Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI or Coronary Bypass Surgery for 3-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: 3-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 3 Trial

Outcomes after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting (FAME 3): 5-year follow-up of a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) might be changing because of improved techniques and better medical therapy. This final prespecified analysis of the Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 trial aimed to reassess their comparative effectiveness at 5 years.

METHODS

FAME 3 was a multicentre, randomised trial comparing FFR-guided PCI using current-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents versus CABG in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease not involving the left main coronary artery. 48 hospitals in Europe, USA and Canada, Australia, and Asia participated in the trial. Patients (aged ≥21 years with no cardiogenic shock, no recent ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, no severe left ventricular dysfunction, and no previous CABG) were randomly assigned to either PCI or CABG using a web-based system. At 1 year, FFR-guided PCI did not meet the prespecified threshold for non-inferiority for the outcome of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularisation versus CABG. The primary endpoint for this intention-to-treat analysis was the 5-year incidence of the prespecified composite outcome of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02100722, and is completed; this is the final report.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 25, 2014 and Nov 28, 2019, 757 of 1500 participants were assigned to PCI and 743 to CABG. 5-year follow-up was achieved in 724 (96%) patients assigned to PCI and 696 (94%) assigned to CABG. At 5 years, there was no significant difference in the composite of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction between the two groups, with 119 (16%) events in the PCI group and 101 (14%) in the CABG group (hazard ratio 1·16 [95% CI 0·89-1·52]; p=0·27). There were no differences in the rates of death (53 [7%] vs 51 [7%]; 0·99 [0·67-1·46]) or stroke (14 [2%] vs 21 [3%], 0·65 [0·33-1·28]), but myocardial infarction was higher in the PCI group than in the CABG group (60 [8%] vs 38 [5%], 1·57 [1·04-2·36]), as was repeat revascularisation (112 [16%] vs 55 [8%], 2·02 [1·46-2·79]).

INTERPRETATION

At the 5-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in a composite outcome of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction after FFR-guided PCI versus CABG, although myocardial infarction and repeat revascularisation were higher with PCI. These results provide contemporary evidence to allow improved shared decision making between physicians and patients.

FUNDING

Medtronic and Abbott Vascular.

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bare-Metal Stents Plus Colchicine Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Preventing Adverse Cardiac Outcomes: Three-Year Follow-Up Results of the ORal Colchicine in Argentina (ORCA) Trial

Background: In patients with coronary artery disease, bare-metal stents (BMS) are considered a safer but less effective treatment than drug-eluting stents (DES). Oral colchicine therapy may compensate for this limitation of BMS. This randomized trial compared the cost-effectiveness of two different revascularization strategies during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Between March 2020 and April 2022, 410 patients were randomly treated with PCI with BMS plus colchicine (BMS-CO: 205 patients) or DES (205 patients) The patients in the BMS-CO group received 0.5 mg oral doses of colchicine for 3 months. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACEs), defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or target vessel revascularization (TVR), and the costs of each treatment strategy. The secondary endpoints included the individual components of MACEs. Results: No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics, and 76% of the patients presented with acute coronary syndromes. The median follow-up period was 36.8 months. Five percent of the patients in the BMS-CO group discontinued study medication. The cumulative incidence of MACEs was not significantly different, with 12.7% in the BMS-CO group and 15.6% in the DES2G group (p = 0.39) as well individual components of the clinical endpoint. The cumulative costs were lower in the BMS-CO group than in the DES2G group (USD 4826.4 ± 2512 vs. USD 5708 ± 3637, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In the 3 years, the DES strategy failed to be cost-saving compared to BMS-CO. However, due to the small sample size, the equivalence in clinical outcomes with both strategies can occur by chance (NCT04382443).

Outcomes After CABG Compared With FFR-Guided PCI in Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND

There are limited data comparing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in outcomes in patients presenting with or without NSTE-ACS after CABG compared with fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI using current generation drug-eluting stents.

METHODS

The FAME 3 trial (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation; NCT02100722) was an investigator-initiated, randomized controlled trial to attest noninferiority of FFR-guided PCI using the current-generation drug-eluting stents to CABG with respect to the primary endpoint, defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or repeat revascularization at 1 year, in 1,500 patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease. The prespecified key secondary endpoint was a composite of death, MI, or stroke at 3 years.

