mortality rate was 5.7%. Eleven patients (57.9%) had favorable outcomes at 90 days. Stent patients (94.1%) maintained stent patency for ≥ 12 months.

CONCLUSION

We showed that emergent carotid artery stenting after IV rtPA therapy for hyperacute stroke caused by atherosclerotic proximal ICA steno-occlusion was feasible and safe.

Developing a Clinical Prediction Rule for Gait Independence at Discharge in Patients with Stroke: A Decision-Tree Algorithm Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To develop a clinical prediction rule (CPR) for gait independence at discharge in patients with stroke, using the decision-tree algorithm and to investigate the usefulness of CPR at admission to the rehabilitation ward.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 181 subjects with stroke during the postacute phase. The Chi-squared automatic interaction detection analysis method with 10-fold cross-validation was used to develop two CPRs; CPR 1 using easily obtainable data available at admission; CPR 2 using easily obtainable data available 1 month after admission, for prediction of gait independence at discharge.

RESULTS

The degree of independence of toileting was extracted as a first node in the development of two CPRs to predict gait independence at discharge. CPR 1 included the presence of delirium. CPR 2 included problem-solving abilities. The accuracy and area under the curve of CPR 1 were 84.5% and 0.911, respectively; those of CPR 2 were 89.0% and 0.958, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Toileting independence is a key factor in predicting the gait independence for the discharge of patients with stroke during the postacute phase. Early intervention, during the acute phase, for delirium and cognitive decline, as well as for toileting, increases the possibility of gait independence at discharge.

Controversies in cerebrovascular disease: high or low doses of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator to treat acute stroke? A literature review

INTRODUCTION

The use of low doses of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) was initially proposed in Asian countries in response to racial peculiarities related to the functionality of fibrinogen and coagulation factors that potentially increased the risk of intracerebral haemorrhage, and with a view to saving costs. In view of the controversy over the use of rt-PA below the standard dose, we conducted a literature review of studies promoting the use of low doses or comparing different doses of rt-PA.

DEVELOPMENT

We reviewed 198 abstracts related to the search terms and the full texts of 52 studies published in the last 30 years. We finally included 13 randomised clinical trials aiming to determine the efficacy and safety of the use of rt-PA at different doses in acute stroke, 14 observational cohort studies, 5 meta-analyses, and 3 systematic reviews.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to classify low doses of rt-PA as superior or at least not inferior to the standard treatment in the management of acute stroke in western populations. More clinical trials are required to determine whether the use of low doses is beneficial in patients with relative contraindications for thrombolytic therapy or other particular circumstances that may increase the risk of intracerebral haemorrhage.

Effectiveness of Standard-Dose vs. Low-Dose Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 3-4.5 h

Background

The efficacy and safety of intravenous alteplase administered 3–4.5 h after acute ischemic stroke have been demonstrated. However, whether responses differ between low-dose and standard-dose alteplase during this time window and whether certain subgroups benefit more remain unknown.

Patients and Methods

The current analysis was based on a multicenter matched-cohort study conducted in Taiwan. The treatment group comprised 378 patients receiving intravenous alteplase 3–4.5 h after stroke onset, and the control group comprised 378 age- and sex-matched patients who did not receive alteplase treatment during the same period. Standard- and low-dose alteplase was administered to patients at the physician's discretion.

Results

Overall, patients receiving alteplase exhibited more favorable outcomes than did controls [34.0 vs. 22.7%; odds ratio (OR): 1.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27–1.42], and the effectiveness was consistent in all subgroups. Although patients in the standard-dose group (n = 182) were younger than those in the low-dose (n = 192) group, the proportions of patients with favorable outcomes (36.3 vs. 31.8%; OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.80–1.88) and symptomatic hemorrhage (2.8 vs 4.2%; OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.21–2.02) were consistently comparable in a covariate-adjusted model and an age-matched cohort. In the subgroup analysis, patients with cardioembolism, atrial fibrillation, and hypercholesterolemia were more likely to achieve favorable outcomes after receiving standard-dose than low-dose alteplase.

Conclusion

In the 3–4.5 h time window, the effectiveness and safety of standard-dose and low-dose alteplase may be comparable. A standard dose may be selected for patients with cardioembolism, atrial fibrillation, or hypercholesterolemia.

