Catheter-Based Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease

Trends in Patient Exposure to Radiation in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Over a 10-Year Period

Technological progress has made it possible to reduce the dose of radiation delivered by medical x-ray systems. In parallel, interventional coronary procedures have become increasingly complex and consequently, last longer. This study aimed to compare the estimated dose of radiation received by patients in interventional cardiology at 10 years interval (2006 vs 2016). The study population included all patients who underwent interventional coronary procedures in one of the catheterization laboratories of our institution during 2 periods, namely, period 1 from October 2005 to March 2006, and period 2 from November 2015 to October 2016. The primary end point was the estimated dose of radiation received by the patient as assessed by dose area product. In 2016, the estimated dose of radiation received by patients who underwent interventional coronary procedures was on average 78% lower than that received in 2006 (p <0.0001), whereas the fluoroscopy time increased by 54% on average over the same period (p <0.0001). By multivariate analysis, including age, approach, body mass index, fluoroscopy time, and performance of angioplasty, the reduction in radiation remained significant. The radial approach was significantly associated with an increased estimated dose of radiation received (p <0.0001). In conclusion, the estimated dose of radiation received by patients who underwent interventional cardiology procedures has been reduced by 78% over the last decade.

Utility of adjunctive modalities in Coronary chronic total occlusion intervention

Coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) intervention remains one of the most challenging domains in interventional cardiology. Due to the technical challenges involved and potential procedural complications, CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) attempt and success rates remain less than standard PCI. However, the use of several adjunctive tools such as intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, rotational atherectomy, orbital atherectomy, excimer laser coronary atherectomy and percutaneous left ventricular assist device may contribute to improved CTO PCI success rates or provide better hemodynamic assessment of CTO lesion (i.e., using fractional flow reserve). In this review we present the current literature describing the utility and efficacy of these adjunctive modalities in CTO intervention.

Health-Related Quality of Life after Coronary Revascularization: A systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize evidence and determine the impact of coronary revascularization (CR) on cardiac patients' Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), highlighting factors that may affect this outcome in patients.

METHODS

A systematic search of Medline (Pubmed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Sciverse (Science Direct and Scopus) and PsycInfo was conducted to identify studies published from January 2000 to December 2012. Data were analyzed using MIX 2.0 Pro and SPSS 20.

RESULTS

Thirty-four longitudinal studies met the inclusion criteria; these studies included 15,992 patients, of whom 8,027 had undergone PCI, 6,348 had undergone CABG and 1,617 had received medication treatment. Moderate long-term effect sizes were revealed for both CR procedures. Both percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) had significantly greater effects on HRQoL than did medication; however, the CR procedures did not differ significantly from each other. Moderators included the type of instrument used to assess HRQoL and the study quality. Benefits related to physical functioning were greater than those related to psychosocial functioning in patients treated with CABG.

CONCLUSIONS

Empirical research highlights the positive effect of CR on patient HRQoL. Researchers should carefully select the instrument they use to measure HRQoL, as this may affect the results and thus conclusions. More RCTs and between-group studies employing pre-post designs should be conducted before clear conclusions can be drawn.

Factors Associated with Early Adverse Events after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Subsequent to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

A previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may affect the outcomes of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The objective of this study was to compare the early in-hospital postoperative outcomes between patients who underwent CABG with or without previous PCI.

METHODS

The present study included 160 patients who underwent isolated elective on-pump CABG at the department of cardiothoracic surgery, Minia University Hospital from January 2010 to December 2014. Patients who previously underwent PCI (n=38) were compared to patients who did not (n=122). Preoperative, operative, and early in-hospital postoperative data were analyzed. The end points of the study were in-hospital mortality and postoperative major adverse events.

RESULTS

Non-significant differences were found between the study groups regarding preoperative demographic data, risk factors, left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association class, EuroSCORE, the presence of left main disease, reoperation for bleeding, postoperative acute myocardial infarction, a neurological deficit, need for renal dialysis, hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. The average time from PCI to CABG was 13.9±5.4 years. The previous PCI group exhibited a significantly larger proportion of patients who experienced in-hospital major adverse events (15.8% vs. 2.5%, p=0.002). On multivariate analysis, only previous PCI was found to be a significant predictor of major adverse events (odds ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.71; p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Previous PCI was found to have a significant effect on the incidence of early major adverse events after CABG. Further large-scale and long-term studies are recommended.

Influence of Sex on Long-Term Outcomes After Implantation of Bare-Metal Stent

Background—

Female sex was reported to be associated with lower risk for midterm restenosis and repeat revascularization after bare-metal stent implantation. However, the influence of sex on very long-term outcomes after bare-metal stent implantation has not been yet reported.

