Impact of Platelet Endothelial Aggregation Receptor-1 Genotypes on Platelet Reactivity and Early Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Treated With Aspirin and Clopidogrel

Effect of PEAR1, PTGS1 gene polymorphisms on the recurrence of aspirin-treated patients with ischemic stroke in the Han population of China: A 4-year follow-up study

Platelet endothelial aggregation receptor 1 (PEAR1) and prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 1 (PTGS1) polymorphisms can affect laboratory aspirin resistance. However, the impact of genetic polymorphisms on the recurrence of ischemic stroke (IS) patients treated with aspirin is not fully understood. This study aimed to examine the relationship between gene polymorphisms of PEAR1 and PTGS1 and IS recurrence in patients treated with aspirin. Peripheral blood samples were collected from 174 patients with nonrecurrent IS and 34 with recurrent IS after aspirin treatment. Follow-up was performed on all patients. PEAR1 rs12041331 and PTGS1 rs10306114 polymorphisms were determined using the PCR fluorescence probe method. And the correlations of them with the clinical characteristics were examined by multivariable logistic regression analysis. The distribution frequencies of PEAR1 rs12041331 and PTGS1 rs10306114 genotypes were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and there was no significant difference in the distribution of PEAR1 rs12041331 polymorphism. Compared to the nonrecurrent group, the AA genotype of the PTGS1 polymorphism was more frequent in the recurrent group (59.77% vs 35.29%, P = .003), and the A allele also showed a higher frequency than the G allele in the recurrent group (P = .001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that smoking (OR = 5.228, 95% CI: 1.938-14.102, P = .001), coronary heart disease (OR = 4.754, 95% CI: 1.498-15.089, P = .008), and the polymorphism at PTGS1(A>G) AA/AG + GG (OR = 2.955, 95% CI: 1.320-6.616, P = .008) were independently associated with IS recurrence in Chinese patients. Our findings suggested that PTGS rs10306114 polymorphisms should receive more attention in the use of aspirin in patients with IS.

Impact of hemodialysis on efficacies of the antiplatelet agents in coronary artery disease patients complicated with end-stage renal disease

It is controversial whether hemodialysis affects the efficacy of the antiplatelet agents. We aimed to investigate the impact of hemodialysis on efficacies of the antiplatelet agents in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients complicated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). 86 CAD patients complicated with ESRD requiring hemodialysis were consecutively enrolled. After 5-day treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor, the platelet aggregations induced by arachidonic acid (PLAA) or adenosine diphosphate (PLADP), and the P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) were measured before and after hemodialysis. The propensity matching score method was adopted to generate a control group with normal renal function from 2439 CAD patients. In patients taking aspirin, the PLAA remained unchanged after hemodialysis. In patients taking clopidogrel, the PLADP (37.26 ± 17.04 vs. 31.77 ± 16.09, p = 0.029) and corresponding clopidogrel resistance (CR) rate (23 [48.9%] vs. 14 [29.8%], p = 0.022) significantly decreased after hemodialysis, though PRU remained unchanged. Subgroup analysis indicated that PLADP significantly decreased while using polysulfone membrane (36.8 ± 17.9 vs. 31.1 ± 14.5, p = 0.024). In patients taking ticagrelor, PLADP, and PRU remained unchanged after hemodialysis. ESRD patients had higher incidences of aspirin resistance (AR) and CR compared to those with normal renal function (AR: 16.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.001; CR: 48.4% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.024). Hemodialysis does not have negative effect on the efficacies of aspirin, clopidogrel and ticagrelor in ESRD patients with CAD. ESRD patients have higher incidences of AR and CR compared with those with normal renal function.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03330223, first registered January 4, 2018.

Pharmacogenetic considerations in therapy with novel antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents

Antiplatelets and anticoagulants are extensively used in cardiovascular medicine for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis in the venous and arterial circulations. Wide inter-individual variability has been observed in response to antiplatelets and anticoagulants, which triggered researchers to investigate the genetic basis of this variability. Data from extensive pharmacogenetic studies pointed to strong evidence of association between polymorphisms in candidate genes and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic action and clinical response of the antiplatelets clopidogrel and the anticoagulant warfarin. In this review, we conducted an extensive search on Medline for the time period of 2009-2023. We also searched the PharmGKB website for levels of evidence of variant-drug combinations and for drug labels and clinical guidelines. We focus on the pharmacogenetics of novel antiplatelets and anticoagulants while excluding acetylsalicylic acid, warfarin and heparins, and discuss the current knowledge with emphasis on the level of evidence.

