Antiplatelet Therapy Following Peripheral Arterial Interventions: The Choice Is Yours

The impact of postoperative dual antiplatelet therapy on outcomes of endovascular therapies in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia in the Vascular Quality Initiative-Medicare-linked database

OBJECTIVE

The beneficial effects of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) have been well-established in coronary and carotid endovascular interventions; however, no consensus exists to the role of DAPT in lower extremity endovascular therapies (ETs). We aimed to investigate the impact of postoperative DAPT after ET in patients presenting with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in the Vascular Quality Initiative-Medicare-Linked (Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network) database.

METHODS

The study was a multicenter retrospective analysis of prospectively collected Vascular Quality Initiative-Medicare-linked data. The Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database was queried for all ETs performed for infrainguinal occlusive disease between 2011 and 2019. The patients were stratified by discharge antiplatelet regimen (DAPT vs SAPT). SAPT patients received either aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors whereas DAPT patients received both. The primary outcome was 1- and 5-year amputation-free survival (AFS). The secondary outcomes included 1- and 5-year overall survival, limb salvage (freedom from major amputation), and freedom from reintervention. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox regression were used for analysis.

RESULTS

The study included two cohorts: SAPT (n = 10,086 [41.7%]) and DAPT (n = 14,081 [58.3%]). Patients in SAPT cohort were older than their DAPT counterparts and were more likely to have congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Patients in the DAPT cohort were more likely to have diabetes and coronary artery disease. In survival analyses, compared with SAPT, 1-year AFS in the DAPT cohort was 67.9% vs 63.7% (P < .001) and 5- year AFS was 30.4% vs 24.6% (P < .001). After adjusting for potential confounders, DAPT was associated with reduced hazards of major amputation or death at 1-year (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.89; P < .001) and 5-year (aHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99; P = .027). DAPT was also associated with lower hazards of death (aHR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-0.99; P = .048) and major amputation (aHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.93; P < .001) at 1 year but not 5 years. Reintervention was not impacted by the antiplatelet therapy strategy. In our subanalysis, we found superior 5-year overall survival and AFSs in patients receiving DAPT compared with aspirin alone and also in patients receiving P2Y12 inhibitor alone compared with aspirin alone. However, the outcomes of DAPT vs P2Y12 inhibitor alone were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large Medicare-linked national analysis, we found that DAPT is associated with improved AFS up to 5 years after ET in patients with CLTI compared with SAPT. However, there was no difference between DAPT and P2Y12 inhibitor alone. Additionally, P2Y12 inhibitor was associated with improved AFS up to 5 years compared with aspirin. Our findings support the use of DAPT or P2Y12 inhibitor after ETs performed in the lower extremity for CLTI; however, further prospective studies are required to confirm our findings.

Increased anti-thrombotic therapy is associated with decreased major adverse limb events in patients with low wound and foot infection scores

INTRODUCTION

The optimal anti-thrombotic management of patients after lower extremity bypass has yet to be fully elucidated, in part due to significant heterogeneity in patient presentation and practice patterns. The Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) score is a validated scoring system to assist in the management of patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). We hypothesized that performing a restriction analysis based on WIFI scores would assist in the postoperative anti-thrombotic management of patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of infrainguinal bypass procedures completed at a single hospital system between January 2018 and January 2021 was selected, and preoperative WIfI scores were extracted for each patient. Patients with either Wound scores of 2 and 3, or Ischemia Scores of 0 and 1, or Foot Infection Scores of 3 were excluded. Based on the type of anti-thrombotic regimen on discharge, demographics, comorbidities, type of bypass, 30-day rates of graft occlusion, major amputation, mortality, and major adverse limb events (MALE) were analyzed. Statistical analysis included t-tests, chi square tests, and time-to-event survival analysis.

RESULTS

230 procedures were included in the study. 69 (30.0%) patients were discharged on single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), compared to 161 (70.0%) who were discharged on either dual antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation (DAPT/AC). There was a higher prevalence of bypasses using prosthetic conduit in the DAPT/AC group (45.9 vs 31.8%, p = .047); no other demographic or procedural variable analyzed had any significant differences. At 30-days postoperatively, there was no significant difference in postoperative reintervention rates, however, the DAPT/AC group had significantly lower rates of mortality (1.2 vs 7.2%, p = .01), major amputation (1.2% vs 5.8%, p = .04), and MALE (3.7 vs 13.0%, p < .01). There were no significant differences in bleeding complications. Survival analysis demonstrated that MALE-free survival was higher in the DAPT/AC group compared to the SAPT group (p < .01). On Cox regression analysis, DAPT/AC was associated with significantly decreased rates of MALE + mortality (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.20 [0.06 - 0.66]).

CONCLUSION

Lower extremity bypasses patients with low Wound and low foot Infection scores who are discharged on DAPT/AC postoperatively have a significantly higher 30-day MALE-free survival rate compared to patients discharged on SAPT; consideration could be made to preferentially discharge such post-bypass patients on DAPT/AC.

Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery in Glanzmann's Thrombasthenia Patients with Anti-GPIIb-IIIa Antibodies: A Case Report

Glanzmann's thrombasthenia (GT) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder of platelet function. The frequent occurrence of alloimmunization due to repeated platelet transfusions is the major complication of the disease. Achieving hemostasis in these patients with anti-GPIIb-IIIa antibodies during surgical procedures is a significant challenge due to the high risk of bleeding. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is an effective agent for achieving hemostasis in alloimmunized Glanzmann's thrombasthenia patients. The key clinical question was to determine whether abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery can be safely performed with rFVIIa in Glanzmann's thrombasthenia patients with anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies and whether long-term antiplatelet therapy is suitable for these patients. The patient underwent endovascular aneurysm repair with intensive rFVIIa administration, experiencing neither bleeding nor thrombosis. Data regarding the surgical management of Glanzmann's thrombasthenia patients with anti-GPIIb-IIIa antibodies and the use of antithrombotics in this high-risk population are still very limited. Sharing clinical experience can be valuable for hematologists managing similar cases.