Controversies in cerebrovascular disease: High or low doses of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator to treat acute stroke? A literature review

INTRODUCTION

The use of low doses of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) was initially proposed in Asian countries in response to racial peculiarities related to the functionality of fibrinogen and coagulation factors that potentially increased the risk of intracerebral haemorrhage, and with a view to saving costs. In view of the controversy over the use of rt-PA below the standard dose, we conducted a literature review of studies promoting the use of low doses or comparing different doses of rt-PA.

DEVELOPMENT

We reviewed 198 abstracts related to the search terms and the full texts of 52 studies published in the last 30 years. We finally included 13 randomised clinical trials aiming to determine the efficacy and safety of the use of rt-PA at different doses in acute stroke, 14 observational cohort studies, 5 meta-analyses, and 3 systematic reviews.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to classify low doses of rt-PA as superior or at least not inferior to the standard treatment in the management of acute stroke in western populations. More clinical trials are required to determine whether the use of low doses is beneficial in patients with relative contraindications for thrombolytic therapy or other particular circumstances that may increase the risk of intracerebral haemorrhage.

The claw sign predicts first-pass effect in mechanical thrombectomy for cerebral large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation

Background:

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for acute cerebral large vessel occlusion (LVO). Complete recanalization of vessels in a single procedure is defined as the first-pass effect (FPE) and is associated with good prognosis. In this study, angiographic clot protruding sign termed the “claw sign,” was examined as candidate preoperative imaging factor for predicting the FPE.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed data from 91 consecutive patients treated for acute LVO in the anterior circulation by MT between January 2014 and December 2019. The claw sign was defined as a thrombus that protruded proximally by more than half of the diameter of the parent artery. Radiological findings such as claw sign, clinical and etiological features, and outcomes were compared between groups with and without successful FPE. Multivariate analysis was conducted to evaluate perioperative factors associated with FPE.

Results:

FPE was achieved in 26 of 91 (28.6%) patients and the claw sign was observed in 34 of 91 (37.4%) patients. The claw sign was significantly more frequent in the successful FPE group than in the failed FPE group (53.8% vs. 30.8%; P = 0.040). After the multivariate analysis, the claw sign was the only pretreatment parameter that could predict FPE (odds ratio, 2.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–7.06; P = 0.047).

Conclusion:

The claw sign is an angiographic imaging factor that might predict FPE after MT for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke.

Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Quantitative Systematic Review

The prevalence and risk factors of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) after acute ischemic stroke HT have not been adequately delineated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify English-language prospective observational MEDLINE and EMBASE-listed reports of acute ischemic stroke with HT published from 1985–2017. Studies that used the ECASS-2 definitions of hemorrhagic transformation subtypes, hemorrhagic infarction (HI), and parenchymal hematoma (PH) were included. Patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) were compared with those who did not receive thrombolysis. A total of 65 studies with 17,259 patients met inclusion criteria. Overall, HT prevalence was 27%; 32% in patients receiving IV-tPA vs. 20% in those without. Overall PH prevalence was 9%; 12% in IV-tPA treated patients vs. 5% in those without. HT was associated with a history of atrial fibrillation (OR 2.94) and use of anticoagulants (OR 2.47). HT patients had higher NIHSS (Hedge’s-G 0.96) and larger infarct volume (diffusion-weighted MRI, Hedge’s-G 0.8). In IV-tPA treated patients, PH correlated with antiplatelet (OR 3) and statin treatment (OR 4). HT (OR 3) and PH (OR 8) were associated with a poor outcome at 90-day (mRS 5–6). Hemorrhagic transformation is a frequent complication of acute ischemic stroke and is associated with poor outcome. Recognition of risk factors for HT and PH may reduce their incidence and severity.

Comparison of Different Dosages of Alteplase in Atrial Fibrillation-Related Acute Ischemic Stroke After Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Nationwide, Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study in Taiwan

Background

Insufficient evidence is available for patients with acute ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation (AF) to determine the efficacy and safety of different dosages of intravenous thrombolysis treatment. This study examined clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with stroke with and without AF after intravenous thrombolysis treatment with different intravenous thrombolysis doses.

