Quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation: comparison between three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging

Disparities in quantification of mitral valve regurgitation between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and trans-thoracic echocardiography: a systematic review

Primary mitral regurgitation (MR) is a prevalent valvular heart disease. Therapy stratification for MR depends on accurate assessment of MR severity and left ventricular (LV) dimensions. While trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) has been the standard/preferred assessment method, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has gained recognition for its superior assessment of LV dimensions and MR severity. Both imaging modalities have their own advantages and limitation for therapy guidance. However, the differences between the two modalities for assessing/grade severity and clinical impact of MR remains unclear. This systematic review aims to evaluate the differences between TTE and CMR in quantifying MR severity and LV dimensions, providing insights for optimal clinical management. A literature search was performed from inception up to March 21st 2023. This resulted in 2,728 articles. After screening, 22 articles were deemed eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The included study variables were, mitral valve regurgitation volume (MRVOL), regurgitation fraction (MRFRAC), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), LV stroke volume (LVSV), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF). TTE showed a significant higher MRVOL (10.4 ml, I2 = 88%, p = 0.002) and MRFRAC (6.3%, I2 = 51%, p = 0.05) compared to CMR, while CMR demonstrated a higher LVEDV (21.9 ml, I2 = 66%, p =  < 0.001) and LVESV (16.8 ml, I2 = 0%, p =  < 0.001) compared to TTE. Our findings demonstrate substantial disparities in TTE and CMR derived measurements for parameters that play a pivotal role in the clinical stratification guidelines. This discrepancy prompts a critical question regarding the prognostic value of both imaging modalities, which warrants future research.

Calculation of Regurgitant Volume Using Echocardiographic Volumetric Method for Accurate Diagnosis of Severe Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown suboptimal results of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) algorithm for diagnosing severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of regurgitant volume (RegVol) calculated using volumetric transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for diagnosing severe primary MR.

METHODS

A total of 74 patients with primary MR due to prolapse or flail leaflet were prospectively recruited for both TTE and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. RegVol was calculated using PISA (RegVol_PISA) or the volumetric method (left ventricular total stroke volume - systolic forward outflow volume; RegVol_TTE). According to the ASE algorithm, patients with four or more parameters were diagnosed with severe MR. RegVol_CMR ≥ 60 mL was used as the gold standard for diagnosing severe MR.

RESULTS

All subjects had at least moderate to severe MR according to ASE guidelines. CMR imaging confirmed that 30 patients (41%) had severe MR. The concordance correlation coefficient between RegVol_TTE and RegVol_CMR (0.809; 95% CI, 0.715-0.893) was higher than that between RegVol_PISA and RegVol_CMR (0.468; 95% CI, 0.323-0.576). The overall accuracy of RegVol_TTE for the diagnosis of severe MR was 90.5% (95% CI, 81.5-96.1), which was significantly higher than that of RegVol_PISA (64.9%; 95% CI, 52.9-75.6; P < .001) and the ASE algorithm (77.0%; 95% CI, 65.8-86.0; P = .004). The area under the curve for RegVol_TTE (0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00) was significantly larger than that for RegVol_PISA (0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96; P = .028).

CONCLUSIONS

RegVol_TTE showed better diagnostic performance than the PISA method and the ASE algorithm in diagnosing severe MR. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the routine use of RegVol_TTE.

Mitral Regurgitation Evaluation in Modern Echocardiography: Bridging Standard Techniques and Advanced Tools for Enhanced Assessment

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is one of the most common valvular heart diseases worldwide. Echocardiography remains the first line and most effective imaging modality for the diagnosis of mitral valve (MV) pathology and quantitative assessment of MR. The advent of three-dimensional echocardiography has significantly enhanced the evaluation of MV anatomy and function. Furthermore, recent advancements in cardiovascular imaging software have emerged as step-forward tools, providing a powerful support for acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of cardiac ultrasound images in the context of MR. This review aims to provide an overview of the contemporary workflow for echocardiographic assessment of MR, encompassing standard echocardiographic techniques and the integration of semiautomated and automated ultrasound solutions. These novel approaches include advancements in segmentation, phenotyping, morphological quantification, functional grading, and chamber quantification.

Observed and expected reliability of echocardiographic volumetric methods and critical change values for quantification of mitral regurgitant fraction in dogs

BACKGROUND

Reliability of echocardiographic calculations for stroke volume and mitral regurgitant fraction (RFMR) are affected by observer variability and lack of a gold standard. Variability is used to calculate critical change values (CCVs) that are thresholds representing real change in a measure not associated with observer variability.

HYPOTHESIS

Observed intra- and interobserver accuracy and variability in healthy dogs help model CCV for RFMR.

ANIMALS

Reliability cohort of 34 healthy dogs; allometric scaling cohort of 99 dogs with heart disease and 25 healthy dogs.

METHODS

Accuracy, variability, and CCV of 2 observers using geometric and flow-based echocardiography were prospectively compared against a standard of RFMR = 0% and extrapolated across a range of expected RFMR values in the reliability cohort partly derived from cardiac dimensions predicted by the allometric cohort.

