RING+STRING: Successful Repair Technique for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation With Severe Leaflet Tethering

Updated pathophysiological overview of functional MR (ventricular and atrial)

Basic mechanism of ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is subvalvular tethering. Left ventricular (LV) dilatation, in association with mitral valve (MV) annular dilatation, causes outward displacement of papillary muscles (PMs), which abnormally pulls or tethers MV leaflets, resulting in MV tenting, reduction in leaflets coaptation and MR. Because surgical annuloplasty does shorten distance between anterior and posterior MV annuli to improve coaptation but does not address this subvalvular tethering, ventricular FMR frequently persists or recurs in the chronic stage after surgical annuloplasty. This high incidence of persistent/recurrent MR requires additional procedures to reduce subvalvular tethering. Although patients occasionally show marked improvements after annuloplasty with surgical tethering reduction procedures such as PM approximation, evidence to support benefits of such surgery is limited, requiring further trials. Recently, MV adaptation or MV leaflets tissue growth associated with LV dilatation attracts attention. Patients with larger MV leaflets with significant LV dilatation/dysfunction show less MV tethering and MR compared to those with smaller MV leaflets but with similar LV remodeling, suggesting the protective or beneficial role of MV leaflets tissue growth against LV remodeling. The MV leaflets tissue growth has the potential to lead to novel strategies of treatment for ventricular FMR. It is well known that atrial FMR is frequent in patients with left atrial dilatation, typically in those with isolated atrial fibrillation. The degree of atrial FMR is usually mild, even when it is present, and occasionally moderate, and severe atrial FMR is really rare. It is known that only severe regurgitation causes heart failure in primary MR, resulting in description on indications of surgery or intervention for only severe MR in current guidelines. Therefore, this atrial FMR up to moderate degree did not attract attention for a long time. However, recent studies have shown that patients with only moderate atrial FMR develop severe heart failure, suggesting more aggressive indication of MV surgery or intervention for "moderate" regurgitation in patients with atrial FMR. Therefore, atrial FMR is now recognized highly important. The unveiled malignant nature of atrial FMR arises many questions, including (1) why patients with only moderate atrial FMR develop heart failure? (2) do patients with mild atrial FMR develop heart failure or not?, and many others. Atrial FMR seems even more mysterious after the unveiling of its significance.

Best treatment option for secondary mitral regurgitation surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled studies

The objective of this study is to ascertain whether subvalvular papillary muscle repair in conjunction with restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty represents the most efficacious treatment for patients presenting with secondary ischemic mitral regurgitation, as compared to restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty alone and to mitral valve replacement. A network meta-analysis was conducted to investigate outcomes of randomized controlled trials, propensity-matched studies, and observational studies, comparing various treatments for secondary ischemic mitral regurgitation. The average follow-up duration for late mortality was 4.4 years. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without mitral valve surgery had a late mortality incidence of 3.7%. Restrictive mitral annuloplasty demonstrated a rate of 6.5%, while restrictive mitral annuloplasty + CABG resulted in a rate of 4.1%. Subvalvular papillary muscle repair plus restrictive mitral annuloplasty ± CABG and mitral valve replacement + CABG had rates of 4.4% and 5.1%. SUCRA analysis showed that CABG was the most effective treatment for reducing late mortality (70.0%). This was followed by subvalvular papillary muscle repair plus restrictive mitral annuloplasty with or without CABG (62.4%). The top strategy for decreasing early death, reoperation, and readmission to the hospital for heart failure is subvalvular papillary muscle repair plus restrictive mitral annuloplasty with or without CABG, based on SUCRA probabilities (84.6%, 85.54%, and 86.3%, respectively). Subvalvular papillary muscle repair plus restrictive mitral annuloplasty ± CABG has potential to reduce the risks associated with early mortality, reoperation, and re-hospitalization for heart failure. However, further research is required to substantiate these findings.

Long-term outcomes of left ventricular posterior wall plication for ischemic mitral regurgitation

Purpose

To evaluate the early and long-term outcomes of left ventricular posterior wall plication for ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Methods

Patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent left ventricular posterior wall plication via right-sided left atriotomy at our institution between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases with normal cardiac function, left ventricular end-systolic diameter < 50 mm, and left ventriculotomy approach were excluded.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 5.3 years [standard deviation (SD) = 3.5], with a maximum of 10 years. Among the 21 patients enrolled, 9 had New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥ III. Three patients required preoperative inotrope support, while two preoperative ventilator support. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 31.4% (SD: 8.6), and 16 patients had mitral regurgitation grade ≥ III. All patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral annuloplasty. Concomitant surgeries included 11 chordae cutting and 3 tricuspid annuloplasties. One in-hospital death occurred due to sepsis. At the follow-up, echocardiographic data showed significant improvement in cardiac dilation and function and good control of mitral regurgitation. The serum brain natriuretic peptide level was significantly reduced, and 85% of patients improved to NYHA class I. Four deaths occurred later due to sudden, unknown causes. The 5- and 8-year survival rates were 60.2% and 46.8%, respectively, and the 5- and 8-year hospitalization rates due to heart failure were 14.9% and 21.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

The long-term outcomes of left ventricular posterior wall plication were satisfactory for controlling heart failure and improving survival rate and patient prognosis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-023-01527-2.

Subannular repair in secondary mitral regurgitation with restricted leaflet motion during systole

OBJECTIVE

Ventricular secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) (Carpentier type IIIb) results from left ventricular (LV) remodelling, displacement of papillary muscles and tethering of mitral leaflets. The most appropriate treatment approach remains controversial. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of standardised relocation of both papillary muscles (subannular repair) at 1-year follow-up (FU).

METHODS

REFORM-MR (Reform-Mitral Regurgitation) is a prospective, multicentre registry that enrolled consecutive patients with ventricular SMR (Carpentier type IIIb) undergoing standardised subannular mitral valve (MV) repair in combination with annuloplasty at five sites in Germany. Here, we report survival, freedom from recurrence of MR >2+, freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, MV reintervention and echocardiographic parameters of residual leaflet tethering at 1-year FU.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients (69.1% male) with a mean age of 65.1±9.7 years met the inclusion criteria. Advanced LV dysfunction (mean left ventricular ejection fraction 36.4±10.5%) and severe LV dilatation (mean left ventricular end-diastolic diameter 61.0±9.3 mm) resulted in severe mitral leaflet tethering (mean tenting height 10.6±3.0 mm) and an elevated mean EURO Score II of 4.8±4.6 prior to surgery. Subannular repair was successfully performed in all patients, without operative mortality or complications. One-year survival was 95.5%. At 12 months, a durable reduction of mitral leaflet tethering resulted in a low rate (4.2%) of recurrent MR >2+. In addition to a significant improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (22.4% patients in NYHA III/IV vs 64.5% patients at baseline, p<0.001), freedom from MACCE was observed in 91.1% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of standardised subannular repair to treat ventricular SMR (Carpentier type IIIb) in a multicentre setting. By addressing mitral leaflet tethering, papillary muscle relocation results in very satisfactory 1-year outcomes and has the potential to durably restore MV geometry; nevertheless, long-term FU is mandatory.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03470155.

