Differential Effect of 3-Dimensional Color Doppler Echocardiography for the Quantification of Mitral Regurgitation According to the Severity and Characteristics

Disparities in quantification of mitral valve regurgitation between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and trans-thoracic echocardiography: a systematic review

Primary mitral regurgitation (MR) is a prevalent valvular heart disease. Therapy stratification for MR depends on accurate assessment of MR severity and left ventricular (LV) dimensions. While trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) has been the standard/preferred assessment method, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has gained recognition for its superior assessment of LV dimensions and MR severity. Both imaging modalities have their own advantages and limitation for therapy guidance. However, the differences between the two modalities for assessing/grade severity and clinical impact of MR remains unclear. This systematic review aims to evaluate the differences between TTE and CMR in quantifying MR severity and LV dimensions, providing insights for optimal clinical management. A literature search was performed from inception up to March 21st 2023. This resulted in 2,728 articles. After screening, 22 articles were deemed eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The included study variables were, mitral valve regurgitation volume (MRVOL), regurgitation fraction (MRFRAC), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), LV stroke volume (LVSV), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF). TTE showed a significant higher MRVOL (10.4 ml, I2 = 88%, p = 0.002) and MRFRAC (6.3%, I2 = 51%, p = 0.05) compared to CMR, while CMR demonstrated a higher LVEDV (21.9 ml, I2 = 66%, p =  < 0.001) and LVESV (16.8 ml, I2 = 0%, p =  < 0.001) compared to TTE. Our findings demonstrate substantial disparities in TTE and CMR derived measurements for parameters that play a pivotal role in the clinical stratification guidelines. This discrepancy prompts a critical question regarding the prognostic value of both imaging modalities, which warrants future research.

Mitral Regurgitation Evaluation in Modern Echocardiography: Bridging Standard Techniques and Advanced Tools for Enhanced Assessment

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is one of the most common valvular heart diseases worldwide. Echocardiography remains the first line and most effective imaging modality for the diagnosis of mitral valve (MV) pathology and quantitative assessment of MR. The advent of three-dimensional echocardiography has significantly enhanced the evaluation of MV anatomy and function. Furthermore, recent advancements in cardiovascular imaging software have emerged as step-forward tools, providing a powerful support for acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of cardiac ultrasound images in the context of MR. This review aims to provide an overview of the contemporary workflow for echocardiographic assessment of MR, encompassing standard echocardiographic techniques and the integration of semiautomated and automated ultrasound solutions. These novel approaches include advancements in segmentation, phenotyping, morphological quantification, functional grading, and chamber quantification.

Echocardiography vs. CMR in the Quantification of Chronic Mitral Regurgitation: A Happy Marriage or Stormy Divorce?

Quantification of chronic mitral regurgitation (MR) is essential to guide patients’ clinical management and define the need and appropriate timing for mitral valve surgery. Echocardiography represents the first-line imaging modality to assess MR and requires an integrative approach based on qualitative, semiquantitative, and quantitative parameters. Of note, quantitative parameters, such as the echocardiographic effective regurgitant orifice area, regurgitant volume (RegV), and regurgitant fraction (RegF), are considered the most reliable indicators of MR severity. In contrast, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has demonstrated high accuracy and good reproducibility in quantifying MR, especially in cases with secondary MR; nonholosystolic, eccentric, and multiple jets; or noncircular regurgitant orifices, where quantification with echocardiography is an issue. No gold standard for MR quantification by noninvasive cardiac imaging has been defined so far. Only a moderate agreement has been shown between echocardiography, either with transthoracic or transesophageal approaches, and CMR in MR quantification, as supported by numerous comparative studies. A higher agreement is evidenced when echocardiographic 3D techniques are used. CMR is superior to echocardiography in the calculation of the RegV, RegF, and ventricular volumes and can provide myocardial tissue characterization. However, echocardiography remains fundamental in the pre-operative anatomical evaluation of the mitral valve and of the subvalvular apparatus. The aim of this review is to explore the accuracy of MR quantification provided by echocardiography and CMR in a head-to-head comparison between the two techniques, with insight into the technical aspects of each imaging modality.

Clinical Utility of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Mitral Valve Disease: Tips and Tricks

Although real-time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE) has only been introduced in the last decades, its use still needs to be improved since it is a time-consuming and operator-dependent technique and acquiring a good quality data can be difficult. Moreover, the additive value of this important diagnostic tool still needs to be wholly appreciated in clinical practice. This review aims at explaining how, why, and when performing RT3DE is useful in clinical practice.

Quantification of primary mitral regurgitation by echocardiography: A practical appraisal

The accurate quantification of primary mitral regurgitation (MR) and its consequences on cardiac remodeling is of paramount importance to determine the best timing for surgery in these patients. The recommended echocardiographic grading of primary MR severity relies on an integrated multiparametric approach. It is expected that the large number of echocardiographic parameters collected would offer the possibility to check the measured values regarding their congruence in order to conclude reliably on MR severity. However, the use of multiple parameters to grade MR can result in potential discrepancies between one or more of them. Importantly, many factors beyond MR severity impact the values obtained for these parameters including technical settings, anatomic and hemodynamic considerations, patient's characteristics and echocardiographer' skills. Hence, clinicians involved in valvular diseases should be well aware of the respective strengths and pitfalls of each of MR grading methods by echocardiography. Recent literature highlighted the need for a reappraisal of the severity of primary MR from a hemodynamic perspective. The estimation of MR regurgitation fraction by indirect quantitative methods, whenever possible, should be central when grading the severity of these patients. The assessment of the MR effective regurgitant orifice area by the proximal flow convergence method should be used in a semi-quantitative manner. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge specific clinical situations in MR at risk of misevaluation when grading severity such as late-systolic MR, bi-leaflet prolapse with multiple jets or extensive leak, wall-constrained eccentric jet or in older patients with complex MR mechanism. Finally, it is debatable whether the 4-grades classification of MR severity would be still relevant nowadays, since the indication for mitral valve (MV) surgery is discussed in clinical practice for patients with 3+ and 4+ primary MR based on symptoms, specific markers of adverse outcome and MV repair probability. Primary MR grading should be seen as a continuum integrating both quantification of MR and its consequences, even for patients with presumed "moderate" MR.