RESULTS

Accuracy of methods to determine RFMR in descending order was 4-chamber bullet (Bullet4CH), mitral inflow, cube formula, and Simpson's method of disks. Intraobserver variability was relatively high. The CCV for RFMR ranged from 28% to 88% and was inversely related to RFMR when extrapolated for use in affected dogs. For both observers, the Bullet4CH method had the lowest intraobserver CCV (Operator 1:28%, Operator 2:41%). Interobserver strength of agreement was low with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.210 to 0.413.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Echocardiographic volumetric methods used to calculate stroke volume and RFMR have low accuracy and high variability in healthy dogs. Extrapolation of observed CCV to a range of expected RFMR suggests observers and methods are not interchangeable and variability might hinder routine clinical usage. Individual observers should be aware of their own variability and CCV.

Echocardiography vs. CMR in the Quantification of Chronic Mitral Regurgitation: A Happy Marriage or Stormy Divorce?

Quantification of chronic mitral regurgitation (MR) is essential to guide patients’ clinical management and define the need and appropriate timing for mitral valve surgery. Echocardiography represents the first-line imaging modality to assess MR and requires an integrative approach based on qualitative, semiquantitative, and quantitative parameters. Of note, quantitative parameters, such as the echocardiographic effective regurgitant orifice area, regurgitant volume (RegV), and regurgitant fraction (RegF), are considered the most reliable indicators of MR severity. In contrast, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has demonstrated high accuracy and good reproducibility in quantifying MR, especially in cases with secondary MR; nonholosystolic, eccentric, and multiple jets; or noncircular regurgitant orifices, where quantification with echocardiography is an issue. No gold standard for MR quantification by noninvasive cardiac imaging has been defined so far. Only a moderate agreement has been shown between echocardiography, either with transthoracic or transesophageal approaches, and CMR in MR quantification, as supported by numerous comparative studies. A higher agreement is evidenced when echocardiographic 3D techniques are used. CMR is superior to echocardiography in the calculation of the RegV, RegF, and ventricular volumes and can provide myocardial tissue characterization. However, echocardiography remains fundamental in the pre-operative anatomical evaluation of the mitral valve and of the subvalvular apparatus. The aim of this review is to explore the accuracy of MR quantification provided by echocardiography and CMR in a head-to-head comparison between the two techniques, with insight into the technical aspects of each imaging modality.

Benefit of 3D Vena Contracta Area over 2D-Based Echocardiographic Methods in Quantification of Functional Mitral Valve Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

The two-dimensional proximal isovelocity surface area (2D PISA) method in the quantification of an effective regurgitation orifice area (EROA) has limitations in functional mitral valve regurgitation (FMR), particularly in non-circular coaptation defects.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to validate a three-dimensional vena contracta area (3D VCA) against a conventional EROA using a 2D PISA method and anatomic regurgitation orifice area (AROA) in patients with FMR.

METHODS

Both 2D and 3D full-volume color Doppler data were acquired during consecutive transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examinations. The EROA 2D PISA was calculated as recommended by current guidelines. Multiplanar reconstruction was used for offline analysis of the 3D VCA (with a color Doppler) and AROA (without a color Doppler). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to calculate a cut-off value for the 3D VCA to discriminate between moderate and severe FMR as classified by the EROA 2D PISA.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2018, 105 consecutive patients with complete and adequate imaging data were included. The 3D VCA correlated strongly with the 2D PISA EROA and AROA (r = 0.93 and 0.94). In the presence of eccentric or multiple regurgitant jets, there was no significant difference in correlations with the 3D VCA. We found a 3D VCA cut-off of 0.43 cm² to discriminate between moderate and severe FMR (area under curve = 0.98). The 3D VCA showed a higher interobserver agreement than the EROA 2D PISA (interclass correlation coefficient: 0.94 vs. 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D VCA has excellent validity and lower variability than the conventional 2D PISA in FMR. Compared to the 2D PISA, the 3D VCA was not affected by the presence of eccentric or multiple regurgitation jets or non-circular regurgitation orifices. With a threshold of 0.43 cm² for the 3D VCA, we demonstrated reliable discrimination between moderate and severe FMR.

3D echocardiography in mitral valve prolapse

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the leading cause of mitral valve surgery. Echocardiography is the principal imaging modality used to diagnose MVP, assess the mitral valve morphology and mitral annulus dynamics, and quantify mitral regurgitation. Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic (3DE) imaging represents a consistent innovation in cardiovascular ultrasound in the last decades, and it has been implemented in routine clinical practice for the evaluation of mitral valve diseases. The focus of this review is the role and the advantages of 3DE in the comprehensive evaluation of MVP, intraoperative and intraprocedural monitoring.

Spatiotemporal Complexity of Vena Contracta and Mitral Regurgitation Grading Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Analysis

BACKGROUND

Spatiotemporal complexity of the color Doppler vena contracta challenging the assumption of a circular and constant orifice may lead to mitral regurgitation (MR) grading inconsistencies. Using 3D transesophageal echocardiography, we characterized spatiotemporal vena contracta complexity and its impact on MR severity grading.