Antithrombotic Strategies for Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: JACC Scientific Statement

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) experience major cardiovascular and limb events. Antithrombotic strategies including antiplatelets and anticoagulants remain a cornerstone of treatment and prevention. Recent trials have shown heterogeneity in the response to antithrombotic therapies in patients presenting primarily with PAD when compared to those presenting primarily with coronary artery disease. In addition, there is observed heterogeneity with regards to the effects of antiplatelets and anticoagulants with respect to different outcomes including cardiovascular and major adverse limb events. This, coupled with risks of bleeding, requires a patient-centered and holistic assessment of benefit-risk when selecting antithrombotic strategies for patients with PAD. A global multidisciplinary work group was convened to evaluate antithrombotic strategies in PAD and to summarize the current state of the art. Common clinical scenarios around antithrombotic decision making were provided. Finally, insights with regard to implementation future investigation were described.

Long-term patency of aorto-biiliac endoprosthesis for critical lower limb ischaemia in Takayasu arteritis after complicated angioplasty with a drug-coated balloon: Effect of dual antiplatelet therapy combined with tocilizumab

Takayasu arteritis is a chronic granulomatous vasculitis of unknown aetiology affecting the aorta and its major branches. Critical limb ischaemia may occur and eventually require surgical intervention. Surgical outcomes are influenced by disease activity, age, and comorbidities. We report a 43-year-old woman with Takayasu arteritis and stenosis of the left common iliac artery and occlusion of the left external iliac artery with limiting vascular claudication, who underwent angioplasty of the iliac artery with drug-eluting stent while being treated with infliximab. The artery ruptured a week later but was contained by the ilio-psoas muscle. She required subsequent stent placement to correct the lesion. Treatment comprised aspirin and clopidogrel, and the biological was switched to monthly intravenous tocilizumab. During an 8-year follow-up, serial imaging examinations showed a patent aorto-biiliac endoprosthesis, without evidence of thrombosis or restenosis. Clinically, the patient denies vascular claudication and pulses remain palpable in the left lower limb. This case highlights the risks inherent to these procedures in patients with large artery vasculitis and reinforces that the effectiveness of endovascular intervention can be increased by detailed preoperative evaluation, associated with a drug strategy including immunomodulatory and antiplatelet therapy as directed by the multispecialty team. Periodic imaging examinations are required because of the reported high rate of restenosis.

Peripheral Artery Disease: Treatment of Claudication and Surgical Management

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects approximately 230 million people worldwide and is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular and limb events. Even though this condition is considered a cardiovascular equivalent, it remains an under-recognized and under-treated entity. Anti-platelet and statin therapy, along with smoking cessation, are the foundations of therapy to reduce adverse events but are challenging to fully implement in this patient population. Race and socioeconomic status also have profound impacts on PAD outcomes. Exercise therapy is the gold standard treatment of claudication while revascularization procedures are often reserved for patients with limb-threatening ischemia.

A Systematic Review of Clopidogrel Resistance in Vascular Surgery: Current Perspectives and Future Directions

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel resistance is a well-described phenomenon that has been linked to adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. The impact of clopidogrel resistance in patient outcomes after vascular and endovascular surgery is not well-established.

METHODS

Using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature review with the medical subject headings (MeSH) terms "(clopidogrel resistance) and (vascular)", "(clopidogrel resistance) and (vascular surgery)", "(clopidogrel resistance) and (endovascular)", and "(clopidogrel resistance) and (endovascular surgery)" was performed in PubMed and Cochrane databases, to identify all peer-reviewed studies performed on clopidogrel resistance in vascular and endovascular surgery. Studies written in the English language from inception to 2022 were included. Case reports, studies with limited information, nonhuman studies, and studies not pertaining to vascular or endovascular surgery were excluded from analysis. Each study was independently reviewed by 2 qualified researchers to assess eligibility.

RESULTS

Of the 691 studies identified through the MeSH strategy, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed and summarized. These studies focused on extracranial cerebrovascular disease (n = 5) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD, n = 11), encompassing a total of 1,716 patients. The prevalence of clopidogrel resistance ranged from 0% to 83.3%, depending on the diagnostic assay and cutoff values used. In cerebrovascular disease, clopidogrel resistance may be associated with cerebral embolization, ischemic neurologic events, and vascular-related mortality. In PAD, clopidogrel resistance has been linked to recurrent stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, amputation-free survival, and all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides an up-to-date summary of clopidogrel resistance in vascular and endovascular surgery. The impact of clopidogrel resistance remains incompletely investigated, and future studies are needed to clarify the role of resistance testing in patients with vascular disease.

Medical Management of Peripheral Artery Disease

Peripheral artery disease is a highly morbid yet undertreated atherosclerotic disease. The cornerstones of peripheral artery disease therapy consist of smoking cessation, lipid-lowering therapy, and hypertension treatment. More recently, clinical trials have demonstrated that novel antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapies reduce the risk of both cardiovascular and limb events in this patient population. In this review, we highlight the components of optimal medical therapy of peripheral artery disease and the evidence base for these therapies.