RESULTS

Of 1,500 patients enrolled, 587 (39.2%) presented with NSTE-ACS. Patients were followed up for a median of 1,080 days (Q1-Q3: 1,080-1,080 days). At 3 years, the risk of the composite of death, MI, or stroke was similar between patients presenting with NSTE-ACS and with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) (11.8% vs 10.0%; adjusted HR [aHR]: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.81-1.77; P = 0.37). Patients presenting with NSTE-ACS had a similar risk of death, MI, or stroke at 3 years after CABG as compared with PCI (aHR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.60-1.60; P = 0.94), whereas patients presenting with CCS had a significantly reduced risk after CABG compared with PCI (aHR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.38-0.90; P = 0.02; Pinteraction = 0.11), which was driven by a lower risk of MI (aHR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.15-0.64; P = 0.002; Pinteraction = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of death, MI, or stroke at 3 years was similar after CABG compared with FFR-guided PCI in patients presenting with NSTE-ACS, but reduced by CABG in patients presenting with CCS. (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation [FAME 3]; NCT02100722).

Coronary Angiography in the Evaluation of Systolic Heart Failure

The review discusses angiographic and hemodynamic features of invasive and computed tomography coronary angiography, which inform diagnosis, prognosis, and coronary revascularization in patients with systolic heart failure.

Statistical primer: an introduction into the principles of Bayesian statistical analyses in clinical trials

Trials in cardiac surgery are often hampered at the design level by small sample sizes and ethical considerations. The conventional analytical approach, combining frequentist statistics with null hypothesis significance testing, has known limitations and its associated P-values are often misinterpreted, leading to dichotomous conclusions of trial results. The Bayesian statistical framework may overcome these limitations through probabilistic reasoning and is subsequently introduced in this Primer. The Bayesian framework combines prior beliefs and currently obtained data (the likelihood), resulting in updated beliefs, also known as posterior distributions. These distributions subsequently facilitate probabilistic interpretations. Several previous cardiac surgery trials have been performed under a Bayesian framework and this Primer enhances the understanding of their basic concepts by linking results to graphical presentations. Furthermore, contemporary trials that were initially analysed under a frequentist framework, are re-analysed within a Bayesian framework to demonstrate several interpretative advantages.

FFR-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Diabetes

Importance

Outcomes in patients with diabetes after fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using current-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are unknown.

Objectives

To investigate the relative treatment effect of PCI vs CABG according to diabetes status with respect to major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 3 years and to evaluate the impact of the SYNTAX score.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This is a prespecified subgroup analysis of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve vs Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) 3 trial, an investigator-initiated, randomized clinical trial conducted at 48 centers worldwide. The FAME 3 trial enrolled patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease not involving the left main undergoing coronary revascularization between August 2014 and December 2019. Data analysis was conducted in August 2023. Clinical follow-up was performed at hospital discharge and at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after randomization.

Intervention

Either FFR-guided PCI with current-generation DES or CABG.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was MACCE, defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization at 3 years.

Results

Of 1500 total patients enrolled, mean (SD) patient age was 65.1 (8.4) years, and 265 patients (17.7%) were female. The FAME 3 trial included 428 patients with diabetes (28.5%). Patients with diabetes, especially those receiving insulin, had a higher risk of MACCE at 3 years compared with those without diabetes. Regarding relative treatment effect, the risk of MACCE was higher after FFR-guided PCI compared with CABG in both patients with diabetes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; 95% CI, 0.91-2.28; P = .12) and those without diabetes (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.08-2.07; P = .02), with no significant interaction (P for interaction = .94). In patients with a low SYNTAX score (<23), there was no significant difference in MACCE between PCI and CABG, while in patients with an intermediate to high SYNTAX score (≥23), PCI had a higher risk of MACCE than CABG, regardless of diabetes status.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this subgroup analysis of the FAME 3 randomized clinical trial, the relative benefit of CABG compared with FFR-guided PCI was similar among patients with and without diabetes.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02100722.

Clinical impact of CCT-FFR as first-strategy in patients with symptomatic stable coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Despite the promising results, the clinical implications of the CCT-FFR is already debated. This metanalysis aimed to determine the potential benefits of incorporating FFRCT into stable CAD management.

METHODS

After searching for studies comparing outcomes of patients with suspected stable CAD who underwent CCT-FFR as a first strategy versus non-urgent cardiovascular testing after a clinical judgment, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95 ​% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects or fixed-effects meta-analysis model depending on heterogeneity significance.