Spatiotemporal Complexity of Vena Contracta and Mitral Regurgitation Grading Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Analysis

BACKGROUND

Spatiotemporal complexity of the color Doppler vena contracta challenging the assumption of a circular and constant orifice may lead to mitral regurgitation (MR) grading inconsistencies. Using 3D transesophageal echocardiography, we characterized spatiotemporal vena contracta complexity and its impact on MR severity grading.

METHODS

In 192 patients with suspected moderate or severe MR (100 primary MR [PMR]; 92 secondary MR [SMR]), we performed three-dimensional vena contracta area (VCA) quantification using single-frame (midsystolic or VCAmid, maximum or VCAmax) and multiframe (VCAmean) methods, as well as measures of orifice shape (shape index) and systolic variation of VCA. Vena contracta complexity and intermethod discrepancies were analyzed and correlated with functional class and pulmonary vein flow (PVF) patterns and with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in a subset of cases (n = 20).

RESULTS

The vena contracta was noncircular (shape index > 1.5) in 90% of patients. Severe noncircularity (shape index > 3) was more prevalent in SMR than in PMR (32.4% vs 14.6%). Variations of the VCA were more prominent in SMR than in PMR. VCAmid showed a low grading agreement with VCAmax (62%) and high grading agreement with VCAmean (83.3%). Pulmonary vein flow systolic reversal was associated with MR severity by VCA in SMR but not in PMR. VCAmid and VCAmean showed a stronger association with systolic flow reversal than VCAmax (area under the curve, 0.88, 0.86, and 0.79, respectively). In the subset of patients with CMR quantification, severe MR by VCAmax was graded as nonsevere by CMR more frequently compared with VCAmid and VCAmean.

CONCLUSIONS

Highly prevalent spatiotemporal vena contracta complexity features in MR challenge the assumption of a circular and constant orifice. VCAmid seems the best single-frame approximation to multiframe quantification, and VCAmax may lead to severity overestimation.

Mitral regurgitation management: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations

Multiple guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of mitral regurgitation (MR), the second most common valvular heart disease in high-income countries, with recommendations that do not always match. We systematically reviewed guidelines on diagnosis and management of MR, highlighting similarities and differences to guide clinical decision-making. We searched national and international guidelines in MEDLINE and EMBASE (1 June 2010 to 1 September 2021), the Guidelines International Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Library for Health Guidelines Finder, Canadian Medical Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Infobase, and websites of relevant organizations. Two reviewers independently screened the abstracts and identified articles of interest. Guidelines that were rigorously developed (as assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument) were retained for analysis. Five guidelines were retained. There was consensus on a multidisciplinary approach from the heart team and for the definition and grading of severe primary MR. There was general agreement on the thresholds for intervention in symptomatic and asymptomatic primary MR; however, discrepancies were present. There was agreement on optimization of medical therapy in severe secondary MR and intervention in patients symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy, but no consensus on the choice of intervention (surgical repair/replacement vs. transcatheter approach). Cut-offs for high-risk intervention in MR, risk stratification of progressive MR, and guidance on mixed valvular disease were sparse.

A Novel Approach for Semi Automated 3D Quantification of Mitral Regurgitant Volume Reflects a More Physiologic Approach to MR

BACKGROUND

Quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR) by echocardiography is an integral to assessing lesion severity, and entails integration of multiple Doppler-based parameters. These methods are primarily founded upon the principle of PISA (proximal isovelocity surface area), a 2D method known to employ several assumptions regarding MR jet characteristics. We analyzed the results of a semi-automated method of 3D-based RV estimation which accounts for jet behavior throughout the cardiac cycle, and compared it to conventional 2D PISA methods for MR.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients referred for transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) for evaluation of primary (n= 25) and secondary MR (n=25) were included for analysis. 3D full volume color data sets were acquired, along with standard 2D methods for PISA calculation. 3D semi-automated MR flow quantification algorithm was applied offline to calculate 3D regurgitant volume (RVol), with simultaneous temporal curves generated from the 3D dataset. 3DRvol was compared to 2DRVol. 3D vena contracta area was also performed in all cases.

RESULTS

There was a modest correlation between 2DRVol and 3DRVol (r = 0.60). The semi-automated 3D approach resulted in significantly lower RV values compared to 2D PISA. Real-time and dynamic flow curve patterns were used for integral estimates of 3DRVol over the cardiac cycle, with a distinct bimodal pattern in functional MR, and brief and solitary peak in primary.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a semi-automated 3D software for quantification of mitral regurgitation allows for simultaneous calculation of 3D RVol with an automated generation of dynamic flow curves characteristic of the underlying MR mechanism. Our flow curve pattern results highlight well-known differences between MR flow dynamics in degenerative MR compared to functional MR.

Computational Analysis of Virtual Echocardiographic Assessment of Functional Mitral Regurgitation for Validation of Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area Methods

BACKGROUND

Mitral regurgitation (MR) quantification by the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method remains challenging. Using computer models, the authors evaluated the accuracy of different PISA methods and quantified their errors.