Mitral valve repair with papillary muscle repositioning for functional mitral regurgitation (Type IIIb) with metal allergies: a case report

Background

Prosthetic heart valves, rings, and clips commonly used in heart surgery may contain metals, such as nickel and cobalt, that can cause severe hypersensitivity reactions in allergic patients. These reactions can cause paravalvular leakage and valve dysfunction. Similarly, stainless steel sternal wires can cause contact dermatitis. We should select rings, valves, and wires that do not contain any metals known to cause allergies in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Case summary

We report the case of a 79-year-old man with severe functional mitral regurgitation (Type IIIb) and a history of nickel and cobalt allergies. We safely performed mitral valve repair with papillary muscle repositioning with nickel- and cobalt-free rings in this patient. He was discharged from the hospital on the 26th postoperative day without dialysis intervention. Two years after surgery, mitral and tricuspid regurgitation had not worsened.

Discussion

According to the 2020 American Heart Association guidelines, surgery for severe functional mitral valve insufficiency (Type IIIb) is considered class IIb. Meanwhile, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair is class IIa. Long-term regurgitation is difficult to control with valve replacement and annuloplasty alone; recurrence has been observed. Therefore, additional techniques were considered. Papillary muscle repositioning has been reported and shown good results. The method used in the present case made intervening in the subvalvular tissue easy and demonstrated technical feasibility, safety, and effectiveness.

Impact of Mitral Regurgitation Recurrence on Mitral Valve Repair for Secondary Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

The current guidelines still do not include specific recommendations on the use of subvalvular repair (SV-r) for treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR). Therefore, the objective of our study was to evaluate the clinical impact of mitral regurgitation (MR) recurrence and ventricular remodeling on long-term outcomes after SV-r combined with restrictive annuloplasty (RA-r).

METHODS

We performed a subanalysis of the papillary muscle approximation trial, studying 96 patients with severe IMR and coronary artery disease undergoing restrictive annuloplasty alongside subvalvular repair (SV-r + RA-r group) or restrictive annuloplasty alone (RA-r group). We analyzed treatment failure differences, the influence of residual MR, left ventricular remodeling, and clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was treatment failure (composite of death; reoperation; or recurrence of moderate, moderate-to-severe, or severe MR) within 5 years of follow-up after the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients showed failure of the treatment within 5 years, of which 16 patients underwent SV-r + RA-r (35.6%) and 29 underwent RA-r (64.4%, p = 0.006). Patients with significant residual MR presented with a higher rate of all-cause mortality at 5 years compared with trivial MR (HR 9.09, 95% CI 2.08-33.33, p = 0.003). MR progression occurred earlier in the RA-r group, as 20 patients in the RA-r group vs. 6 in SV-r + RA-r group had a significant MR 2 years after surgery (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

RA-r remains a surgical mitral repair technique with an increased risk of failure and mortality at 5 years compared with SV-r. The rates of recurrent MR are higher, and recurrence occurs earlier, with RA-r alone compared to SV-r. The addition of the subvalvular repair increases the durability of the repair, thus extending all of the benefits of preventing MR recurrence.

Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Muscle Relocation for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation Type IIIb in Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Objective: Subannular mitral valve (MV) repair techniques have been developed to address increased rates of recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with secondary MR (SMR) type IIIb. Endoscopic papillary muscle relocation (PMR) is feasible via minithoracotomy. Nevertheless, the periprocedural outcome of patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction remains unknown. Methods: A total of 98 consecutive patients with SMR type IIIb underwent PMR at our institution. Due to concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting, 62 patients underwent sternotomy and were excluded from the current analysis, whereas 36 patients were treated by a minimally invasive technique using 3-dimensional endoscopy. Of these, 18 patients had severely depressed LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% (study group) and were compared to the remaining 18 patients with LVEF >35% (control group). Periprocedural outcome was retrospectively analyzed. Results: Although LVEF was significantly worse in the study group (30% ± 4% vs 43% ± 6%, P < 0.001), the severity of SMR and the degree of MV leaflet tethering were similar. The prevalence of concomitant procedures and the duration of surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic cross-clamp were comparable. Periprocedural low cardiac output syndrome was favorably low in both groups (16.7% vs 5.6%, P = 0.29). Postoperative ventilation time (5.7 h [4.2 to 8.7 h] vs 6.0 h [4.6 to 9.8 h], P = 0.43) and duration of intensive care unit stay (2 days [1 to 3 days] vs 2 days [1 to 3 days], P = 0.22) were similar. There was no 30-day mortality in either group. Conclusions: Standardized endoscopic PMR resulted in favorable periprocedural outcomes in patients with severe LV dysfunction, suggesting that minimally invasive surgery can safely be extended to this patient population.

Standardized papillary muscle relocation for type IIIb secondary mitral regurgitation improves two-year outcome

OBJECTIVES

The major drawback of isolated annuloplasty for treatment of secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) with restricted leaflet motion during systole (type IIIb) is recurrence of SMR, leading to adverse clinical outcome. Additional papillary muscles relocation (PMR) specifically addresses leaflet tethering to restore mitral valve geometry. We aimed to compare the two-year outcome of annuloplasty with additional PMR vs isolated annuloplasty.

METHODS

A total of 105 consecutive type IIIb SMR patients with preoperative LVEF <45%, LVEDD >55mm and a tenting height >10mm, reached two-year postoperative follow-up after MV repair and were included in the current analysis. 51 patients underwent annuloplasty and additional PMR (study group). 54 patients underwent isolated annuloplasty (control group). Primary composite study end-point comprised death or recurrence of MR ≥2 at two years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Echocardiographic baseline variables indicating the severity of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and mitral leaflet tethering were similar. Procedural and periprocedural outcome was comparable in both groups. The primary composite end-point was significantly improved in the study group 19.6% [10/51] in comparison to the control group 44.4% [24/54] (p = 0.009). 2-year all-cause mortality was 7.8% [4/51] in the study group, vs 18.5% [10/54] in the control group (p = 0.098). After two years, significant improvement of NYHA functional class as compared to the baseline values was observed in the study group.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional PMR to treat SMR type IIIb resulted in an improved 2-year outcome in comparison to isolated annuloplasty. PMR specifically addressing mitral leaflet tethering represents a valid therapeutic option for heart-failure patients with SMR type IIIb.

