Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Without Left Atrial Appendage Imaging in Patients Treated With Direct Oral Anticoagulants

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

The impact of peri-procedural imaging on safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation: insights from the Israeli AF Catheter Ablation Registry (ICAR)

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the most effective therapy to achieve rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF). Peri-procedural imaging is used in many but not all centers. However, the impact of imaging on safety and efficacy of PVI is not clear. The Israeli Catheter Ablation Registry (ICAR) is a great opportunity to explore this issue in real-world practice.

AIM

To describe the real-world utilization of peri-procedural imaging technologies in a large cohort of patients undergoing ablation for AF.

METHODS

A prospective-multicenter cohort of AF patients who underwent PVI during the years 2019-2021. Peri-procedural imaging (CT, ICE, TEE) was utilized based on the center and operator discretion. The study endpoints were peri-procedural complications and AF recurrence at 12 months follow-up among patients with and without peri-procedural imaging.

RESULTS

Between January 2019 and December 2021, a total of 921 patients underwent PVI. Peri-procedural imaging (at least 1 modality of CT, TEE, and or ICE) was utilized in 753 (81.8%) and no imaging among 168 (18.2%) patients. Cryoablation was the dominant energy used for PVI in both groups (92.3% of the non-imaging group, and 95.3% among imaging group), while RF was used in the rest of the patients. Fluoroscopy time was not different between the 2 groups; however, procedure duration was longer among the imaging group (90 min) compared to the non-imaging group (74.5 min, p = 0.006). By 12 months, the incidence of AF recurrence and repeated ablation were not different between the groups. Complications and re-hospitalization for cardiocerebrovascular reasons were not different among the 2 groups. Cox regression model demonstrated no association between preprocedural imaging and the risk of AF recurrence after ablation.

CONCLUSION

This real-world multicenter prospective registry study demonstrated that the rate of complications and the rate of recurrence of AF during 1 year follow-up were not different among patients who had PVI either with or without peri-procedural imaging.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Persistence of left atrial thrombus in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

We recently demonstrated that patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have an increased risk of left atrial (LA) thrombus. In this study, we aimed to evaluate thrombus management, thrombus persistence, and thromboembolic events for HCM and non-HCM patients with AF and LA thrombus.

METHODS

From a cohort of 2,155 AF patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for any indication, this study included 122 patients with LA thrombus (64 HCM patients and 58 non-HCM controls).

RESULTS

There was no difference in mean CHA2DS2-VASc scores between HCM and control patients (3.9 ± 2.2 vs 3.8 ± 2.0, p = 0.88). Ten (16%) and 4 (7%) patients in the HCM and control groups, respectively, were in sinus rhythm at the time of TEE identifying the LA thrombus (p = 0.13). In all patients, the anticoagulation strategy was modified after the LA thrombus diagnosis. A total of 36 (56%) HCM patients and 34 (59%) control patients had follow-up TEE at median 90 and 62 days, respectively, after index TEE. The HCM group had significantly higher 90-day rates of persistent LA thrombus compared to the control group (88% vs 29%; p < 0.001). In adjusted models, HCM was independently associated with LA thrombus persistence. Among patients with LA thrombus, the 5-year cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events was 11% and 2% in HCM and control groups, respectively (p = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with AF with LA thrombus identified by TEE, those with HCM appear to have a higher risk of LA thrombus persistence than non-HCM patients despite anticoagulation.

Omitting transesophageal echocardiography before catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Data about necessity of performing transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) prior to every catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the safety of an individualized risk-based approach to TOE with respect to thromboembolic cerebrovascular events (CVE) in patients undergoing CA for AF or left atrial tachycardia (AT).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective clinical study based on our institutional registry database. Patients undergoing CA for AF or left-sided AT following initial AF ablation at two participating centers were enrolled. Prior to the procedure, patients were scheduled for TOE only if they had a history of thromboembolic stroke, left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus, or inappropriate anticoagulation regimen in the previous 3 to 4 weeks. The incidence of periprocedural cerebrovascular thromboembolic events was assessed.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1155 patients (median age 70 years, 54.8% male, 48.1% had persistent AF/AT). In 261 patients, a TOE was performed; in 2 patients (0.7%), an LAA thrombus was detected, which led to cancellation of the catheter ablation; in 894 patients, the TOE was omitted. Of the 1153 (0.35%) patients who underwent ablation, 4 (0.35%) experienced a CVE (one TIA and three strokes). The rate of CVE in our study does not exceed that reported in most multicenter trials. The low event rates limited statistical analysis of possible risk factors for CVE. In all 4 patients with CVE, post-CVE imaging showed the absence of LAA thrombus.