METHODS

Five functional MR computer models of different geometric and tethering abnormalities were created, validated, and treated as phantom models, from which the reference values were directly obtained. Virtual two-dimensional (2D) PISA and three-dimensional (3D) PISA (both peak and integrated values) were performed on these phantom models. By comparing virtual PISA results with reference values, the accuracy of different PISA methods was evaluated, and their sources of errors were quantified.

RESULTS

Compared with reference values of regurgitant flow rate, excellent correlations were found for true PISA (r = 0.99, bias = 32.3 ± 35.3 mL/sec), 3D PISA (r = 0.97, bias = -24.4 ± 55.5 mL/sec), followed by multiplane 2D hemicylindrical PISA (r = 0.88, bias = -24.1 ± 85.4 mL/sec) and hemiellipsoidal PISA (r = 0.91, bias = -55.7 ± 96.6 mL/sec). Weaker correlations were found for single-plane 2D hemispherical PISA (parasternal long-axis: r = 0.71, bias = -77.6 ± 124.5 mL/sec; apical two-chamber: r = 0.69, bias = -52.0 ± 122.0 mL/sec; apical four-chamber: r = 0.82, bias = -65.5 ± 107.3 mL/sec). For regurgitant volume quantification, integrated PISA was more accurate than peak PISA. The bias of 3D PISA improved from -12.7 ± 7.8 mL (peak PISA) to -2.1 ± 5.3 mL (integrated PISA).

CONCLUSIONS

For functional MR quantification, 2D hemispherical PISA had significant underestimation, multiplane 2D hemiellipsoidal and hemicylindrical PISA showed improved accuracy, and 3D PISA was the most accurate. The PISA method is subject to both systematic underestimation due to the Doppler angle effect and systematic overestimation when regurgitant flow is not perpendicular to PISA contour. Integrated PISA is able to capture dynamic MR and is therefore more accurate than peak PISA. The sum of regurgitant flow rates is the most feasible way to perform integrated PISA.

Quantification of regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse with automated real time echocardiographic 3D proximal isovelocity surface area: multimodality consistency and role of eccentricity index

Three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (3D-TTE) provides a semi-automated proximal isovelocity surface area method (3D-PISA) to obtain quantitative parameters. Data assessing regurgitation severity in mitral valve prolapse (MVP) are scarce, so we assessed the 3D-PISA method compared with 2D-PISA and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and the role of an eccentricity index. We evaluated the 3D-PISA method for assessing MR in 54 patients with MVP (57 ± 14 years; 42 men; 12 mild/mild-moderate; 12 moderate-severe; and 30 severe MR). Role of an asymmetric (i.e. eccentricity index ≥ 1.25) flow convergence region (FCR) and inter-modality consistency were then assessed. 3D-PISA derived regurgitant volume (RVol) showed a good correlation with 2D-PISA and CMR derived parameters (r = 0.86 and r = 0.81, respectively). The small mean differences with 2D-PISA derived RVol did not reach statistical significance in overall population (5.7 ± 23 ml, 95% CI - 0.6 to 12; p = 0.08) but differed in those with asymmetric 3D-FCR (n = 21; 2D-PISA: 72 ± 36 ml vs. 3D-PISA: 93 ± 47 ml; p = 0.001). RVol mean values were higher using PISA methods (CMR 57 ± 33 ml; 2D-PISA 73 ± 39 ml; and 3D-PISA 79 ± 45 ml) and an overestimation was observed when CMR was used as reference (2D-PISA vs. CMR: mean difference: 15.8 ml [95% CI 10-22, p < 0.001]; and 3D-PISA vs. CMR: 21.5 ml [95% CI 14-29, p < 0.001]). Intra- and inter-observer reliability was excellent (ICC 0.91-0.99), but with numerically lower coefficient of variation for 3D-PISA (8%-10% vs. 2D-PISA: 12%-16%). 3D-PISA method for assessing regurgitation in MVP may enable analogous evaluation compared to standard 2D-PISA, but with overestimation in case of asymmetric FCR or when CMR is used as reference method.

Multimodality Imaging in Secondary Mitral Regurgitation

Secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) is characterized by left ventricular (LV) dilatation or dysfunction, resulting in failure of mitral leaflet coaptation. sMR complicates up to 35% of ischaemic cardiomyopathies (1) and 57% of dilated cardiomyopathies (2). Due to the prevalence of coronary artery disease worldwide, ischaemic cardiomyopathy is the most frequently encountered cause of sMR in clinical practice. Although mortality from cardiovascular disease has gradually fallen in Western countries, severe sMR remains an independent predictor of mortality (3) and hospitalization for heart failure (4). The presence of even mild sMR following acute MI reduces long-term survival free of major adverse events (1). Such adverse outcomes worsen as the severity of sMR increases, due to a cycle in which LV remodeling begets sMR and vice versa. Current guidelines do not recommend invasive treatment of the sMR alone as a first-line approach, due to the paucity of evidence supporting improvement in clinical outcomes. Furthermore, a lack of international consensus on the thresholds that define severe sMR has resulted in confusion amongst clinicians determining whether intervention is warranted (5, 6). The recent Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation (COAPT) trial (7) assessing the effectiveness of transcatheter mitral valve repair is the first study to demonstrate mortality benefit from correction of sMR and has reignited interest in identifying patients who would benefit from mitral valve intervention. Multimodality imaging, including echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), plays a key role in helping to diagnose, quantify, monitor, and risk stratify patients for surgical and transcatheter mitral valve interventions.

Proportionate or disproportionate secondary mitral regurgitation: how to untangle the Gordian knot?

