Reoperation of Left Heart Valve Bioprostheses According to Age at Implantation

Trans-catheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement in a patient on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case report

Background

Bioprosthetic mitral valves on average have a median durability between 8 and 10 years. After the failure of a bioprosthetic valve, surgical replacement is often indicated. However, the options for those patients at high or prohibitive surgical risks are limited. Here, we describe a case of a successful trans-catheter mitral valve-in-valve (TMViV) replacement on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).

Case summary

We describe a case of a 39-year-old female with a history notable for systemic lupus erythematosus, severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (now mixed pre and post) thought to be secondary to prior substance use, and infective endocarditis complicated by severe mitral stenosis status post-bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement who presented with symptoms of acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to severe bioprosthetic mitral valve stenosis. The patient had a prolonged hospital course complicated by a pulseless electrical activity arrest, (continuous renal replacement therapy) for acute renal failure, and hypertonic saline due to cerebral oedema. Due to her significant co-morbidities and haemodynamic instability with acute kidney injury and recent neurologic insult, the patient was thought not to be a good surgical candidate. However, given her young age and overall improved neurologic status, it was thought the patient could benefit from a TMViV with bi-ventricular support given her right- and left-sided heart failure and was placed on VA-ECMO in anticipation of a TMViV procedure for circulatory support. The patient underwent a successful TMViV replacement using a trans-septal approach with a 26 mm SAPIEN 3 valve and atrial septal defect closure with a 14 mm Amplatzer device on hospital Day 12. The patient was successfully de-cannulated from VA-ECMO on hospital Day 13. The patient had a prolonged hospital course but eventually had renal recovery and tracheostomy de-cannulation. A trans-thoracic echocardiogram prior to discharge was notable for a well-functioning valve and normal ejection fraction. The patient was discharged to a nursing home for further rehabilitation.

Discussion

The gold standard for bioprosthetic mitral valve stenosis is surgical replacement of the valve. However, the options for those at high or prohibitive surgical risk are lacking. Recent studies have demonstrated TMViV is a safe alternative to surgical mitral valve redo cases in high-risk patients. To our knowledge, there are limited data on trans-catheter valve placement while on VA-ECMO. Successful implantation in our patient suggests that TMViV in a stenotic bioprosthesis is feasible in very high-risk patients with the use of VA-ECMO to support haemodynamics.

Bovine pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic mitral valves: results from a Korean Nationwide Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Comparisons of long-term clinical outcomes of mitral valve replacement (MVR) between bovine pericardial and porcine bioprostheses are conflicting, with limited research in large-scale real-world clinical settings. This study examined clinical outcomes in MVR according to bioprosthesis type using a national administrative claims database.

METHODS

This study included adult patients undergoing bioprosthetic MVR between 2003 and 2018 using administrative health care data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Propensity score matching with competing risk analysis was used to compare the clinical outcomes according to the type of bioprosthesis. The end points were death, cardiac death, and valve-related events, including the incidence of reoperation, endocarditis, systemic thromboembolism, and major bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 3151 patients underwent bioprosthetic MVR with bovine pericardial (n = 1628, 51.7%) or porcine (n = 1523, 48.3%) bioprostheses. After matching, 1170 pairs were included in the final analysis. During follow-up (median 4.49 years, interquartile range 1.87 -8.75 years), death occurred in 1178 patients (6.8%/patient-year), comprising 730 (4.3%/patient-year) cardiac death. No significant differences were noted between the bovine and porcine groups in the cumulative incidences of death from any cause [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-1.14], cardiac mortality (aHR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81-1.14), or reoperation (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.72-1.41).

CONCLUSIONS

This study on a nationwide comparison between bovine and porcine bioprostheses in MVR found no significant differences in clinical outcomes including mortality, and valve-related reoperation.

A biomimetic multilayered polymeric material designed for heart valve repair and replacement

Materials currently used to repair or replace a heart valve are not durable. Their limited durability related to structural degeneration or thrombus formation is attributed to their inadequate mechanical properties and biocompatibility profiles. Our hypothesis is that a biostable material that mimics the structure, mechanical and biological properties of native tissue will improve the durability of these leaflets substitutes and in fine improve the patient outcome. Here, we report the development, optimization, and testing of a biomimetic, multilayered material (BMM), designed to replicate the native valve leaflets. Polycarbonate urethane and polycaprolactone have been processed as film, foam, and aligned fibers to replicate the leaflet's architecture and anisotropy, through solution casting, lyophilization, and electrospinning. Compared to the commercialized materials, our BMMs exhibited an anisotropic behavior and a closer mechanical performance to the aortic leaflets. The material exhibited superior biostability in an accelerated oxidization environment. It also displayed better resistance to protein adsorption and calcification in vitro and in vivo. These results will pave the way for a new class of advanced synthetic material with long-term durability for surgical valve repair or replacement.

Aortic valve-sparing root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: long-term outcome with the David I procedure over 20 years

OBJECTIVES

Aortic valve-sparing root replacement is an excellent treatment option for patients with intact tricuspid aortic valves. However, the durability in patients with bicuspid aortic valves is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to analyse the short- and long-term outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic valves.