Integrin α9β1 deficiency does not impact the development of atherosclerosis in mice

Sushi, von Willebrand factor type A, EGF and pentraxin domain containing 1 (SVEP1) is an extracellular matrix protein that causally promotes cardiovascular disease in humans and mice. However, the receptor mediating the effect of SVEP1 on the development of disease remains unclear. We previously demonstrated that depleting either vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC)- or myeloid cell-derived integrin α9β1, the first receptor that was identified to interact with SVEP1, did not phenocopy the disease-abrogating effect of depleting SVEP1. Due to its wide expression in tissues and cell types, here we extend this line of investigation to definitively determine if integrin α9β1 impacts the development of atherosclerosis. In a mouse model of atherosclerosis, we found that depleting integrin α9β1 in all cells did not alter plaque size or characteristics of plaque complexity when compared to wild type mice. Further, the significant SVEP1-mediated effects on increase in macrophage content and VSMC proliferation within the atherosclerotic plaque were not altered in animals lacking integrin α9β1. Together, these findings strongly suggest that integrin α9β1 is not responsible for mediating the SVEP1-induced promotion of atherosclerosis and support further studies aimed at characterizing other receptors whose interaction with SVEP1 may represent a therapeutically targetable interaction.

Epoxidase inhibitor-aspirin resistance and the relationship with genetic polymorphisms: a review

Strokes are the leading cause of death in most regions of the world. Epoxidase inhibitors include the drug aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). Aspirin is widely used as first-line treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in at-risk patients. However, patients using conventional doses of aspirin can still develop ischaemic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, a phenomenon known as aspirin resistance. The occurrence of aspirin resistance hinders the prevention and treatment of ischaemic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. There are many factors affecting aspirin resistance, such as sex, drug dose, metabolic disease, genetic polymorphisms, drug interactions and pharmacokinetics. Genetic polymorphism refers to the simultaneous and frequent presence of two or more discontinuous variants or genotypes or alleles in a population of organisms. Platelets contain a large number of highly polymorphic transmembrane glycoprotein receptors encoded by two or more isomeric alleles. Changes in gene polymorphisms in various pathways during platelet aggregation can lead to aspirin resistance. This narrative review describes the gene polymorphisms that have been demonstrated to be significantly associated with aspirin resistance. Research on the mechanisms of aspirin resistance and increased knowledge should provide accurate drug guidance in individuals that require first-line antiplatelet therapy.

Effects of ilaprazole on the steady-state pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel in healthy volunteers: An open-label randomized crossover study

Background: Previous studies have suggested that proton pump inhibitors could impair the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. It is uncertain whether ilaprazole affects the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. This study aimed to determine the drug-drug interaction between ilaprazole and clopidogrel.

Methods: A randomized crossover trial of 40 healthy subjects was performed. Clopidogrel was administered alone or in combination with ilaprazole for 7 days. The maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) to 5 μmol/L adenosine diphosphate was measured by light transmission aggregometry and the platelet reactivity index (PRI) was determined by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein P2Y₁₂ assay. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HOPR) was defined as a MPA of >40%. The inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) and PRI in the two phases were compared between two regimens after the last dosing.

Results: IPA was comparable between the two regimens at 0, 10 and 24 h (p > 0.05), but higher at 4 h in the clopidogrel alone regimen compared with that in the combined treatment regimen (75.66 ± 18.44% vs. 70.18 ± 17.67%, p = 0.031). The inhibition of PRI was comparable between the two regimens at 0 and 24 h. There were no significant differences in the area under the time-IPA% curve (AUC) or the incidence of HOPR at all time-points between the two regimens.

Conclusion: In healthy subjects, ilaprazole has limited effect on the pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel and it may not be clinically relevant.

Clinical Trial Registration: [www.chictr.org.cn], identifier [ChiCTR2000031482].