Recent randomised percutaneous mitral intervention trials in patients with heart failure with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) have yielded contrasting results. A 'relative load' or 'proportionality' conceptual framework for SMR has been proposed to partly explain the disparate results. The rationale behind the framework is that SMR depends on the left ventricular dimension and not vice versa. In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of the proportionality parameters used in this framework and also discuss the regurgitant fraction. We also consider haemodynamic observations in SMR that may affect the interpretation and comparisons among proportionality parameters. The conclusion is that the proportionality concept remains hypothetical and requires prospective validation before envisaging its use at individual patient level for risk stratification or therapeutic decision-making.

Understanding Non-P2 Mitral Regurgitation Using Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography: Characterization and Factors Leading to Underestimation

BACKGROUND

P2 prolapse is a common cause of degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR); echocardiographic characteristics of non-P2 prolapse are less known. Because of the eccentric nature of degenerative MR jets, the evaluation of MR severity is challenging. The aim of this study was to test the hypotheses that (1) the percentage of severe MR determined by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) would be lower compared with that determined by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with non-P2 prolapse and also in a subgroup with "horizontal MR" (a horizontal jet seen on TTE that hugs the leaflets without reaching the atrial wall, particularly found in non-P2 prolapse) and (2) the directions of MR jets between TTE and real-time (RT) three-dimensional (3D) TEE would be discordant.

METHODS

One hundred eighteen patients with moderate to severe and severe degenerative MR defined by TEE were studied. The percentage of severe MR between TTE and TEE was compared in P2 and non-P2 prolapse groups and in horizontal and nonhorizontal MR groups. Additionally, differences in the directions of the MR jets between TTE and RT 3D TEE were assessed.

RESULTS

Eighty-six percent of patients had severe MR according to TEE. TTE underestimated severe MR in the non-P2 group (severe MR on TTE, 57%; severe MR on TEE, 85%; P < .001) but not in the P2 group (severe MR on TTE, 79%; severe MR on TEE, 91%; P = .157). Most "horizontal" MR jets were found in the non-P2 group (85%), and this subgroup showed even more underestimation of severe MR on TTE (TTE, 22%; TEE, 89%; P < .001). There was discordance in MR jet direction between two-dimensional TTE and RT 3D TEE in 41% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-P2 and "horizontal" MR are significantly underestimated on TTE compared with TEE. There is substantial discordance in the direction of the MR jet between RT 3D TEE and TTE. Therefore, TEE should be considered when these subgroups of MR are observed on TTE.

Average pixel intensity method for prediction of outcome in secondary mitral regurgitation

Background

Echocardiographic grading of secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) severity is challenging and involves multiple guideline-recommended parameters. We previously introduced the average pixel intensity (API) method for grading SMR. In this study, the clinical outcome in SMR based on the API method for grading MR was compared with conventional grading methods.

Methods

231 patients with systolic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (ischaemic/non-ischaemic) and SMR were prospectively enrolled. MR was graded using all guideline-recommended parameters and the API method, which is based on the pixel intensity of the continuous wave Doppler signal. The primary outcome was MACE (major adverse cardiac event).

Results

The API method was applicable in 98% of patients with SMR (n=227). During a median follow-up of 24 months, 98 patients (43%) had a MACE (cardiovascular mortality (n=50, 22%), heart failure hospitalisation (n=44, 19%), mitral valve surgery (n=11, 5%), percutaneous mitral intervention (n=12, 5%), heart transplantation (n=5, 2%)). On log-rank test, the API method was highly significant in predicting clinical outcome. On multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, SMR grading with the API method was an independent predictor of clinical outcome (along with NYHA class and right ventricular systolic pressure; p<0.001), increasing the event risk by 9% per 10 au API rise (p=0.001). In the same multivariable analysis, proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA)-effective regurgitant orifice area or PISA-regurgitant volume were not independent predictors of events (p=0.18 and 0.26, respectively).

Conclusion

SMR grading with the API method is an independent predictor of clinical outcome and provides prognostic information in addition to clinical and other echocardiographic variables.

Comparative quantification of primary mitral regurgitation by computer modeling and simulated echocardiography

Clinical investigations have demonstrated that mitral regurgitation (MR) quantification using echocardiography (echo) may significantly underestimate or overestimate the regurgitant volume, especially for two-dimensional (2D) echo. Computer modeling and simulated echo were conducted to evaluate the fundamental assumptions in the echo quantification of primary MR that is due to posterior mitral leaflet prolapse. The theoretical flaw of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method originates from the assumption that the MR flow rate is the product of the isovelocity surface area and aliasing velocity, which is only valid when the velocity vectors are perpendicular to the isovelocity surface. Other factors such as the Doppler angle effect, the view planes of 2D echo, and the single time instant of PISA were also analyzed. We find that the hemielliptic PISA method gives the smallest error for moderate and severe MR cases compared with other PISA methods. Compared with the PISA method, the volumetric technique (VT) is theoretically more robust. By considering correction factors that are caused by nonflat velocity profiles and the closing volume of the aortic valve, the accuracy of the VT method can be significantly improved. The corrected volumetric technique provides more accurate results compared with the PISA methods, especially for mild MR.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We evaluate the accuracy of common echocardiography techniques for the quantification of primary mitral regurgitations using computer modeling. The hemielliptic proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method gives the smallest error (within 15%) for moderate and severe mitral regurgitation cases compared with other PISA methods. The volumetric method is theoretically more robust than the PISA method. The accuracy of the volumetric method can be improved by a correction factor around 0.7 because of the nonflat velocity profiles and the closing volume of the aortic valve.

Assessment of mitral valve regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common valvular heart disease and is the second most frequent indication for heart valve surgery in Western countries. Echocardiography is the recommended first-line test for the assessment of valvular heart disease, but cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) provides complementary information, especially for assessing MR severity and to plan the timing of intervention. As new CMR techniques for the assessment of MR have arisen, standardizing CMR protocols for research and clinical studies has become important in order to optimize diagnostic utility and support the wider use of CMR for the clinical assessment of MR. In this Consensus Statement, we provide a detailed description of the current evidence on the use of CMR for MR assessment, highlight its current clinical utility, and recommend a standardized CMR protocol and report for MR assessment.