Surgical mitral valve repair technique considerations based on the available evidence

Mitral valve regurgitation is the second most common valve disease in the western world. Surgery is currently the best tool for generating a long-lasting elimination of mitral valve regurgitation. However, the mitral valve apparatus is a complex anatomical and functional structure, and repair results and durability show substantial heterogeneity. This is not only due to differences in the underlying mitral valve regurgitation pathophysiology but also due to differences in repair techniques. Repair philosophies differ substantially from one surgeon to the other, and consensus for the technically best repair strategy has not been reached yet. We had previously addressed this topic by suggesting that ring sizing is "voodoo". We now review the available evidence regarding the various repair techniques described for structural and functional mitral valve regurgitation. Herein, we illustrate that for structural mitral valve regurgitation, resuspension of prolapsing valve segments or torn chordae with polytetrafluoroethylene sutures and annuloplasty can generate the most durable results paired with the best achievable hemodynamics. For functional mitral valve regurgitation, the evidence suggests that annuloplasty alone is insufficient in most cases to generate durable results, and additional subvalvular strategies are associated with improved durability and possibly improved clinical outcomes. This review addresses current strategies but also implausibilities in mitral valve repair and informs the mitral valve surgeon about the current evidence. We believe that this information may help improve outcomes in mitral valve repair as the heterogeneity of mitral valve regurgitation pathophysiology does not allow a one-size-fits-all concept.

Exploring the Operative Strategy for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Mitral valve disease surgery is an evolving field with multiple possible interventions. There is an increasing body of evidence regarding the optimal strategy in secondary mitral regurgitation where the pathology lies within the ventricle. We conducted a systematic review to identify the benefits and limitations of each surgical option.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs), propensity-matched observational series, and meta-analyses which were considered initially and followed by unmatched observational series using the MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane Library.

RESULTS

We identified 6 different strategies for treating secondary mitral valve regurgitation: mitral valve replacement, restrictive mitral annuloplasty, surgical revascularization (with and without mitral annuloplasty), subvalvular procedures (papillary muscle approximation, papillary muscle relocation, ring and string procedure), and procedures directly targeting the mitral valve (edge-to-edge repair and anterior leaflet enlargement) alongside transcatheter heart valve therapy. We also highlighted the role of left ventricular assist devices in the management of this condition. The benefits and limitations of each intervention are highlighted.

CONCLUSION

There is currently no unanimous and shared strategy for the optimal treatment of patients with secondary IMR. The management of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation must be entrusted to a multidisciplinary Heart Team to ensure ideal intervention and patient matching for the best outcomes.

Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: A Multifaceted Syndrome with Evolving Therapies

Dysfunction of the left ventricle (LV) with impaired contractility following chronic ischemia or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the main cause of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR), leading to moderate and moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation (MR). The site of AMI exerts a specific influence determining different patterns of adverse LV remodeling. In general, inferior-posterior AMI is more frequently associated with regional structural changes than the anterolateral one, which is associated with global adverse LV remodeling, ultimately leading to different phenotypes of IMR. In this narrative review, starting from the aforementioned categorization, we proceed to describe current knowledge regarding surgical approaches in the management of IMR.

Ischemic functional mitral regurgitation: from pathophysiological concepts to current treatment options. A systemic review for optimal strategy

OBJECTIVE

The current treatment of ischemic functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) remains debated due to differences in inclusion criteria of randomized studies and baseline characteristics. Also, the role of left ventricular pathophysiology and the role of subvalvular apparatus have not been thoroughly investigated in recent literature.

METHODS

A literature search was performed from PubMed inception to June 2020.

RESULTS

Novel concepts of pathophysiology, such as the proportionate/disproportionate conceptual framework, the role of papillary muscles and left ventricular dysfunction, the impact of myocardial ischemia and revascularization, left ventricular remodeling, and the effect of restrictive annuloplasty or subvalvular procedures have been reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical benefits associated with the use of MitraClip is more evident in patients with disproportionate FMR with greater and sustained left ventricular reverse remodeling. Importantly, in the absence of myocardial revascularization, expansion of myocardial scar tissue and non-perfused areas of ischemic myocardium occur with time, and this impact on outcomes with a longer follow-up period cannot be quantified. In advanced phases of FMR, neither mitral ring annuloplasty nor percutaneous therapies could significantly modify the established pathoanatomic alterations.

Standardized subannular repair for type IIIb functional mitral regurgitation in a minimally invasive mitral valve surgery setting†

OBJECTIVES

Subannular repair techniques in addition to undersized ring annuloplasty have been developed to address high mitral regurgitation (MR) recurrence rates after mitral valve repair in type IIIb MR. We compared the results of annuloplasty with simultaneous standardized subannular repair versus isolated annuloplasty, focusing on the periprocedural outcomes of minimally invasive procedures.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 108 patients with type IIIb functional MR with severe signs of bileaflet tethering underwent an annuloplasty + subannular repair (group A; n = 60) versus isolated annuloplasty (group B; n = 48). The primary end point of this prospective, parallel cohort study was death or recurrent MR >2, 1 year postoperatively. The secondary end points were survival and clinical outcomes, with special regard for the minimally invasively treated subgroups.

RESULTS

Duration of surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time were comparable between both study groups. Procedural outcomes as well as echocardiographic outcome parameters were similar and independent of access (fully endoscopic versus full sternotomy). At the 12-month follow-up, death or MR >2 occurred in 3.3% (2/60) of patients in group A vs in 20.8% (10/48) of patients in group B (P = 0.037). The overall mortality rate during the follow-up period was 1.7% (1/60) in group A vs 12.5% (6/48) in group B (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized realignment of papillary muscles is feasible and reproducible via a minimally invasive approach, resulting in excellent periprocedural outcomes, and has a clear potential to significantly decrease MR recurrence and improve 1-year outcomes compared to isolated annuloplasty.

Minimally invasive mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation

Systolic heart failure is frequently accompanied by a relevant functional mitral valve regurgitation (FMR) which develops as a direct sequela of the ongoing left ventricular remodelling. The severity of mitral regurgitation is further aggravated by progressive left ventricular enlargement causing leaflet tethering and reduced systolic leaflet movement. The prognosis of such patients is obviously limited by an underlying left ventricular disease, and the correction of secondary FMR has been previously suggested as predominantly ‘cosmetic’ surgery in the setting of ongoing cardiomyopathy. Inferior results of an isolated annuloplasty in type IIIb FMR supported the philosophy of malignant course of progressive cardiomyopathy and resulted in increasingly restricted indications for mitral valve surgery for FMR in the guidelines. The lack of a standardized pathophysiological approach to correct type IIIb FMR led to the development of valve replacement strategy and edge-to-edge catheter-based mitral valve procedures, which became the most frequent procedures in the FMR setting in Europe. Modern mitral valve surgery combines the advantages of 3-dimensional endoscopic minimally invasive surgical approach with standardized subannular repair to address the pathophysiological background of type IIIb FMR. The perioperative results have been significantly improved, and there is a growing evidence of improved long-term stability of subannular repair procedures as compared to isolated annuloplasty. This review article aims to present the current state-of-the-art of the modern mitral valve surgery in FMR and provides suggestions for future trials analysing the potential advantages in these patients.