Methods and Results

This multicenter, prospective cohort study recruited 2351 patients with acute ischemic stroke (1371 with AF and 980 without AF) treated with intravenous thrombolysis using alteplase. The Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events score is a validated risk‐scoring tool used for assessing patients with acute ischemic stroke with and without AF. We evaluated favorable functional outcome at day 90 and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 24 to 36 hours and outcomes of the patients receiving different doses of alteplase. Compared with the non‐AF group, the AF group exhibited a 2‐ to 3‐fold increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage according to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke standard (relative risk [RR], 2.10 [95% CI, 1.35–3.26]). Favorable functional outcome at 90 days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates according to the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II and the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke‐Monitoring Study standards did not significantly differ between the AF and non‐AF groups. In addition, the low‐dose alteplase subgroup exhibited an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage according to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke standard (RR, 2.84 [95% CI, 1.63–4.96]). A validation study confirmed these findings after adjustment for scores determined using different stroke risk‐scoring tools.

Conclusions

Different alteplase dosages did not affect functional status at 90 days in the AF and non‐AF groups. Thus, the adoption of low‐dose alteplase simply because of AF is not recommended.

Our Efforts for Ideal Stroke Prevention and Treatment in Japan

In the present short review for the Sherman Award, Dr Yamaguchi introduces studies at the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, which included development of intravenous thrombolysis using low-dose alteplase that was officially approved in Japan, long-term dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol together with aspirin or clopidogrel, and others. He also discusses efforts to ensure the passage of the "Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease Control Act," the aims of which are better primary prevention, better acute treatment, rehabilitation, and secondary prevention of stroke for people living in Japan.

Low-cost alternatives for the management of acute ischemic stroke in low and middle-income countries

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients arriving within a suitable time frame are treated with recanalization therapy i.e. intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase and/or mechanical thrombectomy (MT). IVT with alteplase is indicated in AIS patients presenting within 4.5 hours of onset regardless of vascular territory involved. MT is indicated in AIS patients presenting within 24 hours of onset with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. However, MT is ludicrously expensive and requires exorbitant setup, devices, and expertise which is not currently feasible in LMICs. Therefore, in LMICs the only feasible recanalization option left for AIS patients is IVT. The cost of IVT varies across the LMICs, however, most of them cost around 2000-5000 USD. Apart from IVT, patients with AIS often have other significant medical costs including those for neuroimaging, intensive care, and prolonged rehabilitative treatment. In LMICs, these costs can only be afforded by a handful of patients. The majority of the LMICs have health insurance in their infancy and family members of AIS patients opt-out IVT due to the economic burden. In general, the current treatment guidelines for AIS are not very useful in LMICs because of cost-related issues among several other factors. In this editorial, we discuss evidence for alternative treatment strategies that can help tackle the rising epidemic of AIS in poor countries by improvising on existing clinical guidelines and seeking alternative treatment regimens.

Outcomes of stroke patients undergoing thrombolysis in Sri Lanka; an observational prospective study from a low-middle income country

Background

Stroke related deaths are relatively higher in low- and middle-income countries where only a fraction of eligible patients undergo thrombolysis. There is also limited evidence on post-thrombolysis outcomes of patients from Asian countries in these income bands.

Methods

This is a single center prospective observational study of a patient cohort with acute ischaemic stroke, undergoing thrombolysis with alteplase (low and standard dose), over a 24-month period in 2019/2020. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) for dependency at 3 months (primary outcome), duration of hospital stay, incidence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages and all-cause mortality at 3 months (secondary outcomes) were recorded. Demographic, clinical and treatment related factors associated with these outcomes were explored.

Results

Eighty-nine patients (males – 61, 69%, mean age: 60 years ±12.18) were recruited. Time from symptom onset to reperfusion was 174 min ± 56.50. Fifty-one patients were independent according to mRS, 11 (12.4%) patients died, and 11 (12.5%) developed symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages by 3 months. Functional independence at 3 months was independently associated with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on admission (p < 0.05). Thrombolysis with low dose alteplase did not lead to better or worse outcomes compared to standard dose.

Conclusions

On admission NIHSS is predictive of functional independence at 3 months post-thrombolysis. Low dose alteplase may be as efficacious as standard dose alteplase with associated cost savings, but this needs to be confirmed by a prospective clinical trial for the Sri Lankan population.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-021-02475-3.