The impact of PEAR 1 polymorphism on clinical outcomes in Chinese patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention

Background: Patients might still experience major adverse cardiovascular events even with dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Our study aimed to explore the impact of gene polymorphism on clinical outcomes in one-year follow-up. Methods: A total of 171 patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention from April to December 2020 in the first hospital of Jilin University enrolled in this study. Results: PEAR1 genetic polymorphisms was associated with the arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) platelet aggregation. Hyperglycemia was associated with the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events. PEAR1 GA+AA genetic genetic polymorphisms is associated with hyperglycemia. Conclusion: PEAR1 GG is a risk factor for AA and ADP platelet aggregation. Hyperglycemia can effect the one-year outcome. PEAR1 GA+AA genetic polymorphisms are associated with hyperglycemia.

Platelet Endothelial Aggregation Receptor 1 Polymorphism Is Associated With Functional Outcome in Small-Artery Occlusion Stroke Patients Treated With Aspirin

Background: The role of genetic polymorphisms is important in defining the patient's prognosis and outcomes in coronary artery disease. The present study aimed to explore the association between platelet endothelial aggregation receptor 1 (PEAR1) rs12041331 polymorphism and the outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with aspirin or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel.

Methods: A total of 868 ischemic stroke patients admitted to our hospital from January 1, 2016 to December 30, 2018 were retrospectively studied. The Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification defined stroke subtypes. These patients were treated with aspirin alone or DAPT. The genotype distribution of PEAR1 rs12041331 single-nucleotide polymorphism (AA, AC, and CC) between different TOAST subtypes and treatment groups was assessed, and the clinical impact of genetic variants on functional outcomes defined by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, modified Rankin Scale, and Barthel Index was analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

Results: Among the 868 stroke patients, the PEAR1 AA genotype was 16%, GA was 47%, and GG was 36%. Forty-four percent had aspirin alone, and 56% had DAPT. Overall, the distribution of PEAR single-nucleotide polymorphism was not significant among the two treatment groups or subtypes of TOAST. In contrast, in patients treated with aspirin alone, PEAR1 AA tended to be higher in the small-artery occlusion (SAO) subtype when compared with the no-lacunar subtype, including cardioembolism and large-artery atherosclerosis. PEAR1 AA genotype was significantly associated with favorable functional outcomes at day 7 and discharge only in SAO patients treated with aspirin alone compared with the GG genotype. Multivariate regression models further suggested that AA genotype was independently associated with favorable outcomes in this group after being adjusted for three common stroke risk factors such as age, hypertension history, and C-reactive protein level [odds ratio (OR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.07–0.64, P = 0.02 for 7-day National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR 0.2, 95% CI, 0.06–0.66, P = 0.03 for 7-day modified Rankin Scale, and OR 0.25, 95% CI, 0.08–0.72, P = 0.03 for 7-day Barthel Index, respectively].

Conclusion: The impact of PEAR1 rs12041331 polymorphism on aspirin depends on the TOAST subtype. PEAR1 AA carrier with SAO stroke is most sensitive to aspirin therapy. PEAR1 AA is an independent factor for the short-term functional outcomes in SAO patients treated with aspirin alone.

Clinical Registration Number: 1800019911.

Pharmacogenomic polygenic risk score for clopidogrel responsiveness among Caribbean Hispanics: A candidate gene approach

This multicenter clinical study was aimed at conducting a targeted pharmacogenomic association analysis of residual on‐clopidogrel platelet reactivity in 474 Caribbean Hispanic patients. Platelet reactivity was measured using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and clopidogrel resistance was defined as P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs) greater than or equal to 208. Genotyping was performed using the whole‐genome Infinium MEGA BeadChip array. An ancestry‐adjusted, weighted polygenic risk score (wPGxRS) was developed to account for the effect of multiple variants on PRU and compared between clopidogrel responders and nonresponders. The mean PRU across the study cohort was 173.8 ± 68.5 and 33.5% of patients were defined as clopidogrel resistant. Multivariate linear regression showed that 19% of PRU variability was attributed to nine independent predictors, with CYP2C19*2 (rs4244285) accounting for ~ 7% of observed PRU variation (p < 0.001). PON1 rs662, ABCB1/MDR1 rs2032582, PEAR1 rs12041331 carrier status, and the interaction between African ancestry and rs12041331 carriers also predicted PRU among the participants (p ≤ 0.05). A clear gene‐dose effect was detected between PRU and CYP2C19*2 genotype, consistent with previous studies in European patient populations, as well as rs12777823. Importantly, a significant positive correlation was detected between our novel wPGxRS (4 variants) and PRU among the Hispanic patient population (r_p = 0.35, p < 0.001). Moreover, the wPGxRS discriminated between nonresponders and responders (p = 0.003), indicating that this multigene‐based score is a useful predictor of clopidogrel resistance among Caribbean Hispanics. Taken together, these results help close the gap of knowledge on clopidogrel pharmacogenomics and its potential clinical implementation in this under‐represented population.