Meta-analysis of results of subvalvular repair for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing mitral annuloplasty (MA) with or without papillary muscle surgery (PMS) for the treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement were performed.

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. This meta-analysis identified 478 patients: 228 patients underwent MA alone and 250 patients underwent concomitant PMS. Early mortality was similar between two groups (odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-2.53; P = .75). PMS was associated at follow-up with a higher freedom from cardiac-related events (P = .050); moreover, although both surgical techniques had a positive impact on ventricular remodeling, the PMS group showed a significant higher reduction of left ventricle end-diastolic diameter (OR, 4.89, 95% CI, 2.77-7.01; P < .001) and left ventricle end-systolic diameter values (OR, 4.11, 95% CI, 1.98-6.24; P < .001). Finally, PMS compared with MA alone was associated with a significant reduction of recurrent mitral regurgitation at follow-up (OR, 3.25, 95% CI, 1.60-6.59; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated superiority in terms of ventricular remodeling of a combined approach encompassing PMS and MA over MA alone in IMR. Moreover, the association of subvalvular surgery with restrictive MA decreases the incidence of mitral regurgitation recurrence and cardiac-related events at follow-up.

Bilateral papillary muscle repositioning: successful repair of functional mitral regurgitation in dilative cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVES

Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in patients with non-ischaemic dilative cardiomyopathy (DCM) is associated with heart failure and poor outcome. Aggressively undersized annuloplasty as an annular solution for a ventricular problem ameliorates heart failure but may be associated with recurrent FMR and does not improve survival. We sought to analyse if moderately undersized annuloplasty with repositioning of both papillary muscles can lead to improved valve stability and outcome in patients with DCM and FMR.

METHODS

In 66 patients with DCM-associated FMR (age 66 ± 12 years, ejection fraction 29 ± 6% and mean pulmonary artery pressure 35 ± 11 mmHg) and severe leaflet tethering (tenting height ≥10 mm) bilateral papillary muscle repositioning was added to moderately undersized ring annuloplasty (median size 30 mm). Concomitant surgery included tricuspid valve repair in 86% of patients and atrial ablation in 44%.

RESULTS

The early mortality rate was 9%. Overall 5-year freedom from all-cause death, left ventricular assist device implantation or heart transplant was 58% (95% confidence interval 45-71%). Six patients underwent reoperation (redo repair n = 4). Reverse remodelling was observed during follow-up in 66% of patients with decreasing left ventricular end-diastolic diameters (66 ± 5 to 61 ± 12 mm; P < 0.001) and left ventricular end-systolic diameters (56 ± 9 to 51 ± 14 mm; P = 0.001). Subgroup analyses (partial versus complete ring, preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameters <65 mm vs left ventricular end-diastolic diameter ≥65 mm) documented similar survival rates. A competing risks regression analysis identified cerebral vascular disease (P = 0.01), use of a partial ring (P = 0.03) and absence of tricuspid valve repair (P = 0.03) as independent predictors of death.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of bilateral papillary muscle repositioning and moderately undersized ring annuloplasty leads to stable mid-term repair results and reverse remodelling in patients with DCM and FMR and severe leaflet tethering.

Papillary muscle intervention vs mitral ring annuloplasty in ischemic mitral regurgitation

Background and Aims

The main pathophysiological factor of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) is the outward displacement of the papillary muscles (PMs) leading to leaflet tethering. For this reason, papillary muscle intervention (PMI) in combination with mitral ring annuloplasty (MRA) has recently been introduced into clinical practice to correct this displacement, and to reduce the recurrence of regurgitation.

Methods

A meta‐analysis was conducted comparing the outcomes of PMI and MRA performed in combination vs MRA performed alone, in terms of MR recurrence and left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR). A meta‐regression was carried out to investigate the impact of the type of PMI procedure on the outcomes.

Results

MR recurrence in patients undergoing both PMI and MRA was lower than in those who only had MRA (log incidence rate ratio, −0.66; lower‐upper limits, −1.13 to 0.20; I² = 0.0%; p = .44; Egger's test: intercept 0.35 [−0.78 to 1.51]; p = .42).

The group with both PMI and MRA and that with only MRA showed a slightly higher reduction in left ventricular diameters (−5.94%; −8.75% to 3.13%,). However, in both groups, LVRR was <10%. No difference was detected between PM relocation/repositioning and papillary muscle approximation in terms of LVRR (p = .33).

Conclusions

Using PMI and MRA together has a lower MR recurrence than using MRA alone. No significant LVRR was observed between the two groups nor between the PMI techniques employed.

Novel Trigone-Based Sizing Method for Mitral Ring Annuloplasty

BACKGROUND

We devised a novel trigone-based sizing method, setting the trigones at one-quarter of the annular circumference, and used it for mitral annuloplasty in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR).

METHODS

Between 1999 and 2017, 436 patients with degenerative (n = 192), nonischemic functional (n = 124), or ischemic (n = 120) MR underwent mitral valvuloplasty at our institution using an incomplete ring. The intertrigonal distance and prerepair and postrepair annular diameter were measured. Then the diameters predicted from body surface area, the intertrigonal distance, and the ratios of these diameters to observed data were computed. We investigated the influence of these measurements on MR recurrence, transmitral pressure gradient, and systolic anterior motion.

RESULTS

Initial repair was successful in 433 patients (99%), but 3 patients with systolic anterior motion and MR required conversion to valve replacement. After 1, 5, and 10 years (mean follow-up, 6.3 years), the rate of freedom from grade 2 or higher recurrent MR was 96%, 92%, and 86% in the degenerative group, 99%, 97%, and 90% in the nonischemic functional group, and 95%, 90%, and 79%, respectively, in the ischemic group (P = .052). The observed/body surface area predicted diameter ratio was negatively correlated with the mean transmitral pressure gradient (mm Hg); 12.3 - 8.2 × (ratio) (R = -0.37, P < .001), despite a smaller ratio (<0.9) not being associated with less recurrence of MR. In the degenerative group, systolic anterior motion developed in 7 of 71 patients (10%) with an observed/intertrigonal distance predicted diameter ratio of less than 0.9 (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our trigone-based sizing method achieved satisfactory control of MR, while avoiding functional mitral stenosis and systolic anterior motion.

Standardized Subannular Repair Improves Outcomes in Type IIIb Functional Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

The major drawback of isolated annuloplasty in secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is the reoccurrence of MR. We prospectively compared the results of isolated annuloplasty vs annuloplasty with simultaneous standardized subannular repair.