Methods and Results—

Among the 9877 patients in the multicenter Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome study in Kyoto (CREDO-Kyoto) registry cohort-1, bare-metal stent implantation was performed in 5313 patients (men, n=3742 and women, n=1571). Follow-up was completed in 4515 patients (85.0%) at 10 years (duration, 10.3±3.1 [0.0–14.1] years). The cumulative incidence of target-lesion revascularization (TLR) was 27% at 1 year and 34% at 10 years (0.8%/y beyond 1 year). Non–target-lesion revascularization (non-TLR) was the dominant coronary revascularization beyond 1 year (13% at 1 year and 31% at 10 years [2.0%/y beyond 1 year]). Cumulative incidence of stent thrombosis was low (1.2% at 1 year and 1.9% at 10 years). Women were older and had greater prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors than men. The cumulative 10-year incidences of and adjusted risk for TLR were significantly higher in men than in women (36% versus 30%, P <0.001; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–1.46; P <0.001). The higher risk of men relative to women for TLR was consistent regardless of age (<75 years and ≥75 years). Men in comparison with women were also associated with significantly higher adjusted risks for all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary artery bypass grafting, TLR, and non-TLR.

Conclusions—

TLR and stent thrombosis continued to occur without attenuation up to 10 years after bare-metal stent implantation. Men in comparison with women were associated with higher adjusted 10-year risks for all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary artery bypass grafting, TLR, and non-TLR.

Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial

AIMS

Vascular closure devices (VCD) have been introduced into clinical practice with the aim of increasing the procedural efficiency and clinical safety of coronary angiography. However, clinical studies comparing VCD and manual compression have yielded mixed results, and large randomised clinical trials comparing the two strategies are missing. Moreover, comparative efficacy studies between different VCD in routine clinical use are lacking.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial is a prospective, randomised clinical trial designed to compare the outcomes associated with the use of VCD or manual compression to achieve femoral haemostasis. The test hypothesis is that femoral haemostasis after coronary angiography achieved using VCD is not inferior to manual compression in terms of access-site-related vascular complications. Patients undergoing coronary angiography via the common femoral artery will be randomised in a 1:1:1 fashion to receive FemoSeal VCD, EXOSEAL VCD or manual compression. The primary endpoint is the incidence of the composite of arterial access-related complications (haematoma ≥5 cm, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, access-site-related bleeding, acute ipsilateral leg ischaemia, the need for vascular surgical/interventional treatment or documented local infection) at 30 days after randomisation. According to power calculations based on non-inferiority hypothesis testing, enrolment of 4,500 patients is planned. The trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (study identifier: NCT01389375).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety of VCD as compared to manual compression in patients undergoing transfemoral coronary angiography remains an issue of clinical equipoise. The aim of the ISAR-CLOSURE trial is to assess whether femoral haemostasis achieved through the use of VCD is non-inferior to manual compression in terms of access-site-related vascular complications.

Left main intervention in myocardial infarction

We report an 84-year-old patient who suddenly developed nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and needed intubation, assisted ventilation and pharmacological vasopressor support. Admission EKG showed anterior and lateral leads ST segment depression and 2 mm ST segment elevation in avR lead. Angiogram showed unprotected left-main coronary-artery (LM) sub-occlusive disease and totally occluded ostial right-coronary-artery (RCA), distally filled through the left-coronary system. Unprotected LM disease was immediately treated with bare metal stent. The stent jailed the left-circunflex coronary-artery (LCx) ostium but did not compromise the arterial flow. Lately, the patient was discharged in a very good health condition. Ten months angiographic follow-up showed an extremely compromised LCx ostium treated successfully with drug eluted stent (DES) and mid left anterior descendent (LAD) severe lesion, treated with DES.

Twenty-year evolution of percutaneous coronary intervention and its impact on clinical outcomes: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored, multicenter 1985-1986 PTCA and 1997-2006 Dynamic Registries

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has undergone rapid progress, both in technology and adjunct therapy. However, documentation of long-term temporal trends in relation to contemporary practice is lacking.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed PCI use and outcomes in 8976 consecutive patients in the multicenter, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored 1985-1986 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and 1997-2006 Dynamic Registries waves (wave 1: 1997-1998, bare-metal stents; wave 2: 1999, uniform use of stents; wave 3: 2001-2002, brachytherapy; waves 4 and 5: 2004-2006, drug-eluting stents). Patients undergoing PCI in the recent waves were older and more often reported comorbidities than those in the balloon era. PCI was more often performed for acute coronary syndromes and, in spite of the greater disease burden, was more often selective. Procedural success was achieved and maintained more often in the stent era. Significant reductions were observed in in-hospital rates (%) of myocardial infarction (PTCA Registry: 4.9; wave 1, 2.7; wave 2, 2.8; wave 3, 1.9; wave 4, 2.6; wave 5, 2; P(trend)<0.001) and emergency coronary artery bypass surgery (PTCA Registry: 3.7; wave 1, 0.4; wave 2, 0.4; wave 3, 0.3; wave 4, 0.4; wave 5, 0; P(trend)<0.001). Compared with the PTCA Registry, risk for repeat revascularization (31 to 365 days after index PCI) was significantly lower in the dynamic waves (adjusted hazard ratio: wave 1, 0.72; wave 2, 0.51; wave 3, 0.51; wave 4, 0.30; wave 5, 0.36; P<0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous interventions, in the last 2 decades, have evolved to include more urgent, comorbid cases, despite achieving high success rates with significantly reduced need for repeat revascularization.