METHODS

In 192 patients with suspected moderate or severe MR (100 primary MR [PMR]; 92 secondary MR [SMR]), we performed three-dimensional vena contracta area (VCA) quantification using single-frame (midsystolic or VCAmid, maximum or VCAmax) and multiframe (VCAmean) methods, as well as measures of orifice shape (shape index) and systolic variation of VCA. Vena contracta complexity and intermethod discrepancies were analyzed and correlated with functional class and pulmonary vein flow (PVF) patterns and with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in a subset of cases (n = 20).

RESULTS

The vena contracta was noncircular (shape index > 1.5) in 90% of patients. Severe noncircularity (shape index > 3) was more prevalent in SMR than in PMR (32.4% vs 14.6%). Variations of the VCA were more prominent in SMR than in PMR. VCAmid showed a low grading agreement with VCAmax (62%) and high grading agreement with VCAmean (83.3%). Pulmonary vein flow systolic reversal was associated with MR severity by VCA in SMR but not in PMR. VCAmid and VCAmean showed a stronger association with systolic flow reversal than VCAmax (area under the curve, 0.88, 0.86, and 0.79, respectively). In the subset of patients with CMR quantification, severe MR by VCAmax was graded as nonsevere by CMR more frequently compared with VCAmid and VCAmean.

CONCLUSIONS

Highly prevalent spatiotemporal vena contracta complexity features in MR challenge the assumption of a circular and constant orifice. VCAmid seems the best single-frame approximation to multiframe quantification, and VCAmax may lead to severity overestimation.

Recommendations for the Use of Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Rheumatic Heart Disease: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography

Acute rheumatic fever and its chronic sequela, rheumatic heart disease (RHD), pose major health problems globally, and remain the most common cardiovascular disease in children and young people worldwide. Echocardiography is the most important diagnostic tool in recognizing this preventable and treatable disease and plays an invaluable role in detecting the presence of subclinical disease needing prompt therapy or follow-up assessment. This document provides recommendations for the comprehensive use of echocardiography in the diagnosis and therapeutic intervention of RHD. Echocardiographic diagnosis of RHD is made when typical findings of valvular and subvalvular abnormalities are seen, including commissural fusion, leaflet thickening, and restricted leaflet mobility, with varying degrees of calcification. The mitral valve is predominantly affected, most often leading to mitral stenosis. Mixed valve disease and associated cardiopulmonary pathology are common. The severity of valvular lesions and hemodynamic effects on the cardiac chambers and pulmonary artery pressures should be rigorously examined. It is essential to take advantage of all available modalities of echocardiography to obtain accurate anatomic and hemodynamic details of the affected valve lesion(s) for diagnostic and strategic pre-treatment planning. Intraprocedural echocardiographic guidance is critical during catheter-based or surgical treatment of RHD, as is echocardiographic surveillance for post-intervention complications or disease progression. The role of echocardiography is indispensable in the entire spectrum of RHD management.

Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Native Valvular Regurgitation: A Comprehensive Review of Protocols, Grading of Severity, and Prediction of Valve Surgery

Valvular regurgitation is common in developed countries with an increasing prevalence due to the aging of the population and more accurate diagnostic imaging methods. Echocardiography is the gold standard method for the assessment of the severity of valvular heart regurgitation. Nonetheless, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as an additional tool for assessing mainly the severity of aortic and mitral valve regurgitation in the setting of indeterminate findings by echocardiography. Moreover, CMR is a valuable imaging modality to assess ventricular volume and flow, which are useful in the calculation of regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction of mitral valve regurgitation, aortic valve regurgitation, tricuspid valve regurgitation, and pulmonary valve regurgitation. Notwithstanding this, reference values and optimal thresholds to determine the severity and prognosis of valvular heart regurgitation have been studied lesser by CMR than by echocardiography. Hence, further larger studies are warranted to validate the potential prognostic relevance of the severity of valvular heart regurgitation determined by CMR. The present review describes, analyzes, and discusses the use of CMR to determine the severity of valvular heart regurgitation in clinical practice.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement: Competitive or Complementary?

Over the last two decades, transcatheter devices have been developed to repair or replace diseased mitral valves (MV). Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) devices have been proven to be efficient and safe, but many anatomical structures are not compatible with these technologies. The most significant advantage of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) over transcatheter repair is the greater and more reliable reduction in mitral regurgitation. However, there are also potential disadvantages. This review introduces the newest TMVr and TMVR devices and presents clinical trial data to identify current challenges and directions for future research.

Percutaneous Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair for Functional Mitral Regurgitation

The presence and severity of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is associated with worse outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Prior to the availability of percutaneous mitral valve repair, management for FMR has been limited to medical therapy, cardiac resynchronization therapy for a specific subset of patients and surgery which has yet to demonstrate mortality benefits. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of the mitral valve has emerged in the past decade as an invaluable member of the armamentarium against FMR with the 2 landmark randomized controlled trials providing deep insights on patient selection. In addition, TEER has spurred the rapid advancement in our understanding of FMR. This article seeks to provide an overview as well as our current understanding on the role of TEER in FMR.