METHODS

Between July 1993 and October 2015, a total of 582 patients underwent the David I procedure, 50 of whom had a bicuspid aortic valve. In these patients, the mean age was 46 ± 13 years, and 80% (n = 40) were men. Follow-up was complete for 100% of patients and comprised a total of 552 patient-years with a mean follow-up time of 11 ± 5.2 years.

RESULTS

In addition to the David procedure, cusp plication was performed in 34% (n = 17) of patients and commissure repair in 8% (n = 4) of patients. There were no in-hospital deaths, and 1 patient (2%) had a perioperative stroke. The 1-, 5-, 10- and 20-year survival rates of patients after discharge were 98%, 94%, 88% and 84%, respectively. The rates for freedom from valve-related reoperation at 1, 5, 10 and 20 years after initial surgery were 98%, 88%, 79% and 74%, respectively. Long-term freedom from reoperation was comparable to that of patients with tricuspid aortic valves (P = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The David procedure has excellent short-term results in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve. In this study, the long-term durability of reimplanted bicuspid aortic valves was comparable to that of tricuspid valves. However, careful patient selection might have contributed to this, and further studies might be needed to definitely clarify this issue.

The First 100 Cases of Two Innovations Combined: Video-Assisted Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Through Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy Using a Novel Aortic Prosthesis

Introduction

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) via right anterior mini-thoracotomy (RAMT) is less traumatic than via other surgical routes; using a novel aortic valve may confer long-term resistance against valve deterioration, and thus be useful in younger, more active patients. Here we aim to validate using the INSPIRIS RESILIA valve with minimally invasive RAMT.

Methods

Between April 2017 and June 2019, 100 patients underwent video-assisted minimally invasive AVR by RAMT, using the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve. Cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was through femoral vessels. Clinical data were prospectively entered into our institutional database.

Results

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamping times were 79 ± 38 and 41 ± 17 min. Surgical access was successful in 100% of cases. There were no cases of intraoperative mortality, 30-day mortality, cerebrovascular events, rethoracotomy for bleeding, valve-related reoperation, right internal mammary artery injury, or conversion to sternotomy. Intensive care and hospital stays were 2 ± 1 and 6 ± 3 days, respectively. One patient had a pacemaker fitted. Postoperative dialysis was necessary in one patient. Trace to mild aortic valve regurgitation occurred in two patients. No structural valve deterioration (SVD) and paravalvular leak were seen. At 1-year follow-up mean effective orifice area (EOA) was 1.8 ± 0.1 cm², peak gradient was 22.1 ± 3.1 mmHg, and mean gradient was 11.5 ± 2.3 mmHg.

Conclusion

Our preliminary experience suggests that RAMT for AVR using the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve is safe, effective, and reproducible. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and durability of this new valve.

Technical Modifications that Might Improve Long-Term Outcome of the Ross Procedure in Children

BACKGROUND

Failure of the pulmonary autograft (PVA) following the Ross procedure (RP) has discouraged its widespread use and led to modifications or alternatives to the procedure. We sought to analyze whether certain technical modifications could improve results of the RP in children.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients (median age 12 years, range 0.25 to 17.9) underwent the RP between 01/1996 and 12/2018. Concomitant Konno procedure was performed on 20/69 (29%). Prior interventions included balloon valvuloplasty in 30/69 (44%), and/or surgical valvuloplasty in 39/69 (57%). Technical modifications included utilizing the native aortic root for external annuloplasty, implanting the autograft using uniplanar horizontal sutures through the aortic wall, normalizing the sinotubular junction and wrapping the native root remnant around the PVA.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 1/69 (1.5%), with no late death. No patient had neoaortic valvar stenosis and 7/68 (10%) had mild regurgitation on discharge echocardiogram. At latest follow-up (median 9.4 years, range 0.4 - 21.3) there was no significant change in the latest follow up Z scores of annulus, sinus or sinotubular junction diameters when compared to those at discharge. Three patients (4.4%) required late autograft replacement, two PVA repair, and two resection of pseudoaneurysm. Actuarial freedom from PVA replacement was 87% at 20 yrs. Freedom from right ventricular outflow tract catheter reintervention or reoperation was 83% and 80% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Technical modifications of the RP used in this cohort might successfully prolong the life of the PVA without compromising its growth, an important advantage in pediatric patients.

Aortic valve-sparing root replacement with Tirone E. David's reimplantation technique: single-centre 25-year experience

 

OBJECTIVES

Tirone E. David described aortic valve-sparing root reimplantion (AVSRR) almost 30 years ago. At our centre, we adopted this operation in 1993, and since then, we have performed >700 operations over a time period of >25 years. In this report, we present our single-centre experience.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2019, a total of 732 patients underwent AVSRR at our centre. The mean age was 53 ± 15 and 522 (71%) were male. Marfan syndrome was present in 117 (16%) patients and bicuspid aortic valve in 81 (11%). The indication for surgery was aortic root aneurysm in 588 (80%) patients and acute aortic dissection in 144 (20%) patients.