METHODS

The study comprised 101 patients with secondary type IIIb MR. Of these, 51 underwent annuloplasty plus standardized subannular repair with realignment of both papillary muscles (subannular repair) and 50 underwent isolated annuloplasty. The primary study end point was the reoccurrence of MR >2 at the 1-year follow-up. Secondary end points were survival, freedom from major adverse cardiac events, and residual leaflet tethering.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (P = .3). Although postrepair MR was comparable between the subannular repair and isolated annuloplasty subgroups, the residual leaflet tethering (tenting area, 127.6 ± 35.8 mm² vs 166.3 ± 47.3 mm², P = .02; posterior mitral leaflet angle, 19.2 ± 4.7 degrees vs 24.8 ± 5.2 degrees, P = .001; anterior mitral leaflet angle, 25.4 ± 5.8 degrees vs 34.1 ± 4.0 degrees, P = .001; and tenting height, 5.9 ± 1.4 mm vs 9.2 ± 2.2 mm, P = .001) were significantly increased in the isolated annuloplasty group (P < .001). At the 1-year follow-up, we found a significant difference between the groups in the freedom from MR >2 of 98% (50 of 51) for subannular repair vs 86.7% (39 of 45) for isolated annuloplasty (P = .045) and mortality of 0% (0 of 51) for subannular repair vs 10% (5 of 50) for isolated annuloplasty (P = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

In secondary MR with reduced leaflet motion, the combination of annuloplasty and standardized subannular repair is associated with a significantly reduced MR reoccurrence, decreased residual leaflet tenting, and significantly improved 1-year outcome compared with annuloplasty alone.

Predictive impact of previous coronary artery bypass grafting on mortality after MitraClip implantation for ischemic functional mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Many candidates with ischaemic functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) have previously undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), in which transcatheter mitral valve repair can be reasonable for ameliorating the deteriorated hemodynamic and heart failure symptoms. We sought to elucidate the outcomes of MitraClip (MC) implantation in patients with symptomatic ischaemic FMR after CABG.

METHODS

We investigated clinical characteristics, outcomes and predictive impact of previous CABG on mortality in ischaemic FMR patients who underwent MC implantation from two high-volume centres in Germany.

RESULTS

We enrolled 159 patients who previously underwent CABG. Compared with a reference group that did not previously undergo CABG (n = 182), the cohort consisted of more elderly patients (75.0, standard deviation [SD] 7.7 versus 72.9, SD 9.6 years, p = 0.028), more men (84% vs. 69%, p < 0.001), and reduced tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (14.0, SD 4.0, vs. 16.6, SD 4.6 mm, p < 0.0001). The CABG group showed similar outcomes regarding procedural success (91% vs. 94%, p = 0.24) and 30-day mortality (5.0% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.68), but worse survival after MC implantation (log-rank p = 0.019, hazard ratio 1.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-2.26]). After propensity score matching (n = 224), the hazard ratio was 1.18 [95%CI 0.76-1.84] without statistical significance (p = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter mitral valve repair using the MC is a viable treatment option for patients with symptomatic ischaemic FMR after CABG. Although the baseline characteristics seemed to point to sick patients, CABG itself had only a modest impact on survival.

Surgical intervention for ischemic mitral regurgitation: how can we achieve better outcomes?

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common complication of myocardial infarction. Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and distortion of the subvalvular apparatus are the main contributors to ischemic MR. Coronary artery bypass grafting alone, mitral valve replacement, and mitral valve repair, with or without subvalvular procedures, have been performed for moderate-to-severe ischemic MR. Several randomized studies on the surgical treatment of ischemic MR have been performed; however, the optimal surgical strategy remains controversial because none have demonstrated a clear survival benefit. Since the mechanisms of ischemic MR are complex and multifactorial, comprehensive preoperative assessment of LV function and geometry (both global and regional), mitral valve configuration, viability testing, and exercise echocardiography are needed. A better understanding of this complicated disease and of the advantages and limitations of each procedure may help us devise more effective patient-specific surgical treatment strategies and achieve better outcomes.

Large animal model of acute right ventricular failure with functional tricuspid regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) commonly arises secondary to conditions affecting the left heart and is associated with right ventricular dysfunction and tricuspid annular dilatation. We set out to establish an animal model of acute RV failure (RVF) with FTR resembling the clinical features.

METHODS

Ten adult sheep had pressure sensors placed in the LV, RV, and right atrium while sonomicrometry crystals were implanted around tricuspid annulus and on the RV. Animals were studied open-chest to assess for RV function and FTR after: (1) volume infusion, (2) pulmonary artery constriction, (3) 5 min posterior descending artery occlusion, and (4) combination of all interventions. Hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and sonomicrometry data were collected at baseline and after every intervention. RV dimensions, RV strain, and annular area, perimeter, and size were calculated from crystal coordinates. The model was validated in six additional sheep studied only before and after combined interventions.

RESULTS

Neither volume infusion, pulmonary hypertension, nor ischemia were associated with RVF or clinically significant TR when applied separately but combined resulted in RVF and greater than moderate FTR. In the validation group, maximal RV volume increased (62 ± 14 vs 70 ± 16 ml, p = 0.006), contractility decreased (20 ± 6 vs 12 ± 2%, p = 0.02), and strain increased. FTR increased from 0.4 ± 0.5 to 2.5 ± 0.8 (p < 0.001) and annular area from 652 ± 87 mm² to 739 ± 87 mm² (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The developed ovine model of acute RVF was associated with significant annular and RV enlargement and FTR. This novel and clinically pertinent research platform offers insight into the acute RVF pathophysiology and can be utilized to evaluate treatment interventions.

Functional mitral regurgitation: an overview for surgical management framework

Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is one the most common complications of myocardial infarction (MI) in adults carrying a significant clinical and economic burden. Despite specific randomized controlled studies to address its treatment have been performed, there are still a number of questions remained unanswered. Outcomes of surgical repair of FMR are still hampered by a significant rate of recurrence of regurgitation and need for reoperation. Mechanisms underlying failure of repairs still need to be completely clarified and questions regarding the indications and optimal timing for intervention as well as the best suitable operative technique to be applied are still debated. This work will review the current knowledge on FMR including its pathogenic mechanisms, the available treatment strategies, the evidences from trials and observational studies and the potential future directions to address the issues related to its treatment.

Numerical simulation of transapical off-pump mitral valve repair with neochordae implantation

BACKGROUND

Transapical off-pump mitral valve (MV) repair is a novel minimally-invasive surgical technique, allowing to correct mitral regurgitation (MR) caused by chordae tendineae rupture. While numerical simulation of the MV structure has proven to be useful to evaluate the effects of the MV surgical repair techniques, no numerical simulation studies on the outcomes of transapical MV repair have been done up to now.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the transapical MV repair using finite element modeling and to determine the effect of the neochordal length on the function of the prolapsing MV.