Characterization of Primary Mitral Regurgitation With Flail Leaflet and/or Wall-Impinging Flow

BACKGROUND

Echocardiography guidelines note that a flail leaflet is a specific criterion for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and that regurgitant severity is underestimated in wall-impinging jets (Coandă effect). Both findings are often considered to be pathognomonic of severe MR.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the authors sought to determine the association of flail leaflet and Coandă effect with MR severity quantified by means of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).

METHODS

The authors enrolled 158 consecutive patients with primary MR according to echocardiography and CMR. The presence of a flail leaflet or Coandă was determined for each patient. CMR regurgitant volume (RV) and regurgitant fraction (RF) were quantified for all patients.

RESULTS

There were 55 patients (35%) with a flail leaflet, 52 (33%) with Coandă, and 22 (14%) with a flail leaflet and Coandă. The mean CMR mitral RV and RF progressively increased in patients without a Coandă or flail, a Coandă, a flail, or a Coandă and a flail (RV: 28 ± 21 mL vs 43 ± 23 mL vs 58 ± 29 mL vs 64 ± 25 mL [P < 0.001]; RF: 25% ± 16% vs 34% ± 14% vs 41% ± 12% vs 45% ± 12% [P < 0.001]). With the use of CMR RV, 35%, 46%, and 59% of patients had severe MR with the presence of a Coandă, flail leaflet, or both, respectively. With the use of CMR RF, 25%, 31%, and 40% of patients had severe MR with the presence of a Coandă, flail leaflet, or both, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

While the presence of a flail leaflet and Coandă effect on echocardiography are associated with higher regurgitant volumes and fractions, they are frequently not associated with severe MR as assessed by means of CMR. (Comparison Study of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Mitral and Aortic Regurgitation; NCT04038879).

Comparison of mitral regurgitation severity assessments based on magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Mitral regurgitation (MR), which is one of the factors responsible for heart failure symptoms and the development of atrial fibrillation, is an important feature of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and its presence affects which treatment options are chosen. Although cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the reference standard for assessing the regurgitant volume (RV) and fraction (RF), echocardiography is the most common method for assessing MR severity. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to compare the results of echocardiography and cardiac MRI for assessing MR severity in a cohort of patients with HCM. MR severity was assessed in 53 patients using cardiac MRI by determining the mitral RV (MRV) and mitral RF (MRF). The results were graded according to thresholds recommended in current guidelines. MR severity assessed by echocardiography was graded by integrating indices of severity. Greater than mild MR, as assessed using echocardiography, was present in 22 patients (41.5%) with HCM and in none of the control patients (p = 0.001). In all, 31 patients (58.5%) had no more than mild MR. When MR severity was assessed using different methods, either moderate (kappa = 0.44, 95% confidence interval = 0.21–0.67), poor or no agreement was found between MRI-derived and echocardiography-derived grades. HCM patients with echocardiography-derived moderate and severe MR had similar median MRVs and MRFs (p = 0.59 and p = 0.11, respectively). In HCM patients, cardiac MRI and echocardiography were at most in modest agreement in assessing MR severity. Importantly, echocardiography-derived moderate and severe MR were not distinguishable by either MRV or MRF.

3D Echocardiography for Rheumatic Heart Disease Analysis: Ready for Prime Time

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains to be a very important health issue worldwide, mainly in underdeveloped countries. It continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality throughout developing countries. RHD is a delayed non-suppurative immunologically mediated inflammatory response to the throat infection caused by a hemolytic streptococcus from the A group (Streptococcus pyogenes). RHD keeps position 1 as the most common cardiovascular disease in young people aged <25 years considering all the continents. The disease can lead to valvular cardiac lesions as well as to carditis. Rheumatic fever valvular injuries lead most commonly to the fusion and thickening of the edges of the cusps and to the fusion, thickening, and shortening of the chordae and ultimately to calcification of the valves. Valvular commissures can also be deeply compromised, leading to severe stenosis. Atrial and ventricular remodeling is also common following rheumatic infection. Mixed valvular lesions are more common than isolated valvular disorders. Echocardiography is the most relevant imaging technique not only to provide diagnostic information but also to enable prognostic data. Further, it presents a very important role for the correction of complications after surgical repair of rheumatic heart valvulopathies. Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography provides additional anatomical and morphofunctional information of utmost importance for patients presenting rheumatic valvopathies. Accordingly, three-dimensional echocardiography is ready for routine use in patients with RHD presenting with valvular abnormalities.

Update on surgical repair in functional mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is common in patients with myocardial infarction or dilated cardiomyopathy, and portends a poor prognosis despite guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Surgical or transcatheter mitral repair for FMR from recent randomized clinical trials showed disappointing or conflicting results.

