Another Nail in the Coffin for Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsion in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock

Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and clinicians have increasingly used short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) over the last 15 years to manage outcomes. In general, the provision of greater hemodynamic support comes with device platforms that are more complex and potentially associated with more adverse events. In this review, we compare and contrast the available percutaneous and surgically placed device types used in cardiogenic shock and discuss the associated clinical and hemodynamic data to support device use.

Intra-aortic balloon pump in acute chest pain and cardiogenic shock - a long-term follow-up

Objectives. Coronary revascularisation and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) has been considered the gold standard treatment of acute coronary syndrome with cardiogenic shock, recently challenged by the SHOCK II study. The aim of this non-randomised study was to investigate the long term prognosis after immediate IABP supported angiography, in patients with acute chest pain and cardiogenic shock, treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), cardiac surgery or optimal medical treatment. We assessed data from 281 consecutive patients admitted to our department from 2004 to 2010. Results. Mean (±SD) age was 63.8 ± 11.5 (range 30-84) years with a follow-up of 5.6 ± 4.4 (0-12.7) years. Acute myocardial infarction was the primary diagnosis in 93% of the patients, 4% presented with unstable angina pectoris and 3% cardiomyopathy or arrhythmias of non-ischemic aetiology. Systolic blood pressure at admittance was 85 ± 18 mmHg and diastolic 55 ± 18 mmHg. Thirty day, one- and five-year survival was 71.2%, 67.3% and 57.7%, respectively. PCI was performed immediately in 70%, surgery was done in 17%, and 13% were not eligible for any revascularisation. Independent variables predicting mortality were medical treatment vs revascularisation, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and advanced age. Three serious non-fatal complications occurred due to IABP treatment, i.e. 0.001 per treatment day. Conclusions. We report the use of IABP in patients with acute chest pain admitted for angiography. Long-term survival is acceptable and discriminating factors were no revascularisation, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and age. IABP was safe and feasible and the complication rate was low.