METHODS

The reconstruction of the MV geometry based on the patient-specific data was performed. In order to simulate prolapse, chordae inserted into the middle segment of the posterior leaflet (P2) were ruptured. A total of four virtual transapical repairs using neochordae of different length were performed. The function of the MV before and after virtual repairs was simulated.

RESULTS

The evaluation of the effect of the neochordal length on post-repair MV function showed that the length of the implanted neochordae has a significant impact on the correction of MR caused by chordae tendineae rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented results can improve the understanding of the effects of transapical MV repair.

Mitral valve interventions in heart failure

Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) results from left ventricular dilatation and dysfunction. Quantification of secondary MR is challenging because of the underlying myocardial disease. Clinical and echocardiographic evaluation requires a multi‐parametric approach. Severe secondary MR occurs in up to one‐fourth of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, which is associated with a mortality rate of 40% to 50% in 3 years. Percutaneous edge‐to‐edge mitral valve repair (MitraClip) has emerged as an alternative to surgical valve repair to improve symptoms, functional capacity, heart failure hospitalizations, and cardiac haemodynamics. Further new transcatheter strategies addressing MR are evolving. The Carillion, Cardioband, and Mitralign devices were designed to reduce the annulus dilatation, which is a frequent and important determinant of secondary MR. Several transcatheter mitral valve replacement systems (Tendyne, CardiAQ‐Edwards, Neovasc, Tiara, Intrepid, Caisson, HighLife, MValve System, and NCSI NaviGate Mitral) are emerging because valve replacement might be more durable compared with valve repair. In small studies, these interventional therapies demonstrated feasibility and efficiency to reduce MR and to improve heart failure symptoms. However, neither transcatheter nor surgical mitral valve repair or replacement has been proven to impact on the prognosis of heart failure patients with severe MR, which remains high with a mortality rate of 14–20% at 1 year. To date, the primary indication for treatment of secondary severe MR is the amelioration of symptoms, reinforcing the value of a Heart Team discussion. Randomized studies to investigate the treatment effect and long‐term outcome for any transcatheter or surgical mitral valve intervention compared with optimized medical treatment are urgently needed and underway.

Subannular reconstruction in secondary mitral regurgitation: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Mitral valve repair using an undersized complete annuloplasty ring in secondary mitral regurgitation with restricted leaflet motion during systole (Carpentier's surgical classification of mitral valve pathology: type IIIb) only inadequately addresses the underlying left ventricular disease. This may lead to an ongoing ventricular remodelling and progressive papillary muscle displacement with increasing leaflet tethering. Several subannular techniques have been proposed to counteract the reoccurrence of mitral regurgitation after mitral valve repair. We aimed to evaluate the potential additive effect of such subannular techniques on the late reoccurrence rate of secondary mitral regurgitation.

METHODS

Systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed on PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar for studies published up to March 2016 and reporting late reoccurrence of mitral regurgitation after mitral valve repair using standard annuloplasty (control group) versus annuloplasty with subannular correction (study group) cohorts. Primary endpoint was late reoccurrence of mitral regurgitation ≥2 after surgical mitral valve repair, as defined by follow-up echocardiography.

RESULTS

The cumulative number of 1093 patients in 12 included studies served as our study population. A total of 743 patients underwent combined mitral valve repair including annuloplasty and subannular manoeuvre (ie, study group), while the remaining 350 patients underwent an isolated ring annuloplasty (ie, control group). Secondary mitral regurgitation was caused by ischaemic heart disease in 733/743 patients in the study group and 334/350 patients in the control group. Mean echocardiographic follow-up was 42.7±13.9 months. Pooled outcome analysis demonstrated that the combination of subannular repair with ring annuloplasty was associated with a significantly lower reoccurrence rate of mitral regurgitation ≥2 as compared with annuloplasty alone (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.38, P=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The combination of subannular reconstruction and mitral valve annuloplasty is associated with a lower late reoccurrence of mitral regurgitation after surgical mitral valve repair, as compared with annuloplasty alone.

Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Valve Repair Versus Replacement

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR), which occurs in about 20-30% patients with a prior myocardial infarction, is associated with worsening heart failure and an increase in cardiovascular mortality. It should be treated surgically if certain hemodynamic severity criteria are met and in patients who continue to experience symptoms of heart failure despite optimal medical therapy. However, current guidelines do not suggest which of the available approaches to mitral valve surgery-mitral valve (MV) repair or replacement (MVR) is superior for this indication. While MV repair is reported to confer improved survival, MVR may provide higher rates of freedom from recurrent MR. This article attempts to provide the reader with a comprehensive review and comparison of current techniques of mitral valve surgery in patients with severe ischemic MR.

RECENT FINDINGS

The first randomized trial to compare MV repair versus MVR in patients with severe ischemic MR, the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network (CTSN) trial, was recently concluded and reported no significant difference in the primary outcome of left ventricular end systolic volume index between the two approaches at either 1- or 2-year follow-ups. Data comparing approaches of MV repair and MVR for ischemic MR is largely limited to small, non-randomized retrospective trials. The only randomized trial data to examine this issue suggested no difference in mortality with either MVR or MV repair; however, MVR was shown to be consistently associated with higher rates of MR recurrence. Certain echocardiographic features have been reported to predict poor outcomes with MVR and may help refine the selection of the surgical approach in the individual patient.

Comparison of mitral competence after mitral repair with papillary muscle approximation versus papillary muscle relocation for functional mitral regurgitation

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical results of papillary muscle approximation (PMA) and papillary muscle relocation (PMR) for functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and to compare the effects of both procedures on the change in mitral regurgitation (MR) and echocardiogram parameters associated with tethering. Eighteen patients with moderate-to-severe FMR (MR grade ≥2) who underwent PMA or PMR were retrospectively analyzed. Underlying diseases were ischemic cardiomyopathy, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and aortic valve disease for seven, six, and five patients, respectively. Eleven patients underwent PMA and seven patients underwent PMR. Mitral annuloplasty and surgical ventricular restoration were performed concomitantly for 18 and 6 patients, respectively. None of these patients died in the hospital. Three patients died during the late period; two of these deaths were cardiac related. The rate of 3 years of freedom from cardiac-related death was 89%. After a mean follow-up of 33 months, MR grade was significantly improved compared with preoperative values (3.0 ± 0.8 to 0.7 ± 1.2; p < 0.01). Recurrence of MR grade ≥2 occurred in three patients and the rate of 3 years of freedom from recurrence of MR grade ≥2 was 87%. During follow-up, tenting height (1.1 ± 0.2 to 0.7 ± 0.2 cm; p < 0.01), tenting area (2.2 ± 0.7 to 0.9 ± 0.5 cm²; p < 0.01), and anterior leaflet tethering angle (39° ± 11° to 26° ± 8°; p < 0.01) were significantly improved compared with preoperative values. Posterior leaflet tethering angle significantly deteriorated from 40° ± 7° to 53° ± 15° (p < 0.01); however, it did not further deteriorate compared with the early postoperative value of 55° ± 16° (p = 0.7). There was no difference in echocardiogram parameters associated with tethering between PMA and PMR throughout the observation period. Both methods were associated with lasting relief of MR and reverse left ventricular remodeling. There was no difference between PMA and PMR regarding the effect on mitral valve competence. Both methods allowed durable mitral repair and good clinical outcomes.

