New pharmacological agents for arrhythmias

Comparative Study of Receptor-, Receptor State-, and Membrane-Dependent Cholesterol Binding Sites in A2A and A1 Adenosine Receptors Using Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulations

We used coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CG MD) simulations to study protein-cholesterol interactions for different activation states of the A_2A adenosine receptor (A_2AR) and the A₁ adenosine receptor (A₁R) and predict new cholesterol binding sites indicating amino acid residues with a high residence time in three biologically relevant membranes. Compared to 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC)-cholesterol and POPC-phosphatidylinositol-bisphosphate (PIP₂)-cholesterol, the plasma mimetic membrane best described the cholesterol binding sites previously detected for the inactive state of A_2AR and revealed the binding sites with long-lasting amino acid residues. We observed that using the plasma mimetic membrane and plotting residues with cholesterol residence time ≥2 μs, our CG MD simulations captured most obviously the cholesterol-protein interactions. For the inactive A_2AR, we identified one more binding site in which cholesterol is bound to residues with a long residence time compared to the previously detected, for the active A₁R, three binding sites, and for the inactive A₁R, two binding sites. We calculated that for the active states, cholesterol binds to residues with a much longer residence time compared to the inactive state for both A_2AR and A₁R. The stability of the identified binding sites to A₁R or A_2AR with CG MD simulations was additionally investigated with potential of mean force calculations using umbrella sampling. We observed that the binding sites with residues to which cholesterol has a long residence time in A_2AR have shallow binding free energy minima compared to the related binding sites in A₁R, suggesting a stronger binding for cholesterol to A₁R. The differences in binding sites in which cholesterol is stabilized and interacts with residues with a long residence time between active and inactive states of A₁R and A_2AR can be important for differences in functional activity and orthosteric agonist or antagonist affinity and can be used for the design of allosteric modulators, which can bind through lipid pathways. We observed a stronger binding for cholesterol to A₁R (i.e., generally higher association rates) compared to A_2AR, which remains to be demonstrated. For the active states, cholesterol binds to residues with much longer residence times compared to the inactive state for both A_2AR and A₁R. Taken together, binding sites of active A₁R may be considered as promising allosteric targets.

C2-linked alkynyl poly-ethylene glycol(PEG) adenosine conjugates as water-soluble adenosine receptor agonists

A series of 12 novel polyethylene-glycol(PEG)-alkynyl C2-adenosine(ADN) conjugates were synthesized using a robust Sonogashira coupling protocol and characterized by NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry analysis. The ADN-PEG conjugates showed null to moderate toxicity in murine macrophages and 12c was active against Mycobacterium aurum growth (MIC = 62.5 mg/L). The conjugates were not active against Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Conjugates 10b and 11b exhibited high water solubility with solubility values of 1.22 and 1.18 mg/ml, respectively, in phosphate buffer solutions at pH 6.8. Further, 10b and 11b induced a significant increase in cAMP accumulation in RAW264.7 cells comparable with that induced by adenosine. Analogues 10c, 11c and 12c were docked to the A₁ , A_2A , A_2B and A₃ adenosine receptors (ARs) using crystal-structures and homology models. ADN-PEG-conjugates bearing chains with up to five ethyleneoxy units could be well accommodated within the binding sites of A₁ , A_2A and A₃ ARs. Docking studies showed that compound 10b and 11b were the best A_2A receptor binders of the series, whereas 12c was the best binder for A₁ AR. In summary, introduction of hydrophilic PEG substituents at the C2 of adenine ring significantly improved water solubility and did not affect AR binding properties of the ADN-PEG conjugates.

Targeted Treatment of Inappropriate Sinoatrial Node Tachycardia Based on Electrophysiological and Structural Mechanisms