Human urinary kallidinogenase in acute ischemic stroke: A single-arm, multicenter, phase IV study (RESK study)

Aims

Human urinary kallidinogenase (HUK) has shown favorable efficacies in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment. We sought confirmation of the safety and efficacy of HUK for AIS in a large population.

Methods

RESK study enrolled patients with AIS of anterior circulation to receive HUK infusion. The primary endpoint was the incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints assessed neurological and functional improvements and stroke recurrent rate.

Results

Of 1206 eligible patients, 1202 patients received at least one dose of HUK infusion and 983 (81.5%) completed the study. The incidence of treatment‐emergent AEs and serious AEs were 55.99% and 2.41%, respectively. Pre‐specified AEs of special interest occurred in 21.71% of patients, but the majority were mild and unrelated to therapy. Hypertension, age, treatment time, and drug combination were identified to be associated with drug‐related blood pressure reduction. Neurological and functional evaluations revealed favorable outcomes from baseline to post‐treatment assessment. The cumulative recurrence rate of stroke was 2.50% during the 90‐day assessment.

Conclusion

HUK had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile in AIS patients. Besides, HUK demonstrated the neurological and functional improvements in AIS, further confirming its clinical efficacy in a real‐world large population.

Intravenous Alteplase is Associated with First Pass Effect in Stent-retriever but not ADAPT Thrombectomy : Post Hoc Analysis of the SKIP Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of alteplase, either combined with stent-retriever thrombectomy or a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT), in patients with large-vessel occlusion stroke.

METHODS

This was a retrospective post hoc analysis of data from The Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute LVO Stroke (SKIP) study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the first-line thrombectomy technique: stent-retriever and ADAPT. Each group was further divided into two subgroups, namely MT and MT + alteplase. The procedural outcomes, such as first pass effect (FPE) ratio and number of passes, were evaluated. The clinical outcomes included mRS score at 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 180 patients were included (116 in the stent-retriever group and 64 in the ADAPT group). No interaction was detected between the first-line technique and alteplase administration. In the stent-retriever group, after adjusting for factors associated with FPE, the adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of FPE of the MT + alteplase subgroup versus the MT subgroup was 3.57 (1.5-8.48) and in the ADAPT group it was 1.35 (0.37-4.91). With alteplase, the number of passes decreased with adjusted odds ratios of 0.59 (0.37-0.93) in the stent-retriever group but not in the ADAPT group. In both first-line technique groups, clinical outcomes did not differ between subgroups.

CONCLUSION

In the SKIP study, alteplase administration was associated with increased FPE when combined with stent-retriever thrombectomy, but not with ADAPT. We found no differences in the clinical outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (TRACE): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) controlled phase II study

Background

Tenecteplase (TNK) possesses several pharmacological characteristics superior to conventional alteplase (rt-PA), with well-established safety and efficacy profile in Caucasians. There exists controversy over the optimal dose of intravenous rt-PA for East Asians with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Current study aimed to determine the safety dose range of recombinant human TNK tissue-type plasminogen activator (rhTNK-tPA) for patients with AIS in China.

Methods

This multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end-point, phase II study compared three tiers of 0.1, 0.25, 0.32 mg/kg rhTNK-tPA (to a maximum of 40 mg) with standard 0.9 mg/kg rt-PA (to a maximum of 90 mg) in patients who were eligible for intravenous thrombolysis. The safety outcome were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) within 36 hours.

Results

Between May 2018 and February 2020, 240 patients were randomly assigned to four group, 4 of whom did not receive study treatment. The intention-to-treat analysis included 236 patients. There was no difference in the improvement on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at day 14 in the 3 tiers and control group (63.3%, 77.2%, 66.7% vs 62.7%). The number of sICH was 3 of 60 (5.0%) in the 0.1 mg/kg group, none in the 0.25 mg/kg group, 2 of 60 (3.3%) in the 0.32 mg/kg group and 1 (1.7%) of 59 in the rt-PA group. There were no significant between-group differences in severe adverse events.

Conclusions

Similar to the Caucasians, rhTNK-tPA was well tolerated in Chinese patients with AIS at all doses administered within 3 hours of symptom onset. The dose-efficacy profile of rhTNK-tPA needs to be established with future investigations.