AIMS

To provide an update on the role of surgical repair in the management of FMR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The search terms included secondary/FMR, ischemic mitral regurgitation, mitral repair, mitral replacement, mitral annuloplasty, transcatheter mitral repair, and percutaneous mitral repair. Randomized clinical trials over the past decade were the particular focus of the current review.

RESULTS

Recent data underlined the complexity and poor prognosis of FMR. GDMT and cardiac resynchronization, when indicated, should always be applied. Accurate assessment of the interplay between ventricular geometry and mitral valve function is essential to differentiate proportionate FMR from the disproportionate subgroup, which could be helpful in selecting appropriate transcatheter intervention strategies. Surgical repair, most commonly performed with an undersized ring annuloplasty, remains controversial. Adjunctive valvular or subvalvular repair techniques are evolving and may produce improved results in selected FMR patients.

CONCLUSION

FMR resulted from complex valve-ventricular interaction and remodeling. Distinguishing proportionate FMR from disproportionate FMR is important in exploring their underlying mechanisms and to guide medical treatment with surgical or transcatheter interventions. Further studies are warranted to confirm the clinical benefit of appropriate surgical repair in selected FMR patients.

Intraoperative comparison of 2D versus 3D transesophageal echocardiography for quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation

Background:

Effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) can be represented by 3D echocardiographic vena contracta cross-sectional area (3D-VCA) as a reference method for the quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR) without making any geometrical assumptions. EROA can also be derived from 3D PISA technique with a hemispherical (HS) or hemielliptical (HE) assumption of the proximal flow convergence. However, it is not clear whether HS-PISA and HE-PISA has better agreement with 3D-VCA.

Aims:

This study was conducted to compare the EROA and Rvol obtained from 3D-VCA with those obtained from 2D-VC, 2D-HS-PISA, 3D-HS-PISA, and 3D-HE-PISA.

Setting:

Tertiary care hospital.

Design:

Prospective observational study.

Materials and Methods:

After anesthesia induction, 43 consecutive patients were evaluated with RT-3D-TEE after acquiring images from midesophegeal views and performing the offline analysis of volume dataset. 3D-VCA was measured using multiplanar reconstruction mode and EROA and regurgitant volume were estimated using HS-PISA and HE-PISA methods. The HE-PISA was calculated by using the Knud Thomsen formula.

Statistical Analysis:

Agreement between methods to estimate EROA and regurgitant volumes were tested using Bland–Altman analysis. The interobserver variability and intraobserver variability were assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient.

Results:

The EROA estimated by 3D-VCA was larger than EROA obtained by 2D-HS-PISA and 3D-HS-PISA, which were significantly greater than 3D-HE-PISA. 3D-HS-PISA-EROA showed the best agreement with 3D-VCA (bias: 0.21; limits of agreement: −0.01 to 0.41; SD: 0.1). Correlation between various methods as compared to 3D-VCA was better in the organic MR group than functional MR group.

Conclusion:

3D-HS-PISA showed the best agreement with 3D-VCA compared to other PISA methods. Better correlation between PISA-EROA and 3D-VCA was observed in patients with organic MR than functional MR.

Analysis of mitral valve morphology in dogs undergoing mitral valve repair with three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

INTRODUCTION

Information about real-time three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for the evaluation of canine mitral valve morphology is lacking in veterinary medicine.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility of 3D TEE for the evaluation of canine mitral valves and whether there was a difference in mitral valve morphology between American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) stages.

ANIMALS

Thirty-one dogs were evaluated, including nine dogs classified as ACVIM stage B2, 15 as stage C, and seven as stage D.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional TEE was performed after anesthetic induction for mitral valve surgery, and the 3D geometry of the mitral valve apparatus was measured.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficient was good in both inter- and intraobserver analyses of the 3D measurements of mitral valve annulus geometry and excellent in both inter- and intraobserver analyses in the 3D measurements of mitral valve annular and leaflet sizes. Annulus height to commissural width ratio of stage D dogs showed significantly lower values than B2 dogs (B2: 14.2% [9.1-20.5%]; C: 10.6% [6.5-24.1%]; D: 9.5% [4.7-13.8%]). The aortic-mitral angle of stages C and D were significantly flatter than stage B2 (B2: 122.32 ± 9.39; C: 133.66 ± 8.43; D: 140.70 ± 10.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time 3D echocardiography using TEE is a feasible method to evaluate the morphology of the mitral valve in dogs. The saddle shape of the mitral annulus and aortic-mitral angle were flatter in stage D. Further studies are required to understand the pathology of mitral valve disease in dogs.