The purpose of this review is to determine the causal mechanisms and treatment of inappropriate sinoatrial tachycardia (IST), defined as a non-physiological elevation in resting heart rate. IST is defined as a resting daytime sinus rate >100 beats/minute and an average 24-hour heart rate >90 beats/minute. Potential causal mechanisms include sympathetic receptor hypersensitivity, blunted parasympathetic tone, or enhanced intrinsic automaticity within the sinoatrial node (SAN) pacemaker-conduction complex. These anomalies may coexist in the same patient. Recent ex-vivo near-infrared transmural optical imaging of the SAN in human and animal hearts provides important insights into the functional and molecular features of this complex structure. In particular, it reveals the existence of preferential sinoatrial conduction pathways that ensure robust SAN activation with electrical conduction. The mechanism of IST is debated because even high-resolution electroanatomical mapping approaches cannot reveal intramural conduction in the 3-dimensional SAN complex. It may be secondary to enhanced automaticity, intranodal re-entry, or sinoatrial conduction pathway re-entry. Different pharmacological approaches can target these mechanisms. Long-acting β blockers in IST can act on both primarily increased automaticity and dysregulated autonomic system. Ivabradine targets sources of increased SAN automaticity. Conventional or hybrid ablation may target all the described abnormalities. This review provides a state-of-the-art overview of putative IST mechanisms. In conclusion, based on current knowledge, pharmacological and ablation approaches for IST, including the novel hybrid SAN sparing ablation, are discussed.

Role of Adenosine and Purinergic Receptors in Myocardial Infarction: Focus on Different Signal Transduction Pathways

Myocardial infarction (MI) is a dramatic event often caused by atherosclerotic plaque erosion or rupture and subsequent thrombotic occlusion of a coronary vessel. The low supply of oxygen and nutrients in the infarcted area may result in cardiomyocytes necrosis, replacement of intact myocardium with non-contractile fibrous tissue and left ventricular (LV) function impairment if blood flow is not quickly restored. In this review, we summarized the possible correlation between adenosine system, purinergic system and Wnt/β-catenin pathway and their role in the pathogenesis of cardiac damage following MI. In this context, several pathways are involved and, in particular, the adenosine receptors system shows different interactions between its members and purinergic receptors: their modulation might be effective not only for a normal functional recovery but also for the treatment of heart diseases, thus avoiding fibrosis, reducing infarcted area and limiting scaring. Similarly, it has been shown that Wnt/β catenin pathway is activated following myocardial injury and its unbalanced activation might promote cardiac fibrosis and, consequently, LV systolic function impairment. In this regard, the therapeutic benefits of Wnt inhibitors use were highlighted, thus demonstrating that Wnt/β-catenin pathway might be considered as a therapeutic target to prevent adverse LV remodeling and heart failure following MI.

Medicinal Chemistry and Therapeutic Potential of Agonists, Antagonists and Allosteric Modulators of A1 Adenosine Receptor: Current Status and Perspectives

Adenosine is a purine nucleoside, responsible for the regulation of a wide range of physiological and pathophysiological conditions by binding with four G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), namely A1, A2A, A2B and A3 adenosine receptors (ARs). In particular, A1 AR is ubiquitously present, mediating a variety of physiological processes throughout the body, thus represents a promising drug target for the management of various pathological conditions. Agonists of A1 AR are found to be useful for the treatment of atrial arrhythmia, angina, type-2 diabetes, glaucoma, neuropathic pain, epilepsy, depression and Huntington's disease, whereas antagonists are being investigated for the treatment of diuresis, congestive heart failure, asthma, COPD, anxiety and dementia. However, treatment with full A1 AR agonists has been associated with numerous challenges like cardiovascular side effects, off-target activation as well as desensitization of A1 AR leading to tachyphylaxis. In this regard, partial agonists of A1 AR have been found to be beneficial in enhancing insulin sensitivity and subsequently reducing blood glucose level, while avoiding severe CVS side effects and tachyphylaxis. Allosteric enhancer of A1 AR is found to be potent for the treatment of neuropathic pain, culminating the side effects related to off-target tissue activation of A1 AR. This review provides an overview of the medicinal chemistry and therapeutic potential of various agonists/partial agonists, antagonists and allosteric modulators of A1 AR, with a particular emphasis on their current status and future perspectives in clinical settings.

Focusing on Adenosine Receptors as a Potential Targeted Therapy in Human Diseases

Adenosine is involved in a range of physiological and pathological effects through membrane-bound receptors linked to G proteins. There are four subtypes of adenosine receptors, described as A1AR, A2AAR, A2BAR, and A3AR, which are the center of cAMP signal pathway-based drug development. Several types of agonists, partial agonists or antagonists, and allosteric substances have been synthesized from these receptors as new therapeutic drug candidates. Research efforts surrounding A1AR and A2AAR are perhaps the most enticing because of their concentration and affinity; however, as a consequence of distressing conditions, both A2BAR and A3AR levels might accumulate. This review focuses on the biological features of each adenosine receptor as the basis of ligand production and describes clinical studies of adenosine receptor-associated pharmaceuticals in human diseases.

