Venous thromboembolism: risk factors, biomarkers, and treatment

A collagen I derived matricryptin increases aorta vascular wall remodeling after induced thrombosis in mouse

Matricryptins are collagen fragments proteolytically released from the extracellular matrix (ECM) with biological activity that can regulate several processes involved in ECM remodeling. Vessel wall matrix reorganization after lesion is important to the recovery of vascular function. This study aimed to analyze the effect of the peptide p1158/59 (Lindsey, 2015) on thrombosis, neointimal formation, and vascular remodeling of C57BL6 mice abdominal aorta. We used a FeCl₃ induced vascular injury mice model and analyzed thrombus size, neointima formation, gelatinase activities in situ, re-endothelization, and collagen fibers organization on the arterial wall using polarization microscopy. As result, we observed that 2 days after injury the treatment with p1158/59 increased thrombus size and gelatinase activity, vascular lesion and it did not recover the endothelium loss induced by the chemical injury. We also observed that the peptide increased neointima growth and collagen birefringence, indicating collagen fibers reorganization. It also promoted increased re-endothelization and decreased activity of gelatinases 14 days after injury. Thus, we conclude that the peptide p1158/59 impaired the initial thrombosis recovery 2 days after injury but was able to induce vascular ECM remodeling after 14 days, improving vessel re-endothelization, collagen fibers deposition, and organization.

Venous Thromboembolism Research Priorities: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Venous thromboembolism is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The impact of the US Surgeon General's The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in 2008 has been lower than expected given the public health impact of this disease. This scientific statement highlights future research priorities in venous thromboembolism, developed by experts and a crowdsourcing survey across 16 scientific organizations. At the fundamental research level (T0), researchers need to identify pathobiological causative mechanisms for the 50% of patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism and to better understand mechanisms that differentiate hemostasis from thrombosis. At the human level (T1), new methods for diagnosing, treating, and preventing venous thromboembolism will allow tailoring of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to individuals. At the patient level (T2), research efforts are required to understand how foundational evidence impacts care of patients (eg, biomarkers). New treatments, such as catheter-based therapies, require further testing to identify which patients are most likely to experience benefit. At the practice level (T3), translating evidence into practice remains challenging. Areas of overuse and underuse will require evidence-based tools to improve care delivery. At the community and population level (T4), public awareness campaigns need thorough impact assessment. Large population-based cohort studies can elucidate the biological and environmental underpinnings of venous thromboembolism and its complications. To achieve these goals, funding agencies and training programs must support a new generation of scientists and clinicians who work in multidisciplinary teams to solve the pressing public health problem of venous thromboembolism.

Venous thromboembolism research priorities: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The impact of the Surgeon General's Call to Action in 2008 has been lower than expected given the public health impact of this disease. This scientific statement highlights future research priorities in VTE, developed by experts and a crowdsourcing survey across 16 scientific organizations. At the fundamental research level (T0), researchers need to identify pathobiologic causative mechanisms for the 50% of patients with unprovoked VTE and better understand mechanisms that differentiate hemostasis from thrombosis. At the human level (T1), new methods for diagnosing, treating, and preventing VTE will allow tailoring of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to individuals. At the patient level (T2), research efforts are required to understand how foundational evidence impacts care of patients (eg, biomarkers). New treatments, such as catheter-based therapies, require further testing to identify which patients are most likely to experience benefit. At the practice level (T3), translating evidence into practice remains challenging. Areas of overuse and underuse will require evidence-based tools to improve care delivery. At the community and population level (T4), public awareness campaigns need thorough impact assessment. Large population-based cohort studies can elucidate the biologic and environmental underpinings of VTE and its complications. To achieve these goals, funding agencies and training programs must support a new generation of scientists and clinicians who work in multidisciplinary teams to solve the pressing public health problem of VTE.