Postprocedural Anticoagulation After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

Bleeding Complications of Anticoagulation Therapy Used in the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes-Review of the Literature

Bleeding complications are a significant concern in the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The evidence from clinical trials demonstrates the need for balancing efficacy in reducing ischemic events with safety concerns, as bleeding events adversely affect prognosis and mortality. Pharmacological agents like aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors (e.g., prasugrel, ticagrelor), glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and heparins are fundamental to ACS treatment but carry varying bleeding risks depending on individual patient profile. Recent advancements in risk stratification tools have enabled tailored approaches to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), optimizing its duration based on bleeding and thrombotic risks. Further Emerging therapies, including shortened DAPT protocols and P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, have shown promise in minimizing bleeding while maintaining clinical efficacy. The findings underscore the importance of personalized antithrombotic regimens in ACS management, emphasizing precise risk assessment to enhance outcomes and mitigate adverse events. This review examines the mechanisms, risk factors, and strategies to mitigate bleeding associated with anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies in ACS.

Clinical Outcomes With Postprocedural Anticoagulation Versus No Anticoagulation in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis

Postprocedural anticoagulation (PPAC) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can mitigate thrombotic events. However, current clinical guidelines do not recommend PPAC after PCI considering the scarce evidence supporting its use. A comprehensive literature search of electronic databases was conducted to identify studies comparing PPAC to no anticoagulation (AC) after PCI for AMI. Using the inverse-variance random-effects model, we pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Seven studies with a total of 47,981 patients (32,010: PPAC and 15,971: no AC) were included in the final analysis. PPAC administration demonstrated no significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality [RR, 0.73 (95% CI, 0.47-1.16); P = 0.19], 30-day cardiovascular mortality [RR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.45-1.30); P = 0.32], 30-day myocardial infarction [RR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.41-1.12); P = 0.13], 30-day stroke [RR, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.47-1.67); P = 0.71], 30-day target vessel revascularization [RR, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.37-1.47); P = 0.39], 30-day stent thrombosis [RR, 1.08 (95% CI, 0.75-1.57); P = 0.67], and 30-day bleeding [RR, 1.25 (95% CI, 0.83-1.88); P = 0.29] compared with no AC. This meta-analysis concludes that there are no benefits of routine PPAC after PCI in AMI. The decision to prolong anticoagulant use post-PCI depends on risk versus benefits, which vary from case to case. Future large-scale multicentric randomized trials are warranted to corroborate the results of this meta-analysis.

A potential coagulation-related diagnostic model associated with immune infiltration for acute myocardial infarction

The production of pro-coagulation factors can affect the development and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The clinical value of coagulation-related genes (CRGs) was investigated to discover new targets for diagnosing and treating AMI. We screened 335 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between AMI and healthy individuals based on the GSE66360 dataset. We took the intersection of the obtained DEGs with 139 CRGs. Finally, 10 differentially expressed CEGs were screened out. The random forest algorithm was constructed to identify 6 signature CRGs (THBS1, SERPINA1, THBD, MMP9, MAFF, and PLAU). Subsequently, the established predictive model was found to have good diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.9694 in the training cohort [GSE66360 dataset] and 0.9076 in the external validation cohort [GSE48060 dataset]). Consensus clustering identified the CRG clusters, and the accuracy of the grouping was verified. We found that AMI patients can be divided into two distinct subgroups based on the differentially expressed CRGs. Immune cell infiltration level was consistent with the expression levels of CRGs based on single sample gene set enrichment analysis. These findings reveal the potential role of CRGs in AMI. Characterizing the coagulation features of AMI patients can help in the risk stratification of patients and provide personalized treatment strategies.

Post-procedural Anticoagulation With Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insight from the STOPDAPT-3 Trial

The current guidelines for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) discourage the use of anticoagulation after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without specific indications, although the recommendation is not well supported by evidence. In this post hoc analysis of the ShorT and OPtimal Duration of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy-3 (STOPDAPT-3) trial, 30-day outcomes were compared between the 2 groups with and without post-PCI heparin administration among patients with ACS who did not receive mechanical support devices. The co-primary end points were the bleeding end point, defined as the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding, and the cardiovascular end point, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke. Among 4,088 patients with ACS, 2,339 patients (57.2%) received post-PCI heparin. The proportion of patients receiving post-PCI heparin was higher among those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction compared with others (72.3% and 38.8%, p <0.001), and among patients with intraprocedural adverse angiographic findings compared with those without (67.6% and 47.5%, p <0.001). Post-PCI heparin compared with no post-PCI heparin was associated with a significantly increased risk of the bleeding end point (4.75% and 2.52%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 2.46, p = 0.007) and a numerically increased risk of the cardiovascular end point (3.16% and 1.72%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 2.46, p = 0.06). Higher hourly dose or total doses of heparin were also associated with higher incidence of both bleeding and cardiovascular events within 30 days. In conclusion, post-PCI anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin was frequently implemented in patients with ACS. Post-PCI heparin use was associated with harm in terms of increased bleeding without the benefit of reducing cardiovascular events. Trial identifier: STOPDAPT-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04609111.