Historical and Current Adenosine Receptor Agonists in Preclinical and Clinical Development

Adenosine receptors (ARs) function in the body’s response to conditions of pathology and stress associated with a functional imbalance, such as in the supply and demand of energy/oxygen/nutrients. Extracellular adenosine concentrations vary widely to raise or lower the basal activation of four subtypes of ARs. Endogenous adenosine can correct an energy imbalance during hypoxia and other stress, for example, by slowing the heart rate by A₁AR activation or increasing the blood supply to heart muscle by the A_2AAR. Moreover, exogenous AR agonists, antagonists, or allosteric modulators can be applied for therapeutic benefit, and medicinal chemists working toward that goal have reported thousands of such agents. Thus, numerous clinical trials have ensued, using promising agents to modulate adenosinergic signaling, most of which have not succeeded. Currently, short-acting, parenteral agonists, adenosine and Regadenoson, are the only AR agonists approved for human use. However, new concepts and compounds are currently being developed and applied toward preclinical and clinical evaluation, and initial results are encouraging. This review focuses on key compounds as AR agonists and positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) for disease treatment or diagnosis. AR agonists for treating inflammation, pain, cancer, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, angina, sickle cell disease, ischemic conditions and diabetes have been under development. Multiple clinical trials with two A₃AR agonists are ongoing.

Historical and Current Adenosine Receptor Agonists in Preclinical and Clinical Development

Adenosine receptors (ARs) function in the body's response to conditions of pathology and stress associated with a functional imbalance, such as in the supply and demand of energy/oxygen/nutrients. Extracellular adenosine concentrations vary widely to raise or lower the basal activation of four subtypes of ARs. Endogenous adenosine can correct an energy imbalance during hypoxia and other stress, for example, by slowing the heart rate by A₁AR activation or increasing the blood supply to heart muscle by the A_2AAR. Moreover, exogenous AR agonists, antagonists, or allosteric modulators can be applied for therapeutic benefit, and medicinal chemists working toward that goal have reported thousands of such agents. Thus, numerous clinical trials have ensued, using promising agents to modulate adenosinergic signaling, most of which have not succeeded. Currently, short-acting, parenteral agonists, adenosine and Regadenoson, are the only AR agonists approved for human use. However, new concepts and compounds are currently being developed and applied toward preclinical and clinical evaluation, and initial results are encouraging. This review focuses on key compounds as AR agonists and positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) for disease treatment or diagnosis. AR agonists for treating inflammation, pain, cancer, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, angina, sickle cell disease, ischemic conditions and diabetes have been under development. Multiple clinical trials with two A₃AR agonists are ongoing.

A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over study assessing the use of XEN-D0103 in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and implanted pacemakers allowing continuous beat-to-beat monitoring of drug efficacy

PURPOSE

The ultrarapid delayed rectifier current (I_Kur) carried by Kv1.5 channels, which are solely expressed in the atrium, is a potential target for safer treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). XEN-D0103 is a nanomolar ion channel blocker that selectively inhibits potassium ion flux through the Kv1.5 ion channel. The efficacy of XEN-D0103 in reducing AF burden was assessed in patients with DDDRp permanent pacemakers (PPMs) and PAF.

METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study was performed in patients with PAF and DDDRp PPMs with advanced atrial and ventricular Holters allowing beat-to-beat arrhythmia follow-up. All anti-arrhythmic drugs were withdrawn before randomised treatment. After baseline assessment, patients were randomly assigned to two treatment periods of placebo then XEN-D0103 50 mg bd, or XEN-D0103 50 mg bd then placebo.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were screened and 21 patients were eligible and included in the randomised trial. All 21 patients completed both treatment periods. The primary endpoint was change in AF burden assessed by PPM. There was no significant difference in AF burden on treatment with XEN-D0103 versus placebo. There was a reduction in the mean frequency of AF episodes (relative reduction 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.77; p < 0.0001). XEN-D0103 was safe and well tolerated, and there were no serious adverse events. XEN-D0103 did not have any apparent effect on heart rate compared to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

XEN-D0103 did not reduce AF burden in patients with PAF and dual chamber pacemakers providing beat-to-beat monitoring. XEN-D0103 was well tolerated and did not have any apparent effect on heart rate. Although single-ion channel blockade with XEN-D0103 did not affect AF in this study, there might be a potential for this agent to be used in combination with other atrially specific drugs in the treatment of AF.