RESULTS

Mini-sternotomy was performed in 74 (10%) patients. A straight tube graft (David I) was used in 677 (92%) and a Valsalva-graft in 55 (8%) patients. Cusp plasty was done in 83 (11%) patients. Concomitant cardiac procedures were performed in 438 (60%) patients. Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.8% (n = 29) and 1.9% (n = 11) in elective cases. Postoperative echocardiography was available for 671 patients and showed aortic insufficiency (AI) ≤I° in 647 (96%) patients. The mean follow-up time was 10 ± 6.7 years and comprised a total of 7307 patient-years. The 1-, 5-, 10- and 15-year survival rates were: 93%, 88%, 77% and 65%, respectively. The rates for freedom from valve-related reoperation at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years after initial surgery were 97%, 93%, 88% and 85%, respectively. Cox regression analysis identified age [odds ratio (OR) = 0.975, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.955-0.995, P = 0.016], hyperlipidaemia (OR = 1.980, 95% CI = 1.175-3.335, P = 0.010), preoperative level of left ventricular ejection function (OR = 1.749, 95% CI = 1.024-2.987, P = 0.041) and postoperative degree of AI (OR = 1.880, 95% CI = 1.532-2.308, P ≤ 0.001) as risk factors for the future AI or reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

David procedure can be performed extremely safely, with low risks for perioperative morbidity and mortality, both in elective situations via minimally invasive access and in emergent settings for acute aortic type A dissection. Regarding long-term outcome, David's AVSRR seems to provide excellent clinical results and sustainable function of the aortic valve in the majority of patients almost 3 decades after its introduction.

The Ross Procedure in Children: The Gold Standard?

The management of aortic valve disease in the pediatric population is complex and requires an individualized approach and opportune application of techniques focused on each individual patient's specific anatomy, pathology, and clinical presentation. Though some patients may require variations in the approach to management, the ultimate goal should be to perform a Ross procedure when aortic valve replacement is indicated.

Expansion of TAVR into Low-Risk Patients and Who to Consider for SAVR

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of severe aortic stenosis (AS) over the last decade. The results of the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) 3 and Evolut Low Risk trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of TAVR in low-surgical-risk patients and led to the approval of TAVR for use across the risk spectrum. Heart teams around the world will now be faced with evaluating a deluge of younger, healthier patients with severe AS. Prior to the PARTNER 3 and Evolut Low Risk studies, this heterogenous patient population would have undergone surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). It is unlikely that TAVR will completely supplant SAVR for the treatment of severe AS in patients with a low surgical risk, as SAVR has excellent short- and long-term outcomes and years of durability data. In this review, we outline the critical role that SAVR will continue to play in the treatment of severe AS in the post-PARTNER 3/Evolut Low Risk era.

Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Durability on Life Expectancy in Low-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

Background:

Recent clinical trial results showed that transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is noninferior and may be superior to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for mortality, stroke, and rehospitalization. However, the impact of transcatheter valve durability remains uncertain.

Methods:

Discrete event simulation was used to model hypothetical scenarios of TAVR versus SAVR durability in which TAVR failure times were varied to determine the impact of TAVR valve durability on life expectancy in a cohort of low-risk patients similar to those in recent trials. Discrete event simulation modeling was used to estimate the tradeoff between a less invasive procedure with unknown valve durability (TAVR) and that of a more invasive procedure with known durability (SAVR). Standardized differences were calculated, and a difference >0.10 was considered clinically significant. In the base-case analysis, patients with structural valve deterioration requiring reoperation were assumed to undergo a valve-in-valve TAVR procedure. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the impact of TAVR valve durability on life expectancy in younger age groups (40, 50, and 60 years).

Results:

Our cohort consisted of patients with aortic stenosis at low surgical risk with a mean age of 73.4±5.9 years. In the base-case scenario, the standardized difference in life expectancy was <0.10 between TAVR and SAVR until transcatheter valve prosthesis failure time was 70% shorter than that of surgical prostheses. At a transcatheter valve failure time <30% compared with surgical valves, SAVR was the preferred option. In younger patients, life expectancy was reduced when TAVR durability was 30%, 40%, and 50% shorter than that of surgical valves in 40-, 50-, and 60-year-old patients, respectively.

Conclusions:

According to our simulation models, the durability of TAVR valves must be 70% shorter than that of surgical valves to result in reduced life expectancy in patients with demographics similar to those of recent trials. However, in younger patients, this threshold for TAVR valve durability was substantially higher. These findings suggest that durability concerns should not influence the initial treatment decision concerning TAVR versus SAVR in older low-risk patients on the basis of current evidence supporting TAVR valve durability. However, in younger low-risk patients, valve durability must be weighed against other patient factors such as life expectancy.

Long-Term Outcome and Quality of Life After Biological Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonelderly Adults

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a standard of care in the treatment of aortic stenosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term outcome and quality of life (QoL) after biological AVR in patients younger than 60 years of age.