Personalized antiplatelet therapy based on clopidogrel/aspirin resistance tests in acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack: Study protocol of a multi-center, single-blinded and randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel and aspirin are key intervention for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA). However, with increased clinical application, many patients have shown clopidogrel resistance (CR) and/or aspirin resistance (AR) that affect antiplatelet therapy on AIS/TIA. At present, there is no research reported on personalized antiplatelet therapy guidelines for patients with CR and/or AR. Our study aims to assess the effect of personalized antiplatelet therapy based on CYP2C19 genotype and urine 11-dhTxB2 tests in patients with AIS or TIA.

METHODS

This is a multi-center randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients with AIS/TIA from 14 comprehensive hospitals in Jiangxi province will be recruited after obtaining informed consent. Participants will be randomly divided into the intervention group and the control group at a ratio of 1:1. personalized antiplatelet therapy based on the CYP2C19 genotype/urine11-dhTxB2 tests will be given to the intervention group. Demographics, disease history, laboratory investigations, therapys, physiological tests, imaging reports and other clinical features will be collected. Clinical outcomes including stroke recurrence, Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, bleeding events and all-cause mortality will be assessed at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th-month post-discharge.

DISCUSSION

Our study will conduct free antiplatelet resistance tests and personalized antiplatelet therapy for AIS/TIA patients with CR/AR, ultimately evaluating personalized therapy effectiveness through one-year follow-up. The research results will help to assess the impact of personalized antiplatelet therapy on the prognosis of stroke, thus providing reference for precise clinical treatment.

Genetic variants of PEAR1 and ischemic clinical outcomes in coronary artery disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the association between PEAR1 polymorphisms and ischemic clinical outcomes. Materials & methods: We searched the electronic database for articles on the relationship of PEAR1 SNPs and ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) up to October 2020. Results: A total of 9914 patients with CAD from six studies focusing on 12 SNPs of PEAR1 were included in this study. The A allele of rs12041331 were associated with ischemic events (odds ratio: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.04-1.88; p = 0.03). The AA homozygotes of rs2768759 was related to a higher risk of ischemic events than carriers of the C allele (odds ratio: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.09-3.97; p = 0.03). Conclusion: PEAR1 rs12041331 and rs2768759 are significantly associated with ischemic events in patients with CAD.

Impact of Platelet Endothelial Aggregation Receptor-1 Genotypes on Long-Term Cerebrovascular Outcomes in Patients With Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

Background: Platelet endothelial aggregation receptor-1 (PEAR1) rs12041331 has been reported to affect agonist-stimulated platelet aggregation, but it remains unclear whether this variant plays a role in recurrent stroke. Here we assess the clinical relevance of PEAR1 rs12041331 in acute minor ischemic stroke (AMIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) Chinese patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).

Methods: We recruited 273 consecutive minor stroke and TIA patients, and Cox proportional hazard regression was used to model the relationship between PEAR1 rs12041331 and thrombotic and bleeding events.

Results: Genotyping for PEAR1 rs12041331 showed 49 (18.0%) AA homozygotes, 129 (47.3%) GA heterozygotes, and 95 (34.7%) GG homozygotes. No association was observed between PEAR1 rs12041331 genotype and stroke or composite clinical vascular event rates (ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, TIA, myocardial infarction, or vascular death) or bleeding events regardless if individuals carried one or two copies of the A allele. Our results suggested that rs12041331 genetic polymorphism was not an important contributor to clinical events in AMIS and TIA patients in the setting of secondary prevention.

Conclusions: Our data do provide robust evidence that genetic variation in PEAR1 rs12041331 do not contribute to atherothrombotic or bleeding risk in minor stroke and TIA patients treated with DAPT.