Multimodality Imaging in Secondary Mitral Regurgitation

Secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) is characterized by left ventricular (LV) dilatation or dysfunction, resulting in failure of mitral leaflet coaptation. sMR complicates up to 35% of ischaemic cardiomyopathies (1) and 57% of dilated cardiomyopathies (2). Due to the prevalence of coronary artery disease worldwide, ischaemic cardiomyopathy is the most frequently encountered cause of sMR in clinical practice. Although mortality from cardiovascular disease has gradually fallen in Western countries, severe sMR remains an independent predictor of mortality (3) and hospitalization for heart failure (4). The presence of even mild sMR following acute MI reduces long-term survival free of major adverse events (1). Such adverse outcomes worsen as the severity of sMR increases, due to a cycle in which LV remodeling begets sMR and vice versa. Current guidelines do not recommend invasive treatment of the sMR alone as a first-line approach, due to the paucity of evidence supporting improvement in clinical outcomes. Furthermore, a lack of international consensus on the thresholds that define severe sMR has resulted in confusion amongst clinicians determining whether intervention is warranted (5, 6). The recent Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation (COAPT) trial (7) assessing the effectiveness of transcatheter mitral valve repair is the first study to demonstrate mortality benefit from correction of sMR and has reignited interest in identifying patients who would benefit from mitral valve intervention. Multimodality imaging, including echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), plays a key role in helping to diagnose, quantify, monitor, and risk stratify patients for surgical and transcatheter mitral valve interventions.

Role of the Imager in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the key role of the structural imager/interventional echocardiographer in transcatheter mitral valve therapies, particularly edge-to-edge repair. In addition, we review important recent advances in structural imaging and briefly describe several novel devices for transcatheter mitral valve repair.

RECENT FINDINGS

Structural imagers represent a new subspecialty in cardiology and anesthesiology with specific skillset and training requirements. Their role is particularly important in imaging-based transcatheter interventions such as edge-to-edge mitral valve repair. This therapy has increasingly been used to treat primary (degenerative) mitral regurgitation when surgical risk is prohibitive and has recently been extended to patients with secondary (functional) mitral regurgitation. As novel transcatheter therapies continue to emerge, so do new multimodality imaging technologies. Structural imagers have become an integral part of the heart team. Their role is particularly visible in transcatheter mitral procedures. Rapidly developing transcatheter therapies have helped shape this new subspecialty and spark innovation in imaging technologies.

Understanding Non-P2 Mitral Regurgitation Using Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography: Characterization and Factors Leading to Underestimation

BACKGROUND

P2 prolapse is a common cause of degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR); echocardiographic characteristics of non-P2 prolapse are less known. Because of the eccentric nature of degenerative MR jets, the evaluation of MR severity is challenging. The aim of this study was to test the hypotheses that (1) the percentage of severe MR determined by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) would be lower compared with that determined by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with non-P2 prolapse and also in a subgroup with "horizontal MR" (a horizontal jet seen on TTE that hugs the leaflets without reaching the atrial wall, particularly found in non-P2 prolapse) and (2) the directions of MR jets between TTE and real-time (RT) three-dimensional (3D) TEE would be discordant.

METHODS

One hundred eighteen patients with moderate to severe and severe degenerative MR defined by TEE were studied. The percentage of severe MR between TTE and TEE was compared in P2 and non-P2 prolapse groups and in horizontal and nonhorizontal MR groups. Additionally, differences in the directions of the MR jets between TTE and RT 3D TEE were assessed.

RESULTS

Eighty-six percent of patients had severe MR according to TEE. TTE underestimated severe MR in the non-P2 group (severe MR on TTE, 57%; severe MR on TEE, 85%; P < .001) but not in the P2 group (severe MR on TTE, 79%; severe MR on TEE, 91%; P = .157). Most "horizontal" MR jets were found in the non-P2 group (85%), and this subgroup showed even more underestimation of severe MR on TTE (TTE, 22%; TEE, 89%; P < .001). There was discordance in MR jet direction between two-dimensional TTE and RT 3D TEE in 41% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-P2 and "horizontal" MR are significantly underestimated on TTE compared with TEE. There is substantial discordance in the direction of the MR jet between RT 3D TEE and TTE. Therefore, TEE should be considered when these subgroups of MR are observed on TTE.

The impact of different geometric assumption of mitral annulus on the assessment of mitral regurgitation volume by Doppler method

Background

Mitral regurgitation volume (MRvol) by quantitative pulsed Doppler (QPD) method previously recommended suffers from geometric assumption error because of circular geometric assumption of mitral annulus (MA). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different geometric assumption of MA on the assessment of MRvol by two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic QPD method.

Methods

This study included 88 patients with varying degrees of mitral regurgitation (MR). The MRvol was evaluated by QPD method using circular or ellipse geometric assumption of MA. MRvol derived from effective regurgitant orifice area by real time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) multiplied by MR velocity-time integral was used as reference method.

Results

Assumption of a circular geometry of MA, QPD-MA_A4C and QPD-MA_PLAX overestimated the MRvol by a mean difference of 10.4 ml (P < 0.0001) and 22.5 ml (P < 0.0001) compared with RT3DE. Assumption of an ellipse geometry of MA, there was no significant difference of MRvol (mean difference = 1.7 ml, P = 0.0844) between the QPD-MA_{A4C + A2C} and the RT3DE.

Conclusions

Assuming that the MA was circular geometry previously recommended, the MRvol by QPD-MA_A4C was overestimated compared with the reference method. However, assuming that the MA was ellipse geometry, the MRvol by the QPD-MA_{A4C + A2C} has no significant difference with the reference method.