RESULTS

5 studies (3 RCTs and 2 observational studies) globally encompassing 5282 patients (CCT-FFR ​= ​2604 patients, Control Group ​= ​2678 patients) were included in the quantitative analysis. The rates of ICA overall (OR 1.57, 95%CI 1.36-1.81, p value ​< ​0.001) and those without obstructive CAD (OR 6.63, 95%CI 4.79-9.16, p value ​< ​0.001) were reduced in the CCTAFFR group, as compared to the control group. Moreover, CCT-FFR patients underwent coronary revascularization more frequently than patients in the control arm (OR 0.48,CI 0.38-0.62, p value ​< ​0.001). There was no significance difference between the two strategies in terms of 1 year MACE (OR 1.11,CI 0.86-1.44, p value 0.42), nonfatal MI (OR 0.73, CI 0.41-1.33, p value 0.31), all-cause mortality (OR 1.29,CI 0.47-3.54, p value 0.63) and unplanned revascularization for angina (OR 0.99, 95%CI 0.65-1.49, p value 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, in the management of stable CAD, the use of CCT-FFR was associated with lower overall rates of ICA but higher rates of coronary revascularization with comparable 1-year clinical impact.

Clinical Applications of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Computed Tomography in Coronary Artery Disease

Computer tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) represents a significant advancement in noninvasive cardiac functional assessment. This technology uses computer simulation and anatomical information from computer tomography of coronary angiogram to calculate the CT-FFR value at each point within the coronary vasculature. These values serve as a critical reference for cardiologists in making informed treatment decisions and planning. Emerging evidence suggests that CT-FFR has the potential to enhance the specificity of computer tomography of coronary angiogram, thereby reducing the need for additional diagnostic examinations such as invasive coronary angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. This could result in savings in financial cost, time, and resources for both patients and health care providers. However, it is important to note that although CT-FFR holds great promise, there are limitations to this technology. Users should be cautious of common pitfalls associated with its use. A comprehensive understanding of these limitations is essential for effectively applying CT-FFR in clinical practice.

2023 ACC/AHA Chronic Coronary Disease Guideline - An opportunity to reestablish coronary artery bypass recommendations

Coronary artery bypass (CABG) has evolved over the decades, supported by scientific evidence from robust studies. The downgrade of the recommendation for CABG in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease proposed by the 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization and the 2023 ACC/AHA Chronic Coronary Disease Guidelines has brought this discussion to the fore, with prestigious cardiothoracic surgery societies such as AATS and STS not supporting these recommendations. The purpose of this article is to broaden this discussion in light of published studies.

Sex Differences in Patients Undergoing FFR-Guided PCI or CABG in the FAME 3 Trial

BACKGROUND

Outcomes in women after fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using current-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate differences in clinical outcomes according to sex after FFR-guided PCI with current generation DES compared with CABG.

METHODS

The FAME 3 (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial was an investigator-initiated, randomized controlled trial, comparing FFR-guided PCI with current generation DES or CABG in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease. This prespecified subgroup analysis compared the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) according to sex, defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization at 3 years.

RESULTS

Of 1,500 patients included in the FAME 3 trial, 265 (17.7%) were women. Women had a significantly higher risk of MACCE at 3 years compared with men after CABG (18.1% vs 11.7%; adjusted HR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.19-3.60), whereas women had a similar risk of MACCE at 3 years compared with men after PCI (18.2% vs 19.1%; adjusted HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.79-2.03). Regarding treatment effects by sex, women undergoing PCI had a similar risk of MACCE at 3 years compared with CABG (adjusted HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.62-2.11). By contrast, men undergoing PCI had a higher risk of MACCE at 3 years compared with CABG (adjusted HR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.25-2.25; Pinteraction = 0.142), which was mainly driven by a higher risk of myocardial infarction (adjusted HR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.26-3.56; Pinteraction = 0.102) and repeat revascularization (adjusted HR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.47-3.47; Pinteraction = 0.071).

CONCLUSIONS

In the FAME 3 trial, at 3 years, women had similar outcomes with FFR-guided PCI compared with CABG, whereas men had improved outcomes with CABG. (A Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease [FAME 3]; NCT02100722).