The role of papillary muscle approximation in mitral valve repair for the treatment of secondary mitral regurgitation

Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is present in up to half of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, and is associated with a poor prognosis. It primarily results from progressive left ventricular remodelling, papillary muscle displacement and tethering of the mitral valve leaflets. Mitral valve repair with an undersized ring annuloplasty is the reparative procedure of choice in the treatment of secondary MR. However, this technique is associated with a 30-60% incidence of recurrent moderate or greater MR at mid-term follow-up, which results in progressive deterioration of left ventricular function and increased morbidity. Combined mitral valve repair and papillary muscle approximation has been applied in order to address both the annular and subvalvular dysfunction that coexist in secondary MR, which include graft and suture-based techniques. Herein, we provide a systematic review of the published literature regarding the technical aspects, clinical application, and outcomes of mitral valve repair with combined ring annuloplasty and papillary muscle approximation for the treatment of secondary MR.

Mitral valve repair and subvalvular intervention for secondary mitral regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled and propensity matched studies

BACKGROUND

Combining a ring annuloplasty (Ring) with a mitral subvalvular intervention (Ring + subvalvular) in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) may improve mitral valve (MV) repair durability. However, the outcomes of this strategy compared with a Ring only, have not been clearly defined.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed utilizing randomized controlled and propensity matched studies which compared a Ring + subvalvular versus Ring MV repair for the treatment of secondary MR. Risk ratio (RR), weighted mean difference (MD), and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by the Mantel-Haenszel and inverse-variance methods, for clinical outcomes and echocardiographic measures of follow-up MR, left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling, and MV apparatus geometry.

RESULTS

Five studies were identified, with a total of 397 patients. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, and all patients had moderate to severe secondary MR, with the vast majority in the setting of ischemic cardiomyopathy. A Ring + subvalvular repair consisted of papillary muscle approximation (n=2), papillary muscle relocation (n=2), or secondary chordal cutting (n=1). Follow-up ranged from 10.1 (mean range =0.25-42) to 69 [interquartile range (IQR) =23-82] months. When compared with Ring only at last follow-up, a Ring + subvalvular MV repair was associated with: (I) a smaller MR grade (MD =-0.44, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.19; P=0.0005); (II) a reduced risk of moderate or greater recurrent MR (RR =0.43, 95% CI, 0.27-0.66; P=0.0002); (III) a smaller mean LV end-diastolic diameter (MD =-3.56 mm, 95% CI -5.40 to -1.73; P=0.0001) and a greater ejection fraction (MD =2.64%, 95% CI, 0.13-5.15; P=0.04); and, (IV) an improved MV apparatus geometry. There were no differences in operative mortality, post-operative morbidity, or follow-up survival between surgical approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with Ring only, a Ring + subvalvular MV repair is associated with greater LV reverse remodeling and systolic function, less recurrence of moderate or greater MR, and an improved geometry of the MV apparatus at short and mid-term follow-up.

Exercise Dynamics in Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Implications

Secondary mitral valve regurgitation (MR) remains a challenging problem in the diagnostic workup and treatment of patients with heart failure. Although secondary MR is characteristically dynamic in nature and sensitive to changes in ventricular geometry and loading, current therapy is mainly focused on resting conditions. An exercise-induced increase in secondary MR, however, is associated with impaired exercise capacity and increased mortality. In an era where a multitude of percutaneous solutions are emerging for the treatment of patients with heart failure, it becomes important to address the dynamic component of secondary MR during exercise as well. A critical reappraisal of the underlying disease mechanisms, in particular the dynamic component during exercise, is of timely importance. This review summarizes the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the dynamic deterioration of secondary MR during exercise, its functional and prognostic impact, and the way current treatment options affect the dynamic lesion and exercise hemodynamics in general.

The value of adding sub-valvular procedures for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation surgery: a meta-analysis

Background:

The most performed repair technique for the treatment of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients referred for bypass grafting remains restricted annuloplasty. However, it is associated with a high rate of failure, especially if severe tenting exists.

Objectives:

To understand if adjunctive sub-valvular mitral procedures may provide better repair performance.

Methods:

A systematic literature review identified six studies of which five fulfilled the criteria for meta-analysis. Outcomes for a total of 404 patients (214 had adjunctive sub-valvular procedures and 190 restricted annuloplasty) were meta-analyzed using random effects modeling. Heterogeneity and subgroup sensitivity analysis were assessed. Primary endpoints were: late recurrence of moderate mitral regurgitation, left ventricle remodeling and coaptation depth at follow-up. Secondary endpoints were: early mortality, mid-term survival and operative outcomes.

Results:

Sub-valvular procedure technique was associated with a significantly lower late recurrence of mitral regurgitation (Odds ratio (OR) 0.34, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [0.18, 0.65], p=0.0009), smaller left ventricle end-systolic diameter (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) -4.06, 95% CI [-6.10, -2.03], p=0.0001) and reduced coaptation depth (WMD -2.36, 95% CI [-5.01, -0.71], p=0.009). These findings were consistent, even in studies that included patients at high risk for repair failure (coaptation depth >10 mm and tenting area >2.5 cm2). A low degree of heterogeneity was observed. There was no difference in terms of early mortality and mid-term survival; sub-valvular technique was associated with prolonged cardiopulmonary and cross-clamp time.

Conclusions:

Adding sub-valvular procedures when repairing ischemic chronic mitral valve regurgitation may be associated with better durability, even in the case of the presence of predictors for late failure.

Perspective:

Surgical sub-valvular adjunctive procedures have to be considered in the case of the presence of echocardiographic predictors for late failure.

Are adjunct subvalvular techniques more effective than isolated restrictive annuloplasty for treating ischemic mitral regurgitation?