CONCLUSIONS

An individualized selective approach to TOE before catheter ablation of AF or left AT showed a very low risk of overt intraprocedural thromboembolic events for the population in our study. A further randomized controlled study is needed to determine whether TOE prior to catheter ablation without ICE could be omitted in patients with uninterrupted OAC without previous thromboembolic events or a history of left atrial thrombus.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Artificial intelligence in detecting left atrial appendage thrombus by transthoracic echocardiography and clinical features: the Left Atrial Thrombus on Transoesophageal Echocardiography (LATTEE) registry

AIMS

Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) is often performed before catheter ablation or cardioversion to rule out the presence of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAT) in patients on chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC), despite associated discomfort. A machine learning model [LAT-artificial intelligence (AI)] was developed to predict the presence of LAT based on clinical and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) features.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from a 13-site prospective registry of patients who underwent TOE before cardioversion or catheter ablation were used. LAT-AI was trained to predict LAT using data from 12 sites (n = 2827) and tested externally in patients on chronic OAC from two sites (n = 1284). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of LAT-AI were compared with that of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and CHA2DS2-VASc score. A decision threshold allowing for a 99% negative predictive value was defined in the development cohort. A protocol where TOE in patients on chronic OAC is performed depending on the LAT-AI score was validated in the external cohort. In the external testing cohort, LAT was found in 5.5% of patients. LAT-AI achieved an AUC of 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.89], outperforming LVEF (0.81, 95% CI 0.76-0.86, P < .0001) and CHA2DS2-VASc score (0.69, 95% CI: 0.63-0.7, P < .0001) in the entire external cohort. Based on the proposed protocol, 40% of patients on chronic OAC from the external cohort would safely avoid TOE.

CONCLUSION

LAT-AI allows accurate prediction of LAT. A LAT-AI-based protocol could be used to guide the decision to perform TOE despite chronic OAC.

Relationship between postoperative atrial fibrillation and its recurrence after lung resection

PURPOSE

Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently occurs after pulmonary resection and is commonly referred to as postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). This study explored whether or not POAF is related to the recurrence of AF in the chronic phase.

METHODS

A total of 1311 consecutive patients without a history of AF who underwent lung resection based on a diagnosis of lung tumor were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

POAF occurred in 46 patients (3.5%), and a logistic regression analysis revealed that the age (p < 0.05), history of hyperthyroidism (p < 0.05), and major lung resection (p < 0.05) were independent predictors of POAF. AF events in the chronic phase were observed in 15 (32.6%) and 45 (3.6%) patients with and without POAF, respectively. A Cox regression analysis revealed that POAF was the only independent predictor of AF development in the chronic phase (p < 0.01). The Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test revealed that the cumulative incidence of AF in the chronic phase was significantly higher in patients with POAF than in those without POAF (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

POAF was an independent predictor for AF in the chronic phase after lung resection. Further investigations including cases of catheter ablation and optimal medical therapy for patients with POAF after lung resection are needed.