METHODS

A total of 354 consecutive patients less than or equal to 60 years who underwent biological AVR at our institution (2005-2015) were included. The primary endpoint was actual freedom from AV reintervention, and secondary endpoints were actual freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) as well as mental and physical QoL.

RESULTS

Mean age was 52.3 ± 7.1 years and mean follow-up duration was 78.7 ± 38.1 months. Overall survival at 5, 10, and 12 years was 87.6%, 76.3%, and 63.5%, and actual freedom from AV reintervention was 85.5%, 67.8%, and 52.9%, respectively. Actual freedom from MACCE was 82.8%, 63.2%, and 50.4%, respectively. Cox regression revealed concomitant coronary artery disease (P < .001) and creatinine at baseline (P < .001) as independent predictors of survival, AV reintervention, and MACCE. Physical QoL was similar (P = .427) and mental QoL (P = .005) was significantly better compared with the published age-matched control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Biological AVR in patients less than or equal to 60 years of age is associated with a significant occurrence of actual AV reintervention and MACCE at 10 to 12 years. Mental QoL after biological AVR was superior compared with healthy control subjects. The effect of the most recently developed bioprosthesis, specifically for younger patients, needs to be evaluated. Therefore, a shared decision-making process in prosthetic AV selection is mandatory in AVR patients less than or equal to 60 years of age.

[Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation of the 'MedLab-KT' prosthesis]

Valve-in-valve repeat prosthetic reconstruction is a less invasive alternative to 'open' redo operation for degenerative dysfunction of an aortic bioprosthesis. At the beginning of the history of using this method it was resorted to only in cases of high surgical risk, involving virtually inoperable patients. Currently, the world experience numbers in thousands of such interventions, known to be also performed in patients not belonging to a high-risk group. Recent studies have demonstrated a decrease in the perioperative mortality and improved quality of life in the remote period after valve-in-valve transcatheter implantation of an aortic bioprosthesis. High gradients, occlusion of coronary arteries, and thrombosis of the prosthesis's leaflets remain the major problems encountered while using this method. Nevertheless, valve-in-valve prosthetic reconstruction proved to be a reliably safe and efficient procedure of correcting dysfunction of a previously implanted biological prosthesis.

A glimpse of hope: cardiac surgery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)

Currently, more than five times more people live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) than in high-income countries (HICs). As such, the downward trend in cardiac surgical needs in HICs reflects only the situation of one sixth of the world population while the vast majority living in LMICs has still no or limited access to life saving heart operations. In these countries, rheumatic heart disease (RHD) still accounts for a significant proportion of cardiac surgical needs. In low- and lower-middle income countries it remains the single most common cardiovascular disease in young adult and adolescent patients in need of heart surgery outweighing other indications such as congenital cardiac defects almost 4-fold. Compared to HICs with their predominance of calcific aortic stenosis in the elderly mitral valve surgery is required in >90% of the largely young patients with RHD in low-income countries (LICs) and still in 70% of the often middle aged patients in middle-income countries (MICs). Although recent government initiatives in LICs led to the establishment of local, independent cardiac surgical services gradually replacing fly-in missions, these centers still only cover less than 2% of the needs of their populations. In MICs, cardiac surgical needs continually grow with the emergence of degenerative diseases. As such, in spite of the concomitant growth of cardiac surgical capacity, significantly less than half the estimated patients in need have access. Capacities in LICs range from 0.5 to 7 cardiac operations/million population; 100-481/million in MICs and >1,200/million in HICs such as the USA and Germany. While a new level of awareness of the scope and magnitude of the problem has begun to emerge in LICs and the establishment of local cardiac surgical capacity has given rise to a glimpse of hope, the challenges of expanding these fledgling services to a significant proportion of the population still seem insurmountable. Challenges in MICs are on the other hand the widening gap between private cardiac medicine for the affluent few and overwhelmed public services for the many and the rural urban divide with the underappreciation of the ongoing dominance of RHD in the rural and indigent population on the other. Overshadowing all LMICs is the low level of valve-repair skills associated with insufficient cardiac surgical capacity and the unavailability of suitable replacement valves which address the young age of the patients and the difficulties of anticoagulation in a socioeconomic environment distinctly different from the elderly patients of HICs.

Long-Term Outcomes of Mosaic Versus Perimount Mitral Replacements: 17-Year Follow-Up of 940 Implants

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare long-term outcomes of Mosaic (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) porcine mitral valves to Carpentier-Edwards (Edwards Lifesciences, Irving, CA) bovine pericardial mitral valves.

METHODS

From 2001 through 2017 at a single institution, 940 patients received a mitral bioprosthesis, of which 463 (49.3%) were porcine and 477 (50.7%) were bovine pericardial. Retrospective review of the procedure and the postoperative clinical course, including echocardiography, through August 2018 were analyzed. All consecutive mitral valve replacements over the study period were included. Follow-up was 99% (929 patients) complete for a total of 6045 patient-years (mean, 6.4 ± 4.5 years). A propensity-matched cohort of 802 mitral bioprosthesis was used for outcome analyses.