Assessment of mitral valve regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common valvular heart disease and is the second most frequent indication for heart valve surgery in Western countries. Echocardiography is the recommended first-line test for the assessment of valvular heart disease, but cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) provides complementary information, especially for assessing MR severity and to plan the timing of intervention. As new CMR techniques for the assessment of MR have arisen, standardizing CMR protocols for research and clinical studies has become important in order to optimize diagnostic utility and support the wider use of CMR for the clinical assessment of MR. In this Consensus Statement, we provide a detailed description of the current evidence on the use of CMR for MR assessment, highlight its current clinical utility, and recommend a standardized CMR protocol and report for MR assessment.

In this Consensus Statement, Garg and colleagues describe the current evidence on the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of mitral regurgitation, highlight its current clinical utility, and recommend a standardized imaging protocol and report.

[Evaluation of mitral regurgitation : How much quantification do we need?]

Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Thus, the correct evaluation of the underlying etiology, pathomechanism and severity is crucial for optimal treatment. Echocardiography is the predominant diagnostic modality in the clinical routine as it enables grading of mitral regurgitation, which can frequently be achieved by readily available qualitative parameters. Additionally, echocardiography provides several methods to quantify the hemodynamic significance of MR. The effective regurgitation orifice area (EROA) is the quantitative parameter best correlated with clinical events. American and European imaging guidelines both recommend the use of quantitative parameters even though they disagree on the cut-off values for secondary MR. The evaluation of MR should always include an assessment of the adjacent heart chambers in order to be able to assess the impact of volume overload on size and function of the left ventricle and left atrium. The final interpretation of the quantitative parameters requires knowledge of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction. Newer 3D-echocardiographic approaches to quantify MR are less dependent on mathematical assumptions and have shown convincing results in several studies but still lack sufficient clinical validation. As an alternative to echocardiography, for specific indications cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proven to be a systematic and observer-independent method for quantification of MR.

A Systematic Review of 4D-Flow MRI Derived Mitral Regurgitation Quantification Methods

Background: Four-dimensional flow cardiac magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR) is an emerging non-invasive imaging technology that can be used to quantify mitral regurgitation (MR) volume. Current methods of quantification have demonstrated limitations in accurate analysis, particularly in difficult cases such as complex congenital heart disease. 4D flow CMR methods aim to circumvent these limitations and allow accurate quantification of MR volume even in complex cases. This systematic review aims to summarize the available literature on 4D flow CMR MR quantification methods and examine their ability to accurately classify MR severity.

Methods: Structured searches were carried out on Medline and EMBASE in December 2018 to identify suitable research outcome studies. The titles and abstracts were screened for relevance, with a third adjudicator utilized when study suitability was uncertain.

Results: Seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. The most widely used 4D flow MRI method was retrospective valve tracking (RVT) which was examined in five papers. The key finding of these papers was that RVT is a reliable and accurate method of regurgitant volume quantification.

Conclusions: MR quantification through 4D flow MRI is both feasible and accurate. The evidence gathered suggests that for MR assessment, 4D flow MRI is potentially as accurate and reliable to echocardiography and may be complementary to this technique. Further work on MR quantification 4D flow image analysis is needed to determine the most accurate analysis technique and to demonstrate 4D flow MRI as a predictor of clinical outcome.

PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42019122837, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019122837

Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation: a review

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a frequent complication after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) associated with a worse prognosis. The pathophysiological mechanisms of IMR are not fully understood, but it is known to be a complex process in which ventricular remodelling is the main causal factor. The various imaging techniques in cardiology and echocardiography fundamentally have contributed significantly to clarify the mechanisms that cause and progressively aggravate IMR. At present, different therapeutic options, the most important of which are cardio-surgical, address this problem. Nowadays the improvement in cardiac surgery and transcatheter therapies, have shown a therapeutic advance in IMR management. IMR is a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with heart failure and depressed left ventricular (LV) systolic function. However, it remains controversial whether mitral regurgitation (MR) in these patients is a consequence of dilation and dysfunction of the LV, or whether it contributes to worsening the prognosis of the ventricular dysfunction. Given that echocardiography has a fundamental reference role in the identification, graduation of severity and evaluation of the therapeutics used in the treatment of MR, we are going to focus on it over the rest of the imaging techniques. In contrast to primary MR the benefits of mitral surgery in patients with secondary MR are uncertain. Therefore, we will comment fundamentally on the role of mitral surgery in patients with IMR, with an update of the different surgical interventions available, without forgetting to mention the other therapeutic options currently available.

Adaptive Color Gain for Vena Contracta Quantification in Valvular Regurgitation

Severe valvular regurgitation can lead to pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Vena contracta width is used to estimate the severity of the regurgitation. Parameters affecting visualization of color Doppler have a significant impact on the measurement. We propose a data-driven method for automated adjustment of color gain based on the peak power of the color Doppler signal in the vicinity of the vena contracta. A linear regression model trained on the peak power was used to predict the orifice diameter. According to our study, the color gain should be set to about 6 dB above where color Doppler data completely disappears from the image. Based on our method, orifices with reference diameters of 4, 6.5 and 8.5 mm were estimated with relative diameter errors within 18%, 12% and 14%, respectively.