EUDRACT TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

2013-004456-38.

Ivabradine attenuates the anticonvulsant potency of lamotrigine, but not that of lacosamide, pregabalin and topiramate in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice

Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels are involved not only in synaptic transmission and neuronal excitability under physiological conditions, but also in seizure activity. To determine the influence of ivabradine (an HCN channel inhibitor) on the anticonvulsant potency of four novel antiepileptic drugs (AEDs: lacosamide, lamotrigine, pregabalin and topiramate) in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure (MES) model. Adult male albino Swiss mice were challenged with maximal electroconvulsions (electric current of 25mA delivered via auricular electrodes). Total brain concentrations of AEDs were measured with high-pressure liquid chromatography. Ivabradine (10mg/kg, i.p.) significantly reduced the anticonvulsant potency of lamotrigine by elevating the ED₅₀ value of the AED from 7.48 (6.15-9.11) to 10.07 (8.85-11.45) mg/kg (P<0.05) in the mouse MES model. In contrast, ivabradine (10mg/kg, i.p.) did not significantly affect the anticonvulsant potency of lacosamide, pregabalin or topiramate in the mouse MES model. Additionally, ivabradine had no impact on total brain concentrations of all the studied AEDs in mice. A special caution is advised when combining ivabradine with lamotrigine in epilepsy patients due to the possible pharmacodynamic reduction of the anticonvulsant action of the later drug. The combinations of ivabradine with lacosamide, pregabalin and topiramate seem to be pharmacodynamic and neutral from a preclinical viewpoint.

Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Rhythm Control in Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and affects over 33 million people worldwide. AF is associated with stroke and systemic thromboembolism, unpleasant symptoms and reduced quality of life, heart failure, and increased mortality, and treatment of AF and its complications are associated with significant cost. Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) can suppress AF, allowing long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm, and have the potential to relieve symptoms and reverse or prevent adverse effects associated with AF. However, large randomized controlled studies evaluating use of AADs have not demonstrated a clear benefit to maintaining sinus rhythm, and AADs often have significant limitations, including a modest rate of overall success at maintaining sinus rhythm, frequent side effects, and potentially life-threatening toxicities. Although some of the currently available AADs have been available for almost 100 years, better tolerated and more efficacious AADs have recently been developed both for long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm and for chemical cardioversion of AF to sinus rhythm. Advances in automated AF detection with cardiac implantable electronic devices have suggested that AADs might be useful for suppressing AF to allow safe discontinuation of anticoagulation in select patients who are in sinus rhythm for prolonged periods of time. AADs may also have synergistic effects with catheter ablation of AF. This review summarizes the pharmacology and clinical use of currently available AADs for treatment of AF and discusses novel AADs and future directions for rhythm control in AF.

Mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias

Blood circulation is the result of the beating of the heart, which provides the mechanical force to pump oxygenated blood to, and deoxygenated blood away from, the peripheral tissues. This depends critically on the preceding electrical activation. Disruptions in the orderly pattern of this propagating cardiac excitation wave can lead to arrhythmias. Understanding of the mechanisms underlying their generation and maintenance requires knowledge of the ionic contributions to the cardiac action potential, which is discussed in the first part of this review. A brief outline of the different classification systems for arrhythmogenesis is then provided, followed by a detailed discussion for each mechanism in turn, highlighting recent advances in this area.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of dronedarone , a new antiarrhythmic agent for the treatment of atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Dronedarone is a recent antiarrhythmic drug that has been developed for treatment of AF, with electrophysiological properties similar to amiodarone but with a lower incidence of side effects.

AREAS COVERED

This review evaluates the efficacy, safety, tolerability and side effects of dronedarone in the treatment of AF. In particular, the review includes studies comparing: dronedarone and placebo (ANDROMEDA, ATHENA, DAFNE, ERATO, EURIDIS/ADONIS, HESTIA, PALLAS trials), dronedarone and amiodarone (DIONYSOS trial), ranolazine and dronedarone given alone and in combination (HARMONY trial).