RESULTS

Operative mortality of the 940 patients was 5.4% (n = 51) and incidence of postoperative stroke was 2.1% (n = 20). Overall survival of the propensity-matched patients at 10 and 15 years was 49.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45.5%-53.7%) and 23.3% (95% CI 17.9%-29.3%), respectively. Survival at 15 years was 24.0% (95% CI 18.0%-30.5%) for porcine and 16.5% (95% CI 5.5%-32.6%) for bovine implants, which was not significantly different (P = .67). Overall cumulative incidence for reoperative structural valve deterioration at 15 years was 7.9% (95% CI 4.7%-12.3%) for porcine valves versus 13.2% (95% CI 8.1%-19.5%) for pericardial valves (P < .001). For patients age younger than 65 years, structural valve deterioration at 15 years was 15.8% (95% CI 7.4%-27.0%) versus 30.2% (95% CI 15.1%-46.8%) for porcine and pericardial valves, respectively (P = .009). Overall average time to reoperation for structural valve deterioration for porcine valves was 11.1 ± 2.3 years vs 6.8 ± 2.3 years for bovine pericardial valves (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In long-term follow-up, of patients younger than 65 years of age undergoing mitral valve replacement, bovine pericardial valves experienced earlier and more frequent structural valve deterioration than porcine valves.

Aortic Valve-Sparing Root Replacement (David I Procedure) in Adolescents: Long-Term Outcome

INTRODUCTION

Aortic valve-sparing root replacement (David's procedure) is an especially appealing treatment option for young patients. Here, we present the short-, mid, and long-term outcomes of this operation in adolescent patients.

METHODS

Between September 1994 and March 2014, 29 patients aged 6 to 21 years underwent the David-I procedure at our center. We conducted a retrospective study with follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean age was 16.8 ± 3.4 years and 90% (n = 26) were male. Marfan's syndrome was present in 86% (n = 25) of cases. Ninety-seven percent (n = 28) of cases were performed electively, and one case (3%) was performed emergently for acute aortic dissection type A. There were no early perioperative deaths (0%). Follow-up, which was completed on 100% of patients, comprised a total of 394 patient years and a mean follow-up time of 13.6 ± 5.4 years. The estimates for survival at 1, 5, and 10 years after initial surgery were 100, 97, and 93%, respectively. During follow-up, there were four (14%) late deaths and five (17%) aortic valve-related reoperations. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year estimates for freedom from valve-related reoperation were 100, 86, and 83%, respectively. The perioperative mortality for these five reoperations was 0%.

DISCUSSION

Aortic valve-sparing root replacement can be performed in adolescents with a very low perioperative risk. Long-term survival seems to be affected by connective tissue diseases.

Aortic Valve Surgery in Nonelderly Patients: Insights Gained From AVIATOR

Aortic valve surgery in non-elderly patients represents a very challenging patient population. The younger the patient is at the point of aortic valve intervention, the longer their anticipated life expectancy will be, with longer exposure to valve-related complications and risk for re-operation. Although the latest international guidelines recommend aortic valve repair in patients with aortic valve insufficiency, what we see in the real world is that the vast majority of these aortic valves are replaced. However, current prosthetic valves has now been shown to lead to significant loss of life expectancy for non-elderly patients up to 50% for patients in their 40s undergoing mechanical aortic valve replacement. Bioprostheses carry an even worse long-term survival, with higher rates of re-intervention. The promise of trans-catheter valve-in-valve technology is accentuating the trend of bioprosthetic implantation in younger patients, without yet the appropriate evidence. In contrast, aortic valve repair has shown excellent outcomes in terms of quality of life, freedom from re-operation and freedom from major adverse valve-related events with similar life expectancy to general population as it is also found for the Ross procedure, the only available living valve substitute. We are at a time when the paradigm of aortic valve surgery needs to change for the better. To better serve our patients, we must acquire high quality real-world evidence from multiple centers globally - this is the vision of the AVIATOR registry and our common responsibility.

Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: Meta-analysis and microsimulation

OBJECTIVE

To support decision-making in aortic valve replacement (AVR) in elderly patients, we provide a comprehensive overview of outcome after AVR with bioprostheses.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted of studies reporting clinical outcome after AVR with bioprostheses in elderly patients (mean age ≥70 years; minimum age ≥65 years) published between January 1, 2000, to September 1, 2016. Reported event rates and time-to-event data were pooled and entered into a microsimulation model to calculate life expectancy and lifetime event risks.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies reporting on 34 patient cohorts were included, encompassing a total of 12,842 patients with 55,437 patient-years of follow-up (pooled mean follow-up 5.0 ± 3.3 years). Pooled mean age was 76.5 ± 5.5 years. Pooled early mortality risk was 5.42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.49-6.55), thromboembolism rate was 1.83%/year (95% CI, 1.28-3.61), and bleeding rate was 0.75%/year (95% CI, 0.50-1.11). Structural valve deterioration (SVD) was based on pooled time to SVD data (Gompertz; shape: 0.124, rate: 0.003). For a 75-year-old patient, this translated to an estimated life expectancy of 9.8 years (general population: 10.2 years) and lifetime risks of bleeding of 7%, thromboembolism of 17%, and reintervention of 9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The low risks of SVD and reintervention support the use of bioprostheses in elderly patients in need of AVR. The estimated life expectancy after AVR was comparable with the general population. The results of this study inform patients and clinicians about the expected outcomes after bioprosthetic AVR and thereby support treatment decision-making. Furthermore, our results can be used as a benchmark for long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients who were eligible for surgery and other (future) alternative treatments (eg, tissue-engineered heart valves).