This review focused on whether subvalvular techniques are more effective than isolated restrictive annuloplasty in addressing ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR). Searching identified 445 papers and, following a selection process, we ended up with 10 articles. Two were propensity-matched studies, four retrospective and four prospective, non-randomized studies. The end points of interest were late recurrence of MR, other early echocardiographic outcomes of mitral function and early mortality. All studies focusing on echocardiographic measurements showed improved results in the groups where subvalvular repair techniques were used. In almost all studies, the recurrence of MR postoperatively was less when subvalvular techniques were used. No difference in early or in-hospital mortality was demonstrated in all four studies that included comparisons. We conclude that subvalvular techniques in combination with annuloplasty are safe and may better address ischemic MR than the use of annuloplasty ring alone.

Mitral valve repair

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common valvular heart disease in the Western world. The MR can be either organic (mainly degenerative in Western countries) or functional (secondary to left ventricular remodeling in the context of ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy). Degenerative and functional MR are completely different disease entities that pose specific decision-making problems and require different management. The natural history of severe degenerative MR is clearly unfavorable. However, timely and effective correction of degenerative MR is associated with a normalization of life expectancy. By contrast, the prognostic impact of the correction of functional MR is still debated and controversial. In this review, we discuss the optimal treatment of both degenerative and functional MR, taking into account current surgical and percutaneous options. In addition, since a clear understanding of the etiology and mechanisms of valvular dysfunction is important to guide the timing and choice of treatment, the role of the heart team and of echo imaging in the management of MR is addressed as well.

[Modern mitral valve surgery]

At the beginning of the 20th century, Cutler and Levine performed the first successful surgical treatment of a stenotic mitral valve, which was the only treatable heart valve defect at that time. Mitral valve surgery has evolved significantly since then. The introduction of the heart-lung machine in 1954 not only reduced the surgical risk, but also allowed the treatment of different mitral valve pathologies. Nowadays, mitral valve insufficiency has become the most common underlying pathomechanism of mitral valve disease and can be classified into primary and secondary mitral insufficiency. Primary mitral valve insufficiency is mainly caused by alterations of the valve (leaflets and primary order chords) itself, whereas left ventricular dilatation leading to papillary muscle displacement and leaflet tethering via second order chords is the main underlying pathomechanism for secondary mitral valve regurgitation. Valve reconstruction using the "loop technique" plus annuloplasty is the surgical strategy of choice and normalizes life expectancy in patients with primary mitral regurgitation. In patients with secondary mitral regurgitation, implanting an annuloplasty is not superior to valve replacement and results in high rates of valve re-insufficiency (up to 30 % after 3 months) due to ongoing ventricular dilatation. In order to improve repair results in these patients, we add a novel subvalvular technique (ring-noose-string) to the annuloplasty that aims to prevent ongoing ventricular remodeling and re-insufficiency. In modern mitral surgery, a right lateral thoracotomy is the approach of choice with excellent repair and cosmetic results.

Finite Element Modeling of Mitral Valve Repair

The mitral valve is a complex structure regulating forward flow of blood between the left atrium and left ventricle (LV). Multiple disease processes can affect its proper function, and when these diseases cause severe mitral regurgitation (MR), optimal treatment is repair of the native valve. The mitral valve (MV) is a dynamic structure with multiple components that have complex interactions. Computational modeling through finite element (FE) analysis is a valuable tool to delineate the biomechanical properties of the mitral valve and understand its diseases and their repairs. In this review, we present an overview of relevant mitral valve diseases, and describe the evolution of FE models of surgical valve repair techniques.

Is an adjunctive subvalvular repair during mitral annuloplasty for secondary mitral regurgitation effective in preventing recurrent regurgitation?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: Is an adjunctive subvalvular repair during mitral annuloplasty for secondary mitral regurgitation effective in preventing recurrent regurgitation? Altogether, 353 studies were found using the reported search, of which 9 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers were tabulated. The best evidence regarding adjunctive subvalvular repair during mitral annuloplasty for secondary mitral regurgitation was from retrospective analyses. The studies reported outcomes of mitral valve repair (MVr) with annuloplasty alone (ring MVr) versus adjunctive papillary muscle approximation (PMA; n = 3), papillary muscle relocation (PMR; n = 3), secondary chordal cutting (n = 2) and PMA + PMR (n = 1). All but one study included concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting, whereas additional ventriculoplasty was performed in three studies. Follow-up ranged from 1 month to 5 years. The performance of PMA was associated with a lower mitral regurgitation (MR) grade when combined with ventriculoplasty in one study, whereas a greater improvement in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular ejection fraction at follow-up was observed with PMA alone in a separate study. Three studies of ring + PMR reported a reduction in ≥ 2+ recurrent MR, whereas two studies also observed a greater reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter. The two studies on secondary chordal cutting reported a lower MR grade, lower recurrence of ≥ 2+ MR and a greater left ventricular ejection fraction at follow-up. Combining PMA + PMR + ventriculoplasty significantly reduced left ventricular end-systolic volume index at short-term follow-up in one study. Finally, none of the studies reported a significant difference in operative mortality between ring MVr (0-13%) versus ring MVr + subvalvular repair (0-15%). We conclude that an adjunctive subvalvular repair performed at the time of mitral annuloplasty for secondary MR can be safely performed, improves the durability of valve repair and enhances left ventricular reverse remodelling.

A Meta-Analysis of Ring Annuloplasty Versus Combined Ring Annuloplasty and Subvalvular Repair for Moderate-to-Severe Functional Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

A ring annuloplasty (Ring) for moderate-to-severe functional mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with suboptimal outcomes, and adjunctive subvalvular repair techniques (Ring + Subvalvular) have been advocated to improve repair durability. However, the outcomes of this strategy are not clearly defined.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify studies that compared a Ring versus Ring + Subvalvular repair for the treatment of moderate-to-severe functional MR. A meta-analysis was conducted on clinical outcomes and echocardiographic measures of follow-up MR and left ventricular reverse remodeling. Risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) were calculated by the Mantel-Haenszel and Inverse Variance methods under a fixed or random effects model, as appropriate.

RESULTS

Seven non-randomized studies were identified, with a total of 531 patients (Ring = 301, Ring + Subvalvular = 230). At follow-up (range 30-47 months), a Ring + Subvalvular repair was associated with a lower mortality (RR = 0.59, 95%confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.94, p = 0.03), greater freedom from moderate or greater MR (RR = 0.44, 95%CI 0.27-0.72, p = 0.001), and improved left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (MD = -3.49 mm, 95%CI -5.45 to -1.53, p = 0.0005) and New York Heart Association functional class (MD = -0.25, 95%CI -0.42 to -0.08, p = 0.004). A trend toward a reduced risk of reoperation for recurrent MR was noted with a combined Ring + Subvalvular repair (RR = 0.28, 95%CI 0.06-1.22, p = 0.09). Finally, a Ring + Subvalvular repair did not impact operative mortality or follow-up left ventricular ejection fraction.

CONCLUSION

A combined Ring + Subvalvular repair for moderate-to-severe functional MR can be safely performed, and may improve mid-term outcomes, as compared with Ring alone.