Genetic Variation in PEAR1, Cardiovascular Outcomes and Effects of Aspirin in a Healthy Elderly Population

The platelet endothelial aggregation receptor-1 (PEAR1) rs12041331 variant has been identified as a genetic determinant of platelet aggregation in response to antiplatelet therapies, including aspirin. However, association with atherothrombotic cardiovascular events is less clear, with limited evidence from large trials. Here, we tested association of rs12041331 with cardiovascular events and aspirin use in a randomized trial population of healthy older individuals. We undertook post hoc analysis of 13,547 participants of the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial, median age 74 years. Participants had no previous diagnosis of atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease at enrollment, and were randomized to either 100 mg daily low-dose aspirin or placebo for median 4.7 years follow-up. We used Cox proportional hazard regression to model the relationship between rs12041331 and the ASPREE primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) end point, and composites of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and ischemic stroke (STROKE); and bleeding events; major hemorrhage (MHEM) and intracranial bleeding (ICB). We performed whole-population analysis using additive and dominant inheritance models, then stratified by treatment group. Interaction effects between genotypes and treatment group were examined. We observed no statistically significant association (P < 0.05) in the population, or by treatment group, between rs12041331 and cardiovascular or bleeding events in either model. We also found no significant interaction effects between rs12041331-A and treatment group, for CVD (P = 0.65), MACE (P = 0.32), STROKE (P = 0.56), MHEM (P = 0.59), or ICB (P = 0.56). The genetic variant PEAR1 rs12041331 is not associated with cardiovascular events in response to low-dose aspirin in a healthy elderly population.

Lower Platelet Aggregation Is a Risk Factor for Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-Associated Bleeding: A Preliminary Retrospective Study with Genotype Analysis

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate factors influencing bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are on aspirin and ticagrelor as dual antiplatelet therapy.

Material/Methods

This retrospective case-control study included 50 patients with ACS (25 with reported bleeding events and 25 without) on aspirin and ticagrelor. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)- and arachidonic acid (ACA)-induced platelet aggregation rates were measured using light transmission aggregometry. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in PEAR1, GP1BA, and GSTP1 were genotyped.

Results

ACA-induced platelet aggregation rates were obviously lower in patients with bleeding events than in those without (13.28±8.46% vs. 24.93±9.89%, P<0.001). No significant differences in ADP-induced platelet aggregation rates were observed between the 2 groups (16.17±9.74% vs. 16.88±12.69%, P>0.05). Among those with bleeding events and among controls, 70% and 80% had an ACA-induced platelet aggregation rate of 0–18% and 18–50%, respectively. Mutation rates of rs6065 in GP1BA and rs1695, rs4891, and rs8191439 in GSTP1 also differed significantly between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

Lower ACA-induced platelet aggregation rates are associated with increased risk of bleeding in patients with ACS who are on aspirin and ticagrelor. An ACA-induced platelet aggregation rate of 18% may be considered the cutoff point for identifying high risk of aspirin-associated bleeding events in patients with ACS. SNP genotyping may also help predict the risk of bleeding in patients with ACS.

PEAR1 polymorphisms as a prognostic factor in hemostasis and cardiovascular diseases

Platelet Endothelial Aggregation Receptor (PEAR1), as a platelet receptor, plays a vital role in hemostasis. This receptor, by its extracellular part, causes platelet adhesion and consequently initiates platelet aggregation. Dysfunction of PEAR1 can disrupt platelet aggregation in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). The content used in this paper has been taken from English language articles (2005-2020) retrieved from Pubmed database and Google scholar search engine using "Cardiovascular Disease", "PEAR1", "Polymorphism", and "Platelet Aggregation" keywords. Some PEAR1 polymorphisms can disrupt homeostasis and interfere with the function mechanism of cardiac drugs. Since polymorphisms in this gene affect platelet function and the platelet aggregation process, PEAR1 could be further studied in the future as an essential factor in controlling the treatment process of patients with cardiovascular diseases. PEAR1 polymorphisms through disruption of the platelet aggregation process can be a risk factor in patients with CVDs. Therefore, controlling patients through genetic testing and the evaluation of PEAR1 polymorphisms can help improve the treatment process of patients. According to the studies on the PEAR1 gene and the effect of different polymorphisms on some crucial issues in CVDs patients (changes in platelet activity), it is clear that if there is a significant relationship between polymorphisms and CVDs, they can be used as prognostic and diagnostic markers. This study aims to evaluate the prognosis and drug treatment of the PEAR1 gene in CVDs patients.