In this Consensus Statement, Garg and colleagues describe the current evidence on the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of mitral regurgitation, highlight its current clinical utility, and recommend a standardized imaging protocol and report.

[Evaluation of mitral regurgitation : How much quantification do we need?]

Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Thus, the correct evaluation of the underlying etiology, pathomechanism and severity is crucial for optimal treatment. Echocardiography is the predominant diagnostic modality in the clinical routine as it enables grading of mitral regurgitation, which can frequently be achieved by readily available qualitative parameters. Additionally, echocardiography provides several methods to quantify the hemodynamic significance of MR. The effective regurgitation orifice area (EROA) is the quantitative parameter best correlated with clinical events. American and European imaging guidelines both recommend the use of quantitative parameters even though they disagree on the cut-off values for secondary MR. The evaluation of MR should always include an assessment of the adjacent heart chambers in order to be able to assess the impact of volume overload on size and function of the left ventricle and left atrium. The final interpretation of the quantitative parameters requires knowledge of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction. Newer 3D-echocardiographic approaches to quantify MR are less dependent on mathematical assumptions and have shown convincing results in several studies but still lack sufficient clinical validation. As an alternative to echocardiography, for specific indications cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proven to be a systematic and observer-independent method for quantification of MR.

Multimodality imaging in ischaemic heart failure

In heart failure, extensive evaluation with modern non-invasive imaging modalities is needed to assess causes, pathophysiology, and haemodynamics, to determine prognosis and consider therapeutic options. This systematic evaluation includes a stepwise assessment of left ventricular size and function, the presence and severity of coronary artery disease, mitral regurgitation, pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular dilation and dysfunction, and tricuspid regurgitation. Based on this imaging-derived information, the need for specific therapies besides optimised medical therapy can be determined. The need for revascularisation, implantation of an implantable cardiac defibrillator, and mitral or tricuspid valve repair or replacement, can be (partially) guided by non-invasive imaging. Importantly, randomised controlled trials on the use of non-inasive imaging to guide therapy are scarce in this field and most non-pharmacological therapies are based on expert-consensus, but whenever trials are available, they will be addressed in this paper.

Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Valvular Heart Disease: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article will review the current techniques in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) for diagnosing and assessing primary valvular heart disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent advancements in CMR have led to an increased role of this modality for qualifying and quantifying various native valve diseases. Phase-contrast velocity encoded imaging is a well-established technique that can be used to quantify aortic and pulmonic flow. This technique, combined with the improved ability for CMR to obtain accurate left and right ventricular volumetrics, has allowed for increased accuracy and reproducibility in assessing valvular dysfunction. Advancements in CMR technology also allows for improved spatial and temporal resolution imaging of various valves and their regurgitant or stenotic jets. Therefore, CMR can be a powerful tool in evaluation of native valvular heart disease. The role of CMR in assessing valvular heart disease is growing and being recognized in recent guidelines. CMR has the ability to assess valve morphology along with qualifying and quantifying valvular disease. In addition, the ability to obtain accurate volumetric measurements may improve more precise management strategies and may lead to improvements in mortality and morbidity.

Integrated imaging of echocardiography and computed tomography to grade mitral regurgitation severity in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Aims

Quantitative mitral regurgitation (MR) grading remains challenging. This study evaluated the concept of integrating echocardiography and computed tomography for grading MR severity. Specifically, an integrated parameter was developed that combines the true cross-sectional mitral regurgitant orifice area (ROA) assessed with multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) with flow data from echocardiography.

Methods and results

Systolic MDCT data of 73 patients, referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) who also had MR, were evaluated. The MDCT systolic phase with the smaller left ventricular volume and the largest mitral regurgitant orifice was selected. Using planimetry, the mitral ROA was measured. The mitral ROA was multiplied with the velocity time integral of the MR jet on echocardiography for the calculation of the integrated regurgitant volume (RVol). MDCT analysis showed a mean mitral ROA of 11.3 ± 7.4 mm2 and a mean integrated RVol of 21.4 ± 14.7 mL/beat, whereas echocardiography showed a mean effective ROA and RVol of MR of 13.3 ± 8.2 mm2 and 23.9 ± 13.6 mL/beat, respectively. Compared with echocardiography, grading based on integrated mitral RVol resulted in reclassification of 10% of the patients from severe to non-severe MR and 14% of the patients from non-severe to severe MR.

Conclusions

Integrated mitral RVol is a quantitative parameter of MR severity by combining the true cross-sectional mitral ROA assessed with MDCT and Doppler mitral haemodynamics which resulted in a significant reclassification of MR grade in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR.

Impact of a Geometric Correction for Proximal Flow Constraint on the Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation Severity Using the Proximal Flow Convergence Method

Background

Overestimation of the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) by the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method has been reported. We sought to test whether angle correction (AC) of the constrained flow field is helpful to eliminate overestimation in patients with eccentric MR.

Methods

In a total of 33 patients with MR due to prolapse or flail mitral valve, both echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance image (CMR) were performed to calculate regurgitant volume (RV). In addition to RV by conventional PISA (RV_PISA), convergence angle (α) was measured from 2-dimensional Doppler color flow maps and RV was corrected by multiplying by α/180 (RV_AC). RV measured by CMR (RV_CMR) was used as a gold standard, which was calculated by the difference between total stroke volume measured by planimetry of the short axis slices and aortic stroke volume by phase-contrast image.