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement for Native and Failed Bioprosthetic Mitral Valves

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is a novel approach for treatment of severe mitral regurgitation. A number of TMVR devices are currently undergoing feasibility trials using both transseptal and transapical routes for device delivery. Overall experience worldwide is limited to fewer than 200 cases. At present, the 30-day mortality exceeds 30% and is attributable to both patient- and device-related factors. TMVR has been successfully used to treat patients with degenerative mitral stenosis (DMS) as well as failed mitral bioprosthesis and mitral repair using transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve (TMViV)/valve-in-ring (ViR) repair. These patients are currently treated with devices designed for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Multicenter registries have been initiated to collect outcomes data on patients currently undergoing TMViV/ViR and TMVR for DMS and have confirmed the feasibility of TMVR in these patients. However, the high periprocedural and 30-day event rates underscore the need for further improvements in device design and multicenter randomized studies to delineate the role of these technologies in patients with mitral valve disease.

Functional mitral stenosis following mitral valve repair

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the evidence describing functional mitral stenosis (MS) following surgical mitral valve repair.

RECENT FINDINGS

Functional MS is an evolving concept and has been implicated in the repair of functional and organic mitral regurgitation. Following repair of functional mitral regurgitation, an elevation in peak transmitral gradient and pulmonary artery pressure has been observed under physiologic stress. These changes have been associated with worse functional status early after restrictive annuloplasty. Following repair of organic mitral regurgitation, functional MS has also been observed and appears associated with worse functional status late after surgery.

SUMMARY

Because repair of functional mitral regurgitation commonly involves restrictive annuloplasty, the issue of functional MS must be weighed against the benefits and durability of repair. Functional MS following repair of degenerative mitral regurgitation, however, may be modifiable. Research evaluating various repair techniques and their impact on functional MS following repair of organic is ongoing.

Aortic valve insufficiency in aortic root aneurysms: consider every valve for repair

Aortic valve (AV) preservation and repair is emerging as an attractive alternative to AV replacement in younger patients with aortic insufficiency (AI) and aortic root aneurysms. AV repair mitigates some of the risks associated with prosthetic valves. More centers are reporting the safety of AV preservation and repair and favorable short- and long-term outcomes. However, further work is needed to improve long-term repair durability and dissemination of knowledge and technique to make AV repair the gold standard in this patient population.

Sudden bioprostethic mitral valve dysfunction years after implantation: 3 cases and review of the literature

Mitral valve replacement is a common procedure. Degeneration of the valve is a complication that usually develops progressively. We discuss three cases of patients who underwent mitral valve replacement by means of a porcine bioprosthesis and who developed sudden and severe mitral regurgitation years after implantation.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Pericardial Bioprosthesis in Chinese Patients with Single or Multiple Valve Replacement in Aortic, Mitral, or Tricuspid Positions

OBJECTIVES

To report the safety and efficacy results of a 9- to 15-year follow-up investigation among patients who had received Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (CE-P) bovine pericardial bioprostheses (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) for valve replacement.

METHODS

This retrospective study investigated freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) as well as survival and reoperation among different age and etiology groups in patients who were implanted with a CE-P bioprosthesis at Guangdong General Hospital between 2001 and 2007. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression were performed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients (N = 225) was only 61.2 ± 11.5 years at valve replacement. More than half of the patients (55.1%) had rheumatic heart disease. The survival rates were 86.46, 81.58, and 74.42% at 5 years, 64.39, 66.19, and 55.85% at 10 years, and 48.37, 57.33, and 46.54% at 15 years for the groups with mitral valve replacement (MVR), aortic valve replacement (AVR), and double valve replacement (DVR), respectively. The median time to freedom from SVD was 12.5, 13.2, and 11.2 years, respectively, for patients with MVR, AVR, and DVR. A higher age at valve replacement was a significant risk factor for SVD in all patients (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Good long-term clinical results of CE-P valves have been demonstrated in Chinese patients >60 years.

Reconstructive surgery of the aortic valve

Reconstructive surgery of the aortic valve is a safe alternative to aortic valve replacement in many patients with aortic regurgitation, with satisfactory durability and an overall and cardiovascular survival advantage. It is also associated with higher rates of freedom from valve-related and anticoagulation-related events.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve Therapy

Valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring transcatheter mitral valve replacement can be used in for the treatment of inoperable patients with failing mitral surgical bioprosthesis or valve repairs. Preprocedural multi-image evaluation by a heart team must include transthoracic echocardiogram, transesophageal echocardiogram, and cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA). CTA is used to determine access site (transapical, transseptal, or transatrial), transcatheter valve size, and landing zone. Though complications can occur (ie, valve embolization, bleeding, or vascular complications), this less invasive procedure has a reported success rate of 70% to 100% and is now increasingly used.