Long-term outcomes of second-generation drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass graft: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and multivariable adjusted data

Long-term data are limited comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation drug-eluting stents (S-DES) vs coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing these interventions in patients with left main or multivessel CAD. We systematically reviewed PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies that compared PCI with S-DES and CABG in patients with left main or multivessel CAD with a minimum mean follow-up period of 3 years. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We extracted data from observational studies as multivariable-adjusted or propensity score-matched hazard ratio to minimize confounding and pooled hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random effects model in Review Manager 5.4.1. We included 10 studies, 3 of which were randomized controlled trials, comprising a total of 26964 patients, of whom 14928 underwent PCI. As compared with CABG, S-DES had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.35; 95% CI 1.22-1.49; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%), MACE (hazard ratio 1.27; 95% CI 1.08-1.50; P = 0.005; I2 = 67%), and MI (hazard ratio 2.43; 95% CI 1.80-3.28; P < 0.01; I2 = 0%). There was no significant difference between groups in incidence of stroke. In this meta-analysis of patients with complex CAD, PCI with S-DES was associated with an increased risk of mortality, MI, and MACE compared with CABG.

Medical Therapy Alone, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease

In this review, we describe how the management of coronary artery disease (CAD) has become increasingly complex due to the rapid evolution of pharmacotherapy and procedural techniques. The expanding array of treatment options has driven researchers to investigate the optimal combination of therapies; while the findings offer invaluable insights, the sheer volume and occasional contradictions can foster confusion. Given the diverse spectrum of CAD and its manifestations, a tailored treatment decision is critical for each patient. We hope to demonstrate that by integrating the key messages from clinical trials and prioritizing patient comprehension and preference, healthcare providers can guide their patients toward appropriate treatment options, ultimately leading to enhanced care.

Impact of Bifurcation Lesions on Outcomes After FFR-Guided PCI or CABG

BACKGROUND

In the era of first-generation drug-eluting stents and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the presence of a bifurcation lesion was associated with adverse outcomes after PCI. In contrast, the presence of a bifurcation lesion had no impact on outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Therefore, the presence of a coronary bifurcation lesion requires special attention when choosing between CABG and PCI. The aim of this study is to assess whether the presence of a bifurcation lesion still influences clinical outcomes after contemporary PCI using second-generation drug-eluting stent and fractional flow reserve (FFR) guidance versus CABG.

METHODS

The randomized FAME 3 trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) compared FFR-guided PCI using current drug-eluting stents with CABG in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease. The prespecified key end point at 3-year follow-up was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. In this substudy, the impact of bifurcation lesions on outcomes after FFR-guided PCI and CABG was investigated.

RESULTS

The FAME 3 trial enrolled 1500 patients and 653 (45.2%) patients had at least 1 true bifurcation lesion. There was no difference in the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at the 3-year follow-up between patients with or without at least 1 true bifurcation lesion (11.6% versus 10.0%; hazard ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.86-1.61]; P=0.32), regardless of revascularization strategy. The composite end point was not statistically different between FFR-guided PCI and CABG in patients with at least 1 true bifurcation lesion (hazard ratio, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.80-2.00]) or without a true bifurcation lesion (hazard ratio, 1.36 [95% CI, 0.87-2.12]), with no significant interaction (Pinteraction=0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease, the presence of a true bifurcation lesion was not associated with a different treatment effect after FFR-guided PCI with contemporary drug-eluting stent versus CABG.

Comparing percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting for left main stenosis on the basis of current regional registry evidence

Objectives

There is an ongoing debate whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the better choice for treatment of left main (LM) stenosis. We aimed to provide external validation for the recently reviewed guideline recommendations for invasive LM therapy by evaluating the impact of CABG or PCI on long-term survival from local reports of different regions in the world. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to address contemporary registry studies comparing PCI and CABG for patients with LM stenosis.

Methods

Three databases were assessed. Our primary end point was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, stroke, and periprocedural mortality. Reconstruction of time-to-event data was performed.

Results

A total of 2477 studies were retrieved. Seven studies with risk-adjusted populations were selected for the analysis. Four studies favored CABG and 3 studies showed no difference for the primary end point. Compared with PCI, patients who underwent CABG had lower risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.26, P < .01) and MACE (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-1.69, P < .01) during follow-up. Moreover, PCI was associated with more myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, but less strokes when compared with CABG. There was no significant difference regarding periprocedural mortality. The MACE rate was lower after CABG in both early and late phase, which outweighs the higher rate of periprocedural stroke after CABG.