Implementation and first outcomes of a novel standard operating procedure for preprocedural transoesophageal echocardiography screening in course of atrial arrhythmia ablation

AIMS

Preprocedural transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) screening for left atrial (LA) thrombi is the standard of care in many centres performing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, TEE imposes procedural risks for patients and is often challenging to implement in daily practice, besides causing patient discomfort. At our centre, a novel standard operating procedure (SOP) was implemented, aiming to identify patients that can be exempt from TEE screening. We aimed to assess whether this screening approach may reduce preprocedural TEEs without imposing patients of higher risks for cerebrovascular events (CVEs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data of 1874 consecutive patients treated by catheter ablation of LA arrhythmias between 2018 and 2022 were retrospectively analysed. A cohort of 937 patients, where decision to perform TEE screening was based on a new SOP (considering rhythm at admission, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and sufficient anticoagulation), was compared to a matched cohort receiving TEE before every procedure. Number of performed TEEs and incidences of CVEs were compared. Implementation of the new SOP led to a 67% reduction in TEEs performed (old SOP: 933 vs. new SOP: 305). No significant differences between the groups were detected regarding transitory ischaemic attack (old SOP: 5 vs. new SOP: 3; P = 0.48) and stroke (no events). No solid thrombi were detected during TEE screening.

CONCLUSION

The number of preprocedural screening TEEs before AF ablation procedures can be safely reduced by applying risk stratification based on rhythm at admission and CHA2DS2-VASc score, if anticoagulation was performed properly.

Anesthetic Considerations in the Electrophysiology Laboratory: A Comprehensive Review

Catheter ablation procedures for arrhythmias or implantation and/or extraction of cardiac pacemakers can present many clinical challenges. It is imperative that there is clear communication and understanding between the anesthesiologist and electrophysiologist during the perioperative period regarding the mode of ventilation, hemodynamic considerations, and various procedural complications. This article provides a comprehensive narrative review of the anesthetic techniques and considerations for catheter ablation procedures, ventilatory modes using techniques such as high-frequency jet ventilation, and strategies such as esophageal deviation and luminal temperature monitoring to decrease the risk of esophageal injury during catheter ablation. Various hemodynamic considerations, such as the intraprocedural triaging of cardiac tamponade and fluid administration during catheter ablation, also are discussed. Finally, this review briefly highlights the early research findings on pulse-field ablation, a new and evolving ablation modality.

Characteristics, Thrombus Resolution, and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Thrombus

To assess the prevalence and management of atrial thrombus in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and identify the risk factors of the nonresolution of atrial thrombus. This single-center retrospective observational study consecutively enrolled patients with NVAF and atrial thrombus detected using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA) from January 2012 to December 2020. Patients with prior left atrial appendage (LAA) intervention were excluded. The primary endpoint was the presence of atrial thrombus, while the secondary endpoint was the complete resolution of atrial thrombus. The prevalence of atrial thrombus in patients with NVAF was 1.4%. Ninety patients with atrial thrombus (mean age 62.8 ± 11.9 years and 61.1% men) were finally analyzed. Atrial thrombus was in the LAA in 82 (91.1%) patients. During follow up, 60% of the patients showed complete resolution of atrial thrombus. Congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR]: 8.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67-47.80) and a history of ischemic stroke (OR: 8.28; 95% CI: 1.48-46.42) were independently associated with the risk of the nonresolution of atrial thrombus. The presence of atrial thrombus in patients with NVAF who received anticoagulation therapy is non-negligible. Even in anticoagulated patients, TEE or cardiac CTA might still be needed. Congestive heart failure and a history of ischemic stroke are risk factors of the nonresolution of atrial thrombus.

Risk Factors for Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Development After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the prognosis of patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), aiming to elucidate predictors of occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the chronic phase after esophagectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 415 consecutive patients between July 2010 and December 2021 who were scheduled to undergo esophagectomy for esophageal cancer and had no previous history of AF.

RESULTS

POAF occurred in 73 patients (18%). Their ages were higher than those without POAF (72 [66-77] vs 68 [62-75], P < 0.01). Three-field lymph node dissection was more frequent in patients with POAF (63% vs 50%, P = 0.04). Overall survival rates were not significantly different between those with and without POAF in patients with stage III/IV cancer (P = 0.37), but overall survival rate of patients with POAF was lower than in those without POAF in stage I/II cancer (P = 0.03). Seventeen patients (4.1%) had recurrence of AF or new onset 31 days after esophagectomy. POAF was the only independent predictor of AF development in the chronic phase (HR: 4.09, 95%CI: [1.42-11.74], P = 0.01). AF development in the chronic phase was observed in 8 patients (11.0%) with and 9 patients (2.6%) without POAF (P < 0.01). AF development rates were not significantly different in patients with stage III/IV cancer (P = 0.05), but there was significant difference in patients with stage I/II cancer (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of POAF after esophagectomy is related with future development of AF and overall survival prognosis. Future studies must ascertain optimal therapeutic strategy.

