Impella to Resist the Storm

Utility of Adjunctive Impella Support to Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for a Refractory Electrical Storm

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) stabilizes hemodynamics in an electrical storm leading to cardiogenic shock. However, adverse effects of VA-ECMO are increased left ventricular (LV) afterload and LV end-diastolic pressure due to retrograde blood return. These adverse effects could be ameliorated by LV unloading with Impella insertion. This case illustrates the possible efficacy of adjunctive Impella insertion for a refractory electrical storm that is resistant to defibrillation under mechanical support with VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock.

Noninvasive neurological monitoring to enhance pLVAD-assisted ventricular tachycardia ablation - a Mini review

For critically ill patients, hemodynamic fluctuations can be life-threatening; this is particularly true for patients experiencing cardiac comorbidities. Patients may suffer from problems with heart contractility and rate, vascular tone, and intravascular volume, resulting in hemodynamic instability. Unsurprisingly, hemodynamic support provides a crucial and specific benefit during percutaneous ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Mapping, understanding, and treating the arrhythmia during sustained VT without hemodynamic support is often infeasible due to patient hemodynamic collapse. Substrate mapping in sinus rhythm can be successful for VT ablation, but there are limitations to this approach. Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy may present for ablation without exhibiting useful endocardial and/or epicardial substrate-based ablation targets, either due to diffuse extent or a lack of identifiable substrate. This leaves activation mapping during ongoing VT as the only viable diagnostic strategy. By enhancing cardiac output, percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVAD) may facilitate conditions for mapping that would otherwise be incompatible with survival. However, the optimal mean arterial pressure to maintain end-organ perfusion in presence of nonpulsatile flow remains unknown. Near infrared oxygenation monitoring during pLVAD support provides assessment of critical end-organ perfusion during VT, enabling successful mapping and ablation with the continual assurance of adequate brain oxygenation. This focused review provides practical use case scenarios for such an approach, which aims to allow mapping and ablation of ongoing VT while drastically reducing the risk of ischemic brain injury.

Mechanical circulatory support for thyrotoxicosis-induced cardiomyopathy

Thyroid storm is a life-threatening condition which, in rare cases, may lead to cardiogenic shock and dysrhythmias. Mechanical circulatory support with an Impella device or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may be used as a bridge to recovery in these cases. This case involves a patient with thyrotoxicosis and reduced ejection fraction and hemodynamic instability requiring Impella device placement. After treatment with methimazole, Lugol's iodine, and hydrocortisone, he was weaned off mechanical circulatory support and made a full recovery. Mechanical circulatory support devices can be a useful bridging tool in reversible causes of cardiogenic shock, such as thyroid storm.

Mechanical circulatory support in ventricular arrhythmias

In atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, reduced time for ventricular filling and loss of atrial contribution lead to a significant reduction in cardiac output, resulting in cardiogenic shock. This may also occur during catheter ablation in 11% of overall procedures and is associated with increased mortality. Managing cardiogenic shock and (supra) ventricular arrhythmias is particularly challenging. Inotropic support may exacerbate tachyarrhythmias or accelerate heart rate; antiarrhythmic drugs often come with negative inotropic effects, and electrical reconversions may risk worsening circulatory failure or even cardiac arrest. The drop in native cardiac output during an arrhythmic storm can be partly covered by the insertion of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices guaranteeing end-organ perfusion. This provides physicians a time window of stability to investigate the underlying cause of arrhythmia and allow proper therapeutic interventions (e.g., percutaneous coronary intervention and catheter ablation). Temporary MCS can be used in the case of overt hemodynamic decompensation or as a “preemptive strategy” to avoid circulatory instability during interventional cardiology procedures in high-risk patients. Despite the increasing use of MCS in cardiogenic shock and during catheter ablation procedures, the recommendation level is still low, considering the lack of large observational studies and randomized clinical trials. Therefore, the evidence on the timing and the kinds of MCS devices has also scarcely been investigated. In the current review, we discuss the available evidence in the literature and gaps in knowledge on the use of MCS devices in the setting of ventricular arrhythmias and arrhythmic storms, including a specific focus on pathophysiology and related therapies.

Electrical Storm Ablation in a Patient in Cardiogenic Shock Supported by Impella 5.0

Intra-axial pumps are increasingly used to support cardiogenic shock. The occurrence of electrical storms in this setting is a rising issue, and data remain scarce about optimal management. We report the feasibility of ventricular tachycardia ablation in the presence of a recent surgically inserted Impella 5.0 device (Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts). (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)