Conclusions

Regional registry evidence supports the current notion of superior long-term endpoints with CABG compared with PCI for the treatment of LM stenosis over time.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents for coronary artery revascularization

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the clinical efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the treatment of left main coronary artery and/or triple-vessel disease (LM and/or TVD).

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 1484 consecutive patients with LM and/or TVD in Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital from January 2015 to December 2022 and divided them into the OPCAB group (n = 583) and the PCI group (with second-generation drug-eluting stents) (n = 901). Propensity score matching was used for 316 equally matched pairs of patients in the groups. The outcomes were all-cause and cardiac mortality, angina recurrence, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, which comprised non-lethal myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 3.93 years in the OPCAB group and 4.19 years in the PCI group. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, or non-lethal myocardial infarction between the groups. The incidence of repeat revascularization and angina recurrence was higher in the PCI group than in the OPCAB group. However, the incidence of stroke was higher in the OPCAB group than in the PCI group.

CONCLUSIONS

OPCAB may be a favorable coronary revascularization strategy for LM and/or TVD.

Tailored endothelialization enabled by engineered endothelial cell vesicles accelerates remodeling of small-diameter vascular grafts

Current gold standard for the replacement of small-diameter blood vessel (ID < 4 mm) is still to utilize the autologous vessels of patients due to the limitations of small-diameter vascular grafts (SDVG) on weak endothelialization, intimal hyperplasia and low patency. Herein, we create the SDVG with the tailored endothelialization by applying the engineered endothelial cell vesicles to camouflaging vascular grafts for the enhancement of vascular remodeling. The engineered endothelial cell vesicles were modified with azide groups (ECVs-N3) through metabolic glycoengineering to precisely link the vascular graft made of PCL-DBCO via click chemistry, and thus fabricating ECVG (ECVs-N3 modified SDVG), which assists inhibition of platelet adhesion and activation, promotion of ECs adhesion and enhancement of anti-inflammation. Furthermore, In vivo single-cell transcriptome analysis revealed that the proportion of ECs in the cell composition of ECVG surpassed that of PCL, and the tailored endothelialization enabled to convert endothelial cells (ECs) into some specific ECs clusters. One of the specific cluster, Endo_C5 cluster, was only detected in ECVG. Consequently, our study integrates the engineered membrane vesicles of ECVs-N3 from native ECs for tailored endothelialization on SDVG by circumventing the limitations of living cells, and paves a new way to construct the alternative endothelialization in vessel remodeling following injury.

Impact of a Chronic Total Occlusion on Outcomes After FFR-Guided PCI or Coronary Bypass Surgery: A FAME 3 Substudy

BACKGROUND

The clinical impact of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease undergoing fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with current-generation drug-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is unclear.

METHODS

The FAME 3 trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 3) compared fractional flow reserve-guided PCI with CABG in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization at 1 year. In this substudy, the 3-year outcomes were analyzed in patients with or without a CTO.

RESULTS

Of the patients randomized to PCI or CABG in the FAME 3 trial, 305 (21%) had a CTO. In the PCI arm, revascularization of the CTO was attempted in 61% with a procedural success rate of 88%. The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 3 years was not significantly different between those with or without a CTO in both the PCI (15.2% versus 20.1%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.38-1.03]; P=0.07) and the CABG (13.0% versus 12.9%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.55-1.66]; P=0.88) arms. In those without a CTO, PCI was associated with a significantly higher risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events compared with CABG (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.20-2.17]; P<0.01) but not in those with a CTO (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.64-2.28]; P=0.56; Pinteraction=0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a CTO did not significantly impact the treatment effect of PCI versus CABG at 3 years in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02100722.

Tooth Loss is a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: A Systematic Review with Meta-analyses

INTRODUCTION

The current evidence linking tooth loss and cardiovascular disease mortality is inconclusive. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to explore the association between tooth loss and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of databases and gray literature included: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, various digital repositories. The included studies reported on CVD mortality and tooth loss. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of included studies. Random-effects meta-analysis method, sub-group analysis (based on the tooth loss categories (edentulous and fewer than 10 teeth present), meta-regression (based on the number. of confounders), publication bias, and sensitivity analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Twelve articles met the eligibility criteria with an overall "Good" quality. A significant association between tooth loss (edentulous or less than 10 teeth present) and CVD mortality was found in the primary meta-analysis, which compiled data from 12 studies. The estimated hazard ratio was 1.66 (95% CI: 1.32-2.09), and there was high heterogeneity (I2 = 82.42). Subgroup analysis revealed that the edentulous subgroup showed a higher risk with no significant heterogeneity, while the subgroup with fewer than 10 teeth showed a higher risk with substantial heterogeneity. Meta-regression analysis did not reveal any significant impact (P = .626) on whether variations in the number of confounders across studies would substantially affect the overall findings. No publication bias was detected and the sensitivity analysis based on the critical confounders also confirmed that tooth loss as a risk factor for CVD mortality (hazard ratio = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.28-1.80), (I2 51.82%).