An investigation of the anisotropic mechanical properties and anatomical structure of porcine atrioventricular heart valves

Valvular heart diseases are complex disorders, varying in pathophysiological mechanism and affected valve components. Understanding the effects of these diseases on valve functionality requires a thorough characterization of the mechanics and structure of the healthy heart valves. In this study, we performed biaxial mechanical experiments with extensive testing protocols to examine the mechanical behaviors of the mitral valve and tricuspid valve leaflets. We also investigated the effect of loading rate, testing temperatures, species (porcine versus ovine hearts), and age (juvenile vs adult ovine hearts) on the mechanical responses of the leaflet tissues. In addition, we evaluated the structure of chordae tendineae within each valve and performed histological analysis on each atrioventricular leaflet. We found all tissues displayed a characteristic nonlinear anisotropic mechanical response, with radial stretches on average 30.7% higher than circumferential stretches under equibiaxial physiological loading. Tissue mechanical responses showed consistent mechanical stiffening in response to increased loading rate and minor temperature dependence in all five atrioventricular heart valve leaflets. Moreover, our anatomical study revealed similar chordae quantities in the porcine mitral (30.5 ± 1.43 chords) and tricuspid valves (35.3 ± 2.45 chords) but significantly more chordae in the porcine than the ovine valves (p < 0.010). Our histological analyses quantified the relative thicknesses of the four distinct morphological layers in each leaflet. This study provides a comprehensive database of the mechanics and structure of the atrioventricular valves, which will be beneficial to development of subject-specific atrioventricular valve constitutive models and toward multi-scale biomechanical investigations of heart valve function to improve valvular disease treatments.

Prognostic Implications of Magnetic Resonance-Derived Quantification in Asymptomatic Patients With Organic Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With Doppler Echocardiography-Derived Integrative Approach

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an accurate method for the quantitative assessment of organic mitral regurgitation (OMR). The aim of the present study was to compare the discriminative power of MRI quantification and the recommended Doppler echocardiography (ECHO)-derived integrative approach to identify asymptomatic patients with OMR and adverse outcome.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 258 asymptomatic patients (63±14 years, 60% men) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>60%) and chronic moderate and severe OMR (flail 25%, prolapse 75%) defined by using the ECHO-derived integrative approach. All patients underwent MRI to quantify regurgitant volume (RV) of OMR by subtracting the aortic forward flow volume from the total left ventricular stroke volume. Severe OMR was defined as RV≥60 mL.

RESULTS

Mean ECHO-derived RV was on average 17.1 mL larger than the MRI-derived RV (P<0.05). Concordant grading of OMR severity with both techniques was observed in 197 (76%) individuals with 62 (31%) patients having severe OMR (MRI SEV-ECHO SEV) and 135 (69%) patients having moderate OMR (MRI MOD-ECHO MOD). The remaining 61 (24%) individuals had discordant findings (MRI SEV-ECHO MOD or MRI MOD-ECHO SEV) between the 2 techniques. The majority of these differences in OMR classification were observed in patients with late systolic or multiple jets (both κ<0.2). Patients with eccentric jets showed moderate agreement (κ=0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.64). In contrast, a very good agreement (κ=0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.98) was observed in a combination of holosystolic, central, and single jet. During a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range, 3.5-6.0 years), 38 (15%) patients died and 106 (41%) either died or developed indication for mitral valve surgery. In separate Cox regression analyses, the MRI-derived left ventricular end-systolic volume index, RV, and OMR category (severe versus moderate), and the ECHO-derived OMR category were independent predictors of all-cause mortality (all P<0.05). The MRI-derived RV showed the largest area under the curve to predict mortality (0.72) or its combination with the development of indication for mitral valve surgery (0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the present study suggest that the MRI-derived assessment of OMR can better identify patients with severe OMR and adverse outcome than ECHO-derived integrative approach warranting close follow-up and perhaps, early mitral valve surgery.

Echocardiographic 3D-guided 2D planimetry in quantifying left-sided valvular heart disease

Echocardiographic 3D-guided 2D planimetry can improve the accuracy of valvular disease assessment. Acquisition of 3D pyramidal dataset allows subsequent multiplanar reconstruction with accurate orthogonal plane alignment to obtain the correct borders of an anatomic orifice or flow area. Studies examining the 3D-guided 2D planimetry approach in left-sided valvular heart disease were identified and reviewed. The strongest evidence exists for estimating mitral valve area in patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenosis and vena contracta area in patients with mitral regurgitation (both primary and secondary). 3D-guided approach showed excellent feasibility and reproducibility in most studies, as well as time efficiency and good correlation with reference and comparator methods. Therefore, 3D-guided 2D planimetry can be used as an important clinical tool in quantifying left-sided valvular heart disease, especially mitral valve disorders.