EXPERT OPINION

Dronedarone is an interesting antiarrhythmic agent in well-selected groups of patients. It also has several other pleiotropic effects that may potentially be beneficial in clinical practice, such as the reduction of the risk of stroke and acute coronary syndromes. In addition, combination therapies such as those with dronedarone and ranolazine, currently being investigated in the HARMONY trial, may provide another interesting approach to increase the antiarrhythmic efficacy and further reduce the incidence of side effects. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying dronedarone's pleiotropic actions is expected to facilitate the selection of patients benefiting from dronedarone, as well as the development of novel antiarrhythmic drugs for AF.

Pleiotropic effects of antiarrhythmic agents: dronedarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation remains the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice. Dronedarone is an antiarrhythmic drug for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. Dronedarone is an amiodarone derivative developed to reduce the number of extracardiovascular side effects. Dronedarone has undergone extensive experimental and clinical testing during the last decade. On the aggregate, these studies have highlighted a complex set of pleiotropic actions that may contribute to dronedarone's antiarrhythmic effects. In this review, we summarize the clinical studies that have evaluated dronedarone and provide an overview of dronedarone's electrophysiological and nonelectrophysiological pleiotropic actions.

Current and emerging antiarrhythmic drug therapy for ventricular tachycardia

Ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular fibrillation (VF) and sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), are the principal causes of sudden cardiac death in patients with structural heart disease. While coronary artery disease is the predominant substrate associated with the development of VT, these arrhythmias are known to occur in a variety of disorders, including dilated cardiomyopathy, valvular and congenital heart disease, and cardiac ion channelopathies such as the long QT syndrome. In a minority of patients, VT occurs in the absence of structural heart disease. Despite the established mortality benefit of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in patients at risk of lethal arrhythmias, recurrent VT/VF events continue to be a source of morbidity and impaired quality of life in such patients. Antiarrhythmic therapy is indicated in select patients to treat symptomatic VT episodes, to reduce the incidence of ICD shocks, and potentially to improve quality of life and reduce hospitalizations related to cardiac arrhythmia. The primary adverse effects of antiarrhythmic medications are related to both cardiac and extracardiac toxicity, including the risk of proarrhythmia. Current drug therapy for ventricular arrhythmia has been limited by suboptimal efficacy in many patients, resulting in recurrent VT/VF events, and by drug toxicity or intolerance leading to discontinuation in a large percentage of patients. Amiodarone and sotalol are the principal agents used in the chronic treatment of VT. In addition, dronedarone and dofetilide, agents approved for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, and ranolazine, an antianginal agent, have been demonstrated to be protective against ventricular arrhythmia in small clinical studies. Finally, advances in basic electrophysiology have uncovered new molecular targets for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmia, and pharmacologic agents directed at these targets may emerge as promising VT treatments in the future. The roles of these current and emerging therapies for the treatment of VT in humans will be summarized in this review.

Ivabradine in Combination With Metoprolol Succinate in the Treatment of Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia

Background:

Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) is a clinical syndrome characterized by excessive resting heart rate (HR) or a disproportional increase in HR during exercise. β-blocker or calcium channel-blocker therapy is often noneffective or not well tolerated. The HR reduction on ivabradine is similar to β-blockers but in some patients its efficacy to resolve all IST-related symptoms is limited. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of combining ivabradine with metoprolol succinate in patients with refractory highly symptomatic IST.

Methods:

Twenty patients (36 ± 10 years; 16 women) with IST were enrolled. All patients received metoprolol succinate 95 mg single dose during the first month of the study. After 4 weeks of treatment with metoprolol, ivabradine was administered as adjuvant therapy up to 7.5 mg twice daily. Holter monitoring and treadmill stress test were performed at baseline, after 4, and 8 weeks of the study, respectively.

Results:

We observed significant and similar reduction in resting HR both for metoprolol and for combined therapy compared to the baseline. The mean HR during daily activity was significantly lower on ivabradine and metoprolol compared to monotherapy with β-blocker. The combined treatment yielded a significant increase in exercise capacity as assessed by treadmill stress test. After 4 weeks of combined therapy a significant reduction in IST-related symptoms, measured by means of the European Heart Rhythm Association score, was observed.