Off-Label Use and Inappropriate Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cardiopulmonary Disease

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in clinical practice and have become essential in the management of atrial fibrillation and VTE. The enthusiasm for DOACs has fueled the off-label application of these agents in cardiopulmonary disease, and their use has often outpaced the evidence supporting their application. This article reviews the evidence and current off-label use of DOACs in various cardiopulmonary disease states.

Incidence of Left Atrial Thrombus Development and Imaging Approach in Patients Scheduled for Repeat Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

The risk for developing left atrial (LA) thrombi after initial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) and requirements for imaging evaluation for thrombi screening at repeat ablation is unclear. This study aimed to assess the occurrence of thrombus development and frequency of any imaging study evaluating thrombus formation during repeat ablation for AF. Of 2,066 patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for AF with uninterrupted oral anticoagulation, 615 patients underwent repeat ablation after 258.0 (105.0-882.0) days. We investigated the factors associated with safety outcomes and requirements for thrombus screening. All patients underwent at least one imaging examination to screen for thrombi in the initial session; however, the examination rate decreased to 476 patients (77%) before the repeat session. The frequency of imaging evaluations was 5.0%, 11%, 21%, 84%, and 91% for transesophageal echocardiography and 18%, 33%, 49%, 98%, and 99% for any imaging modality at repeat ablation performed ≤60 days, ≤90 days, ≤180 days, >180 days, and >1 year after the initial session, respectively. Three patients (0.5%) developed LA thrombi at repeat ablation due to identifiable causes, and no patients experienced thromboembolic events when no imaging evaluation was performed. Multivariate analysis revealed that repeat ablation performed after >180 days, non-paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction were predictors of thrombus development and severe spontaneous echocardiography contrast. In conclusion, the risk for thrombus development at repeat ablation for AF was low. There needs to be a risk stratification of the imaging screening for thrombi at repeat ablation.

Atrial thrombus detection on transoesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardioversion or catheter ablation: A pooled analysis of rates and predictors

OBJECTIVE

To summarize data on the rates and predictors of left atrial thrombus/left atrial appendage thrombus (LAT/LAAT) detection by transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before electrical cardioversion (ECV) or catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched to identify all studies providing relevant data and published by October 7, 2020. A random-effects meta-analysis method was used to pool effect size estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 85 studies were included, reporting data from 56 660 patients with AF. In patients undergoing CA and ECV, the pooled prevalence of LAT/LAAT was 1.8% and 7.5% in those not on oral anticoagulation (OAC), 1.8% and 5.5% in those taking OAC, and 1.3% and 4.9% in case of adequate OAC, respectively. According to the type of OAC, the prevalence was 2.0% and 7.6% for vitamin K antagonist, 1.3% and 3.5% for direct oral anticoagulant. Predictors of LAT/LAAT detection were nonparoxysmal AF (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6, 95% confidence interval: 2.4-5.2), hypertension (OR: 2.9, 1.2-7.0), previous stroke (OR: 3.0, 1.6-5.63), heart failure (OR: 4.3, 2.7-6.8), and CHADS₂ score ≥2 (OR: 3.3, 1.9-5.8) for patients undergoing CA; and heart failure (OR: 2.8, 1.3-6.2) and the CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score (OR: 2.55, 1.5-4.5) for those undergoing ECV.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of LAT/LAAT in AF patients undergoing ECV or CA varies widely, mainly due to differences in patient risk profiles and OAC types. Further research should determine whether the predictors of LAT/LAAT detection identified by this study could be used to select patients who require preprocedural TEE.