Results

The correlation between RV_CMR and RV by echocardiography was modest [RV_CMR vs. RV_PISA (r = 0.712, p < 0.001) and RV_CMR vs. RV_AC (r = 0.766, p < 0.001)]. However, RV_PISA showed significant overestimation (RV_PISA - RV_CMR = 50.6 ± 40.6 mL vs. RV_AC - RV_CMR = 7.7 ± 23.4 mL, p < 0.001). The overall accuracy of RV_PISA for diagnosis of severe MR, defined as RV ≥ 60 mL, was 57.6% (19/33), whereas it increased to 84.8% (28/33) by using RV_AC (p = 0.028).

Conclusion

Conventional PISA method tends to provide falsely large RV in patients with eccentric MR and a simple geometric AC of the proximal constraint flow largely eliminates overestimation.

Multimodality imaging for the quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation

The natural history of mitral regurgitation (MR) results in significant morbidity and mortality. Innovations in non-invasive imaging have provided new insights into the pathophysiology and quantification of MR, in addition to early detection of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and prognostic assessment in asymptomatic patients. Transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal (TOE) echocardiography are the mainstay for diagnosis, assessment and serial surveillance. However, the advance from 2D to 3D imaging leads to improved assessment and characterization of mitral valve (MV) disease. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is increasingly used for MR quantitation and can provide an alternative imaging method if echocardiography is suboptimal or inconclusive. Other techniques such as exercise echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging and speckle-tracking echocardiography can further offer complementary information on prognosis. This review summarises the current evidence for state-of-the-art cardiovascular imaging for the investigation of MR. Whilst advanced echocardiographic techniques are superior in the evaluation of complex MV anatomy, CMR appears the most accurate technique for the quantification of MR severity. Integration of multimodality imaging for the assessment of MR utilises the advantages of each imaging technique and offers the most comprehensive assessment of MR.

Prognostic Implications of Magnetic Resonance-Derived Quantification in Asymptomatic Patients With Organic Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With Doppler Echocardiography-Derived Integrative Approach

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an accurate method for the quantitative assessment of organic mitral regurgitation (OMR). The aim of the present study was to compare the discriminative power of MRI quantification and the recommended Doppler echocardiography (ECHO)-derived integrative approach to identify asymptomatic patients with OMR and adverse outcome.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 258 asymptomatic patients (63±14 years, 60% men) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>60%) and chronic moderate and severe OMR (flail 25%, prolapse 75%) defined by using the ECHO-derived integrative approach. All patients underwent MRI to quantify regurgitant volume (RV) of OMR by subtracting the aortic forward flow volume from the total left ventricular stroke volume. Severe OMR was defined as RV≥60 mL.

RESULTS

Mean ECHO-derived RV was on average 17.1 mL larger than the MRI-derived RV (P<0.05). Concordant grading of OMR severity with both techniques was observed in 197 (76%) individuals with 62 (31%) patients having severe OMR (MRI SEV-ECHO SEV) and 135 (69%) patients having moderate OMR (MRI MOD-ECHO MOD). The remaining 61 (24%) individuals had discordant findings (MRI SEV-ECHO MOD or MRI MOD-ECHO SEV) between the 2 techniques. The majority of these differences in OMR classification were observed in patients with late systolic or multiple jets (both κ<0.2). Patients with eccentric jets showed moderate agreement (κ=0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.64). In contrast, a very good agreement (κ=0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.98) was observed in a combination of holosystolic, central, and single jet. During a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range, 3.5-6.0 years), 38 (15%) patients died and 106 (41%) either died or developed indication for mitral valve surgery. In separate Cox regression analyses, the MRI-derived left ventricular end-systolic volume index, RV, and OMR category (severe versus moderate), and the ECHO-derived OMR category were independent predictors of all-cause mortality (all P<0.05). The MRI-derived RV showed the largest area under the curve to predict mortality (0.72) or its combination with the development of indication for mitral valve surgery (0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the present study suggest that the MRI-derived assessment of OMR can better identify patients with severe OMR and adverse outcome than ECHO-derived integrative approach warranting close follow-up and perhaps, early mitral valve surgery.

Quantification of Multiple Mitral Regurgitant Jets: An In Vitro Validation Study Comparing Two- and Three-Dimensional Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area Methods

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method for the quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR), in the case of multiple jets, is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate different two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) PISA methods using 3D color Doppler data sets.

METHODS

Several regurgitant volumes (Rvols) were simulated using a pulsatile pump connected to a phantom equipped with single and double regurgitant orifices of different sizes and interspaces. A flowmeter served as the reference method. Transthoracic (TTE) and transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were used to acquire the 3D data sets. Offline, Rvols were calculated by 2D PISA methods based on hemispheric and hemicylindric assumptions and by 3D integrated PISA.

RESULTS

A fusion of the PISA was observed in the setting of narrow-spaced regurgitant orifices; compared with flowmeter, Rvol was underestimated using the single hemispheric PISA model (TTE: Bland-Altman bias ± limit of agreement, -17.5 ± 8.9 mL; TEE: -15.9 ± 7.3 mL) and overestimated using the double hemispheric PISA model (TTE: +7.1 ± 14.6 mL; TEE: +10.4 ± 11.9 mL). The combined approach (hemisphere for single orifice, hemicylinder with two bases for nonfused PISAs, and hemicylinder with one base for fused PISAs) was more precise (TTE: -3.4 ± 6.3 mL; TEE: -1.9 ± 5.6 mL). Three-dimensional integrated PISA was the most accurate method to quantify Rvol (TTE: -2.1 ± 6.5 mL; TEE -3.2 ± 4.8 mL).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of double MR orifices, the 2D combined approach and integrated 3D PISA appear to be superior as compared with the conventional hemispheric method, thus providing tools for the challenging quantification of MR with multiple jets.

