T1 Mapping in Athletes

Histological evaluation of cardiac remodelling in equine athletes

Approximately 1-2 per 100,000 young athletes die from sudden cardiac death (SCD) and extreme exercise may be associated with myocardial scar and arrhythmias. Racehorses have a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and SCD but the presence of myocardial scar and inflammation has not been evaluated. Cardiac tissues from the left (LAA) and right (RAA) atrial appendages, left ventricular anterior (LVAPM) and posterior (LVPPM) papillary muscles, and right side of the interventricular septum (IVS-R) were harvested from racehorses with sudden cardiac death (SCD, n = 16) or other fatal injuries (OFI, n = 17), constituting the athletic group (ATH, n = 33), and compared to sedentary horses (SED, n = 10). Horses in the ATH group had myocyte hypertrophy at all sites; increased fibrosis at all sites other than the LAA; increased fibroblast infiltration but a reduction in the overall extracellular matrix (ECM) volume in the RAA, LVAPM, and IVS-R compared to SED horses. In this horse model, athletic conditioning was associated with myocyte hypertrophy and a reduction in ECM. There was an excess of fibrocyte infiltration and focal fibrosis that was not present in non-athletic horses, raising the possibility of an exercise-induced pro-fibrotic substrate.

Screening for dilated cardiomyopathy in immediate family members: to whom, how, when (and where)

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is defined by the presence of left ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction in the absence of coronary artery disease, valvular disease, congenital heart disease, or altered haemodynamic conditions. Dilated cardiomyopathy can recognize multiple aetiologies, including infectious processes, effect of toxic substances, immunological mechanisms, and genetic causes. In recent years, many genes coding for proteins involved in the structure and function of the cardiomyocytes have been associated with the development of DCM, making the identification of familial forms increasingly frequent. At the same time, an ever-increasing use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging has made it possible to identify early morpho-functional alterations in subjects with initial forms of the disease, or carriers of pathogenic genetic variants. The increasingly in-depth understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanisms operating in DCM has also favoured the development of new therapeutic strategies including drugs with molecular targets and gene therapies. In this panorama, screening of family members of patients affected by DCM represents an important tool for early diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic stratification. In relation to its clinical relevance and its complexity, it is important that family screening and follow-up of identified patients are carried out in units dedicated to the treatment and study of cardiomyopathies.

Cardiac Remodeling in Hypertension: Clinical Impact on Brain, Heart, and Kidney Function

Hypertension is the most common causative factor of cardiac remodeling, which, in turn, has been associated with changes in brain and kidney function. Currently, the role of blood biomarkers as indices of cardiac remodeling remains unclear. In contrast, cardiac imaging, including echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), has been a valuable noninvasive tool to assess cardiac remodeling. Cardiac remodeling during the course of systemic hypertension is not the sole effect of the latter. "Remodeling" of other vital organs, such as brain and kidney, also takes place. Therefore, it will be more accurate if we discuss about "hypertensive remodeling" involving the heart, the brain, and the kidneys, rather than isolated cardiac remodeling. This supports the idea of their simultaneous assessment to identify the early, silent lesions of total "hypertensive remodeling". In this context, magnetic resonance imaging is the ideal modality to provide useful information about these organs in a noninvasive fashion and without radiation. For this purpose, we propose a combined protocol to employ MRI in the simultaneous assessment of the heart, brain and kidneys. This protocol should include all necessary indices for the evaluation of "hypertensive remodeling" in these 3 organs, and could be performed within a reasonable time, not exceeding one hour, so that it remains patient-friendly. Furthermore, a combined protocol may offer "all in one examination" and save time. Finally, the amount of contrast agent used will be limited granted that post-contrast evaluations of the three organs will be performed after 1 injection.

Myocardial Tissue Characterization and Fibrosis by Imaging

Myocardial fibrosis, either focal or diffuse, is a common feature of many cardiac diseases and is associated with a poor prognosis for major adverse cardiovascular events. Although histological analysis remains the gold standard for confirming the presence of myocardial fibrosis, endomyocardial biopsy is invasive, has sampling errors, and is not practical in the routine clinical setting. Cardiac imaging modalities offer noninvasive surrogate biomarkers not only for fibrosis but also for myocardial edema and infiltration to varying degrees, and have important roles in the diagnosis and management of cardiac diseases. This review summarizes important pathophysiological features in the development of commonly encountered cardiac diseases, and the principles, advantages, and disadvantages of various cardiac imaging modalities (echocardiography, single-photon emission computer tomography, positron emission tomography, multidetector computer tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance) for myocardial tissue characterization, with an emphasis on imaging focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis.

Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Athletes: Differentiating Physiology From Pathology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The changes that occur in athlete's heart are influenced by a number of factors including age, gender, ethnicity and the type of cardiovascular training. It is therefore important that the clinician is able to integrate all of these factors when assessing athletes to be able to guide investigations appropriately and to distinguish pathology from physiology. This review discusses the potential diagnostic conundrums when trying to differentiate physiological left ventricular hypertrophy from pathological hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in athletes. The mechanism of physiological and pathological hypertrophy is discussed together with history, clinical and investigational findings that can help to identify pathology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Athletes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are more likely to have non-concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), an elevated relative wall thickness, lateral ECG changes and a smaller LV cavity than athletes with physiological LVH. Certain diastolic echocardiographic parameters when used as part of an algorithm (e'; E/E'; E/A) can help to distinguish physiology from pathology, and there is evidence that assessment of global longitudinal strain during exercise echocardiography may be of use in the future. Cardiac MRI is an important imaging modality that can have an additive effect over echocardiography in the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy. Late gadolinium enhancement is a recognised advantage for cardiac magnetic resonance to allow detection of fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. T1 mapping and extracellular volume quantification may be a tool for the future to help distinguish athlete's heart from HCM. Cardiac adaptation to exercise and training in athletes, the athlete's heart causes electrophysiological and geometric changes that may mimic mild phenotypes of a pathological cardiomyopathy. This review article summarises a systematic approach to the assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy in athletes and describes pertinent clinical and investigation findings that can help to differentiate physiology from pathology.