Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: How Can Less Be More?

Mapping Technologies for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Beyond Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Catheter ablation remains the most effective and relatively minimally invasive therapy for rhythm control in patients with AF. Ablation has consistently shown a reduction of arrhythmia-related symptoms and significant improvement in patients’ quality of life compared with medical treatment. The ablation strategy relies on a well-established anatomical approach of effective pulmonary vein isolation. Additional anatomical targets have been reported with the aim of increasing procedure success in complex substrates. However, larger ablated areas with uncertainty of targeting relevant regions for AF initiation or maintenance are not exempt from the potential risk of complications and pro-arrhythmia. Recent developments in mapping tools and computational methods for advanced signal processing during AF have reported novel strategies to identify atrial regions associated with AF maintenance. These novel tools – although mainly limited to research series – represent a significant step forward towards the understanding of complex patterns of propagation during AF and the potential achievement of patient-tailored AF ablation strategies for the near future.

The temporal behavior and consistency of bipolar atrial electrograms in human persistent atrial fibrillation

The unstable temporal behavior of atrial electrical activity during persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF) might influence ablation target identification, which could explain the conflicting persAF ablation outcomes in previous studies. We sought to investigate the temporal behavior and consistency of atrial electrogram (AEG) fractionation using different segment lengths. Seven hundred ninety-seven bipolar AEGs were collected with three segment lengths (2.5, 5,and 8 s) from 18 patients undergoing persAF ablation. The AEGs with 8-s duration were divided into three 2.5-s consecutive segments. AEG fractionation classification was applied off-line to all cases following the CARTO criteria; 43% of the AEGs remained fractionated for the three consecutive AEG segments, while nearly 30% were temporally unstable. AEG classification within the consecutive segments had moderate correlation (segment 1 vs 2: Spearman’s correlation ρ = 0.74, kappa score κ = 0.62; segment 1 vs 3: ρ = 0.726, κ = 0.62; segment 2 vs 3: ρ = 0.75, κ = 0.68). AEG classifications were more similar between AEGs with 5 and 8 s (ρ = 0.96, κ = 0.87) than 2.5 versus 5 s (ρ = 0.93, κ = 0.84) and 2.5 versus 8 s (ρ = 0.90, κ = 0.78). Our results show that the CARTO criteria should be revisited and consider recording duration longer than 2.5 s for consistent ablation target identification in persAF.

Mechanistic targets for the ablation of atrial fibrillation

The mechanisms responsible for sustaining atrial fibrillation are a key debate in cardiovascular pathophysiology, and directly influence the approach to therapy including ablation Clinical and basic studies have split AF mechanisms into two basic camps: ‘spatially distributed disorganization’ and ‘localized sources’. Recent data suggest that these mechanisms can also be separated by the method for mapping – with nearly all traditional electrogram analyses showing spatially distributed disorganization and nearly all optical mapping studies showing localized sources We will review this dichotomy in light of these recently identified differences in mapping, and in the context of recent clinical studies in which localized ablation has been shown to impact AF, also lending support to the localized source hypothesis. We will conclude with other concepts on mechanism-based ablation and areas of ongoing research that must be addressed to continue improving our knowledge and treatment of AF.