An easy-to-use scoring index to determine severity of mitral regurgitation by 2D echocardiography in clinical practice

PURPOSE

Mitral regurgitation (MR) grading by two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography is challenging, but important to determine the best treatment strategy in patients with MR. Current guidelines advocate an integrative approach, although no recommendation is provided on how to do so. An easy-to-use index will be helpful for standardized and reproducible MR grading.

METHODS

Eleven echocardiographic parameters were retrospectively evaluated in 145 patients with moderate or severe MR. Parameters were scored positive or negative for severe MR, where expert panel consensus reading was considered as the reference standard. Logistic regression was performed, and adjusted coefficients were used to create a risk score for severe MR per patient (ROSE-index). The best cutoff with corresponding predictive values was determined.

RESULTS

Eighty-two percent of all parameters could be determined. Multivariable analysis revealed five parameters that remained significant predictors for severe MR: morphology, jet characteristics, vena contracta, systolic reversal, and left ventricular dimensions. With different weighing, a total score of 8 could be obtained. Median total ROSE-index score for moderate (2.0) and severe MR (5.0) did significantly differ. The cutoff score (≥4) revealed sensitivity 0.84 and specificity 0.83 to diagnose severe MR. Negative predictive value was 100% for score 0 and 1; score 6-8 showed a 100% positive predictive value. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were excellent (K-values >0.80).

CONCLUSION

Here, we propose an easy-to-use tool for integrated analysis of guideline parameters to assess MR severity. Using this so-called ROSE-index revealed reliable and reproducible assessment of severe MR (cutoff≥4) that may be helpful for clinical decision making.

What Does 3D Echocardiography Add to 2D Echocardiography in the Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review was to elucidate the additional value of 3D echocardiography for the assessment of mitral regurgitation (MR) compared to standard 2D echocardiography.

RECENT FINDINGS

3D echocardiography provides key information, aetiology, degenerative mitral valve disease vs. secondary MR, causes and mechanism, severity by measurements of effective regurgitant orifice area and regurgitant volume; likelihood of reparability and assessment of pre- and intra-mitral valve transcatheter procedures. 3D echocardiography as a promising method for assessment of MR is useful and crucial for research, clinical practice and patient management in all heart valve team members.

Three-dimensional proximal flow convergence automatic calculation for determining mitral valve area in rheumatic mitral stenosis

PURPOSE

Management of patients with mitral stenosis (MS) depends heavily on the accurate quantification of mitral valve area (MVA) using echocardiography. All currently used two-dimensional (2D) methods have limitations. Estimation of MVA using the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method with real time three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography may circumvent those limitations. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 3D direct measurement of PISA in the estimation of MVA.

METHODS

Twenty-seven consecutive patients (median age of 63 years; 77.8% females) with rheumatic MS were prospectively studied. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography with 2D and 3D acquisitions were performed on the same day. The reference method for MVA quantification was valve planimetry after 3D-volume multiplanar reconstruction. A semi-automated software was used to calculate the 3D flow convergence volume.

RESULTS

Compared to MVA estimation using 3D planimetry, 3D PISA showed the best correlation (rho=0.78, P<.0001), followed by pressure half-time (PHT: rho=0.66, P<.001), continuity equation (CE: rho=0.61, P=.003), and 2D PISA (rho=0.26, P=.203). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a good agreement for MVA estimation with 3D PISA (mean difference -0.03 cm² ; limits of agreement (LOA) -0.40-0.35), in contrast to wider LOA for 2D methods: CE (mean difference 0.02 cm² , LOA -0.56-0.60); PHT (mean difference 0.31 cm² , LOA -0.32-0.95); 2D PISA (mean difference -0.03 cm² , LOA -0.92-0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

MVA estimation using 3D PISA was feasible and more accurate than 2D methods. Its introduction in daily clinical practice seems possible and may overcome technical limitations of 2D methods.

[Real-time 3D echocardiography for estimation of severity in valvular heart disease : Impact on current guidelines]

Besides providing spatial anatomic information on heart valves, real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) combined with color Doppler has the potential to overcome the limitations of flow quantification inherent to conventional 2D color Doppler methods. Recent studies validated the application of color Doppler 3DE (cD-3DE) for the quantification of regurgitation flow based on the vena contracta area (VCA) and the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) methods. Particularly the assessment of VCA by cD-3DE led to a change of paradigm by understanding of the VCA as being strongly asymmetric in the majority of patients and etiologies. This review provides a comprehensive description of the different concepts of cD-3DE-based flow quantification in the setting of different valvular heart diseases and their presentation in recent guidelines.

Advanced imaging in valvular heart disease

Although echocardiography remains the mainstay imaging technique for the evaluation of patients with valvular heart disease (VHD), innovations in noninvasive imaging in the past few years have provided new insights into the pathophysiology and quantification of VHD, early detection of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and advanced prognostic assessment. The severity grading of valve dysfunction has been refined with the use of Doppler echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and CT imaging. LV ejection fraction remains an important criterion when deciding whether patients should be referred for surgery. However, echocardiographic strain imaging can now detect impaired LV systolic function before LV ejection fraction reduces, thus provoking the debate on whether patients with severe VHD should be referred for surgery at an earlier stage (before symptom onset). Impaired LV strain correlates with the amount of myocardial fibrosis detected with CMR techniques. Furthermore, accumulating data show that the extent of fibrosis associated with severe VHD has important prognostic implications. The present Review focuses on using these novel imaging modalities to assess pathophysiology, early LV dysfunction, and prognosis of major VHDs, including aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation, and aortic regurgitation.