Conclusion:

Combining ivabradine with metoprolol is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for IST in patients with refractory to monotherapy.

Searching for new cardiovascular drugs: towards improved systems for drug screening?

INTRODUCTION

The pharmaceutical industry urgently needs new ways of profiling the safety and efficacy of new cardiovascular (CV) drugs and more effectively transitioning these compounds through the stages of CV drug screening. This article reviews new technologies and methodological innovations and assesses whether these frameworks offer improved solutions to the problems facing the contemporary CV drug development.

AREAS COVERED

The article comprises literature derived from a systematic search (from 2000 onwards) using the US patent office and ESP@CENET search engines as well as through multiple Boolean terms. The article focuses on patents relating to technologies and resources and categorises the patents according to their niche in the CV drug screening landscape.

EXPERT OPINION

The CV drug pipeline is stalling due to the inability of many contemporary drug screening frameworks to discriminate between safe, efficacious therapy and hazardous off-target effect. Given the current limitations of drug screening frameworks, there is little scope for expanding the CV drug portfolio with newer, safer drugs with improved mechanisms of action. New screening modalities are urgently needed. Searches reveal that there are few examples of truly new technologies and systems in the patent literature. This apparent failure to revamp facets of the CV drug screening process can only perpetuate the inability of current platforms to improve the CV drug pipeline. Consequently, with few exceptions, there is stagnation in pre-clinical assay design that limits the pharmaceutical industry's ability to search for new drugs in new and more effective ways.

Emerging antiarrhythmic agents: a personal view from the Far East

INTRODUCTION

Arrhythmia treatments today take three different approaches. One uses electronic devices, such as electronic pacemakers or defibrillators, and this is regarded as life-saving in cases of bradyarrhythmias and ventricular fibrillation. Another is the ablation technique which eliminates abnormal pacemakers and/or conductive pathways by applying thermal or cryo-injury to pathological portions of the heart. The most classical one is the antiarrhythmic drugs, but are they effective and safe?

AREAS COVERED

Recent development of the understanding of arrhythmias, cardiac ionic channels and antiarrhythmic drugs covered by papers mostly published after 2000 are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The market size of the antiarrhythmic drugs is small, but various multichannel acting drugs may become candidates as antiarrhythmic drugs. As the cardiac ionic channels have become recognized as proteins, the molecular target for antiarrhythmic drugs has become apparent, but at the same time accurate data on clinical effectiveness and safety are required for drug approval; thus, few atrium selective drugs, such as IKur, IKACh and IKAde blocking drugs and amiodarone-like multichannel acting drugs are being developed.

Gap junctions enhancer combined with Vaughan Williams class III antiarrhythmic drugs, a promising antiarrhythmic method?

Arrhythmias is one of the leading causes of death in the world. Current antiarrhythmic drugs are limited by unsatisfactory efficacy and adverse effects such as proarrhythmias. Reentry mechanism plays an important role in persistence of arrhythmias. Reentry can only continue when reentry path-length is longer than cardiac wavelength which is equal to the product of conduction velocity (CV) and effective refractory period (ERP). Gap junctions uncoupling is associated with proarrhythmic CV slowing and transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) increasing in many cardiac diseases. Vaughan Williams class III antiarrhythmic drugs prolong ERP with an augmented TDR which is the main mechanism of the proarrhythmic effects. Gap junctions enhancer can augment CV and diminish TDR. As a result, gap junctions enhancer combined with class III drugs may be a promising antiarrhythmic method.

Early management of atrial fibrillation: from imaging to drugs to ablation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, and is responsible for the highest number of rhythm-related disorders and cardioembolic strokes worldwide. Early management of this condition will lower the risk of AF-associated morbidity and mortality. Targeted drug therapy has an important role in preventing the progression of AF through modification of the substrate. Discovery of the role of pulmonary veins as a trigger has been an important breakthrough, leading to the development of pulmonary vein ablation-an established curative therapy for drug-resistant AF. Identifying the underlying reasons for the abnormal firing of venous cardiomyocytes and the widespread progressive alterations of atrial tissue found in persistent AF are challenges for the future. Novel imaging techniques may help to determine the right time for intervention, provide specific targets for ablation, and judge the efficacy of treatment. If new developments can successfully address these issues, the knowledge acquired as a result will have a vital role in preclinical and early management of AF.