CONCLUSION

The present systematic review reported that being edentulous or having lesser than 10 teeth is a predictive indicator of CVD mortality.

Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Developing A Gold Standard for Coronary Artery Disease Diagnostics

In recent years, a new technique called computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) has been developed. CT-FFR overcomes many limitations in the current gold-standard fractional flow reserve (FFR) techniques while maintaining a better concordance with FFR. This technique integrates static coronary CT angiography data with hydrodynamic models, employing algorithms rather than guidewire interventions to compute the FFR. In addition to diagnosing coronary heart disease, CT-FFR has been applied in the preoperative risk assessment of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in organ transplantation and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Continuous advancements in CT-FFR techniques and algorithms are expanding their applicability to other methodologies. Subsequently, with robust clinical trial validation, CT-FFR can potentially supersede FFR as the primary "gatekeeper" for interventions.

Intracoronary imaging guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions: how and when to apply validated metrics to improve the outcome

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still burdened by a substantial number of complications despite constant technological advances, including the advent of intracoronary imaging (ICI) techniques. ICI modalities have been instrumental for the understanding the mechanism of PCI failure. Thanks to the ability to detail the pre-intervention coronary anatomy and identify the features indicative of sub-optimal stent deployment, ICI techniques can be utilised to improve coronary interventions in different clinical scenarios. More recently large randomized clinical trials on ICI guidance confirmed the clinical effectiveness of this approach especially in complex high-risk interventions.

Outcomes According to Coronary Disease Complexity and Optimal Thresholds to Guide Revascularization Approach: FAME 3 Trial

BACKGROUND

Coronary disease complexity is commonly used to guide revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel disease (MVD).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the interactive effects of coronary complexity on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) outcomes and identify the optimal threshold at which PCI can be considered a reasonable option.

METHODS

A total of 1,444 of 1,500 patients with MVD from the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multi-vessel Evaluation) 3 randomized trial were included in the analysis (710 CABG vs 734 PCI). SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) scores were transformed into restricted cubic splines, and logistic regression models were fitted, with multiplicative interaction terms for revascularization strategy. Optimal thresholds at which PCI is a reasonable alternative to CABG were determined on the basis of Cox regression model performance.

RESULTS

The mean SYNTAX score (SS) was 25.9 ± 7.1. SS was associated with 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events among PCI patients and 3-year death, myocardial infarction, and stroke among CABG patients. Significant interactions were present between revascularization strategy and SS for 1- and 3-year composite endpoints (P for interaction <0.05 for all). In Cox regression models, outcomes were comparable between CABG and PCI for the 3-year primary endpoint for SS ≤24 (P = 0.332), with 44% of patients below this threshold and 32% below the conventional SS threshold of ≤22.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MVD without left main disease, PCI and CABG outcomes remain comparable up to SS values in the mid- rather than low 20s, which allows the identification of a greater proportion of patients in whom PCI may be a reasonable alternative to CABG.

Cardiac Surgery 2023 Reviewed

We reviewed the cardiac surgical literature for 2023. PubMed displayed almost 34,000 hits for the search term "cardiac surgery AND 2023." We used a PRISMA approach for a results-oriented summary. Key manuscripts addressed the mid- and long-term effects of invasive treatment options in patient populations with coronary artery disease (CAD), comparing interventional therapy (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) with surgery (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]). The literature in 2023 again confirmed the excellent long-term outcomes of CABG compared with PCI in patients with left main stenosis, specifically in anatomically complex chronic CAD, but even in elderly patients, generating further support for an infarct-preventative effect as a prognostic mechanism of CABG. For aortic stenosis, a previous trend of an early advantage for transcatheter (transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI]) and a later advantage for surgical (surgical aortic valve replacement) treatment was also re-confirmed by many studies. Only the Evolut Low Risk trial maintained an early advantage of TAVI over 4 years. In the mitral and tricuspid field, the number of interventional publications increased tremendously. A pattern emerges that clinical benefits are associated with repair quality, making residual regurgitation not irrelevant. While surgery is more invasive, it currently generates the highest repair rates and longest durability. For terminal heart failure treatment, donor pool expansion for transplantation and reducing adverse events in assist device therapy were issues in 2023. Finally, the aortic diameter related to adverse events and technical aspects of surgery dominated in aortic surgery. This article summarizes publications perceived as important by us. It cannot be complete nor free of individual interpretation, but provides up-to-date information for patient-specific decision-making.

