The influence of noninvasive tests on the selection of patients for carotid angiography

Redefined duplex ultrasonographic criteria for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate duplex ultrasonographic criteria for the determination of 50% or more and 70% or more stenosis of the diameter of the internal carotid artery based on conventional angiography in order to align ultrasonographic diagnostic categories with current clinical management schemes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1, 1995, and June 30, 1999, 915 patients underwent both carotid duplex ultrasonography and cerebral angiography within 30 days at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Of these patients, 294 were excluded from this study because of occlusion of one or both of the internal carotid arteries or atypical flow characteristics. In the remaining 621 patients (61 % male, 39% female; mean age, 67.7 years [range, 14-88 years]), 1218 vessels were available for correlation. Several Doppler ultrasonographic velocity variables were compared with the angiographic findings by use of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The primary end point was verification of optimal ultrasonographic criteria to diagnose 70% or more internal carotid artery stenosis. The secondary end point was establishment of threshold values to detect stenosis of 50% or more.

RESULTS

At angiography, 382 patients had internal carotid arteries with 70% or more stenosis. Peak systolic and end diastolic velocities of the internal carotid artery and internal carotid artery:common carotid artery peak systolic velocity ratios were measured. For an internal carotid artery stenosis of 70% or more, a peak systolic velocity of 230 cm/s or more resulted in a sensitivity of 86.4%, a specificity of 90.1%, a positive predictive value of 82.7%, a negative predictive value of 92.3%, and an accuracy of 88.8%. An end diastolic velocity of 70 cm/s or more and an internal carotid artery:common carotid artery ratio of 3.2 or more yielded similar values. For an internal carotid artery stenosis of 50% or more, a peak systolic velocity of 130 cm/s or more resulted in a sensitivity of 92.1 %, a specificity of 89.5%, a positive predictive value of 90.3%, a negative predictive value of 91.3%, and an overall accuracy of 90.8%. An internal carotid artery:common carotid artery ratio of 1.6 or more yielded similar values.

CONCLUSION

In our ultrasonography laboratory, a carotid artery stenosis of 70% or more (for which carotid endarterectomy is typically recommended in symptomatic patients) is diagnosed reliably with the following duplex ultrasonographic criteria: a peak systolic velocity of 230 cm/s or more, an end diastolic velocity of 70 cm/s or more, or an internal carotid artery:common carotid artery ratio of 3.2 or more.

Recent advances in imaging of cerebrovascular disease

The recent advances made in CT and MR imaging have led to increased accuracy in making a number of diagnoses in the emergency room setting. Increasingly, radiologists are asked to perform these studies and accurately interpret the findings, which often have a dramatic impact on triaging and treatment of the patient. Future trials need to address further the relative merits of each of the techniques outlined previously in specific settings. In addition, given the increasing number of means of obtaining diagnostic information, cost effectiveness studies are needed to better formulate an appropriate algorithm for each diagnosis.

Cerebral angiography for cerebrovascular disease: the risks

Cerebral angiography is still suggested as a first line investigation for patients with putative transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) and it is considered by most surgeons as a necessary prelude to carotid endarterectomy. That conventional cerebral angiography involves risk is well known, although the magnitude of this risk is not. Prospective studies of cerebral complications from this technique, published over the last decade, have been analysed to show that the major stroke rate after conventional cerebral angiography for patients with TIAs is likely to be about 2.4 per cent. This must be taken into account if the true morbidity of carotid endarterectomy is to be appreciated (assuming conventional angiograms have been used). Furthermore, since many sufferers are assessed by angiography but not submitted to surgery, a policy of conventional angiography for patients with TIAs puts a far greater number at risk than that actually having carotid endarterectomy.