Three-dimensional Echocardiography in Congenital Heart Disease: An Expert Consensus Document from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography

Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) has become important in the management of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), particularly with pre-surgical planning, guidance of catheter intervention, and functional assessment of the heart. 3DE is increasingly used in children because of good acoustic windows and the non-invasive nature of the technique. The aim of this paper is to provide a review of the optimal application of 3DE in CHD including technical considerations, image orientation, application to different lesions, procedural guidance, and functional assessment.

Three-Dimensional Field Optimization Method: Clinical Validation of a Novel Color Doppler Method for Quantifying Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Assessment of mitral regurgitation (MR) severity by echocardiography is important for clinical decision making, but MR severity can be challenging to quantitate accurately and reproducibly. The accuracy of effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and regurgitant volume (RVol) calculated using two-dimensional (2D) proximal isovelocity surface area is limited by the geometric assumptions of proximal isovelocity surface area shape, and both variables demonstrate interobserver variability. The aim of this study was to compare a novel automated three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic method for calculating MR regurgitant flow using standard 2D techniques.

METHODS

A sheep model of ischemic MR and patients with MR were prospectively examined. Patients with a range of severity of MR were examined. EROA and RVol were calculated from 3D color Doppler acquisitions using a novel computer-automated algorithm based on the field optimization method to measure EROA and RVol. For an independent comparison group, the 3D field optimization method was compared with 2D methods for grading MR in an experimental ovine model of MR.

RESULTS

Fifteen 3D data sets from nine sheep (open-chest transthoracic echocardiographic data sets) and 33 transesophageal data sets from patients with MR were prospectively examined. For sheep data sets, mean 2D EROA was 0.16 ± 0.05 cm², and mean 2D RVol was 21.84 ± 8.03 mL. Mean 3D EROA was 0.09 ± 0.04 cm², and mean 3D RVol was 14.40 ± 5.79 cm³. There was good correlation between 2D and 3D EROA (R = 0.70) and RVol (R = 0.80). For patient data sets, mean 2D EROA was 0.35 ± 0.35 cm², and mean 2D RVol was 58.9 ± 52.9 mL. Mean 3D EROA was 0.34 ± 0.29 cm², and mean 3D RVol was 54.6 ± 36.5 mL. There was excellent correlation between 2D and 3D EROA (R = 0.94) and RVol (R = 0.84). Bland-Altman analysis revealed greater interobserver variability for 2D RVol measurements compared with 3D RVol using the 3D field optimization method measurements, but variability was statistically significant only for RVol.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct automated measurement of proximal isovelocity surface area region for EROA calculation using real-time 3D color Doppler echocardiography is feasible, with a high correlation to current 2D EROA methods but less variability. This novel automated method provides an accurate and highly reproducible method for calculating EROA.

Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Assessment of Severity of Mitral Regurgitation Using Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area and Vena Contracta Area Method. Lessons We Learned and Clinical Implications

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is considered the most common valve disease with a prevalence of 2-3 % of significant regurgitation (moderate to severe and severe) in the general population. Accurate assessment of the severity of regurgitation was demonstrated to be of significant importance for patient management and prognosis and consequently has been widely recognized in recent guidelines. However, evaluation of severity of valvular regurgitation can be potentially difficult with the largest challenges presenting in cases of mitral regurgitation. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) by the use of color Doppler has the potential to overcome the limitations of conventional flow quantification using 2D color Doppler methods. Recent studies validated the application of color Doppler RT3DE for the assessment of flow based on vena contracta area (VCA) and proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA). Particularly, the assessment of VCA by color Doppler RT3DE led to a change of paradigm by understanding the VCA as being strongly asymmetric in the majority of patients and etiologies. In this review, we provide a discussion of the current state of clinical evaluation, limitations, and future perspectives of the two methods and their presentation in recent literature and guidelines.

Automatic quantification of aortic regurgitation using 3D full volume color doppler echocardiography: a validation study with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Recent advances in real-time three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography provide the automated measurement of mitral inflow and aortic stroke volume without the need to assume the geometry of the heart. The aim of this study is to explore the ability of 3D full volume color Doppler echocardiography (FVCDE) to quantify aortic regurgitation (AR). Thirty-two patients with more than a moderate degree of AR were enrolled. AR volume was measured by (1) two-dimensional-CDE, using the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) and (2) real-time 3D-FVCDE with (3) phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (PC-CMR) as the reference method. Automated AR quantification using 3D-FVCDE was feasible in 30 of the 32 patients. 2D-PISA underestimated the AR volume compared to 3D-FVCDE and PC-CMR (38.6 ± 9.9 mL by 2D-PISA; 49.5 ± 10.2 mL by 3D-FVCDE; 52.3 ± 12.6 mL by PC-CMR). The AR volume assessed by 3D-FVCDE showed better correlation and agreement with PC-CMR (r = 0.93, p < 0.001, 2SD: 9.5 mL) than did 2D-PISA (r = 0.76, p < 0.001, 2SD: 15.7 mL). When used to classify AR severity, 3D-FVCDE agreed better with PC-CMR (k = 0.94) than did 2D-PISA (k = 0.53). In patients with eccentric jets, only 30% were correctly graded by 2D-PISA. Conversely, almost all patients with eccentric jets (86.7%) were correctly graded by 3D-FVCDE. In patients with multiple jets, only 3 out of 10 were correctly graded by 2D-PISA, while 3D-FVCDE correctly graded 9 out of 10 of these patients. Automated quantification of AR using the 3D-FVCDE method is clinically feasible and more accurate than the current 2D-based method. AR quantification by 2D-PISA significantly misclassified AR grade in patients with eccentric or multiple jets. This study demonstrates that 3D-FVCDE is a valuable tool to accurately measure AR volume regardless of AR characteristics.