Trial registration number

NCT04676659.

Effect of erroneous body-weight estimation on outcome of thrombolyzed stroke patients

Intravenously administered tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA), dose determined by patients' body-weight, remains the only approved drug treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Since a shorter onset-to-treatment time results in better functional outcome, treatment is often initiated according to the estimated or last-known body-weight of the patient. This approach may result in underdosing or overdosing of tPA. In this multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated the extent of error in tPA dosing in our AIS cohort and its impact on functional outcome and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH). Consecutive AIS patients, receiving IV-tPA, dose determined by the estimated body-weight, at three tertiary centers between January and December 2017 were included. Collected data included information about demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, stroke subtype and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Estimated and measured body-weights were recorded. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 2 or more defined unfavorable outcome. The study included 150 patients. Median age was 64 -years (IQR 55-75) with male preponderance (67%) and median NIHSS score of 9 points (IQR 6-17). Mean measured weight of our study population was 58 (SD 13) kg. Median difference between actual and estimated body-weight was 3 kg (IQR 1.5-6). Difference was more than 10% in 35 (23.3%) patients. Good functional outcome (mRS 0-1) was achieved by 74 (49.3%) patients and 10 (6.8%) developed SICH. NIHSS (OR 1.288; 95% CI 1.157-1.435, p < 0.001) and large artery atherosclerosis (OR 5.878; 95% CI 1.929-17.910, p = 0.002) were independent predictors of unfavorable functional outcome. Our finding of the statistically insignificant 2.5-fold increase in poor outcomes among patients where the estimated and actual weight differed by more than 10% should be interpreted with caution due to the limited sample size. Significant difference occurs between estimated and actual body-weight in a considerable proportion of thrombolysed AIS patients. However, this discrepancy does not affect functional outcome or the risk of SICH.

Current approach to acute stroke management

There have been marked improvements in the management of stroke in Australia over the past two decades. The greatest benefit has accrued from public health measures including reduced smoking rates and treatment of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia. Recent advances in recanalisation therapy offer the chance of recovery to a subset of people who have a stroke. For many patients, stroke remains an illness with a devastating impact on their quality of life. Reducing the burden of stroke requires intervention across the health system from primary prevention through diagnosis, acute treatment, rehabilitation and secondary prevention. In this review, we will cover the changes in the epidemiology of stroke, public health measures in primary prevention of stroke, and acute management and secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke and primary intracerebral haemorrhage.

Low versus standard dose intravenous alteplase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in Egyptian patients

Objectives:

To assess low dose altepase outcome and safety in comparison with a standard-dose regimen for acute ischemic stroke treatment in Egyptian patients.

Materials:

An observational prospective cohort non-randomized single blinded study was carried out during the period from November 2017 to December 2018. Eighty Egyptian acute ischemic stroke patients, all eligible for intravenous alteplase, were subdivided into 2 groups (40 patients in each group). Patients were thrombolysed at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg in the first group and 0.9 mg/kg in the second group. Both groups were compared in regard to safety and outcome. Safety was expressed by the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and 3 months mortality, while outcome was expressed by favorable outcomes at three months (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] of 0 to 2).

Results:

In the first group, 69.2% (n=27) achieved favorable outcomes at 90 days compared with 64.1% (n=25) in the second group (p=0.631). Ninety-day mortality was 5% (n=2) in the first group versus 2.5% (n=1) in the second group (p=0.556). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was noted in 3 patients in the second group and zero patients in the first group (p=0.077).

Conclusion:

Low-dose alteplase could be a practical alternative for Egyptian populations with acute ischemic stroke especially in 3 to 4.5 hours window.