Gender Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease and Their Management: A Review

Worldwide, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are still the primary cause of death, and there are notable differences between sexes when it comes to symptoms/course and treatment. Due to evolving healthcare technologies, significant progress has been made in understanding CVDs. Hence, it is evident that gender disparities exist in the clinical presentation, prevalence, management, outcomes, and risk factors, including biological, behavioral, and sociocultural factors. This narrative review is designed to provide a generalized idea of gender disparities in CVDs. It aims to provide insights to prove the role of hormonal influences, genetic predispositions, and the difference in physiological outcomes owing to different genders. This review explores subtle distinctions in CVD across genders, including changes in structure, biology, and hormones that affect how illness presents and progresses. Lifestyle variables also influence sociocultural factors and gender disparities in risk profiles. Traditional risk factors, diabetes mellitus (DM), cholesterol levels, and smoking may have different weights and relevance in men and women. Moreover, age and other conventional risk variables have distinct effects on gender. Treatment efficacy may be impacted by the expression of gender-specific factors, emphasizing the necessity for customized strategies. Development of CVDs can be delayed or prevented, and its consequences can be lessened with the early identification and effective management of gender-specific factors. More investigation is necessary to clarify complex interactions between structural, biochemical, and hormonal aspects across genders in order to maximize treatment results and reduce the burden of CVDs.

Intracoronary imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: from evidence to guidelines

Despite notable advances in devices and techniques, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still affected by a substantial number of complications and failure rates. Over the years, the use of intracoronary imaging (ICI) has dramatically improved the understanding of mechanical and technical factors related to successful and failed PCI, becoming a mainstay in complex trans-catheter interventions. However, ICI modalities are invasive, time-consuming, and costly, and a net clinical benefit needs to be shown in order to recommend their routine use in clinical practice. In the past, the lack of evidence from randomized trials has been reflected in the scepticism shown by international guidelines. The recent publication of large randomized clinical trials conducted worldwide has provided new evidence regarding the clinical usefulness of ICI guidance in PCI. The consistent reduction of adverse events achieved in these trials, also demonstrated in an updated meta-analysis, suggested that the use of ICI in PCI is compelling to achieve optimal technical results and better outcomes, especially in complex high-risk interventions. Also considering the burden of information provided by ICI on coronary artery disease, looking from the inside seems today an opportunity that modern cardiology cannot ignore anymore.

Current Landscape and Future Directions of Coronary Revascularization in Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure: A Review

Ischemic heart disease is the largest cause of death worldwide and the most common cause of heart failure (HF). The incidence and prevalence of HF are increasing owing to an aging population and improvements in the acute cardiac care of previously fatal conditions such as myocardial infarction. Strategies to improve outcomes in patients with ischemic systolic HF are urgently needed. There is systematic underutilization of testing for coronary artery disease in patients with HF, and revascularization is performed in an even smaller minority despite evidence for reduced mortality with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over medical therapy in the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure Extension Study. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a less-invasive approach to coronary revascularization; however, the recent Revascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction (REVIVED)-British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS2) trial failed to demonstrate a benefit of PCI compared with that of medical therapy in patients with ischemic systolic HF. The comparative effectiveness of PCI and CABG for patients with ischemic systolic HF remains unknown, particularly in the era of contemporary medical therapy. In this review, we discuss the benefit of CABG in ischemic systolic HF, its underutilization, and the unmet clinical need. We also review the recent REVIVED-BCIS2 trial comparing PCI to medical therapy, as well as upcoming randomized controlled trials of PCI for ischemic systolic HF and persistent evidence gaps that will exist despite anticipated data from ongoing trials. There remains a need for an adequately powered randomized controlled trials to establish the comparative clinical effectiveness of PCI vs CABG in ischemic systolic HF in the era of contemporary revascularization approaches and medical therapy, as well as trials of coronary revascularization in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction or less severe forms of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.