Combined venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and transcatheter aortic valve implantation for the treatment of acute aortic prosthesis dysfunction in a high-risk patient

We describe the case of a patient with acute bioprosthesis dysfunction in cardiogenic shock, in whom hemodynamic support was provided by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and successfully treated by transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Association of inflammatory gene polymorphisms with mechanical heart valve reoperation

Background

Various complications lead to reoperation in patients who undergo prosthetic valve replacement where inflammatory process could be involved. The goals of this study were to identify risk factors that correlate with reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves and to investigate the relationship between reoperation and inflammatory gene polymorphisms.

Results

The study included 228 patients from the EwhA–Severance Treatment Group of Warfarin. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of c-reactive protein (CRP), interferon-gamma, interleukin 1 beta, interleukin 6, interleukin 10, transforming growth factor beta 1, and tumor necrosis factor genes were genotyped by means of SNaPshot and TaqMan assays. Thirty-nine patients (17.1 %) underwent more than one heart valve operation. A threefold increased risk for heart valve reoperation was evident in homozygous variant-type (TT) carriers as compared with ancestral allele carriers of CRP rs1205. Logistic regression analysis revealed that CRP rs1205 (OR 2.68, 95 % CI 1.22–5.90, p = 0.014), valve position (mitral valve OR 2.80, 95 % CI 1.01–7.80, p = 0.048; tricuspid valve OR 9.24, 95 % CI 2.46–34.70, p = 0.001; reference: aortic valve) and time after first operation (OR 1.13, 95 % CI 1.06–1.20, p < 0.001) affected the risk of reoperation.

Conclusions

Inflammatory gene polymorphisms could be a possible marker of risk for reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valve surgery.

Choice of prosthetic heart valve in a developing country

Mechanical prostheses and stented xenografts (bioprosthesis) are most commonly used substitutes for aortic and mitral valve replacement. The mechanical valves have the advantage of durability but are accompanied with the risk of thromboembolism, problems of long-term anticoagulation, and associated risk of bleeding. In contrast, bioprosthetic valves do not require long-term anticoagulation, but carry the risk of structural valve degeneration and re-operation. A mechanical valve is favoured in young patients (<40 years) if reliable anticoagulation is ensured. In elderly patients (>60 years), a bioprosthesis is a suitable substitute. In middle-aged patients (40-60 years), risk of re-operation in a bioprosthesis is equal to that of bleeding in a mechanical valve. Traditionally, a bioprosthesis is opted in patients with limited life expectancy. Calculation of life expectancy, based solely upon chronological age, is erroneous. In developing countries, the calculated life expectancy is much lower than that of Western population, hence age related Western cut-offs are not valid in developing countries. Besides age, cardiac condition of the patient, systemic illnesses, socio-economic status, gender and geographical location also decide the life expectancy of the patients. Selection of the prosthetic valve substitute should be based on: aspiration of the patient, life expectancy, socio-economic and educational background, occupation of the patient, availability, cost, monitoring of anti-coagulation, monitoring of valve function and other valve related complications, and possibility of re-operation.

Contemporary outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement with bioprostheses and allografts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Many observational studies have reported outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR), but there are no recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses including all available bioprostheses and allografts. The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the outcomes after AVR with bioprostheses and allografts reported in the last 15 years. We conducted a systematic literature review (PROSPERO register: CRD42015017041) of studies published between 2000–15. Inclusion criteria were observational studies or randomized controlled trials reporting on outcomes of AVR with bioprostheses (stented or stentless) or allografts, with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or valve repair procedure, with study population size n ≥ 30 and mean follow-up length ≥5 years. Fifty-four bioprosthesis studies and 14 allograft studies were included, encompassing 55 712 and 3872 patients and 349 840 and 32 419 patient-years, respectively. We pooled early mortality risk and linearized occurrence rates of valve-related events, reintervention and late mortality in a random-effects model. Sensitivity, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to investigate the influence of outliers on the pooled estimates and to explore sources of heterogeneity. Funnel plots were used to investigate publication bias. Pooled early mortality risks for bioprostheses and allografts were 4.99% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.44–5.62) and 5.03% (95% CI, 3.61–7.01), respectively. The late mortality rate was 5.70%/patient-year (95% CI, 4.99–5.62) for bioprostheses and 1.68%/patient-year (95% CI, 1.23–2.28) for allografts. Pooled reintervention rates for bioprostheses and allografts were 0.75%/patient-year (95% CI, 0.61–0.91) and 1.87%/patient-year (95% CI, 1.52–2.31), respectively. There was substantial heterogeneity in most outcomes. Meta-regression analyses identified covariates that could explain the heterogeneity: implantation period, valve type, patient age, gender, pre-intervention New York Heart Association class III/IV, concomitant CABG, study design and follow-up length. There is possible publication bias in all outcomes. This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis provides an overview of the outcomes after AVR with bioprostheses and allografts reported during the last 15 years. The results of this study can support patients and doctors in the prosthetic valve choice and can be used in microsimulation models to predict patient outcomes and estimate the cost-effectiveness of AVR with bioprostheses or allografts compared with current and future heart valve prostheses.

Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve in patients aged 50-65 years

OBJECTIVES

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) using a bioprosthesis remains controversial for patients aged 50-65 years. This cohort study reports the very long-term outcomes of AVR using Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis in this age group.

METHODS

From 1984 to 2008, 522 Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial aortic bioprostheses were implanted in 516 patients aged 50-65 years (mean age, 60 ± 4 years; 19% female). Multiple valve replacements were excluded fro m our cohort. Baseline demographic, perioperative and follow-up data were recorded prospectively. Mean follow-up was 9 ± 6 years, for a total of 4428 valve-years. Follow-up was complete for 97% of patients included.

RESULTS

Operative mortality rate was 2%. One hundred and forty-six late deaths occurred for a linearized rate of 3%/valve-year. Actuarial survival rates averaged 73 ± 2, 59 ± 3 and 35 ± 5% after 10, 15 and 20 years of follow-up, respectively. Mortality rate associated with reoperation was 2%. Actuarial freedom from reoperation rates due to structural valve deterioration (SVD) at 10, 15 and 20 years was respectively of 91 ± 2, 76 ± 3 and 50 ± 6%. Competing risk analysis demonstrated an actual risk of explantation secondary to SVD at 20 years of 30 ± 3%. Expected valve durability was 19 years for this age group. Age was not a significant risk factor for SVD in this middle-aged population.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients aged 50-65 years undergoing AVR with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis, the expected valve durability was 19 years. Age was not a significant risk factor for SVD within this age group. Patient selection and attention to timing of reintervention may be determinants of long-term outcomes.

A European Multicenter Study of 616 Patients Receiving the Freedom Solo Stentless Bioprosthesis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of the Freedom Solo valve in aortic valve replacement by clinical and hemodynamic outcomes.

METHODS

Six hundred sixteen patients underwent aortic valve replacement in 18 European centers; mean age was 74.5 ± 5.9 years, 54.1% of the patients were male, and concomitant procedures were performed in 43.2% of the patients. The majority (69%) of the implanted sizes were 23 mm and 25 mm.

RESULTS

At 1 year, overall survival was 94.0%, whereas freedom from valve-related death was 98.6%. There were 9 (1.5%) early (≤ 30 days) and 27 (4.4%) late (>30 days) deaths. Early and late valve-related mortality was 0.3% (n = 2) and 1.1% (n = 7), respectively. Freedom from explant was 97.6%; 10 valves were explanted for endocarditis and 4 for paravalvular leak. There were 10 (1.6%) early and 5 (0.8%) late strokes. Atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implant occurred in 8 (1.3%) and 1 (0.2%) patients in the early and late postoperative period, respectively. Thrombocytopenia was seen in 27 cases (4.4%) in the early postoperative period. Preoperatively, 93.8% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional classes II through IV, whereas at 1 year 96.9% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional classes I and II. At 1-year follow-up, mean and peak pressure gradients were 7.2 and 14.6 mm Hg, respectively. Indexed left ventricular mass decreased by 12% from 138 g/m(2) at discharge to 122 g/m(2) at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

At 1-year follow-up after Freedom Solo implantation, we found acceptable clinical results with low mortality and morbidity and good hemodynamic performance, confirming safety and effectiveness in this multicenter experience.

The Ross procedure in young adults: over 20 years of experience in our Institution

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes following the Ross procedure in young adults in our institution.

METHODS

All adult patients who received a Ross operation between 1991 and 2014 were included in the study. Survival analysis and regression analysis were performed. Survival of the Ross cohort was compared with the age-, gender- and calendar year-matched general population.

RESULTS

Three hundred-and-six patients (mean age: 41.7 ± 9.7, male: 74.8%, bicuspid aortic valve: 58.5%, valve stenosis: 68%) were included in the analysis. There were 7 perioperative deaths (2.3%). Nine patients were lost to follow-up from hospital and completeness of the follow-up was 94%. The median follow-up of the remaining 290 patients was 10.6 years. There were 21 late deaths of which only 3 were valve-related. The overall survival at 15 years since surgery is 88 ± 3% that is comparable with the matched population. Freedom from valve-related deaths was 96.8 ± 2% at 16 years. Freedom from autograft and pulmonary homograft reoperation was 74.5 ± 4.3% at 16 years. Preoperative aortic regurgitation was the only significant predictor of autograft failure over time. Freedom from the combined end point of bleeding/thromboembolism/endocarditis/reoperation was 69.2 ± 4% at 16 years. Perioperative mortality following reoperation was 2.6% and the autograft could be spared in 72% of reinterventions.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ross operation in young adults is associated with an excellent survival in the long term that is comparable with the general population. Although there is a risk of reoperation, incidence of other valve-related events is very low. The use of pulmonary autograft should be considered in any young adult patient requiring aortic valve replacement.