Pre-treatment of Single and Double Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant With Intravenous Thrombolysis for Older Adults With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The TTT-AIS Experience

Background: This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of single antiplatelet, anticoagulant and Dual Antiplatelet pre-treatment (DAPP) in older, moderate to high severity acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted to monitor the development of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and functional outcomes at 90 days. Two different dosages of alteplase were used for IVT. Logistic regression models were used for analysis of the safety and efficacy outcomes. Results: A total of 1,156 patients were enrolled and categorized into six groups based on their pre-treatment medications: (1) aspirin (n = 213), (2) clopidogrel (n = 37), (3) DAPP of aspirin + clopidogrel (n= 27), (4) warfarin (n = 44), (5) any of the above pre-medications (n = 331), and (6) none of these medications as controls (n = 825). The DAPP group showed significantly increased SICH by the NINDS (adjusted OR: 4.90, 95% CI 1.28-18.69) and the ECASS II (adjusted OR: 5.09, 95% CI: 1.01-25.68) standards. The aspirin group was found to significantly improve the favorable functional outcome of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-1 (adjusted OR: 1.91, 95% CI, 1.31.2.78), but no significance for mRS of 0-2 (adjusted OR: 1.39, 95% CI, 0.97-1.99). The DAPP group also significantly increased mortality (adjusted OR: 4.75, 95% CI: 1.77-12.72). A significant interaction between different dosages for IVT and the functional status was noted. Compared to standard dose, the DAPP group showed higher proportions of disability and mortality with low dose of IVT. Conclusion: For older adults with higher baseline severity of acute ischemic stroke, DAPP may increase the risk of SICH and mortality post IVT. However, DAPP is still not an indication to withdraw IVT and to prescribe low-dose IVT for older adults.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke

Intravenous thrombolysis is the only approved systemic reperfusion treatment for patients with acute ischaemic stroke. These European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations to assist physicians in their clinical decisions with regard to intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. These guidelines were developed based on the ESO standard operating procedure and followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The working group identified relevant clinical questions, performed systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and wrote recommendations. Expert consensus statements were provided if not enough evidence was available to provide recommendations based on the GRADE approach. We found high quality evidence to recommend intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase to improve functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 h after symptom onset. We also found high quality evidence to recommend intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke on awakening from sleep, who were last seen well more than 4.5 h earlier, who have MRI DWI-FLAIR mismatch, and for whom mechanical thrombectomy is not planned. These guidelines provide further recommendations regarding patient subgroups, late time windows, imaging selection strategies, relative and absolute contraindications to alteplase, and tenecteplase. Intravenous thrombolysis remains a cornerstone of acute stroke management. Appropriate patient selection and timely treatment are crucial. Further randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to inform clinical decision-making with regard to tenecteplase and the use of intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion.

Differences between predictive factors for early neurological deterioration due to hemorrhagic and ischemic insults following intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator

Early neurological deterioration (END) following intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) treatment is a serious clinical event that can be caused by hemorrhagic or ischemic insult. We investigated the differences in predictive factors for END due to hemorrhagic and END due to ischemic insults. Consecutive patients from four hospitals who received 0.6 mg/kg intravenous rt-PA for acute ischemic stroke were retrospectively recruited. END was defined as a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 4 points within 24 h compared with baseline. END was classified into those due to hemorrhagic (END_h) or ischemic (END_i) insult based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. Risk factors associated with END_h and END_i were investigated by comparison with non-END cases. A total of 744 patients (452 men, median 75 years old) were included. END was observed in 79 patients (10.6%), including 22 END_h (3.0%) and 57 END_i (7.7%), which occurred within a median of 7 h after treatment. Multivariate analyses showed that higher pretreatment NIHSS score (odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00–1.13) and pretreatment with antiplatelets (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.08–7.72) were associated with END_h. Extensive early ischemic change (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score ≤ 7 on CT or ≤ 6 on diffusion-weighted imaging; OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.36–5.64) and large artery occlusions (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.53–6.57) were associated with END_i. Distinct factors were predictive for the END subtypes. These findings could help develop preventative measures for END in patients with the identified risk factors.

Alteplase and Adjuvant Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a time sensitive medical emergency and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV alteplase) is currently the only proven effective medication for the treatment of AIS with promising adjuvant medications currently under investigation. Recent advances in endovascular thrombectomy have broadened therapeutic options in specific patient populations, with modern treatment strategies utilizing advanced imaging modalities to extend the window for treatment. In all cases, rapid treatment remains a priority. The future of IV alteplase and the changing standard for treatment of AIS remain unwritten with the increasing evidence for imaging selection for both endovascular thrombectomy and IV alteplase, while novel adjuncts are under investigation. In this article, we review the history of IV alteplase investigations for stroke, evidence for thrombectomy as an adjunct to IV alteplase, and the potential of novel adjuvant therapeutics currently under investigation.